UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  xRegis
tra
nt  
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

x

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

 
Confidential, for
Use
of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

¨

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨

 

Definitive Additional Materials

¨

 

Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12


DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

x

 

No fee required.

required

¨

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:


LOGO


LOGO

Dear Fellow Stockholders,


LOGO

Devon Energy Corporation

333 W. Sheridan

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Notice of 2012

Annual Meeting of

Stockholders

and

Proxy Statement

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

8:00 a.m. (local time)

The Skirvin Hilton Hotel

Continental Room

1 Park Avenue

Oklahoma City, OklahomaT

 

 

April 25, 2012

Dear Devon Stockholder,

You are invited to attendhis January marked the 2012 Annual Meetingtwo-year anniversary of Stockholdersthe transformational merger of Devon Energy Corporation on Wednesday, June 6, 2012. The meeting will be held at 8:00 a.m., local time, at The Skirvin Hilton Hotel, Continental Room, 1 Park Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

The Annual Meeting will focus onand WPX. This past year, Devon posted top-tier market returns, set new financial and oil production records, completed two highly valuable acquisitions, made significant progress toward our ESG goals, and delivered strong overall performance as a cohesive team. Our success over the formal items of business announced in the Notice of the 2012 Annual Meetingpast year is a testament to our disciplined operating strategy, our premier asset portfolio, and Proxy Statement that follows. Additionally, we will present a report on Devon’s operations during 2011.

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. I urge youour excellent financial position, which have enabled us to submit your proxy using the Internet, telephone or by completing and mailing your Proxy Card in the envelope provided. If you decideprovide industry-leading cash returns to attend the Annual Meeting, you will be able to vote in person, even if you have previously submitted your proxy.

Sincerely,

LOGO

J. Larry Nichols

Executive Chairman of the Board

Commitment Runs Deep


DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Time

8:00 a.m. (local time) on Wednesday, June 6, 2012our stockholders.

Place

The Skirvin Hilton Hotel

Continental RoomWe acknowledge, however, that our recent successes are set amidst a backdrop of many serious economic and geopolitical challenges in the world today. Current events—from the war in Ukraine to hyperinflation across multiple continents—spotlight the critical role that reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy plays across the globe.

1 Park AvenueDevon’s core business of delivering responsibly produced oil and natural gas is essential to maintaining our nation’s energy security and improving the quality of human lives around the world. But to do so, we must remain focused on our approach to balancing growth and managing costs. We must remain humble about the need to continually improve what we do and how we do it. We must remain resourceful in using technology and collaboration to capture new insights as well as step-function changes. And we must be vigilant in advancing on our ESG targets, cognizant that ongoing investments in our employees, in our contractors, and in the communities where we operate are absolutely critical to our continued success.

Oklahoma City, OklahomaEarlier this year, Dave Hager, Devon’s Executive Chair, retired. Dave worked tirelessly to position Devon for the successes we’ve experienced before and following the merger. At this year’s Annual Meeting, Duane Radtke will also retire from the Board. Duane’s business acumen and sound judgement advanced stockholders’ interests throughout his tenure.

Items of Business

Elect Eight Directors for a Term of One Year;

Approve, inDave is succeeded by Barbara Baumann, an advisory vote, Executive Compensation;

Ratifyindependent Director, whose appointment as Board Chair continues Devon’s governance practice of separating the AppointmentChair and CEO roles. The Board also recently appointed two high-caliber Directors, Michael Mears and Gennifer Kelly, each of the Independent Auditorswhom are proven leaders with valuable strategic perspectives for 2012;

Approve Amending the Amendedour Company. We invite you to learn more about Michael and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Grant Stockholders the Right to Call a Special Meeting;

Approve the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan;

Approve the 2012 Amendment to the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan;

ConsiderGennifer and Vote upon the Stockholder Proposal set forthour selection process in this Proxy Statement, if presented; andproxy statement.

Transact such other business as may properly come beforeDevon is an industry leader in many ways. Our success depends on our foundational ethic of doing the meeting or any adjournment ofright things in the meeting.

Who Can Vote

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 9, 2012 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. You may examine a complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting during normal business hours for the 10 days prior to the meeting at our offices and at the meeting.

Voting by Proxy

Please submit a proxy as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. You may submit your proxy by:

Internet;

telephone; or

mail

For specific information, please refer to the section entitled “About the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 1.right way.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy MaterialsWe respectfully ask for your voting support for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on June 6, 2012:items described in more detail in the materials that follow.

Our 2012 Proxy Materials, including the 2012 Proxy StatementSincerely,

and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,

are available atwww.proxydocs.com/dvn.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

Carla D. Brockman

Vice President Corporate Governance

and Corporate Secretary

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

April 25, 2012

Commitment Runs Deep


PROXY STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETINGLOGO

 1

AGENDA ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORSLOGO

Barbara Baumann

 6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCELOGO

 11

LOGO

Rick Muncrief

Independent Chair of the Board

 

Board of Directors’ Information

11

Practices for Considering Diversity

11

Committees

12

Director Independence

14

Lead Director

14

Board Involvement in Risk Oversight

14

Leadership Structure

14

Director Communication

15

Compensation Committee InterlocksPresident and Insider ParticipationCEO

15

Related Party Transactions

15

Director Compensation for the Year Ended December 31, 2011

16

Annual Retainer and Meeting Fees

17

Annual Equity Awards

17

GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

18

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

20

Independent Auditors’ Fees

21

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

21

RESERVES COMMITTEE REPORT

22

AGENDA ITEM 2. APPROVE, IN AN ADVISORY VOTE, EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

23

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

24

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

24

Executive Summary

24

Compensation Process

27

Compensation Decisions in 2011

28

Compensation Elements Used in 2011

32

ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION

40

Retirement Benefits

40

Post-Termination or Change in Control Benefits

40

Material Differences in Compensation of CEO

41

Stock Ownership Guidelines

41

Compensation Program and Risk Taking

42

Considerations of Tax Implications

42

2011 COMPENSATION TABLES

43

Summary Compensation Table

43

Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 2011

45

Outstanding Equity Awards on December 31, 2011

46

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During the Year Ended December 31, 2011

48

Pension Benefits for the Year Ended December 31, 2011

49

LOGO


LOGO

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

LOGO iLOGO Commitment Runs DeepLOGO

Time and Date

8:00 a.m. (Central Time)

on June 7, 2023

Place

Devon Energy Center Auditorium

333 W. Sheridan Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Record Date

April 10, 2023


PROXY STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont’d)

Meeting AgendaStockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting):

 

 

BENEFIT PLANS

  Item        50Board Recommendation

Defined Benefit Plan  1

 50
Election of Directors FOR each director nominee nominated herein

Benefit Restoration Plan

  52

Supplemental Retirement Income Plan

53

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2011

54

401(k) Plan

54

Deferred Compensation Plan

54

Supplemental Contribution Restoration Plans

55

Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

55

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

55

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

60

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

62 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT  2

 Ratify the selection of the independent auditors for 202363FOR
 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT  3

 Approve, in an advisory vote, executive compensation64FOR
 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE  4

 Approve, in an advisory vote, the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation66ONE YEAR
 

INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS  5

 Approve an amendment to the Company’s Bylaws to designate the exclusive forum for the adjudication of certain legal matters67FOR
 

AGENDA ITEM 3. RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2012  6

 

Approve amendments to the Company’s Certificate of

Incorporation to adopt limitations on the liability of officers similar to those that already exist for Directors

69FOR
 

AGENDA ITEM  4. APPROVE AMENDING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO GRANT STOCKHOLDERS THE RIGHT TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING  7

 70

AGENDA ITEM 5. APROVE THE 2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Consider and vote upon the stockholder proposal set forth in this Proxy Statement, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting
 72

AGENDA ITEM 6. APPROVE THE 2012 AMENDMENT TO THE 2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

76

AGENDA ITEM  7. STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A REPORT ON THE DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING POLICIES AND PRACTICES

85

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

88

OTHER MATTERS

89

APPENDIX A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE VI OF THE DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

A-1

APPENDIX B 2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

B-1

APPENDIX C 2009 AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

C-1AGAINST

 

 ii Commitment Runs Deep


INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETINGYour Vote Is Important

We are furnishingRegardless of whether or not you this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (Board)plan to be used atattend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares of Devon Energy Corporation common stock in any of the following ways:

LOGO

ONLINE Before the meeting you may vote your shares through the Internet by following the directions on your proxy card. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day. To vote online, you will need the control number located on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

LOGO

PHONE Call 1-800-690-6903 from a touch-tone phone and follow the voice instructions. To vote by phone, you will need the control number located on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

LOGO

MAIL If you received a proxy card by mail, you can complete, sign, and date the form and return it by mail using the postage-paid envelope included in your package.

LOGO

AT THE MEETING Stockholders as of April 10, 2023, can vote at the meeting. To vote at the meeting, you will need the control number included on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

LOGO

If you are a non-registered stockholder, please refer to the information forwarded by your bank, broker, or other holder of record to see which voting methods are available to you to vote in advance of the meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on June 7, 2023:

Our 2023 Proxy Materials, including the 2023 Proxy Statement and Annual Report

on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, are available at www.proxydocs.com/dvn.

Each stockholder of record as of the close of business on April 10, 2023 (the record date) is entitled to receive notice of, attend, ask questions, and any adjournment thereof (Annual Meeting). Thevote at the meeting. A Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card is being mailed beginning on or about April [    ], 2023, to each stockholder of record as of the record date. A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote during the Annual Meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 6, 2012 at 8:00 a.m. We are sending this Proxy Statementavailable to our stockholders during ordinary business hours, for a period of 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting.

For specific information, please refer to the section “Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting” beginning on or about April 25, 2012.page 89.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

LOGO

Christopher J. Kirt

Vice President Corporate Governance
and Secretary

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

April [    ], 2023

Commitment Runs Deep


PROXY STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DEVON AT A GLANCE

1

OUR BOARD

WHO WE ARE (Our Nominees for Election)

4

Biographies

4

Director Skills and Experience

10

Tenure, Diversity, and Independence

11

Recent Board Appointments and Selection Process

11

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

12

AGENDA ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

14

HOW WE ARE SELECTED, COMPRISED, AND EVALUATED

15

GOVERNANCE, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE REPORT

15

HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN

18

Committees

18

Director Independence

21

Related Person Transactions

23

Board Leadership Structure

23

Board and Committee Evaluations

24

Board Involvement in Risk Oversight

24

High-Level Oversight and Coordination of ESG Efforts

25

HOW TO COMMUNICATE WITH US

26

Director Compensation

27

Annual Retainers

27

Equity Awards to Directors

27

Total Compensation for Non-Management Directors for 2022

28

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

28

OUR CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

29

Fees to Independent Auditor

30

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

30

Audit Committee Financial Expertise

30

AGENDA ITEM 2. RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2023

31

RESERVES COMMITTEE REPORT

32

OUR COMPANY

WHO WE ARE (Our Officers)

33

AGENDA ITEM 3. APPROVE, IN AN ADVISORY VOTE, EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

35

AGENDA ITEM 4. APPROVE, IN AN ADVISORY VOTE, THE FREQUENCY OF AND ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

36

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

37

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

37

Introduction

38

Executive Summary

38

Elements of 2022 Compensation

41

Compensation Process Background

47

Additional Benefits and Compensation Information

49

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

53

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

54

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

56

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END

57

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING 2022

58

PENSION BENEFITS

58

BENEFIT PLANS

59

Defined Benefit Plan

59

Normal Retirement

59

Defined Contribution Plan – 401(k) Plan

59

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

61

Supplemental Contribution Restoration Plans

62

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

62

Accrued Payments Upon Termination of Employment

63

Rights Upon Termination for Death or Disability

63

Rights Upon Termination Without Cause and Constructive Discharge

63

Termination Following a Change in Control

63

Payment Conditions

64

Long-Term Incentive Awards

64

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Tables

65

CEO PAY RATIO

68

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE

69

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

74

OUR STOCKHOLDERS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

75

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owner

75

Security Ownership of Management

76

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

77

AGENDA ITEM 5. APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS TO DESIGNATE THE EXCLUSIVE FORUM FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF CERTAIN LEGAL MATTERS

78

AGENDA ITEM 6. APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ADOPT LIMITATIONS ON THE LIABILITY OF OFFICERS SIMILAR TO THOSE THAT ALREADY EXIST FOR DIRECTORS

81

AGENDA ITEM 7. STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL

83

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

87

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

89

OTHER MATTERS

93

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

94

APPENDIX A. EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

A-1

APPENDIX B. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS

B-1

APPENDIX C. AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

C-1

All references in this Proxy Statement to we, our, us, Devon, or the Company refer to Devon Energy Corporation, including our subsidiaries and affiliates.

What are the Board of Directors’ voting recommendations?Corporation.

 

 

For the election of the eight Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement for a term expiring at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

 

For the approval of executive compensation;

Commitment Runs Deep


 

For the ratification of the appointment of our independent auditors for 2012;

DEVON AT A GLANCE

 

Forthe approval of an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to grant stockholders the right to call a special meeting;


Our Company and Assets

For the approval of the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan;

For the approval of the 2012 Amendment to the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan;

Againstthe stockholder proposal set forth in this Proxy Statement, if presented.

Who is entitledBased in Oklahoma City, Devon employs approximately 1,800 people across our onshore oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas assets located in New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, and Wyoming. On January 7, 2021, our Company completed a merger of equals transaction with WPX Energy, Inc. (the Merger). The combined company continues to vote?

Stockholders asoperate under the name Devon. The strategic combination of the close of business on April 9, 2012 (the Record Date) are eligible to vote their shares atcompanies created a leading unconventional oil producer in the Annual Meeting. AsUnited States, with an asset base underpinned by a premium acreage position in the economic core of the Record Date, there were                     shares of our common stock outstanding. Each share of common stockDelaware Basin, which is entitled to one vote atlocated in the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote?

You may:most prolific geologic basin for oil in the United States.

 

attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person; or

 

dial the toll-free number listed on the Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Form. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. Telephone voting will be available 24 hours a day, and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 5, 2012; or

go to the websitewww.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions, then confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote using the website, you can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Internet voting will be available 24 hours a day, and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 5, 2012; or

if you elected to receive a paper copy of your proxy materials, mark your selections on the Proxy Card, date and sign it, and return the card in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided.

LOGO

 

 1 Commitment Runs Deep


DEVON AT A GLANCE (cont’d)


Our Strategy

Our business strategy is focused on delivering a consistently competitive stockholder return among our peer group. Because the business of exploring for, developing, and producing oil and natural gas is capital intensive, delivering sustainable, capital efficient cash flow growth is a key tenet to our success. While our cash flow is highly dependent on volatile and uncertain commodity prices, we pursue our strategy throughout all commodity price cycles with four fundamental principles:

Ø

We have a commitment to be a proven and responsible operator—We produce a valuable commodity that is fundamental to society, and we endeavor to do so in a safe, environmentally responsible, and ethical way, while striving to deliver strong returns to our stockholders.


Ø

We strive to own a premier, sustainable portfolio of assets—We expect to continuously own premier assets capable of generating cash flows in excess of our capital and operating requirements, as well as competitive rates of return.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING (cont’d)

Ø

We pursue superior execution—We continually work to optimize the efficiency of our capital programs and production operations. We also seek to leverage our culture of health, safety, and environmental stewardship in all aspects of our business.

Ø

We seek to maintain financial strength and flexibility—Commodity prices are uncertain and volatile, so we strive to maintain a strong balance sheet, as well as adequate liquidity and financial flexibility, in order to operate competitively in all commodity price cycles.

Our Values

Because we’re guided by strong values, one of the first steps our newly merged company took in 2021 was to define the values we all share—integrity, relationships, courage, and results.

 

Why did I receive a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail instead of a full set of proxy materials?

United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) rules allow companies to furnish proxy materials over the Internet. We have sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice) to most of our stockholders instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or email will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

Why did I receive paper copies of proxy materials?

We are providing certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive them, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to no longer receive printed proxy materials, you may consent to receive all future proxy materials electronically via email or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided in your proxy materials. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.

How do I vote the shares held in my Devon 401(k) Plan account?

If you are a current employee participating in the Devon Energy Incentive Savings Plan (401(k) Plan), please follow the instructions you received via email from Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (Broadridge).

If you are a former employee and have shares of our common stock credited to your 401(k) Plan account as of the Record Date, such shares are shown on the Voting Instruction Form you received from Broadridge. You have the right to direct Fidelity Management Trust Company (401(k) Plan Trustee) regarding how to vote those shares, which you can do by voting your shares in the same manner as provided above.

The 401(k) Plan Trustee will vote your shares in the 401(k) Plan account in accordance with your instructions. If instructions are not received by June 3, 2012, the shares credited to your account will be voted by the 401(k) Plan Trustee in the same proportion as it votes shares for which it did receive timely instructions.

Will each stockholder in our household receive proxy materials?

Generally, no. We try to provide only one set of proxy materials to be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless you have given us other instructions. Any stockholder at a shared address may request delivery of single or multiple copies of proxy materials for future meetings by contacting us at Devon Energy Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 333 W. Sheridan, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, email:CorporateSecretary@dvn.com or by calling (405) 235-3611.

Who will be admitted to the Annual Meeting?

Admission to the Annual Meeting will be limited to our stockholders of record, persons holding proxies from our stockholders, beneficial owners of our common stock and our employees. If yourLOGO

 

 2 Commitment Runs Deep


DEVON AT A GLANCE (cont’d)

Our Environmental Performance Targets and Progress

We know that strong environmental performance is essential to protecting the communities in which we live and operate, managing risk, and generating long-term value for stakeholders. Devon has established aggressive environmental performance targets focused on reducing the carbon intensity of our operations, minimizing freshwater use, and engaging constructively with our value chain. These targets reflect our dedication and commitment to achieving meaningful emissions reductions while pursuing our ultimate goal of net zero GHG emissions for Scope 1 and 2 by 2050. We invite you to access our most recent Sustainability Report at www.devonenergy.com to evaluate our progress on the targets.

Corporate Governance Centered on Strategy, Risk-Management, and Responsible Governance Practices

Devon recognizes that high standards for corporate governance are required to promote long-term value for our investors. Our Board focuses on effective strategic decision-making and risk management practices as it oversees our business. This Proxy Statement details our corporate governance framework and profile. Below we highlight features of our Board composition:

Ø

91% Independence – Ten of Devon’s 11 Director nominees qualify as independent under NYSE and SEC standards. We believe that independent board members bring fresh perspectives and diverse skills to their oversight of the Company.


Ø

36% Gender Diversity – Our Board benefits from the wide range of experiences, skills, and backgrounds of our Directors. We believe that diversity is a key feature of a high-functioning board.

Ø

Independent Board Chair – In January 2023, Barbara Baumann became Devon’s Board Chair. Ms. Baumann’s appointment as Board Chair continues a Devon governance practice of separating the Chair and CEO roles.

Ø

Average Tenure 5-6 Years – Our Board nominees have an average tenure on the Board of 5.4 years, which provides a balance of fresh viewpoints and experience in overseeing the Company.

Ø

Skills and Competencies – Our Director nominees have skills and competencies that are highly relevant for a company with Devon’s profile. Our Board has significant leadership experience in key areas for an energy company.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING (cont’d)Other Recent Actions

In 2022, Devon joined the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership 2.0 (OGMP 2.0), a multi-stakeholder partnership to improve the accuracy and transparency of methane emissions reporting in the oil and gas sector. Devon is also a founding sponsor of the GTI Veritas initiative that seeks to demonstrate verifiable methane emissions reductions in a consistent, credible, and transparent way.

Recognition

 

shares are registered in your name, we will verify your ownership at the meeting in

LOGO

#1

#1

INTHE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

INTHE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

FORWORKERS

Additional Reporting

We invite you to review our list of stockholders as of the Record Date. If your shares are held through a broker, bank ormost recent Sustainability Report, Climate Change Assessment Report, Political Activity and Lobbying Report, and other nominee, you must bring proof of your ownership of the shares. This proof could consist of, for example, a bank or brokerage firm account statement or a letter from your bank or broker confirming your ownership as of the Record Date. You may also send proof of ownership to us at Devon Energy Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 333 W. Sheridan, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, or email:CorporateSecretary@dvn.com before the Annual Meetingreports and we will send you an admission card.

If I vote via telephone or the Internet or by mailing my Proxy Card, may I still attend the Annual Meeting?

Yes.

What if I want to change my vote?

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by submitting a new proxy with a later date (by mail, telephone or Internet), by voting at the Annual Meeting, or by filing a written revocation withdocuments available on our Corporate Secretary. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy.

Is my vote confidential?

Yes. We have procedures to ensure that regardless of whether stockholders vote by mail, telephone, Internet or in person, all proxies, ballots and voting tabulations that identify stockholders are kept permanently confidential, except as disclosure may be required by federal or state law or as expressly permitted by a stockholder. In addition, special procedures have been established to maintain the confidentiality of shares voted in our 401(k) Plan.

Who will count the votes?

Broadridge will tabulate the votes.

What constitutes a quorum?

A majority of the shares entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum. If you vote by telephone or Internet or by returning your Proxy Card, you will be considered part of the quorum. Broadridge, the Inspector of Election, will treat shares represented by a properly executed proxy as present at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner submits a proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

How many votes will be required to approve a proposal?

Election of Directors at the Annual Meeting will be by a plurality of votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Votes may be cast in favor of the election of the Director nominee or withheld.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Bylaws contain a director resignation policy which provides that any nominee for Director in an uncontested election who receives a greater number ofwebsite: www.devonenergy.com.

 

 3 Commitment Runs Deep


INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING (cont’d)

 

votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election must submit his or her offer of resignation to the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors within 90 days from the date of the election. The Governance Committee will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation.

With respect to other matters, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares, present in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, is required to take any other action.

Shares cannot be voted at the Annual Meeting unless the holder of record is present in person or by proxy.

Can brokers who hold shares in street name vote those shares if they have received no instructions?

Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), brokers may not vote the shares held by them in street name for their customers and for which they have not received instructions, except with respect to a routine matter. The only matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting that is considered routine for these purposes is the ratification of the appointment of the Independent Auditors. This means that brokers may not vote your shares on any other matter if you have not given specific instructions as to how to vote. Please be sure to give specific voting instructions to your broker so that your vote will be counted.

How will you treat abstentions and broker non-votes?

We will:

OUR BOARD

 

count abstentions and broker non-votes

WHO WE ARE

Our Nominees for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting;Election

 

treat abstentions as votes not cast but as shares represented at the Annual Meeting for determining results on actions requiring a majority of shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting;

LOGO

BARBARA M. BAUMANN

Chair of the Board

Age: 67

Director Since: 2014

Committees

•  Chair, Dividend

•  Audit (2014-2023)

•  Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy (2014-2023)

Principal occupation or employment

•  President and Owner, Cross Creek Energy Corporation

Certain other directorships

•  National Fuel Gas Company. Serves on the audit and financing committees

•  Putnam Mutual Funds (vice chair, independent board of trustees)

•  First Reserve Corporation (senior advisor)

•  Previously served on the board of Buckeye Partners, L.P.

Barbara M. Baumann joined the Board in January 2014 and was appointed Board Chair in January 2023. She is president of Cross Creek Energy Corp., an energy advisory firm with investments in domestic oil and natural gas. She is currently on the board of National Fuel Gas Company and serves on the audit and financing committees. Baumann is a senior advisor for First Reserve Corp., a private equity firm focused on energy, and she serves as vice chair of the independent board of trustees of the Putnam Mutual Funds. Previously, Baumann served in various areas of finance and operations during an 18-year career with Amoco (later BP Amoco). Those roles included chief financial officer of Ecova Corp., Amoco’s wholly owned environmental-remediation unit, and vice president of Amoco’s San Juan Basin business unit. She earned a bachelor’s degree from Mount Holyoke College and a master’s in business administration from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Ms. Baumann brings to the Board her extensive knowledge of financial matters and the energy industry and her experience as an accomplished leader and business professional. Her insights on investor dynamics deepen our Board’s understanding on ESG-related initiatives.

Please refer to the Director Skills and Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.

 

not consider broker non-votes for determining actions requiring a majority of shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting; and

consider neither abstentions nor broker non-votes in determining results of plurality votes.

Who pays the solicitation expenses?

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. Proxies may be solicited by mail or personally by our Directors, officers or employees, none of whom will receive additional compensation for such solicitation. We have retained Phoenix Advisory Partners to assist in the solicitation of proxies at an estimated cost of $10,500.00, plus reasonable expenses. Those holding shares of common stock of record for the benefit of others, or nominee holders, are being asked to distribute proxy soliciting materials to, and request voting instructions from, the beneficial owners of such shares. We will reimburse nominee holders for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting, and we will publish final results in a Form 8-K that will be filed with the SEC within four business days of the Annual Meeting. You

LOGO

JOHN E. BETHANCOURT

Age: 71

Director Since: 2014

Committees

•  Chair, Reserves

•  Compensation

•  Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy (2014-2018)

Principal occupation or employment

•  Former Executive Vice President for Technology and Services, Chevron

Certain other directorships

•  Previously served on the board of trustees of the Texas A&M Foundation

•  Past director of the Society of Petroleum Engineers

•  Former director of the National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc.

John E. Bethancourt joined the Board in January 2014. He is a retired Chevron executive, serving most recently as executive vice president for technology and services, where he oversaw Chevron’s environmental, health and safety efforts, major project management, procurement and mining operations. Bethancourt began his career with Getty Oil Co. in 1974 and joined Texaco Inc. through a 1984 merger. He earned a bachelor’s degree in petroleum engineering from Texas A&M University.

Mr. Bethancourt is an experienced and accomplished leader. His broad competencies in matters impacting the energy industry strengthen the collective capabilities of the Board. His experience in areas relating to human resources, environmental matters, and energy-related infrastructure has provided valuable perspectives for the Board.

Please refer to the Director Skills and Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.

 

 4 Commitment Runs Deep


WHO WE ARE (cont’d)

LOGO

ANN G.
FOX

Age: 46

Director Since: 2019

Committees

•  Compensation

•  Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy

Principal occupation or employment

•  President and Chief Executive Officer, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Certain other directorships

•  Nine Energy Service, Inc.

•  American Petroleum Institute

•  Baker Institute (board of advisors)

•  Groton School

Ann G. Fox joined the board of directors in June 2019. She is president, chief executive officer, and a board member of Nine Energy Service, Inc. (Nine), a Houston-based oilfield services company. Fox joined Nine in 2013 and previously served as chief financial officer and vice president of strategic development. Prior to joining Nine, she worked for SCF Partners, a private-equity firm supporting the oilfield services and equipment industries. Fox also has experience as an investment banking analyst and as a Marine, where she served several tours of duty in Iraq on a team that reported directly to Gen. David Petraeus. She received a bachelor’s degree in diplomacy and security in world affairs from Georgetown University and a master’s in business administration from Harvard University. Fox currently serves on the board of the American Petroleum Institute, the board of advisors of Rice University’s Baker Institute, and the board of trustees of Groton School.

Ms. Fox brings to the Board her significant and unique career experiences, knowledge of the energy industry and capital markets, and perspective as a leader. Her recognition of upstream business and operational developments contributes to the Board’s overall performance.

Please refer to the Director Skills and Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.


INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING (cont’d)

may obtain a copy of this and other reports free of charge atwww.devonenergy.com, or by contacting our Investor Relations Department at (405) 552-4570 orinvestor.relations@dvn.com, or by accessing the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.

Will the Company’s independent auditors be available at the Annual Meeting to respond to questions?

Yes. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has approved KPMG LLP to serve as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2012. Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to stockholder questions.

Where can I contact the Company?

Our mailing address is:

Devon Energy Corporation

333 W. Sheridan

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

Our telephone number is:

(405) 235-3611

LOGO

GENNIFER F. KELLY

Age: 50

Director Since: 2023

Committees

•  Audit

•  Reserves

Principal occupation or employment

•  Former Chief Operating Officer and SVP of Western Midstream Partners

Certain other directorships

•  Delek Logistics Partners, L. P. Serves on the conflicts, EHS, and technology committees

•  Lone Star College Foundation. Serves on the audit committee

Gennifer Kelly joined the board of directors in January 2023. She is currently on the board of Delek Logistics, where she serves as chair of the technology committee and as a member of the conflicts and environmental, health and safety committees. Kelly has 25 years of oil and gas industry experience in both upstream and midstream sectors. She previously held the role of chief operating officer and SVP of Western Midstream Partners and vice president of marketing for Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. Prior to her role at Western Midstream, Kelly led operations transformation efforts, as well as strategic planning, portfolio management, and asset management teams for Anadarko. She holds a master’s degree in business administration and a bachelor’s degree in petroleum engineering from Louisiana State University.

Ms. Kelly brings to the Board her extensive knowledge of the energy industry, including strategic and regulatory matters. She is an experienced executive who has led significant corporate transformational efforts. She has a broad understanding of key matters considered by boards of directors of energy companies.

Please refer to the Director Skills and Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.

 

 5 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

WHO WE ARE (cont’d)

Pursuant to provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Certificate of Incorporation) and Bylaws, the Board of Directors shall consist of not less than three nor more than 20 Directors. Currently, the Board is comprised of eight Directors. Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide for all Directors to be of one class and to be elected annually for a term expiring at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Board of Directors has nominated for re-election incumbent Directors Robert H. Henry, John A. Hill, Michael M. Kanovsky, Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr., J. Larry Nichols, Duane C. Radtke, Mary P. Ricciardello and John Richels, whose terms expire at the 2012 Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the nominees for election to the Board of Directors.

It is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote proxies“FOR” the election of the nominees unless they are instructed otherwise. In the event any of the nominees should fail to stand for election, the persons named in the proxy intend to vote for substitute nominees designated by the Board of Directors, unless the Board of Directors reduces the number of Directors to be elected. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

Director Nominees

 

LOGO

KELT

KINDICK

Age: 68

Director Since: 2021

Committees

•  Chair, Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy

•  Compensation

•  Audit (2021-2023)

•  Dividend (2021-2023)

• Lead Director (2021-2023)

Principal occupation or employment

•  Advisory Partner at Bain & Company (formerly Chief Financial Officer and Partner)

Certain other directorships

•  Previously served on WPX’s board of directors, including as lead director and chairman of its nominating, governance, environmental and public policy committee

•  Previously served on The Advisory Board Company’s board until its acquisition in 2017

 

LOGOKelt Kindick joined the board of directors in January 2021 following Devon’s merger with WPX. Kindick became a member of WPX’s board of directors in 2013. In December 2012, Kindick retired from Bain & Company Inc., a management consulting firm, serving most recently as chief financial officer and partner. He joined Bain & Company in 1980, was elected partner in 1986, served as managing director of the firm’s Boston office from 1991 to 1996, and as chairman of the firm’s executive committee from 1998 to 1999. Kindick also served as chief financial officer of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2004. He received a bachelor’s degree from Franklin & Marshall College and a master’s in business administration from Harvard Business School.

 

Robert H. Henry

Director since 2010

Age 59

Committees:

• Audit

• Governance

Professional Experience

 

Mr. Henry has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Oklahoma City University since June 2010. Mr. Henry was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in 1994, where he served until June 2010, most recently as Chief Judge. Prior to his appointment, he was Dean and Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University School of Law from 1991 to 1994, Attorney General of Oklahoma from 1987 to 1991 and an Oklahoma State Representative from 1976 to 1986.

Education

Mr. Henry holds a Bachelor’s degree and a law degree from the University of Oklahoma.

Other Boards and Appointments

Mr. Henry serves as a director for the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Foundation for the Future, Oklahoma Heritage Association and the Vera Institute of Justice.

Qualifications

Mr. HenryKindick brings to the Board his experience in strategic roles across a broad range of industries and in the public sector. His insights on governance, finance and other key strategic matters enhances Board discussions.

Please refer to the Director Skills and Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.

LOGO

JOHN

KRENICKI JR.

Age: 60

Director Since: 2018

Committees

•  Audit

•  Reserves

•  Compensation (2018-2021)

•  Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy (2018-2021)

Principal occupation or employment

•  Vice Chairman at Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (CD&R)

Certain other directorships

•  Non-executive chairman of Brand Industrial Holdings, Inc., Artera Services, and Wilsonart International Holdings LLC., which are privately held entities controlled by CD&R

•  Non-executive chairman of Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc., which was taken private in a transaction with CD&R in 2022

John Krenicki Jr. joined the board of directors in June 2018. He is vice chairman at the private-equity investment firm CD&R and is chairman of four privately held entities controlled or jointly controlled by CD&R. Previously, Krenicki built a 29-year career at General Electric Co., where he served as vice chairman as well as president and CEO of GE Energy, among other executive positions. He has a master’s degree in management from Purdue University and a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Connecticut. He also is a member of the National Petroleum Council.

Mr. Krenicki brings to the Board his extensive knowledge as a legal scholarof the overall value chain in the energy industry and his experience as an executive, leader, and owner of public servicea range of enterprises. His recognition of market dynamics and entrepreneurial change deepens the capabilities of the Board.

Please refer to the Director Skills and Experience Matrix on numerous national and international judicial advisory committees.page 10 for more information.

 

 6 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORSWHO WE ARE (cont’d)

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

John A. HillKARL F.

Director since 2000

Age 70KURZ

 

Lead Director

Committees:

• Chair, Compensation

 

Professional Experience

Age: 61

Director Since: 2021

Committees

•  Compensation

•  Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy

•  Reserves

Principal occupation or employment

•  Former Managing Director of CCMP Capital Advisors LLC and Chief Operating Officer of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Certain other directorships

•  American Water Works Company, Inc. Serves as non- executive chairman

•  Texas Pacific Land Corporation. Serves on the compensation committee

•  Previously served on WPX’s board of directors and its audit committee

•  Previously served on the board of SemGroup Corporation

Karl F. Kurz joined the board of directors in January 2021 following Devon’s merger with WPX. Kurz became a member of WPX’s board of directors in 2014. He currently serves as non-executive chairman of American Water Works Company, Inc. Kurz is also on the board of Texas Pacific Land Corporation, where he serves on the compensation committee. Previously, from 2009 until his retirement in 2012, Kurz served as managing director, co-head of the energy group and member of the investment committee at CCMP Capital Advisors LLC, a leading global private equity firm focused on energy investments. Prior to joining CCMP, he spent nine years with Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, most recently serving as chief operating officer responsible for overseeing the company’s global exploration and production, marketing, midstream, land, technology, and service businesses. Kurz holds a bachelor’s of science, magna cum laude, in petroleum engineering from Texas A&M University, and he is a graduate of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.

 

Mr. Hill founded First Reserve Corporation, an oil and gas investment management company, in 1983 and is currently its Vice Chairman and Managing Director. Mr. Hill was formerly President and Chief Executive Officer of several investment banking and asset management companies and served as Deputy Associate Director of the Office of Management and Budget and as Deputy Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration during the Ford administration.

Education

Mr. Hill holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Southern Methodist University and pursued graduate studies there as a Woodrow Wilson Fellow.

Other Boards and Appointments

Mr. Hill also serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Putnam Funds in Boston and as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Sarah Lawrence College.

Qualifications

Mr. HillKurz brings to the Board his extensivesignificant experience in investment managementthe energy industry and knowledge ofexpertise in petroleum engineering. He has served in leadership positions and provides candid perspectives on the oilCompany and gas business.the industry.

Please refer to the Director Skills and Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.

LOGOLOGO

 

Michael M. KanovskyMICHAEL N. MEARS

Director since 1999

Age 63Age: 60

 

Committees:Director Since: 2023

• Chair, Reserves

Committees

•  Audit

•  Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy

 

Professional Experience

Principal occupation or employment

•  Former Chairman, President and CEO of Magellan Midstream Partners

Certain other directorships

•  Sempra Energy. Serves on the corporate governance and safety, sustainability and technology committees

•  Previously served on Magellan Midstream Partners’ board until his retirement in 2022

Michael Mears joined the board of directors in January 2023. He is currently on the board of Sempra where he serves on the corporate governance and safety, sustainability and technology committees. Mears was the chairman, president and CEO of Magellan Midstream Partners from 2011 until his retirement in April 2022. He joined Magellan Midstream Partners in 2002 when the company was formed and was the company’s chief operating officer from 2008 to 2011. Prior to Magellan, Mears worked in a range of management positions for its predecessor company, Williams Pipeline Co. He holds a bachelor’s degree in chemical and petroleum refining engineering from the Colorado School of Mines.

 

Mr. KanovskyMears has significant leadership experience in the energy industry. As a former chief executive officer of a large corporation, he is able to provide perspectives on a professional engineerbroad range of issues that are important for a corporation with Devon’s scale and President of Sky Energy Corporation. Mr. Kanovsky was a founder of both Northstar Energy Corporationoperations. His background in marketing and Bonavista Energy Corporation. From 1982energy-related infrastructure adds valuable perspectives to 1998 he served on the Board of Directors of the Canadian-based Northstar Energy Corporation, which was acquired by Devon in 1998.Board.

 

EducationPlease refer to the Director Skills and Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.

 

Mr. Kanovsky holds a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Queen’s University as well as a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the Richard Ivey School of Business at the University of Western Ontario.

Other Boards and Appointments

Mr. Kanovsky serves as a director of ARC Resources Ltd., Bonavista Petroleum Ltd., Pure Technologies Ltd. and TransAlta Corporation.

Qualifications

Mr. Kanovsky brings to the Board his extensive knowledge of the energy industry and of the Company’s assets and areas of operation.

 

 

 7 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORSWHO WE ARE (cont’d)

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

RobertROBERT A. Mosbacher, Jr.MOSBACHER, JR.

Director since 2009

Age 60Age: 71

 

Committees:Director Since: 2009

Committees

•  Chair, GovernanceCompensation

•  CompensationGovernance, Environmental, and Public Policy

•  Reserves(2019-2021)

•  Lead Director (2015-2019)

  

Professional ExperiencePrincipal occupation or employment

 

Mr. Mosbacher is  Chairman of Mosbacher Energy Company an independent oil and gas exploration and production company. Mr.

Certain other directorships

•  Center for Global Development

•  Previously served as a director of Calpine Corporation from 2009 until the company was acquired in 2018

•  Previously served as a member of Devon’s Board from 1999 until 2005

Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr. was appointed to the board of directors in April 2009. Mosbacher previously served as a member of the Boardboard from 1999 until 2005, whenat which time he was appointedresigned to accept an appointment by the Bush administration to the position of Presidentserve as president and Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC)Corp., an independent agency of the U.S. government that supports private capital investment in emerging markets around the world.

Education

Mr. He is chairman of Mosbacher receivedEnergy Co., an independent oil and gas exploration and production company. He is chair of the Development Advisory Council for the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, which supports investment in the developing world. Mosbacher also currently serves on the board of the National Archives Foundation. He has a Bachelor’sbachelor’s degree in political science from Georgetown University and a law degree from Southern Methodist University.

 

Other Boards and Appointments

Mr. Mosbacher also currently serves as a director of Calpine Corporation.

Qualifications

Mr. Mosbacher brings to the Board his extensiveleadership experience in the energy industry, as well as in state and his leadership experience at OPIC, which contributedfederal government. His strategic mindset and broad understanding of the Company provides important perspectives for the Board.

Please refer to the development of the global marketplace.Director Skills and Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

RICHARD E. MUNCRIEF

 

J. Larry Nichols

Director since 1971

Age 69

Executive Chairman

 

Professional Experience

Age: 64

 

Mr. Nichols is a co-founder of the CompanyDirector Since: 2021

Committees

•  Dividend

Principal occupation or employment

•  President and has served on the Board since the Company’s inception. In 2010 he was elected to the position of Executive Chairman, having served previously as Chief Executive Officer, Devon Energy Corporation

Certain other directorships

•  Williams Companies, Inc. Serves on compensation and Chairmanmanagement development and environmental, health, and safety committees

•  American Petroleum Institute (board of directors and the executive committee)

•  American Exploration & Production Council (board of directors and the executive committee)

•  Previously served as chairman of WPX’s board of directors

Richard E. Muncrief was appointed to the board of directors and elected president and chief executive officer of the Company.

Education

Mr. Nichols holdscompany in January 2021 following Devon’s merger with WPX. Muncrief previously served as chief executive officer and chairman of the board of WPX. He became a Bachelor’s degreemember of WPX’s board of directors in Geology2014. Prior to joining WPX, he served as senior vice president, operations and resource development of Continental Resources, Inc. Muncrief was earlier employed from Princeton UniversityAugust 2008 through May 2009 by Resource Production Company where he served as corporate business manager. From September 2007 to August 2008 he served as president, chief operating officer, and a law degree from the University of Michigan.

Other Boards and Appointments

Mr. Nichols isas a director of Baker Hughes IncorporatedQuest Midstream Partners, LP. From 1980 to 2007, he served in various managerial capacities with ConocoPhillips and Sonic Corp.its predecessor companies, Burlington Resources, Meridian Oil, and El Paso Exploration. Muncrief holds a bachelor’s of science in petroleum engineering technology from Oklahoma State University, where he has also been recognized as a distinguished alumnus and is a member of the College of Engineering, Architecture & Technology Hall of Fame. He is currently on the board of directors of Williams Companies and serves on the Boardcompensation and management development committee and the environmental, health, and safety committee. Muncrief also serves on the board of Directorsdirectors and the executive committee of the American Petroleum Institute Inc.

QualificationsInstitute. He is a past chairman and currently serves on the board of directors and the executive committee of the American Exploration & Production Council.

 

Mr. Nichols bringsMuncrief is a proven leader in the energy industry. His understanding of WPX’s and the post-Merger combined Company’s operations and assets provide valuable Board-level perspective.

Please refer to the Board his knowledgeDirector Skills and experience as a founder and proven leader of the CompanyExperience Matrix on page 10 for more than 40 years. He has been a primary factor in the Company’s development, growth and continued success.information.

 

 

 8 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORSWHO WE ARE (cont’d)

 

 

LOGOLOGO

VALERIE M. WILLIAMS

Age: 66

 

Duane C. Radtke

Director since 2010

Age 63Since: 2021

 

Committees:Committees

•  CompensationChair, Audit

•  Reserves

 

Professional Experience

Principal occupation or employment

 

Mr. Radtke currently is owner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Valiant Exploration LLC. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Dominion Exploration and Production from 2001 to 2007. Following the Company’s 2000 merger with Santa Fe Snyder, Mr. Radtke was President of the Company’s international division until joining Dominion.•  Former Southwest Region Assurance Managing Partner at Ernst & Young LLP

 

EducationCertain other directorships

 

Mr. Radtke holds a Bachelor’s degree in Mining Engineering from•  Omnicom Group, Inc. Serves on the University of Wisconsin.audit and finance committees

 

Other Boards•  DTE Energy. Serves on the corporate governance committee and Appointmentsaudit committee (chair)

 

Mr. Radtke is Non-Executive Chairman•  Franklin Templeton Funds (independent board of NFR Energy, LLC. He is also a director of Kris Energy and served as a director of Smith International, Inc. from 2009 until 2010, at which time Smith International, Inc. merged with Schlumberger Limited.trustees)

 

Qualifications

Mr. Radtke brings to the Board extensive knowledge•  Previously served on WPX’s board of the energy industry, including experience with the Company’s assetsdirectors and operations.its audit committee

 

 

LOGO

Mary P. Ricciardello

Director since 2007

Age 56

Committees:

• Chair, Audit

• Governance

Professional Experience

Ms. RicciardelloValerie M. Williams joined the board of directors in January 2021 following Devon’s merger with WPX. Williams became a member of WPX’s board of directors in 2018. Williams is a licensed Certified Public Accountant. In 2002member of the board of directors of Omnicom Group, Inc., a global advertising and public relations firm, where she retired afterserves on the audit and finance committees. She is also a 20-year career with Reliantmember of the board of directors of DTE Energy, Incorporated,an electric and natural gas utility, where she serves as chair of the audit committee and as a leadingmember of the corporate governance committee. Williams is also a member of the independent power producer and marketer. Ms. Ricciardelloboard of trustees of Franklin Templeton funds. Williams began her career with ReliantErnst & Young LLP in 19821981 and servedhas over 35 years of audit and public accounting experience serving numerous global companies. Prior to her retirement in various financial management positions with the company including Comptroller, Vice President and2016, Williams most recently served as Senior Vice Presidentthe firm’s southwest region assurance managing partner, a position she assumed in 2006. She held several senior leadership positions at Ernst & Young and Chief Accounting Officer.

Education

Ms. Ricciardello holdsalso served on several strategic committees, including the firm’s partner advisory council, inclusiveness council, audit innovation task force and the diversity task force. She received a Bachelor’sbachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the University of South DakotaNorth Texas and a Master’s degreemaster’s in Business Administration with emphasis in Financebusiness administration from the University of Houston.

 

Other Boards and Appointments

Ms. Ricciardello is a director of Noble Corporation. She also serves on the Board of Midstates Petroleum, a private company, and the National Association of Corporate Directors Houston Chapter.

Qualifications

Ms. RicciardelloWilliams brings to the Board her qualificationsextensive experience as a certified public accountant, including 35 years at a premier accounting firm serving clients in the energy and technology sectors. She has strong leadership skills and experience with accounting and financial expertreporting matters at complex organizations. She has been designated an “audit committee financial expert” by Devon’s Board.

Please refer to the Director Skills and her extensive experience in corporate finance and tax matters.Experience Matrix on page 10 for more information.

 

 

 9 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORSWHO WE ARE (cont’d)

Director Skills and Experience

The Board is committed to maintaining a diverse and inclusive membership with varying experience, characteristics, and expertise that align with our business strategy. Our Director nominees, individually and as a group, have skills and experiences that are highly relevant for an upstream energy company like Devon. Fundamental skills and experiences of our Board nominees include strengths in the areas of:

 

 

LOGO•  Prior service in senior leadership at a substantial business enterprise;

 

John Richels

Director since 2007

Age 61

Professional  Experience with operations, development, or other principal functions of an energy company;

 

Mr. Richels was appointed President•  Effective communication skills, especially concerning strategy and Chief Executive Officer in 2010, having previously served as President of the Company since 2004. Prior to that, Mr. Richels served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Devon Canada Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company. He joined the Company in 1998 when the Company acquired Canadian-based Northstar Energy Corporation. Prior to that Mr. Richels served as Managing and Chief Operating Partner of the Canadian-based national law firm, Bennett Jones.analytical decision-making;

 

Education•  Acumen in the area of financial statements, cash flows, and other financial and accounting matters; and

 

Mr. Richels holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from York University and a law degree from the University of Windsor.

Other Boards and Appointments

Mr. Richels served as a director of Northstar Energy Corporation from 1993 to 1996. He also served as Vice-Chairman of•  Prior service on the board of governors of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.a public company.

 

Qualifications

Mr. Richels brings to the Board extensive knowledge of the energy industry, including experience with the Company’s assets and operations. Mr. Richels also brings demonstrated leadership abilities and commitment.

The matrix below provides a summary of the background and certain other key skills and experiences of our Director nominees.

Director Nominees 

LOGO

Baumann

 

LOGO

Bethancourt

 

LOGO

Fox

 

LOGO

Kelly

 

LOGO

Kindick

 

LOGO

Krenicki

 

LOGO

Kurz

 

LOGO

Mears

 

LOGO

Mosbacher

 

LOGO

Muncrief

 

LOGO

Williams

Age

 67 71 46 50 68 60 61 60 71 64 66

Diversity

 p   p p             p

Key Skills and Experience

                      
           

Human Capital Mgt./Comp.

           
           

Engineering Education/Experience

  

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

           

Finance/Capital Allocation

           
           

Regulatory/Policy Matters

  

 

  

 

          

 

           

Technology or Cybersecurity

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

           

Environmental Matters

      

 

  

 

   

 

    

 

           

Corp. Governance/Risk Mgt.

           
           

Investment Management/Stewardship

   

 

   

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

 
           

Marketing/Energy-Related Infrastructure

    

 

   

 

      

p = All four Directors are women. Ms. Williams is Black/African American.

 

 10 Commitment Runs Deep


WHO WE ARE (cont’d)

Tenure*

The tenure of our Director nominees reflects a balance of experience and fresh perspectives.

*Tenure calculated as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Diversity

Our Director nominees voluntarily self-disclose their race, ethnicity, and gender. The aggregate of these disclosures is reflected in the diversity representation shown below.

LOGO

LOGO


Independence*

Ten of Devon’s 11 Director nominees qualify as

independent under NYSE standards and SEC regulations.

*Independence reflected as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

LOGO

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Recent Board Appointments and Selection Process

In early January 2023, the Board appointed Michael N. Mears and Gennifer F. Kelly to the Board. These appointments culminated a process that spanned several months and encompassed the steps described below.

Review the Mix of Directors’ Information

Our Board of Directors met four times in 2011. All Directors attended 75% or more of the total meetingsSkills, Experience, and Characteristics of the Board in Light of DirectorsPotential Departures

At their meetings in June, Devon’s Board and Board Committees on which they served. We require a majority of our Directorstypically conduct self-evaluations and plan for the upcoming twelve months leading up to be in attendance at our Annual Meetings of Stockholders. All Directors attended the 2011Devon’s next Annual Meeting.

Copies of This evaluation considers the following governance documents are available atwww.devonenergy.com and in print to any stockholder upon request:

Certificate of Incorporation;

Bylaws;

Corporate Governance Guidelines;

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics;

Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Chief Accounting Officer (CAO); and

Committee Charters.

Amendments to and waivers from any provision of the Code of Ethics for the CEO, CFO, and CAO will be posted on our website.

Our website also includes our Corporate Responsibility Report and information on our Environmental, Health and Safety Initiatives.

Practices for Considering Diversity

The Charter of the Governance Committee provides that the Committee shall periodically review the appropriate skills and characteristics of memberscomposition of the Board of Directors in relation to the contextstrategic plan of the then current make-upCompany and other areas that are critical for the performance of the Board. This assessment includesBoard’s responsibilities. In June 2022, the following factors: diversity (including diversity of skills, backgroundBoard identified likely near-term departures from the Board and experience); business and professional background; financial literacy and expertise; availability and commitment; independence; and other criteria thatasked the Governance, Committee or the full Board finds relevant. It is the practice of the GovernanceEnvironmental, and Public Policy (GEPP) Committee to consider these factors when screeningbegin a process to identify potential new Board members targeting certain skills, experience, and evaluating candidates for nomination tocharacteristics. Among other skills and competencies, the Board sought expertise in upstream oil and gas activities as well as energy infrastructure, particularly in light of Directors.potential Director retirements.

Identify Board Candidates and Establish Resources to Assist in Search Process

With Board searches, the GEPP Committee utilizes the expertise of a third-party search firm and considers potential candidates identified by other sources (e.g., other organizations that develop Board talent; referrals from stockholders, Directors, and management). Devon’s Corporate Governance Guidelines describe key

 

 11 Commitment Runs Deep


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (cont’d)

 

CommitteesWHO WE ARE (cont’d)

aspects of Devon’s Board recruitment. Baseline qualifications for a Board member include integrity and accountability, ability to exercise informed judgement, peer respect, and high performance standards. As with all of our Board searches, the GEPP Committee has a “Rooney Rule” policy under which it seeks to include and requires any search firm that it engages to endeavor to include, women and minority candidates in the pool from which the GEPP Committee selects potential Director candidates.

Undertake In-Depth Review of Potential Board Candidates

The GEPP Committee conducts a fulsome review of many potential Board candidates. From this initial screening, a preliminary group of potential candidates is identified, which leads to additional diligence on the candidates. The background of the candidates is reviewed for potential conflicts of interest. The Chair of the GEPP Committee and other Directors has standing Audit, Compensation, Governanceoften meet with the candidates. The Chair of the GEPP Committee keeps the Board apprised of the status of the process.

Focus Search and Reserves Committees.Perform Final Review

Candidates interview with the Board. The following table shows eachinterviews often occur in an in-person, small-group setting. The Board meets in executive session – with and without management Directors present – to discuss the candidates, arrive at a consensus on potential appointments, and consider potential Committee assignments for the candidates. A more rigorous diligence process is performed, including background checks, reference checks, and independence and related party transaction evaluation.

Finalize Decision and Make Appointments

The GEPP Committee reviews the results of final diligence on candidates, recommends appointments to the Board, and arrives at preliminary independence determinations and proposed Board Committee assignments for the candidates. The Board meets to review the GEPP Committee’s current membership, functionrecommendation, approves the appointments, and takes other actions associated with appointments.

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

New Director Orientation

Directors participate in orientation sessions as they join Devon’s Board. The sessions customarily involve providing written background materials on the numberCompany that address business strategy, operations, performance, and corporate governance, as well as key functions at the Company such as finance, business development, human resources, EHS/ESG, marketing, supply chain, and legal and regulatory. Members of our executive leadership team meet with new Directors in a setting that provides an opportunity for open discussion. Other Directors often attend these sessions. The orientation sessions are tailored to the background and experience of the new Director.

Shortly after their appointment to the Board in January, Michael Mears and Gennifer Kelly participated in an orientation session at our corporate offices in Oklahoma City. Over a two-day period, Mr. Mears and Ms. Kelly met with our executive leadership team and other senior executives, as well as our Board Chair.

Director Continuing Education and Related Resources

Board and Board Committee meetings each Committee held in 2011:

LOGOserve as a critical avenue for our Directors to further their knowledge of topics impacting their core responsibilities as Directors. On-going dialogue between the Board and our executives guides the content of updates that the Board receives on a range of topics. Executives and subject

 

 12 Commitment Runs Deep


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (cont’d)

 

LOGOWHO WE ARE (cont’d)

 

1

Chairman

matter experts (both within and outside the Company) regularly present to the Board and often engage with the Board between meetings on emerging matters for the Company and the industry in general. Materials provided in advance of Board and Board Committee meetings also customarily include resources addressing emerging topics.

Directors are encouraged to explore additional resources to stay informed of developments relating to their responsibilities. The Company provides access to respected organizations and programs for maintaining board knowledge and skills and periodically sends Directors a compendium of third-party resources that includes overviews of board and board committee best practices, emerging issues, and educational programs. The Board also from time-to-time identifies areas for continuing education, which has resulted in the Company covering the expenses associated with Director participation in continuing education programs.

2

Audit Committee financial expert

 

 13 Commitment Runs Deep


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (cont’d)

 

AGENDA ITEM 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board has nominated 11 directors for election at the Annual Meeting. Each Director Independencewill serve for a term ending at the next Annual Meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, subject to such Director’s earlier death, disqualification, resignation, or removal. All nominees are currently Devon Directors.

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board considers transactions and relationships betweenWithin each Director or any member of the Director’s immediate familynominee’s biography and the Company, our subsidiariesmatrix above, we have highlighted the notable skills and affiliates. The Board has affirmatively determinedqualifications that each of the current Directors and each person who servedcontributed to his or her selection as a Director during 2011, with the exception of our Executive Chairman, J. Larry Nichols, and our President and CEO, John Richels, was or is an independent Director as defined by the standards for director independence established by applicable laws, rules, and listing standards, including, without limitation, the standards for independent directors established by the NYSE and the SEC, has or had no material relationship with us that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment and, therefore, is or was independent under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and standards established by the NYSE.

In evaluating the independence of Mr. Robert H. Henry, the Board has considered the charitable contributions made by us to Oklahoma City University (OCU) in recent years. While these charitable contributions do not affect Mr. Henry’s independence status, disclosure of the contributions are provided herein. In 2009, 2010 and 2011, we made charitable contributions to OCU of $3.1 million, $970,000 and $158,000, respectively. The charitable contributions in 2009 and 2010 were made pursuant to funding commitments we entered into in 2008, prior to Mr. Henry’s appointment to his current position at OCU and prior to his appointmentnominee to our Board. Mr. Henry was named President of Oklahoma City University in June 2010 and appointed

We have no reason to our Board in August 2010.

Lead Director

The Board has a Lead Director whose primary responsibility is to preside over the executive sessionbelieve that any of the Board meeting in which Mr. Nichols, Mr. Richels and other membersnominees for Director will be unable to serve if elected. However, if any of management do not participate. The Lead Director also performs other duties thatthese nominees becomes unavailable, the Board may from time to time delegate to assist the Boardpersons named in the fulfillmentproxy intend to vote for any alternate designated by the current Board. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of its responsibilities. In 2011,persons than the Lead Director presided over four executive sessionsnominees named.

Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote

“FOR” the election of the Board.director nominees listed above.

John A. Hill has served as our Lead Director since June 2010 and will serve in that position until a successor is named by the Board.

Board Involvement in Risk Oversight

The full Board has primary responsibility for risk oversight, with the Board’s standing Committees supporting the Board by addressing the risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. The Audit Committee, Governance Committee, Compensation Committee and Reserves Committee have been delegated certain risk oversight responsibilities.

Leadership Structure

As stated in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board reserves the right to determine, from time to time, how to configure the leadership of the Board and the Company in the way that best serves the Company. The Board specifically reserves the right to vest the responsibilities of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in the same or in different individuals. The Board currently has no fixed policy with respect to combining or separating the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.

 

 14 Commitment Runs Deep


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (cont’d)

 

In June 2010, the roles were separated when John Richels was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer and J. Larry Nichols transitioned to the role of Executive Chairman of the Board. Although the Board believes this structure is in the Company’s best interest at the present time, the Board may combine these positions in the future should circumstances change.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that at any time the Chief Executive Officer holds the position of Chairman of the Board, the Board shall appoint an independent Director to serve as the Lead Director. Although these positions are currently held by different individuals, the Board has appointed Mr. John Hill to serve as Lead Director.

Director Communication

Any stockholder or other interested party may contact any of our Non-ManagementDirectors, including the Lead Director or Non-Management Directors as a group, by:

U.S. mail to Lead Director or to Non-Management Directors, c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary, Devon Energy Corporation, 333 W. Sheridan, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102;HOW WE ARE SELECTED, COMPRISED, AND EVALUATED

 

calling our Non-Management Director access line at (866) 888-6179; or

GOVERNANCE, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE REPORT

sending an email tononmanagement.directors@dvn.com.

A Management Director may be contacted by:

U.S. mail to Management Directors, c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary, Devon Energy Corporation, 333 W. Sheridan, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102;

contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary at (405) 235-3611; or

sending an email toCorporateSecretary@dvn.com.

All calls or correspondence are anonymous and kept confidential to the extent possible. All such communications, other than advertisements or commercial solicitations, will be forwarded to the appropriate Director(s) for review.

CompensationThe GEPP Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2011, the Compensation Committee wasis currently comprised of threefive independent Non-Management Directors with no interlocking relationships as defined by the SEC.

Related Party Transactions

We have adoptedand operates under a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Code) that applies to all of our Directors, officers and employees. The Code is posted atwww.devonenergy.com. The Code describes the policies and standards for protecting the Company’s integrity and provides guidance for recognizing and properly resolving any ethical and legal issues that may be encountered while conducting business. The Board of Directors reviews the Code annually and all Directors, executives and employees individually sign acknowledgements agreeing to abide by the Code. Any waiver of any provisions of the Code on behalf of an executive officer or Director may only bewritten charter approved by the Board. The GEPP Committee Charter and the other documents referenced in this report may be viewed at www.devonenergy.com. Below is a summary of key features of our corporate governance framework, including our approach to Board of Directors ornominations.

Corporate Governance

The GEPP Committee plays a Committee designatedleadership role in shaping the Company’s corporate governance. It reviews the Company’s corporate governance practices along with best practices followed by other companies to maintain a corporate governance framework for the Board of Directors. ItCompany that is effective and functional and that addresses the policyinterests of the Audit Committee to review the terms and substance of any potential related party transaction for purposes of determining whether a waiver to the Code should be granted.

There have been no “related person transactions” as defined by applicable SEC regulations during the reporting period of 2011.Company’s stakeholders.

 

Highlights of Our Corporate Governance
Framework
 15 Commitment Runs DeepPrincipal Documents for Our Corporate Governance
Standards


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (cont’d)

Director Compensation for the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Non-Management Director compensation is determined annually by the Board of Directors acting upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee. Directors who are also employees receive no Director compensation. The following table shows compensation for Non-Management Directors for 2011:

Name Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash ($)
  

Stock Awards

($)1

  

Option Awards

($)1

  

Total

($)

 

Robert H. Henry

  82,000    159,980    102,832    344,812  

John A. Hill

  80,000    159,980    102,832    342,812  

Michael M. Kanovsky

  79,500    159,980    102,832    342,312  

J. Todd Mitchell

  63,500            63,500  

Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr.

  90,000    159,980    102,832    352,812  

Duane C. Radtke

  74,000    159,980    102,832    336,812  

Mary P. Ricciardello

  95,000    159,980    102,832    357,812  

1

Stock and option awards were made on June 8, 2011 to all Directors with the exception of J. Todd Mitchell. Mr. Mitchell’s term on the Board of Directors ended on June 8, 2011. The stock awarded on June 8, 2011 was valued at $79.99 per share and the options awarded on June 8, 2011 were at an exercise price of $79.99 with a value of $34.2772 per share. The dollar amounts reported in these columns represent the grant date fair values of the stock and option awards granted in 2011. The assumptions used to value stock and option awards are discussed inNote 3—Share-Based Compensation of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The following table represents the number of unvested stock awards and the number of outstanding and unexercised option awards held by each of our Non-Management Directors as of December 31, 2011:

Name Outstanding
Stock Awards
  Outstanding
Option Awards
 

Robert H. Henry

  3,500    6,000  

John A. Hill

  5,000    28,000  

Michael M. Kanovsky

  5,000    28,000  

J. Todd Mitchell

      25,000  

Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr.

  4,500    9,000  

Duane C. Radtke

  3,500    6,000  

Mary P. Ricciardello

  5,000    15,000  

•  Annual election of Directors

•  Majority voting in uncontested elections

•  Independent Lead Director in the event the Chair of the Board is not independent

•  Executive sessions of independent Directors

•  Stockholder right to call a special meeting

•  Proxy access right

•  Board participation in succession planning

 16

 Commitment Runs Deep

•  Corporate Governance Guidelines

•  Charters for each of the Board’s Committees

•  Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all Directors, officers, and employees

•  Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (cont’d)

Annual Retainer and Meeting FeesBoard of Director Nominations

The following is a schedule of annual retainers and meeting fees for Non-Management Directors in effect during 2011:

Type of Fee Amount 

Annual Board Retainer

 $50,000  

Additional Annual Retainer to Chairman of Audit Committee

 $15,000  
Additional Annual Retainer to Chairman of Compensation,
Governance and Reserves Committees
 $10,000  

Additional Annual Retainer to Audit Committee Members

 $2,000  

Fee for each Board Meeting attended in person

 $2,000  

Fee for each Board Meeting attended via telephone

 $1,000  

Fee for each Committee Meeting attended in person

 $2,000  

Fee for each Committee Meeting attended via telephone

 $1,000  

Each Non-Management Director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred while serving as a Director.

Annual Equity Awards

As described in footnote 1 to the Director Compensation Table, in June 2011, our Non-Management Directors were granted an annual award of 3,000 stock options and 2,000 shares of restricted stock under our 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Stock and option awards to Non-Management Directors are granted immediately following each Annual Meeting. Options vest on the date of grant and are granted at an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on that date. Unexercised options will expire eight years from the date of grant. With respect to restricted stock awards, 25% of each award vests on each anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the Director’s continued service to the Company. Cash dividends on shares of restricted stock are paid at the same times and in the same amounts as on other shares of our common stock.

17Commitment Runs Deep


GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The Governance Committee operates under a written Charter approved by the Board of Directors. The Charter may be viewed atwww.devonenergy.com. The Governance Committee is currently comprised of three independent Directors.

The GovernanceGEPP Committee is responsible for nominating qualified candidates to serve on the Board of Directors and reviewing their qualifications with the Board, taking into account the composition and skills of the entire Board and specifically ensuring a sufficient number of the members of the Board are financially literate.

In alignment with the Board’s philosophy, the GEPP Committee assures that a diverse group of qualified candidates is in the pool from which the nominees for the Board are chosen. The GEPP Committee may, at its discretion, seek third-party resources to assist in the process and make final director candidate recommendations to the Board. The Board considered the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills of each of the nominees for Director at the 2023 Annual Meeting. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines outline certain foundational qualifications for our nominees, as well as certain expectations of our Directors upon their election to the Board.

15Commitment Runs Deep


GOVERNANCE, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE REPORT (cont’d)

Qualifications of Our Directors    

Expectations of Our Directors

•  Integrity and accountability

•  Informed judgment

•  Peer respect

•  High performance standards

•  Mandatory retirement at the Annual Meeting immediately following the 74th birthday of a Director

•  Ownership of Devon common stock equal to five times the Director’s annual retainer to be reached by the end of a five-year period after election along with a holding requirement for those who have yet to meet the ownership requirement

•  Recommendation that a Director not serve on more than three public company boards in addition to serving on the Company’s Board

•  Approval of the GEPP Committee to serve as a director, officer, or employee of a competitor of the Company

•  Requirement that a Director advise the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the GEPP Committee in advance of accepting any invitation to serve on other public company boards or any assignment to the audit or compensation committees of the board of any public company of which such Director is a member

•  Requirement that a Director promptly advise the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the GEPP Committee upon accepting service on private or non-profit boards

The GEPP Committee considers nominees recommended by stockholders and gives appropriate consideration in the same manner as given to other nominees. Stockholders who wish to submit recommendations for director nominees for election at our 20132024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders may do so by submitting such nominee’s name in writing, in compliance with the procedures required by our Bylaws, to the Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy Committee of the Board of Directors, Attention: Chairman,Chair of the GEPP Committee, c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary, Devon Energy Corporation, 333 W. Sheridan Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102. Pursuant to our Bylaws, stockholders may recommend a director nominee by delivering a timely notice to our Corporate Secretary at the address above. Such a recommendation must be received between February 7, 20138, 2024 and March 10, 20139, 2024, in order to be considered timely.a timely notice. The stockholder’s notice must contain:contain, among other things:

 

all information that is required to be disclosed with respect to such person being nominated pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including such person’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a Director, if elected;

 

the name and address of the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner;

 

the class and number of shares of our stock that are owned beneficially and of record by the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner;

 

whether and the extent to which any hedging or other similar transaction or series of transactions has been entered into by or on behalf of the stockholder or beneficial owner;

 

a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder giving the notice and any other person or persons (including their names) in connection with the nomination; and

 

a representation that the stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the 2024 Annual Meeting to bring such business before the meeting; and

 

an undertaking by the stockholder giving the notice to update the information required to be included in the notice.

The Board takes reasonable steps to ensure that a diverse group of qualified candidates are in the pool from which the nominees for the Board are chosen. The Governance Committee may, at its discretion, seek third-party resources to assist in the process and make final director candidate recommendations to the Board. Our Board of Directors considered the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each of the nominees for Director at the 2012 Annual Meeting. As identified in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the basic qualifications that the Governance Committee looks for in a Director include such factors as:

integrity and accountability;

informed judgment;

peer respect; and

high performance standards.

 

 1816 Commitment Runs Deep


GOVERNANCE, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE REPORT (cont’d)

Following a Director’s election to the Board, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for:

mandatory retirement at the Annual Meeting following the 73rd birthday of a Director;

ownership of Devon common stock equal to five times the Director’s annual retainer divided by the average daily closing price of the Company’s common stock for the prior year;

 

a recommendation that a Director not serve on more than five public company boards in addition to serving on the Company’s Board;

“majority voting,” which requires a nominee for Director in an uncontested election to submit an offer of resignation to the Governance Committee within 90 days of the date of the election if the nominee receives a greater number of “withheld” votes than “for” votes. The Governance Committee will then consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and recommend to the full Board the action to be taken with respect to the offer to resign;

approval of the Governance Committee to serve as a Director, officer or employee of a competitor of the Company; and

prompt notification to the Executive Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Governance Committee upon the acceptance of a directorship of any other public, private or non-profit company or any assignment to the audit or compensation committees of the board of any public, private or non-profit company.

The Governance Committee also plays a leadership role in shaping the Company’s corporate governance. It periodically undertakes a corporate governance self-assessment, consisting of a thorough review of the Company’s corporate governance practices. The Governance Committee reviews the Company’s practices and best practices followed by other companies to maintain a corporate governance framework for the Company that is effective and functional and that fully addresses the interests of the Company’s stakeholders. The Governance Committee from time to time recommends enhanced corporate governance standards to the Board. The corporate governance standards that have been approved by the Board are reflected in:

the Corporate Governance Guidelines;

the Charters for each of the Board’s Committees;

the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all Directors, officers and employees; and

the Code of Ethics for the CEO, CFO and CAO

The standards reflected in these documents implement and strengthen the Company’s corporate governance practices. These documents, and others related to corporate governance, are available atwww.devonenergy.com.

With the Company’s fundamental corporate governance practices firmly in place and regularly evaluated, the GovernanceGEPP Committee is prepared to respond quickly to new regulatory requirements and emerging best practices. The GovernanceGEPP Committee intends to continue to require an annual evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees to enable the Company to maintain its position at the forefront of corporate governance best practices.

Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr., ChairmanGovernance, Environmental, and Public Policy Committee

Robert H. Henry

LOGO

Kelt Kindick, Chair

LOGO

Ann G. Fox

LOGO

Karl F. Kurz

LOGO

Michael N. Mears

LOGO

Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr.

17Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN

Mary P. Ricciardello

Committees

During 2022, the Board had four standing Committees: Audit, Compensation, GEPP, and Reserves. The Charters for our Committees are available on the Company’s website, www.devonenergy.com. Below we reflect each Committee’s current membership, core duties and responsibilities, recent activities, and key focus areas.

LOGO  

LOGO  

LOGO  

LOGO  

LOGO  LOGO  

LOGO  

LOGO  

LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  
Baumann 1BethancourtFoxKellyKindickKrenickiKurzMearsMosbacherMuncrief 1Williams 2

Audit

LOGO

Compensation 3

LOGO

GEPP

LOGO

Reserves 3

LOGO

LOGO

 Committee Chair

1

Dividend Committee member. The Board maintains a dividend committee to assist with the declaration and payment of dividends on Devon’s common stock in accordance with the dividend policy of the Company.

2

Audit committee financial expert.

3

Duane Radtke is a member of the Compensation and Reserves Committees. He is retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting.

Audit Committee

Monitors the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and reporting system;

Oversees the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

Appoints the independent auditors and monitors their performance, qualifications, and independence;

Oversees the Company’s internal audit function and reviews significant internal audit findings and management’s actions to address those findings;

Reviews the Company’s financial and cybersecurity risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposure; and

Monitors the business practices and ethical standards of the Company.

RECENT ACTIVITIES AND KEY FOCUS AREAS

•  Reviewed and discussed the audit results prior to the filing of Devon’s 10-K for fiscal year-end 2022 and met with the independent auditors concerning the results;

•  Reviewed and discussed the earnings materials and periodic reports for each quarter of the year;

•  Received reports and interacted with management about legal, regulatory, and tax matters, cybersecurity, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters, and other topical issues such as the SEC’s proposed climate-disclosures rule; and

•  Met in executive session on a regular basis with the independent auditors and Devon personnel responsible for the Company’s internal audit function, financial reporting, and legal and regulatory compliance.

Number of Meetings held in 2022: 8

18Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN (cont’d)

Compensation Committee

Reviews and approves the Company’s compensation philosophy and strategy;

Directs management to administer the annual compensation process in accordance with the stated compensation strategy of the Company and any requirements of the appropriate regulatory bodies;

Reviews and approves the Company’s employee benefit and incentive programs;

Annually reviews and determines total compensation for each management Director;

Reviews and approves total compensation for the Company’s executive officers;

Reviews with the President and CEO and advises the Board with regard to executive officer succession planning;

Evaluates and recommends compensation or revisions to compensation for members of the Board; and

Assesses and considers the independence of any advisor that provides advice to the Compensation Committee.

RECENT ACTIVITIES AND KEY FOCUS AREAS

•  Reviewed and approved the peer group used and approved in executive pay considerations and evaluated the Company’s performance on pre-set metrics to determine the 2022 bonus pool;

•  Analyzed financial, ESG, and other metrics used in the incentive programs of energy companies; and

•  Met separately and with the GEPP Committee in order to review and discuss with management Devon’s DEI metrics, including strategy and actions for improving Devon’s workforce DEI.

Number of Meetings held in 2022: 9

Governance, Environmental, and Public Policy (GEPP) Committee

Identifies and recommends qualified individuals to become Board members;

Evaluates and recommends nominees for election as directors at the annual stockholders’ meetings or for appointment between annual stockholders’ meetings;

Develops, recommends, and reviews corporate governance guidelines for the Company;

Reviews the Company’s policies and performance relating to the Company’s environmental, health, and safety efforts, and the Company’s approach to social responsibility;

Reviews the Company’s performance and stakeholder engagement on key ESG matters;

Advises the Board and management on significant public policy issues that are pertinent to the Company and its stakeholders; and

Oversees management in setting strategy, establishing goals, and integrating sustainability into strategic and tactical business activities across the Company to create long-term stockholder value.

 

 19 Commitment Runs Deep


 

HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN (cont’d)

RECENT ACTIVITIES AND KEY FOCUS AREAS

•  Oversaw the Director succession process that culminated in the appointment of Gennifer Kelly and Michael Mears to the Board in January 2023;

•  Reviewed Devon’s performance on, and tactics for meeting, the Company’s environmental targets announced in June 2021;

•  Received updates on policy matters impacting (or potentially impacting) Devon and discussed Devon’s and its trade associations’ engagement on such matters;

•  Received Devon’s ESG reporting prior to publication, including Devon’s 2022 Sustainability Report, and engaged with management on the content of such reporting; and

•  With the Compensation Committee, reviewed and discussed with management Devon’s DEI metrics, as well as strategy and actions for improving Devon’s workforce DEI.

Number of Meetings held in 2022: 7

Reserves Committee

Oversees an annual review and evaluation of the Company’s consolidated oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves;

Oversees the integrity of the Company’s reserves evaluation and reporting system;

Assesses the reserves disclosure for the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related to its oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves;

Reviews the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent engineering consultants;

Monitors the performance of the Company’s independent engineering consultants; and

Monitors and evaluates the Company’s business practices and standards in relation to the preparation and disclosure of its oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves.

RECENT ACTIVITIES AND KEY FOCUS AREAS

•  Oversaw a comprehensive review of the capabilities, experience, and quality of independent engineering consultants for purposes of selecting an independent engineering consultant for the year-end reserves evaluation, which culminated in the selection of a new independent engineering consultant for the Company for 2022;

•  Met to review and discuss the reserves evaluation results prior to the filing of Devon’s 10-K for fiscal year-end 2022; and

•  Discussed Devon’s policies and approaches for booking and valuing reserves.

Number of Meetings held in 2022: 3

20Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN (cont’d)

Our Board met ten times in 2022. All Directors attended at least 93% of the total meetings of the Board and the respective Committees on which they served.

All Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders unless there are extenuating circumstances. All of our then-current Directors attended our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Copies of the following governance documents are available at www.devonenergy.com and in print to any stockholder upon request:

•  Certificate of Incorporation;

•  Bylaws;

•  Corporate Governance Guidelines;

•  Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and

•  Code of Ethics for CEO, CFO, and CAO.

Amendments to and waivers from any provision of the Code of Ethics for the CEO, CFO, and CAO will be posted on our website.

Director Independence

Relevant Independence Standard

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a majority of the Board members must qualify as “independent” Directors in accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the related disclosure requirements in the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Regulation S-K, Item 407(a). Additionally, (i) all of the members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the GEPP Committee, and the Reserves Committee and (ii) at least one of the members of the Dividend Committee must be Directors determined by the Board to be independent according to applicable standards relating to board committee membership, including as set forth in the listing and other relevant standards for the Committee, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and relevant Committee Charters.

Board Diligence Process

In assessing independence, the Board reviews whether a Director has any material relationships with Devon or any of its subsidiaries. This review considers direct and indirect relationships of a Director and any member of the Director’s immediate family, including, as relevant, such Director’s or family member’s status as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Devon or any of its subsidiaries. The Board also takes into account other facts and circumstances that the Board deems relevant.

Independence Determinations

Based on its review and applicable standards, the Board has affirmatively determined that (i) each of the current Directors, with the exception of Richard E. Muncrief, is an independent Director and (ii) each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, GEPP Committee, and Reserves Committee, and at least one of the members of the Dividend Committee (Barbara M. Baumann), is independent. As a result of these determinations, 11 of the Board’s 12 current Directors and 10 of the Board’s 11 Director nominees are independent.

21Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN (cont’d)

Relationships Considered

Pursuant to SEC regulations, for each director and nominee for director that is identified as independent, a company’s proxy statement must describe, by specific category or type, any transactions, relationships, or arrangements not disclosed as a related person transaction that were considered by a company’s board of directors under the applicable independence definitions in determining that the director is independent.

The Board considered the following relationships in making its determination that all Directors (including the Director nominees), other than Mr. Muncrief, are independent. In each case, the transactions identified are routine, ordinary course transactions in which the relevant Director had no personal involvement and derived no direct personal benefit.

Director/Nominee

OrganizationRelationshipSummary
Ann G. FoxNine Energy ServicePresident/ CEO Director

Nine provides services to Devon in the ordinary course of business. Devon represented under 1.0% of Nine’s revenues for 2022.1

Gennifer F. KellyDelek LogisticsDirector

Delek provides services to Devon in the ordinary course of business. Devon represented under 1.0% of Delek’s revenues for 2022.

Karl F. KurzTexas Pacific Land (TPL)Director

TPL owns royalty interests and provides services to Devon in the ordinary course of business. Devon represented under 8.0% of TPL’s overall revenues for 2022, with services accounting for less than 1.0% of TPL’s revenues.

Michael N. MearsSempra EnergyDirector

Sempra purchases energy products from Devon. Devon represented under 1.0% of Sempra’s cost of goods sold, and Sempra represented under 1.0% of Devon’s revenues for 2022.

Valerie M. WilliamsDTEDirector

DTE purchases energy products from Devon. Devon represented under 1.0% of DTE’s cost of goods sold, and DTE represented under 1.0% of Devon’s revenues for 2022.

1

One of the categorical tests under the NYSE listing standards asks whether the director is a current employee of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the listed company in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues (the “NYSE revenue test”). Amounts paid by Devon to Nine exceeded 2% of Nine’s consolidated gross revenues for the 2019 fiscal year. This meant that, due to the NYSE revenue test, the Board could not determine Ms. Fox to be independent in 2020, 2021, or 2022. However, in each of those years, amounts paid by Devon to Nine were less than 2% of Nine’s revenues. In March 2023, the Board reviewed the Devon-Nine relationship in connection with the diligence process described above and determined Ms. Fox to be independent.

22Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN (cont’d)

Related Person Transactions

The Board has approved a written policy (the “Policy”) to assist Devon in the collection and review of information regarding potential related person transactions and conflicts of interest. All Directors and executive officers are required to identify business and financial affiliations involving themselves or their immediate family members that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a reportable related person transaction. Based on this information, Devon staff review Devon’s records and makes follow-up inquiries as necessary to identify potentially reportable related person transactions. A report summarizing such transactions is provided to the Board’s Audit Committee.

The Committee reviews reports and makes recommendations to the Board as to whether an identified transaction is required to be publicly disclosed as a related person transaction. If the transaction at issue involves a member of the Committee, or a family member of a Committee member, then that member of the Committee would not participate in discussions. In the event the Committee concludes that a related person has a material interest in any Company transaction, the Committee then reviews the transaction to determine whether to approve or ratify it. Any transaction that meets the monetary threshold under the SEC rules and is determined to have a direct or indirect material benefit to a related person would be disclosed in accordance with SEC rules. The Policy provides that certain categories of transactions are not deemed to involve a material interest. Those categories align with, and in many cases are more conservative than, the standards under applicable SEC rules.

In early 2023, the Company performed its diligence for purposes of identifying potential related party transactions and provided its report to the Committee. Based on the Committee’s review and discussion, the Committee has not identified any transactions that qualify as related person transactions and require disclosure.

Board Leadership Structure

Following the closing of the Devon-WPX merger in early 2021, the Board appointed David A. Hager as Executive Chair (at that time, Devon’s CEO) and named Richard E. Muncrief (at that time, WPX’s President, CEO, and Board Chair) as President and CEO of the Company. This structure promoted the objective of ensuring continuity in leadership of the go-forward Company. In accordance with Devon’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board designated Kelt Kindick as the Board’s independent Lead Director upon Mr. Hager’s appointment as Executive Chair.

In September 2022, the Board announced that Mr. Hager would retire in early 2023 and Barbara Baumann would be his successor. Ms. Baumann is an independent Director. Although the Board has no fixed policy with respect to combining or separating the positions of Chair of the Board and CEO, Ms. Baumann’s appointment as Board Chair continues a Devon governance practice of separating the Chair and CEO roles that preceded the merger and recognizes that the Company’s stockholders are best served by Ms. Baumann’s leadership of the Board at this time. Ms. Baumann is skilled at developing open, substantive communication among members of the Board and between the Board and management. She also has extensive board and energy industry experience and has served in key roles on Devon’s Board. Until her appointment as Board Chair, Ms. Baumann chaired Devon’s GEPP Committee and served as a member of the Audit Committee, where she was one of Devon’s “audit committee financial experts.”

As an independent Chair, Ms. Baumann fills certain duties performed by the Lead Director role that was vacated upon her appointment. She presides over executive sessions of the Board in which members of management are not present, as well as executive sessions in which only independent Directors are present. Ms. Baumann also works with Mr. Muncrief on Board agendas, items of discussion, and meeting materials and serves as a resource for fostering communication among the Board and management.

23Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN (cont’d)

Board and Committee Evaluations

The Board maintains an annual review process that evaluates the effectiveness and performance of the Board, the Chair, the Lead Director (if applicable), and the Board Committees. The evaluations are reviewed and discussed by the GEPP Committee, which also annually considers how to maximize the effectiveness of the process. The full Board discusses the evaluations with and without management present.

LOGO

In recent years, the Lead Director has conducted one-on-one interviews with each Director as part of the process. Those interviews, as well as Board Committee self-evaluations, have in part been facilitated by written questionnaires that prompt a robust discussion. The Board, however, has not solicited written responses from Directors in order to preserve the confidentiality and candor of those discussions.

Through the evaluation processes, Board members have provided feedback on a range of topics, including:

Board and management succession planning;

agendas and materials for Board meetings;

the composition and structure of the Board and Board Committees;

the cadence and substance of discussions of Devon’s strategy, including the consideration of low-carbon business ventures;

Devon’s ESG program and target-setting for performance in the area; and

the opportunity for outside speakers to present on certain topics at Board meetings.

Devon’s Board and Board leadership consistently emphasize open communication among members of the Board with a view toward building alignment on highly effective corporate governance of the Company.

Board Involvement in Risk Oversight

The full Board has primary responsibility for risk oversight, which includes, among other things, determining whether the Company’s risk-management programs are appropriately designed and implemented in light of the Company’s material risks. To assist it in this role, the Board has delegated to four standing Board Committees certain matters relating to the risks inherent in the Committees’ respective areas of oversight, with each Committee regularly reporting to the full Board. Our management team is, in turn, responsible for executing the directives of the Board and those Committees with respect to the Company’s risk-management programs, including by overseeing and reporting on Devon’s day-to-day efforts to manage risk.

24Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE GOVERNED AND GOVERN (cont’d)

Devon employs a variety of governance and analytical measures to identify and evaluate the risks to our business. We use an enterprise-wide risk-management framework that includes an annual analysis of the top risks to the Company. This analysis asks the Board, management, and certain internal subject matter experts to consider the likelihood that certain risks could result in an impact to the Company and to identify, among other things, the Company’s level of preparedness for those risks. The Board and management then use the results from this analysis and other exercises to determine and prioritize the material risks to our business. In addition to this annual review process, the Board also assesses developments as they evolve and considers the risk they pose to the Company. Management and other subject matter experts meet on a regular basis to review the risks to the Company and consider and develop means of mitigating those risks. For a more detailed discussion of the material risks of the Company, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and our other filings with the SEC.

Cybersecurity risk is an area of increasing focus for our Board, particularly as more and more of our operations rely on digital technologies. To mitigate this risk, Devon has adopted an information security program, which uses sophisticated technology and processes and is aligned with the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework for risk management. Our management team provides quarterly updates to the Audit Committee on activities and other developments impacting our digital security, which focus on, among other things, key security metrics for the Company such as the number and type of cyberattacks targeting the Company. The updates also frequently review cybersecurity assessments performed on Devon by third parties, some of which have been retained by the Company to consider Devon’s standing and readiness to address to certain risks. The full Board receives regular updates regarding the overall cybersecurity program and reports from the Committee.

High-Level Oversight and Coordination of ESG Efforts

The Company recognizes that ESG matters are important for Devon and Devon’s stakeholders. Following the closing of the Devon-WPX merger, Devon created a new executive position of vice president of EHS/ESG, as well as a manager-level position and other staffing for sustainability activity. The Company also proceeded with aggregating ESG programs and data of Devon and WPX. The Board and the GEPP Committee were apprised of Devon’s progress, with a view toward reviewing in advance the environmental targets that were announced in June 2021. The Board and management continue to support the Company’s ongoing efforts in this area. Devon’s Executive Committee, Board GEPP Committee, and the full Board receive regular updates on our ESG efforts and expect high performance in this area. Over the past year, oversight has included Devon’s activities in the following areas:

Devon’s strategy for and third-party assessment of Devon’s performance on ESG matters;

Devon’s progress on achieving the environmental targets established in June 2021;

the tactics and associated budgets for attaining the environmental targets and other ESG objectives;

an on-going assessment and discussion of Devon’s participation in ESG-related initiatives, which included the decision in 2022 to join OGMP 2.0;

Devon’s community support efforts, including charitable contributions and participating in charitable projects; and

management’s steps in furthering the Company’s carbon accounting systems and capabilities.

25Commitment Runs Deep


HOW TO COMMUNICATE WITH US

The Board believes it is important to cast a wide net for input to inform its decision making and considers input from stockholders to be critical. Accordingly, the Board maintains a number of ways to receive feedback from stockholders and other stakeholders:

Our Directors attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

Our Directors participate in director education programs that include investors and investor commentary;

Our Directors listen to Devon’s quarterly conference calls with investors and receive reports with analyst commentary on the Company’s performance;

Our Board receives updates on the communication received from the Company’s reporting helplines; and

Our Board values direct stockholder engagement with the Company, which is detailed below.

Devon has a long-standing practice of engagement with our stockholders throughout the year with respect to corporate governance, executive compensation, and other topics. Over the past year, Devon has continued to emphasize engagement with our stockholders, especially with respect to ESG matters. The Company has participated in numerous one-on-one meetings with investors who have a wide range of perspectives. Our Board receives frequent updates on these engagements and has been keen to hear specific input. We value the dialogue and feedback received from this engagement and, as a result, have been responsive by making meaningful changes to our programs and practices.

Contact Information for Communicating with Board Members

Any stockholder or other interested party may contact any of our Non-Management Directors or Non-Management Directors as a group, by:

U.S. mail to Non-Management Directors, c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary, Devon Energy Corporation, 333 W. Sheridan Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102;

calling our Non-Management Directors access line at (866) 888-6179; or

sending an email to nonmanagement.directors@dvn.com.

A Management Director may be contacted by:

U.S. mail to Management Directors, c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary, Devon Energy Corporation, 333 W. Sheridan Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102;

contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary at (405) 235-3611; or

sending an email to CorporateSecretary@dvn.com.

If requested, calls or correspondence remain anonymous and will be kept confidential to the extent possible. All such communications, other than advertisements or commercial solicitations, will be forwarded to the appropriate Director(s) for review.

26Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE PAID

Director Compensation

Director compensation is reviewed and determined annually by the Board acting upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The Committee periodically obtains data on the director compensation for Devon’s principal competitors and other comparable companies. The Committee also engages an independent consultant (Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC) to supplement such data and provide additional information on director compensation and other compensation-related practices. Meridian is also retained by the Committee to advise on executive compensation. Aside from the foregoing, Meridian performs no other work for Devon.

The standard arrangement for compensating our non-management Directors consists of cash and equity awards. Devon employees receive no additional compensation for serving as Directors. Non-management Directors are also eligible to participate in the Company’s charitable gift program subject to the same terms as employees. This program, which was established in 2022, matches contributions (up to $10,000 per year) made to charitable organizations by Directors and employees.

Annual Retainers

The annual cash retainers in effect for 2022 are set forth in the table below:

Type of Fee Amount 

Annual Board Retainer

 $100,000 

Additional Annual Lead Director Retainer

 $25,000

Additional Annual Retainer to the Chair of Audit Committee

 $25,000

Additional Annual Retainer to the Chairs of Compensation, GEPP, and Reserves Committees

 $15,000

Additional Annual Retainer to Audit Committee Members

 $2,000 

Each Non-Management Director is reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred while serving as a Director, which includes expenses associated with attending Board meetings and other functions arising from their responsibilities as a Director.

The Committee reviewed the compensation of Devon’s Board Chair in advance of the retirement of David Hager, Devon’s Executive Chair until January 7, 2023, from the Board. The Committee recommended, and the Board approved, an annual retainer in the amount of $175,000 for Devon’s Board Chair, with such amount divided evenly (50/50) between equity and cash. The retainer is in addition to the base retainer for Board members. Barbara Baumann was appointed Devon’s Board Chair effective with Mr. Hager’s retirement.

Equity Awards to Directors

The Board compensates Directors in part through equity awards (LTI Awards) in order to align the Directors’ and stockholders’ interests in the long-term performance of the Company. During 2022, Directors were granted LTI Awards under our 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2022 LTIP), having a value of $230,000. Equity awards to non-management Directors are granted immediately following each Annual Meeting. The shares underlying LTI Awards fully vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant subject to the conditions set forth in the 2022 LTIP and applicable grant agreements. Beginning with LTI Awards made following the 2023 Annual Meeting, non-management Directors have the option to receive LTI Awards as Restricted Stock Units with a deferred payment date rather than the standard Restricted Stock Awards that would otherwise be paid after one year. Cash dividends accrue on unvested shares. With Restricted Stock Awards, dividends are paid upon vesting. Restricted Stock Units provide optionality with respect to the form, and the timing of payment, of dividends.

27Commitment Runs Deep


HOW WE ARE PAID (cont’d)

Total Compensation for Non-Management Directors for 20221

The following table reflects the fees earned or paid to our Directors for Board service in 2022 and the stock awards granted to our Directors in 2022.

  Name Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash ($)
  Stock Awards2
($)
  Gift Matching
Contribution
($)
  

Total

($)

 

  Barbara M. Baumann

  117,000   230,049      347,049 

  John E. Bethancourt

  115,000   230,049   10,000   355,049 

  Ann G. Fox

  100,000   230,049   10,000   340,049 

  Kelt Kindick

  125,000   230,049   9,500   364,549 

  John Krenicki Jr.

  102,000   230,049   10,000   332,049 

  Karl Kurz

  100,000   230,049      330,049 

  Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr.

  115,000   230,049      345,049 

  Duane C. Radtke

  100,000   230,049   2,500   332,549 

  Valerie M. Williams

  125,000   230,049      355,049 

1

Throughout 2022, David Hager served (i) as Executive Chair of the Board and (ii) as an executive officer of the Company. Because he was an employee of the Company, he received no additional compensation for his services as a Director.

2

The dollar amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair values of the stock awards made to all non-management Directors on June 8, 2022, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to value stock awards are discussed in Note 4 – Share-Based Compensation of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, each of the non-management Directors as of such date held an unvested stock award for 2,952 shares of Devon common stock. As noted in “Equity Awards to Directors” above, dividends on the awards are not paid until shares vest.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Throughout 2022, the Compensation Committee was solely comprised of independent Directors with no interlocking relationships as defined by the SEC.

28Commitment Runs Deep


OUR CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Board of Directors maintains an Audit Committee which is currently comprised of threefour independent Directors. The Board and the Audit Committee believe that the Audit Committee’s current membership satisfies the rules of the NYSE and the SEC that govern audit committee composition, including the requirement that all audit committee members all be independent, directors as that term is defined under the listing standards of the NYSE, and the requirement that at least one member of the Audit Committee is a financial expert. For purposes of complying with the listing standards of the NYSE, the Board has determined that none of the Directors is currently serving on the audit committees of more than three public companies. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The CharterDirectors, which is available atwww.devonenergy.com. www.devonenergy.com.

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements and the establishment and maintenance of the system of internal controls. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the areas of reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities,

For 2022, the Audit Committee reviewed with management internal controls over financial reporting in accordance withperformed the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the audited financial statements in the Annual Report. This review included a discussion of the quality, and the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

In fulfilling its duties during 2011, the Audit Committee:following key duties:

 

•  Reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditors the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and the audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, that has been filed with the SEC;

•  Discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC;

•  Discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter received from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and

•  Considered whether the provision of non-audit services by the independent auditors is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.

reviewed with the independent auditors their opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and the effective operation of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting;

reviewed with the independent auditors their judgment as to the quality and the acceptability of the Company’s accounting principles and other matters;

discussed with the independent auditors other matters under generally accepted auditing standards, including Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114, the Auditor’s Communication with those charged with governance;

discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter received from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence;

discussed with the independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit; and

met with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their audit and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

In relianceBased on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20112022, that has been filed with the SEC. The

Audit Committee has approved KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Mary P. Ricciardello, Chairman

Robert H. Henry

Michael M. Kanovsky

LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO
Valerie M. Williams, Chair        Gennifer F. Kelly                  John Krenicki Jr.            Michael N. Mears    

 

 2029 Commitment Runs Deep


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT (cont’d)

 

Fees to Independent Auditors’ FeesAuditor

Under the terms of its Charter, the Audit Committee has the responsibility to approve the fees paid to the independent auditors. For the years ended December 31, 20112021, and December 31, 2010,2022, the following fees were paid to KPMG LLP:

 

   2011  2010 

Audit fees

 $3,423,000   $3,300,000  

Audit related fees

  499,000    132,000  

Tax fees

  189,000    267,000  

All other fees

  281,000      
  $4,392,000   $3,699,000  
   2022  2021 

  Audit fees1

 $3,550,000  $3,951,500 

  Audit-related fees2

  123,000   135,000 

  Tax fees3

     19,762 

  All other fees

      

  Total

 $3,673,000  $4,106,262 

Audit fees included services for the audits of the financial statements and the effective operation of our internal controls over financial reporting. Audit related fees consisted principally of audits of financial statements of certain affiliates and subsidiaries, certain accounting consultation and review and assessment of certain processes and contracts related to certain of our information systems. Tax fees consisted of tax compliance and tax consulting fees. All other fees relate to a review and assessment of our primary data center.

1

Audit fees included services for the audits of the Company’s financial statements and the effective operation of its internal controls over financial reporting.

2

Audit-related fees consisted principally of fees for audits of financial statements of certain of the Company’s affiliates and subsidiaries.

3

Tax fees consisted of tax consulting fees related to an unclaimed property examination of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has pre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of audit and non-audit services. Under these procedures, the Audit Committee pre-approves both the type of services to be provided by KPMG LLP and the estimated fees related to these services. During the approval process, the Audit Committee considers the impact of the types of services and the related fees on the independence of the auditors. The services and fees must be deemed compatible with the maintenance of the auditors’ independence, including compliance with SEC rules and regulations.

All of the 20112022 and 20102021 audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG LLP were approved by the Audit Committee. The non-audit services that were approved by the Audit Committee were also reviewed to ensure compatibility with maintaining the auditors’ independence, and the Audit Committee determined the auditors’ independence was not impaired.

Audit Committee Financial Expertise

The Board has determined that the Company has an audit committee financial expert (as defined by SEC regulations) serving on its Audit Committee, Ms. Williams. The Board has also determined, in accordance with NYSE listing standards, that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate.

 

 2130 Commitment Runs Deep


RESERVES COMMITTEE REPORT

AGENDA ITEM 2.

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2023

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent auditing firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. To carry out this responsibility, the Audit Committee engages in a comprehensive annual evaluation of the independent auditor’s qualifications, performance, and independence; considers whether the auditing firm should be rotated, including the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm and adopting a policy of regular rotation; and negotiates the audit fees associated with the Company’s retention of the independent auditing firm. The Audit Committee has selected KPMG LLP (KPMG) to serve as our independent auditing firm for 2023.

In 2004,accordance with SEC rules and KPMG policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide service to our Company. For lead and concurring audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years. The selection of the Company’s lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a rigorous process, including interviews of potential audit partner candidates with the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders. In furtherance of its commitment to corporate governance practices, the Board is asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023. In the event that our stockholders fail to ratify the selection of KPMG, the Audit Committee will consider the selection of a different independent auditing firm for 2024.

Representatives of KPMG will be present at the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

Our Board of Directors established arecommends that stockholders vote

“FOR” the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent auditors for 2023.

31Commitment Runs Deep


RESERVES COMMITTEE REPORT

The Reserves Committee that is currently comprised of threesix independent Directors. The Reserves CommitteeDirectors and operates under a written charter approved by the Board thatof Directors, which is available atwww.devonenergy.com. www.devonenergy.com. The Reserves Committee oversees, on behalf of the Board, the integrity of the Company’s oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves data. Management and our independent engineering consultants have the primary responsibility for the preparation of the reserves reports. In fulfillingconnection with its oversight responsibilities, the Reserves Committee reviewed with management the internal procedures relating to the disclosure of reserves in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,2022, having regard to industry practices and all applicable laws and regulations. In fulfilling its duties during 2011,

For 2022, the Reserves Committee:

 

•  Approved DeGolyer & MacNaughton as the Company’s independent engineering consultant for the year ended December 31, 2022;

•  Reviewed with the independent engineering consultant the scope of the annual review of the Company’s reserves;

•  Met with the independent engineering consultant, with and without management, to review and consider the evaluation of the reserves and any other matters of concern with respect to the evaluation of the reserves;

•  Reviewed and approved any statement of reserves data or similar reserves information, and any report of the independent engineering consultants regarding such reserves to be filed with any securities regulatory authorities or to be disseminated to the public;

•  Reviewed the internal procedures relating to the disclosure of reserves; and

•  Reviewed the qualifications and independence of the independent engineering consultant prior to their appointment and throughout their engagement.

approved AJM Deloitte and LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. as the Company’s independent engineering consultants for the year ended December 31, 2011;

reviewed with the independent engineering consultants the scope of the annual review of the Company’s reserves;

met with the independent engineering consultants, with and without management, to review and consider the evaluation of the reserves and any other matters of concern in respect to the evaluation of the reserves;

reviewed and approved any statement of reserves data or similar reserves information, and any report of the independent engineering consultants regarding such reserves to be filed with any securities regulatory authorities or to be disseminated to the public;

reviewed the internal procedures relating to the disclosure of reserves; and

reviewed the qualifications and independence of the independent engineering consultants prior to their appointment and throughout their engagement.

In relianceBased on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Reserves Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the reserves information be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20112022, that has been filed with the SEC.

MichaelReserves Committee

LOGO

John E. Bethancourt,

Chair

LOGO

Gennifer F. Kelly

LOGO

John Krenicki Jr

LOGO

Karl F. Kurz

LOGO

Duane C. Radtke

LOGO

Valerie M. Williams

32Commitment Runs Deep


OUR COMPANY

WHO WE ARE

Our Officers

Information concerning our executive officers is set forth below. Information concerning Richard E. Muncrief, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is set forth under the caption “Our Nominees for Election”.

Dennis C. Cameron, Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Mr. Cameron, 60, was appointed executive vice president and general counsel in January 2021 following Devon’s merger with WPX. He is responsible for the Devon’s legal and public and government affairs functions. Cameron most recently served as executive vice president and general counsel of WPX. He joined WPX in 2012, previously serving as senior vice president and general counsel, vice president and deputy general counsel and assistant general counsel. Cameron has over 25 years of legal experience. He began his career in 1987 at GableGotwals, a private, full service firm he was with until joining WPX. Cameron is a member of the Oklahoma, Texas, Tulsa County, and American Bar associations, as well as The Foundation for Natural Resources and Energy Law. He holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and a law degree, both from the University of Oklahoma.

Tana K. Cashion, Executive Vice President Human Resources and Administration

Ms. Cashion, 51, was appointed to the position of executive vice president of human resources and administration in February 2022. Cashion is responsible for Devon’s human resources, corporate communications, community relations, and multiple administration functions. Cashion joined Devon in 2005 and has held roles of increasing responsibility, including vice president of human resources and most recently, senior vice president of human resources and administration. Before joining Devon, Cashion worked in the retail, wholesale, and tourism industries. She has a bachelor’s degree in political science from Pepperdine University and a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Oklahoma.

Clay M. Kanovsky, ChairmanGaspar, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr.

Duane C. Radtke

Mr. Gaspar, 51, was appointed executive vice president and chief operating officer in January 2021 following Devon’s merger with WPX. He is responsible for Devon’s geosciences, reservoir, production, drilling, completions, facilities, field operations, environmental, health and safety, and ESG functions. Gaspar most recently served as president and chief operating officer of WPX and served on the company’s board of directors. He joined WPX in 2014, previously serving as senior vice president and chief operating officer and senior vice president of operations and resource development. Prior to joining WPX, he worked for Newfield Exploration, Anadarko Petroleum, and Mewbourne Oil serving in a number of technical and leadership roles. Gaspar is a registered professional engineer and a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. He holds a bachelor’s degree in petroleum engineering from Texas A&M University and a master’s degree in petroleum and geosciences engineering from the University of Texas.

 

 2233 Commitment Runs Deep


WHO WE ARE (cont’d)

David G. Harris, Executive Vice President and Chief Corporate Development Officer

Mr. Harris, 49, was appointed to the position of executive vice president and chief corporate development officer in January 2021. Harris is responsible for Devon’s business development, new ventures, subsurface, land, and technology functions. Prior to the WPX merger, he served as executive vice president of exploration and production responsible for all of Devon’s business units, as well as land, technology, subsurface, and environment, health and safety groups. He has previously served as senior vice president of exploration and production, senior vice president of business development, vice president of corporate finance and treasurer, and as associate general counsel. Harris has been with Devon since 2007. Prior to joining Devon, he was a partner in the Dallas office of Thompson & Knight LLP, specializing in corporate and securities matters. Harris holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Tulsa and a law degree from the University of Oklahoma.

Jeffrey L. Ritenour, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Ritenour, 49, was appointed to the position of executive vice president and chief financial officer in April 2017. Ritenour is responsible for Devon’s corporate finance, treasury, planning, reserves, accounting, tax, internal audit, investor relations, marketing, and supply chain functions. He has been with Devon since 2001, serving in various leadership roles, most recently as senior vice president of corporate finance, investor relations, and treasury. Before joining Devon, Ritenour was with Ernst & Young in Dallas. He holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting and a master’s degree in business administration, both from the University of Oklahoma.

34Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 2.3.

APPROVE, IN AN ADVISORY VOTE, EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with SEC rules,Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. At the 2017 Annual Meeting, you approved our proposal to provide you with this opportunity on an annual basis. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather our overall compensation policies and practices relating to our named executive officers as disclosed in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and other related tables and narrative disclosure. Accordingly, we will ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the 20122023 Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20122023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 20112022 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and narrative disclosure.”

This vote, normally called a “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” vote, is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee, or our Board of Directors.the Board. The Board will, however, as it did last year,has in prior years, take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future compensation arrangements.

The

Our Board of Directors recommends athat stockholders vote “FOR”

“FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

 2335 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

AGENDA ITEM 4.

APPROVE, IN AN ADVISORY VOTE, THE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE ON

EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking our stockholders to indicate how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, such as Agenda Item 3 included on page 35 of this Proxy Statement. By voting on this Agenda Item 4, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every one, two, or three years.

After careful consideration of this proposal, the Board has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for Devon and our stockholders, and therefore the Board recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation. In reaching this recommendation, the Board considered that an annual vote allows stockholders to provide frequent, ongoing input on our executive compensation program. Moreover, the Board believes that seeking annual input from its stockholders on its executive compensation program is a key component of Devon’s ongoing dialogue with stockholders on executive compensation and other corporate governance matters.

Stockholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation on this agenda item. Instead, you may cast your vote on the voting frequency by choosing among three frequency options – the option of one, two, or three years – or you may abstain from voting.

Although this advisory vote on the frequency of the “say-on-pay” vote is non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. The Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and Devon to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option receiving the highest number of votes from our stockholders.

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote for the option of “ONE YEAR” as the frequency

with which stockholders are asked to provide an advisory vote on executive compensation.

36Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

37Commitment Runs Deep


IntroductionEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

In thisIntroduction

Purpose of Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), we will outline our outlines Devon’s compensation philosophy and describedescribes the material components of ourthe Company’s executive compensation practices and programsprogram for the following “namedits named executive officers” whose (NEOs). This CD&A also summarizes decisions the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee) made under the program for 2022. Additional information about the compensation of the NEOs is set forthprovided in the 20112022 Summary Compensation Table and other compensation tables contained inthat follow this proxy statement:CD&A.

Named Executive Officers

The NEOs for 2022 are the following individuals:

 

Executive Position

John RichelsRichard E. Muncrief

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

J. Larry Nichols

Executive Chairman

Jeffrey A. AgostaL. Ritenour

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Clay M. Gaspar

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

David A. HagerG. Harris

 

Executive Vice President Exploration and Production

Chief Corporate Development Officer

Darryl G. SmetteDennis C. Cameron

 

Executive Vice President Marketing, Midstream and Supply Chain

General Counsel

This CD&A also summarizes the compensation decisions we made under these programs and the factors we considered in making those decisions.Executive Summary

The compensation objectives, practices, and programs discussed in this CD&A also apply to the four Executive Vice Presidents of the Company who are not named executive officers. In this CD&A, the term “executive officers” refers to the group that includes both the named executive officers and the other Executive Vice Presidents.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

It is our goalDevon was formed in 1971 and has been publicly held since 1988. Since 2010, the Company has successfully transitioned to be the premier independent oila liquids-rich (oil and natural gas company inliquids), higher-margin, onshore North AmericaAmerican production base and continues to provide our stockholders with top-quartile returns over the long-term. To achieve this, we strivetransform its organizational structures and processes to optimize ourallocate capital investments to maximize growth in cash flow, earnings, productionthe Company’s most promising assets. On January 7, 2021, Devon and reserves, all on a per debt-adjusted share basis. This demands that the Company exercise capital discipline, maintain superior financial strength, invest inWPX Energy, Inc completed an all-stock merger of equals (the Merger). WPX was an oil and gas propertiesexploration and production company with assets in the Delaware Basin in Texas and New Mexico and the Williston Basin in North Dakota. The Merger enhanced the scale of the Company’s operations and built a leading position in the Delaware Basin. Devon has delivered strong full-cycle margins, balance our productionreturns on its investments through a dynamic culture focused on innovation, safety, operational excellence, environmental stewardship, and resource mix between oil, natural gas liquidssocial responsibility. The Company focuses its business on generating positive operating returns by managing a premier asset portfolio, delivering superior execution, and natural gas, maintainexercising discipline in capital allocation. Devon also maintains a low overall cost structure,strong commitment to financial strength and establish an appropriate balance between resource capture and resource development.flexibility through all commodity price cycles, as reflected in the Company’s investment grade credit ratings.

This operatingThe success of Devon’s strategy requiresis founded on apay-for-performance compensation philosophy that recognizes near-termintended to motivate near- term operational and financial success as well as decision-making that supports long-term stockholder value creation. For these reasons,The Committee utilizes a range of quantitative and strategic measures to evaluate performance, evolving the Company’s executive compensation program is designedmeasures as appropriate. Additionally, the Committee considers Devon’s size and scope relative to strike a balance between the near-term and the long-term by providing executive officers annual performance cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards. Properly allocating these compensation elements is critical in motivating executive officers to carry out our operating strategy.its peer group when setting compensation. Overall, the value of an executive officer’s total compensation is weighted in favor of long-term incentives in order to focus the officer’s efforts on the long-term performance of the Companyemphasize value creation and to encourage the executive to remain at the Company.

24Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

stockholder alignment.

The objectives of ourDevon’s compensation program are to:

motivate and reward executives to drive and achieve the Company’s goal of increasing stockholder value;

allocate incentives for the achievement of near-term and long-term objectives, in a manner that motivates executives to take measured and appropriate risk; and

 

attract and retain highly trained, experienced, and committed executives who have the skills, education, business acumen, and background to leadcreate value in a large and diversified oil and gas business;business.

 

38Commitment Runs Deep


motivate and reward executives to drive and achieve our goal of increasing stockholder value;

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

provide balanced incentives for the achievement of near-term and long-term objectives, without motivating executives to take excessive risk; and

track and respond to developments such as tightening of the labor market or changes in competitive pay practices.

The primary components of ourDevon’s executive compensation programs consist ofprogram are base salary, annuala performance cash bonus, and long-term equity incentive awards. Welong- term incentives (LTI). The Committee generally targettargets each component, as well as the aggregate of the components, at approximately the 50th percentile of market compensation comparables within a group of industrythe Company’s peer companies. group.

Individual compensation levels may vary from these targets based on performance, expertise, experience, responsibilities, or other factors unique to the individual orindividual’s role within the Company. WeThe Committee also provideprovides retirement and other benefits in order to compete with the practices of ourtypical for Devon’s peer group.

Response to 2011 Say-on-Pay Vote2022 Company Performance Highlights and the Impact on Compensation

The Company’s 2011 say-on-pay vote yielded a 56 percent approval. While the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (Committee) believes the type of awards historically utilizedIn 2022, Devon marked its 51st anniversary in the Company’s executive compensation packageoil and the structured process through which the Committee determined compensation levels has served stockholders well over the long term, the Committee felt it appropriategas business and its 34th year as a public company. The successful, strategic Merger accelerated Devon’s transition to direct Company management to seek more specific stockholder feedback following the vote. In response, Company management contacted 25 stockholders that collectively held approximately 46.5%a cash-return business model and was matched by excellent performance on most of the Company’s stock. Manyfinancial and operational goals. Devon’s portfolio was further strengthened in 2022 following the completion of two acquisitions in the Williston Basin and Eagle Ford that were highly complementary to its existing positions in each basin. In addition, commodity prices strengthened in 2021 and continued to strengthen throughout the majority of 2022, which significantly improved the Company’s earnings and cash flow generation. The actions taken and leadership provided by the executives during 2022 led to strong operational and financial results for Devon.

The Company’s accomplishments in 2022 are illustrated by the following highlights:

Operational and financial achievements

•  Devon’s 2022 oil production averaged 299 MBbls/d, which is a 3% increase from 2021;

•  the Company exited 2022 with $4.5 billion of liquidity, including $1.5 billion of cash;

•  Devon invested approximately $100 million in emissions reduction capital projects in 2022;

•  Devon generated $8.5 billion of operating cash flow in 2022, which is a 74% increase from prior year; and

Operating  

Cash Flow of  

$8.5 Billion  

•  the Company completed approximately 65% of its authorized $2.0 billion share repurchase program, with 25.7 million of its    common shares repurchased for $1.3 billion, or $50.90 per share, since the inception of the plan.

Total stockholder return

•  Devon’s high share price for 2022 was $79.40, an 80% increase from the end of 2021;

•  when incorporating reinvested dividends and the Company’s closing stock price of 2022, $61.51, Devon’s total shareholder return (TSR) for the year was 50.7%;

•  including variable dividends, Devon paid dividends of approximately $3.4 billion in 2022 and has declared $579 million of dividends to be paid in the first quarter of 2023, which is inclusive of an 11% increase to our fixed quarterly dividend to $0.20 per share; and

50.7% 

Shareholder 

Return & 

$3.4 Billion in  

Dividends 

•  for the three and five-year periods ending on December 31, 2022, Devon posted the highest and second highest TSR of the Company’s peer group, respectively.

39Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Response to Stockholder Feedback

Devon conducts investor outreach throughout each year to ensure that management and the Board understand issues that matter to Devon’s stockholders. During 2022, the Company had contact with more than 600 investors or their representatives. Devon reviews the feedback resulting from its investors and implements changes, as appropriate. The Committee generally utilizes compensation metrics that the investor community considers most important in assessing the performance of the Company and considers such metrics in its compensation decisions, including its annual performance bonus calculation as set forth on page 43. In addition, Devon is disclosing its prospective 2023 scorecard (page 45) at the request of stockholders. Devon also considers the results of the most recent advisory vote on executive compensation by Devon’s stockholders, which for 2022 reflected that approximately 95% of voting stockholders voted “for” Devon’s executive compensation in 2021. With a clear majority of shareholder support for our executive compensation program, Devon did not make any material changes to the executive compensation program during the 2022 year. For a further description of Devon’s history of stockholder outreach, see prior Proxy Statements.

95% Support    

in 2022

What Devon Does and Doesn’t Do

Good Compensation Governance Practiced by Devon

•  Award Performance-Based LTI—The Company awards 60% of NEO LTI in the form of Performance Share Units (PSUs) tied to TSR. A 100% of target payout on PSUs requires TSR that exceeds the peer group median and positive TSR for the performance period is required for a payout of more than 100% of target.

•  Utilize a Quantitative Process for Performance Bonuses—The goals, their weightings, thresholds, and maximums are determined at the beginning of the year. At the end of the year, the Committee evaluates performance on the goals, assigning each a score between 0% and 200%. The total performance score is determined by multiplying each goal’s score by its weighting and aggregating.

•  Tie Realizable Pay Opportunities to Company Performance—The Committee regularly reviews the realizable pay of the President and CEO and other executive officers in light of Company performance. This has resulted in pay that aligns with Company performance.

•  Require Executives to Hold Devon Stock—Board-adopted guidelines establish minimum stock ownership levels for the executive officers.

•  Provide for Clawback of Compensation—Pursuant to a Board-adopted policy, the Committee may claw back performance bonuses and LTI if the Company restates its financial statements.

•  Dialog to Promote Continuous Improvement—On an annual basis, the Committee conducts in-depth, confidential, one-on-one interviews with each executive officer, which is a highly effective tool in the Committee’s oversight.

40Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Controversial Compensation Governance Not Practiced by Devon

Enter into Egregious Employment Agreements—The Company does not enter into contracts containing multi- year guarantees of salary increases or non-performance-based bonuses or equity compensation.

Allow Excessive Severance Benefits and/or Liberal Change-in-Control Payments—Employment agreements do not provide cash payments that exceed three times base salary plus target/average/last paid bonus; do not contain liberal change-in-control definitions; and, do not provide severance payments without job loss (i.e., no “single trigger” cash severance or equity vesting solely with a change-in-control).

Allow Risky Transactions in the Company’s Stock—Company policy prohibits the executives from engaging in short-term or speculative transactions or hedging or pledging Devon’s common stock.

Reprice or Replace Underwater Options—The Company does not reprice or replace underwater stock options.

Permit Abusive Perquisites Practices—Perquisites made available to the executives are limited.

Elements of 2022 Compensation

Overview of 2022 Pay Decisions

Most of the stockholders were willing to provide their insight and perspective on ourCompany’s overall executive compensation practices.is delivered through performance bonuses and LTI awards, each of which correlate with Company performance. The conversationsCommittee considered incentive compensation for 2022 at two different times. At the January 2022 meetings, the Committee considered 2022 LTI grants and salary increases. At the Committee’s January 2023 meeting, the Committee considered the award of 2022 performance bonuses.

As illustrated below, compensation decisions made by the Committee resulted in meaningful feedbackawards heavily weighted toward TSR and achievement of other 2022 Company performance measures. Approximately 91% of the value of total direct compensation awarded to the President and CEO, and an average of approximately 87% of the value of total direct compensation awarded to the other NEOs, was delivered through performance bonuses and LTI.

LOGO

Each year, the Committee refers to the following factors in considering any compensation decisions for the NEOs:

Company performance in relation to goals pre-approved by the Board, including the Company’s TSR performance as compared to peers;

41Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

each NEO’s individual performance during the year, including the performance of the business or organizational unit for which the officer is responsible;

Devon’s pay-for-performance compensation philosophy and objectives (see section titled “Compensation Philosophy & Objectives” on page 38);

input from the Compensation Consultant (see section titled “Role of Compensation Consultant” on page 48 for additional information);

the Committee’s review of competitive market data provided by the Compensation Consultant; and

the President and CEO’s recommendations with respect to the compensation of the other NEOs.

The Committee regularly reviews the above-listed factors when considering compensation decisions and from time-to-time changes or supplements its analysis with other factors.

Base Salary

Base salary typically represents a smaller portion of total executive compensation than the combination of long-term incentives and performance bonus, which vary year-to-year based on performance. Competitive salaries, however, are vital to ensuring that included two consistent areasthe Company attracts and retains executives who have a combination of comment: (1)business acumen, significant industry experience, and length of service with the determinationCompany. In evaluating salary levels each year, the Committee generally considers the following factors:

the competitive position of compensation awards under the executive’s base salary compared to similarly situated executives at Devon’s benchmark peer companies, as set forth on page 49;

the scope of responsibility, experience, and tenure of the executive and the executive’s potential to take on greater or different responsibilities; and

the Company’s incentive programs (i.e., annual performance cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards) lacked transparency and did not appearcost structure.

Based on the foregoing considerations, the Committee approved salary increases for all NEOs at its January 2022 meetings. The Summary Compensation Table’s entries for “Salary” reflect the base salary received by the NEOs during 2022 from Devon. Those entries may be different than the rates listed below due to be sufficiently tied to pre-set performance goals, and (2)salary changes taking effect after the Company’s transition plan related to the June 2010 promotionstart of Mr. Richels to CEO and transition of Mr. Nichols to Executive Chairman was not clearly articulated and the transition was not reflected2022.

Executive 

Annual

Salary

Rate in Effect
12/31/211

  

2022

Annual Salary
Rate Set at

January
Meetings1

  

%

Change

 

Richard E. Muncrief

 $1,100.0  $1,138.5   3.5

Jeffrey L. Ritenour

 $620.0  $641.7   3.5

Clay M. Gaspar

 $620.0  $641.7   3.5

David G. Harris

 $610.0  $631.4   3.5

Dennis C. Cameron

 $4 75.0  $500.0   5.3

1 Dollar amounts shown in their relative compensation levels.thousands.

 

 2542 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Annual Performance Bonus

In awarding performance bonuses, the Committee uses a formula that establishes a performance-bonus target for each NEO based on a percentage of his base salary. In establishing performance-bonus targets, the Committee considers industry benchmarks for the relevant officer position as well as the scope of responsibility associated with the position. For 2022, performance-bonus targets for NEOs ranged from 80% to 130% of base salary rate, which is consistent with the performance-bonus range of the peer company executives of Devon’s benchmark peers as set forth on page 49.

Performance-bonus payouts depend on the Company’s performance in relation to the structured and measurable goals approved by the Board at the beginning of the year and the individual executive’s contributions to the achievement of those goals. The goals were selected because they are critical to the Company’s near-term performance, its prospects for sustainable growth in returns, and the creation of long-term value for the Company and its stockholders.

The table below provides detail on the Company’s performance on the goals set for 2022. As reflected in the table, the Board assigns a separate weighting to each performance measure in order to reflect the relative importance of those areas for the year. The Committee aggregates the weighted performance score for each measure to arrive at an overall Company performance score.

The process for determining performance bonuses relies on Company performance measures and the application of set formulas to arrive at the bonus amounts. However, the Committee maintains the authority to adjust the amount of an executive’s performance bonus within the range of the bonus pool (0% to 200% of target) based upon individual contributions, market conditions, or other factors. For 2022, the Committee adjusted the weighted score for the performance bonus down to emphasize the importance of continuous improvement in operational safety and performance within the “ESG & Community Engagement” goal.

 

Measure  Threshold  Goal  Maximum  Outcome  Weight  Score5  Weighted
Score
Free Cash Flow1 ($, Millions)  $3,250  $4,000  $5,000  $5,986  25%  200%  50.00%
Cash Return on Capital Employed1,2 (CROCE)  25%  35%  60%  61%  25%  200%  50.00%
Total Capital Expenditures1 ($, Millions)  $2,860  $2,601  $2,340  $2,770  10%  67%  6.70%
Total Oil and Gas Production (MBOE/day)  570  592  660  610  10%  115%  11.50%
ESG & Community Engagement3  See Footnote 3  15%  160%  24.00%
Emissions Reduction4  See Footnote 4  15%  175%  26.25%
Score Card Total, Before Adjustment  168.45%
Score Card Total, After Adjustment  165.00%

Changes to Our Compensation Programs in 2011

The Committee awarded performance bonuses commensurate with the superior overall performance of the Company reflected by results on the performance scorecard. The Company outperformed the targets on all 2022 goals for the performance scorecard, with the exception of results on “Total Capital Expenditures,” which was influenced by the impacts of inflation, and which fell between the Company’s established threshold and target goal. In response to stockholder feedback,assessing 2022 performance, the Committee has implementedscored the following significant changes:Company highest on its financial goals, “Free Cash Flow” and “Cash Returned on Capital Employed.” During their discussions, the Committee highlighted the Company’s performance on the new standalone “Emissions Reduction” goal.

1

The financial results considered by the Committee when determining the performance bonuses were based on the Company’s best reasonable estimates available at that time. Although the actual results varied from such estimates in certain instances, none of the

 

Stockholder Feedback on 2010
Compensation Practices
 43 Changes to Compensation
Practices in 2011
Addressed
on Page(s)
Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Annual performance cash bonus was perceived as non-formulaic and lacking structure.

 

The bonus determination processvariances were material in amount or significance. These financial measures are not calculated in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to Appendix A for 2011 was more transparent, andadditional information regarding these financial measures, including reconciliations to their most directly comparable GAAP measure.

2

CROCE is a measure of the calculationCompany’s capital efficiency. A reconciliation of bonuses included more structure.this goal to the Company’s financial statements can be found in Appendix A.

 

•  This CD&A sets forth the formula used for calculating bonuses.

•  Executives were assigned target bonus opportunities.

•  Actual payouts vs. target opportunities were based on achievement against pre-set Company performance measures.

33-36

Long-term incentives were in the form of stock options (1/2) and restricted stock (1/2).

The restricted stock provided for vesting over a four-year period without reference to Company performance measures.

3

2011 long-term incentives were 100% performance based. This was achieved through a combination of performance share units tied to total stockholder return (1/3), performance restricted stock tied to a financial metric (1/3), and stock options (1/3).

36-39

The Company’s transition plan related“ESG & Community Engagement” goal is comprised of ESG goals (70% of total) and Community Engagement goals (30% of total). The ESG goals consisted of (i) SIF (Serious Incident & Fatality) Event Reduction, which included a goal of a SIF recordable incident rate of 0.07 for the number of recordable SIF events experienced per 200,000 employee hours worked and received a Company result of 0.05, exceeding the goal, (ii) Reduction of Spill Rate, which included a goal to reduce spilled barrels to 21.99 barrels of liquid spilled per 1,000,000 barrels of liquid transported and received a Company result of 29.67, falling below the June 2010 promotionset goal, (iii) Utilization of Mr. Richels to CEOSIF Learnings, which ensures that SIF events are investigated in a timely manner and transition of Mr. Nichols to Executive Chairman was not clearly articulated and the transition was not reflected in their relative compensation levels.

As contemplated in the transition plan adopted bySIF learnings are implemented throughout the Company to prevent future occurrences, and (iv) EHS Management System, which ensures that the Company is on track to meet leading indicators and integrate critical initiatives.

The Community Engagement goals consisted of (i) Strategic Enhancement of STEM Education that included the goal of supporting 500 classrooms, 50,000 students, and 1,000 teachers, which goal was exceeded by supporting over 1,900 classrooms, over 100,000 students, and over 2,500 teachers, (ii) Expansion of Reach of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Charitable Programing that included the goal of cultivating partnerships with five new organizations, which goal was exceeded by reaching ten new organizations, and (iii) Increasing Employee Engagement through Community Programs, which goal was exceeded by having 125 employees participate in 2010 uponDevon’s charitable match program while maintaining participation rates in Devon’s Give for Good charitable campaign.

The score on the promotion“ESG & Community Engagement” goal was 160% of Mr. Richels to CEOtarget.

4

The “Emissions Reduction” Goal consisted of (i) Flaring Intensity Reduction and the transition of Mr. Nichols to Executive Chairman, the combined performance cash bonus and long-term incentives(ii) Enhanced Leak Detection Program, each 50% of the Executive Chairman decreased by 61%.

Base salarytotal. The goal for Flaring Intensity Reduction was to reduce the amount of Executive Chairman was reduced from $1,500,000gas flared to $1,000,000.

31

Employment agreements with executive officers included tax gross-up payment obligations in0.75% of gross natural gas production or below. The Company achieved a result of 0.46% of gross natural gas production, exceeding the event0.75% goal. For Enhanced Leak Detection, Devon achieved the following results on its sub-goals: (i) conducted optical gas imaging surveys at 100% of facilities (versus a change in controlgoal of 100%), (ii) conducted semi-annual surveys at 100% of facilities (versus a goal of 100%), and (iii) installed continuous or near-continuous emissions detection and monitoring equipment on 31% of the Company.Company’s production (versus a goal of 20%).

5 

Employment agreements have been amended to eliminate tax gross-up payment obligations.

41

Significant portions of executive compensation were not eligible for tax deduction under IRS Section 162(m)Outcomes that fall below the Threshold are scored at 0%; Outcomes between Threshold and Goal are scored between 50% and 100%; Outcomes between Goal and Maximum are scored between 100% and 200%; and Outcomes that exceed the Maximum are scored at 200%.

Cash bonus and long-term incentives have been re-designed to be performance-based compensation and, subject to certain approvals, eligible for tax deduction under IRS Section 162(m).

42

These changes further strengthenThe following table outlines the tie between executive officer pay and performance. Ascalculations made for the performance bonuses awarded to NEOs for 2022:1

Executive Annual Salary
Rate1
     Bonus Target     

Adjusted
Company
Performance

Score

     Performance
Bonus1
 
     

Richard E. Muncrief

 $1,138.5   
Multiplied
by
 
 
  130%        
Multiplied
by
 
 
  165%        Equals  $2,442.1 

Jeffrey L. Ritenour

 $641.7   90%       $952.9 

Clay M. Gaspar

 $641.7   100%       $1,058.8 
     

David G. Harris

 $631.4    90%           $937.6 
     

Dennis C. Cameron

 $500.0  

 

 

 

  80%       

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $660.0 

1

All dollar amounts in thousands.

Please note that the Summary Compensation Table’s entries for Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in 2022 reflect the past,annual performance bonuses listed under the Company will continue its dialogue with stockholders this year and incolumn above titled “Performance Bonus.”

The Committee did not make any individual adjustments for the future seek further feedback on our compensation programs, processes, and outcomes, including the changes we implemented in 2011.2022 NEO performance bonus amounts.

 

 2644 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

2023 Company Performance Scorecard

For further transparency, Devon’s Board decided to proactively disclose a summary of the Company’s anticipated 2023 performance scorecard. The scorecard, summarized below, will be used to analyze Company performance for 2023 and to award executive performance bonuses.

 

MeasureWeight

Free Cash Flow (FCF)

25

Cash Return on Capital Employed (CROCE)

25

Total Capital Expenditures

10

Total Oil & Gas Production

10

ESG & Community Engagement

15

Emissions Reduction

15

Devon’s Board decided that using the same 2022 goals and weightings for the 2023 Company performance scorecard best promotes continued growth of shareholder returns. Performance thresholds, targets, and maximums will, for most or all goals, likely change from 2022 to 2023.

Long-Term Incentives

A key element of Devon’s compensation program is to align pay and performance by rewarding executive officers for long- term strategic accomplishments and enhancement of long-term stockholder value through equity-based incentives that vest over an extended period of time. LTI compensation plays an essential role in attracting and retaining executive officers and aligns their interests with the long-term interests of Devon’s stockholders.

45Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

The following table describes the purpose and structure of the LTI granted to the NEOs at the Committee’s meetings to set 2022 executive compensation:

Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs)

Purpose:

Awards of RSAs foster long-term stock ownership, strengthen alignment with stockholders, and promote executive retention during the vesting period.

Additional Details:

Devon grants RSAs that vest ratably over four years, 25% on each anniversary of the grant date.

Performance Share Units (PSUs)

Purpose:

Awards of PSUs encourage executives to make decisions and take actions that promote Company performance and long-term stockholder return.

Additional Details:

•  Executives may earn between 0% and 200% of the shares underlying the grant based on the Company’s TSR relative to peer companies1 over a three-year performance period (for 2022 grants, January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024).

•  Payout will be determined as of the end of the performance period. The grid below further details the relationship between relative performance and payout levels.

•  Executives may earn the targeted number of shares (100%) only if the Company’s TSR outperforms that of at least half of peers (6th relative position or higher).

•  Without respect to Devon’s relative TSR position, executives may earn no more than the targeted number of shares (100%) if the Company’s TSR is negative during the performance period.

 

PSU Payout Schedule

           

Devon’s Relative

TSR Position

 1st, 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th,12th
       

% of

Shares Earned

 200% 175% 150% 125% 100% 88% 75% 63% 50% 0%

1

The peer companies used for comparison for the PSU grants selected in January 2022 at the time the grant was approved. The peers are APA Corporation, ConocoPhillips, Continental Resources, Inc., Coterra Energy Inc., Diamondback Energy, Inc., EOG Resources, Inc., Marathon Oil Corporation, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Ovintiv Inc., Pioneer Natural Resources Company, and the S&P Midcap 400 Index.

At its January 2022 meetings, the Committee approved LTI grant values that approximated the competitive 50th percentile of the peer group applicable to each NEO. The Committee also determined that the pursuit of strategic Company goals and creation of stockholder value would again be promoted by linking 60% of the LTI awarded for the 2022 year to Company performance and 40% to long-term stock ownership, thereby strengthening the alignment between interests of executives and stockholders. Accordingly, the two types of LTI granted to NEOs were PSUs and time-based restricted stock awards (RSAs), respectively.

46Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

LTI Granted in 20221

Executive Item2 Target
Performance Share
Units3
  Restricted
Stock
  Total 

Richard E. Muncrief

 Shares  100,537   67,025          167,562 
 Grant Value  $5,250   $3,500          $8,750 

Jeffrey L. Ritenour

 Shares  36,768   24,512          61,280 
 Grant Value  $1,920   $1,280          $3,200 

Clay M. Gaspar

 Shares  43,662   29,108          72,770 
 Grant Value  $2,280   $1,520          $3,800 

David G. Harris

 Shares  36,768   24,512          61,280 
 Grant Value  $1,920   $1,280          $3,200 

Dennis C. Cameron

 Shares  22,980   15,320          38,300 
 Grant Value  $1,200   $800          $2,000 

1

Dollar amounts shown in thousands.

2

For each NEO, the Committee first determines the total value of LTI to be awarded then divides the total value between 60% PSUs and 40% RSAs (based on the closing price of the Company stock as of the grant effective date), rounding each up to the next whole share if needed.

3

In accordance with applicable accounting requirements, Devon uses a different valuation method in the Summary Compensation Table (in this case, a Monte Carlo simulation) for PSUs than in this table. The Monte Carlo simulation for PSUs, when valued for purposes of inclusion in next year’s Summary Compensation Table as compensation for 2022, requires Devon to assign a higher value per unit than the closing price of the Company’s stock as of the grant approval date.

Additionally, at its January 2023 meetings, the Committee certified that the Company achieved the highest TSR out of a 12-company peer group for the three-year period associated with the PSUs granted in February of 2020 with a performance period that ended December 31, 2022. Pursuant to the grant’s applicable terms and conditions, including certain caps on the number of shares paid out, 167.7% of the grants’ target number of shares were deemed vested for Messrs. Ritenour and Harris. Messrs. Muncrief, Gaspar, and Cameron were not recipients of this grant. Further information about this grant is provided in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table on page 57.

Compensation Process for 2011Background

The Committee is responsible for and directs the process of reviewing and determining compensation for named executive officers.the NEOs. The Committee retains an externalindependent compensation consultant to provide assistance withfor guidance and expertise during the process. The rolesrole of the Committee and the compensation consultant, which includeincludes the development of a peer group in order to benchmark ourthe Committee uses for benchmarking and comparing the executive officers’ compensation, areis further described in the following sections.

Role of the Committee

The Committee establishes ourthe Company’s executive compensation philosophy and administers the overall executive compensation program. The Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board, of Directors, a copy of which is available atwww.devonenergy.com. the Company’s website, www.devonenergy.com.

EachEvery year, the Committee conducts an individual, in-depth, confidential interview with each executive officer to discuss the officer’s analysis of the Company’s overall performance for the year, performance within the officer’s area of responsibility, and any issues or concerns the officer may have regarding the Company’s operations. We believe

47Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

operations and results. The Committee believes this is a unique and highly effective tool in the Committee’s oversight of the executive compensation process.oversight. In addition, the Executive Chairman and the President and CEO each discussdiscusses with the Committee theirhis evaluation of each executive officer’s performance, role, development, and potential to take on greater or different responsibilities. The President and CEO also provides compensation recommendations to the Committee for executive officersall NEOs (other than himself and the Executive Chairman)himself).

The Committee considers the various factors described in this CD&A, including its interviews with executive officers and the Executive Chairman’sNEOs and the President and CEO’s evaluations of each executive officer’sNEOs performance and, in a closed session without any executive officerthe President and CEO present, the Committee sets the Executive Chairman’s and the President and CEO’s compensation. The Committee then determines whether to approve the compensation recommendations provided by the President and CEO’s recommendations of compensationCEO for the other executive officers.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

For the 2011 compensation process,2022, the Committee retained as its external compensation consultant representatives from Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Compensation Consultant). as its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Consultant evaluated the competitiveness of our programsthe Company’s program and assisted withreviewed the executive compensation program design. The Committee did not direct the particular manner or method in which the Compensation Consultant performed these services. The Committee has the final authority to hire and terminate the Compensation Consultant, and the Committee annually evaluates the performance and independence of the Compensation Consultant.

In selecting its consultant, the Committee considers factors that could affect the consultant’s independence, including whether the consultant provides services to the Company other than under its engagement by the Committee, and the other factors set forth in the Committee’s Charter. When reviewing the Compensation Consultant’s independence, the Company also considered the fact that Devon’s business represents only a very small portion of the Compensation Consultant’s overall revenue. Based on this review, the Committee determined that the Compensation Consultant annually.had no conflicts of interest.

BenchmarkingUse of Peer Groups

Devon uses peers groups in two ways: (i) to compare TSR for the PSUs, as documented on page 46 and (ii) to benchmark executive compensation, as shown below. To successfully compete for executive talent, the Committee, working with the Compensation Consultant, annually compares the compensation of ourthe executive officers to the compensation of similarly situated executives at peer companies with business operations focused on the exploration and production of oil and gas. In establishing a peer group, the Committee chieflyprimarily seeks companies with asset and market values similar to the Company. The Committee also considers revenue levels and enterprise values, calculated as marketcommon equity valueplusnet long-term debt and preferred stock, and certain operational and financial measures indicative of the

27Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

companies.size and scope. The Committee believes these metrics are appropriate for determining peers because they provide a reasonable point of reference for comparing executives with similar positions and responsibilities. At the time the Committee approvedThe peer companies used in setting 2022 pay are listed below, as are the peer groupcompanies selected at the end of 2022 for 2011, the Company was positioned between the 35th and 65th percentiles of the peer group on each of these metrics.use in 2023.

The approved peer group for 2011 consisted of the 14 companies listed below.

48Commitment Runs Deep


Anadarko Petroleum CorporationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Apache Corporation

   

Peer Company

     2022         2023    
   

APA Corporation

 p p
   

Cimarex Energy Corporation1

 p  

 

   

ConocoPhillips

 p p
   

Continental Resources, Inc

 p p
   

Coterra Energy Inc.1

  

 

 p
   

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

 p p
   

EOG Resources, Inc.

 p p
   

Hess Corporation

 p p
   

Marathon Oil Corporation

 p p
   

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

 p p
   

Ovintiv, Inc

 p p
   

Pioneer Natural Resources Co.

 p p

Chesapeake Energy Corporation

Chevron Corporation

ConocoPhillips

EnCana Corporation

EOG Resources, Inc.

Hess Corporation

Marathon Oil Corporation

Murphy Oil Corporation

Noble Energy, Inc.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Pioneer Natural Resources Company

Talisman
1

Cimarex Energy Corporation was acquired after it made disclosures used for the competitive market assessment conducted by the Compensation Consultant in 2022. Coterra Energy, Inc. is the company that resulted from the acquisition.

The Committee’s benchmarkingpeer group analysis consists of all components of total direct compensation, including base salary, annual performance bonus, and long-term equity incentives. The Compensation Consultant collected and summarized compensation data from the proxy statements of the peer group companies and the Compensation Consultant’s proprietary databases. Additionally, the Compensation Consultant introduced reference points from similarly sized companies in the broader oil and gas industry as well as non-energy industries to bring further context to the Committee’s decision making.

Tally Sheet Review

ThePrior to making compensation decisions, the Committee annually reviews tally sheets for executive officers that include all elements of compensation, including potential payments under various termination scenarios.

Succession Planning

The Company has a robust succession planning process Tally sheets allow the Committee to ensureevaluate compensation elements individually and collectively. Please refer to the development of executive talenttables that follow this CD&A for additional information on the final compensation amounts determined for the near2022 year.

Additional Benefits and long term. The process and progress are reviewedCompensation Information

Retirement Benefits

Defined Benefit Plans

Based on his hire date with the Committee andCompany, Mr. Ritenour is the Board of Directors on an annual basis.

Compensation Decisions in 2011

Company Performance

During 2011, the Company successfully completed the planned divestitures of its offshore assetsonly NEO eligible to participate in the Gulfdefined benefit plan maintained by the Company. Devon’s qualified Defined Benefit Plan provides annual retirement income based on a formula that considers the executive’s final average compensation, Social Security benefits, and years of Mexicocredited service with the Company. In 2007, employees were given the choice to continue their accruals under the plan or become eligible for the 8% Company 401(k) contribution described below. Mr. Ritenour elected to have his benefit under the Defined Benefit Plan frozen and countries outside North America. In total,began to receive the Company realized approximately $8 billion of after-tax proceeds from the divestiture program, exceeding the Company’s initial expectation of $4.5 billion to $7.5 billion. The Company also successfully re-focused its efforts on expanding operationsenhanced 401(k) contribution in North America and delivering strong operational and financial results.

In addition to funding a robust exploration and development program in 2011, the Company maintained one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry. In 2011, the Company also returned $2.3 billion to the Company’s stockholders through share repurchases, which completed a $3.5 billion share repurchase program initiated in May 2010. In spite of good operational and financial2008.

 

 2849 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

performance, the Company’s total stockholder return (TSR) (stock price appreciationplus dividends) trailed the average return of our industry peers. Further discussion of company performance can be found on page 28.

Key 2011 Executive Compensation Decisions

The Company recognizes the importance of TSR to our stockholders and its significance in aligning the efforts of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. For 2011, the Company’s TSR fell short of the industry median. As such, although the Company posted strong operational and financial performance during 2011, the Committee made the following key compensation decisions at its meeting in November 2011:

each named executive officer received alower performance cash bonus than that of the prior year;

four of the five named executive officersdid not receive an increase in base salary for 2012.

The promotion of Mr. Richels to CEO had been contemplated by Mr. Nichols and the Board for some time prior to Mr. Richels’ promotion in June 2010. At the time of Mr. Richels’ promotion, the Committee developed a transition plan pursuant to which their respective salaries would be adjusted through a transition period to reflect the transfer of responsibilities from Mr. Nichols to Mr. Richels. In furtherance of that transition plan, the Committee reduced each component of the Executive Chairman’s direct pay. Base salary decreased from $1,500,000 in 2011 to $1,000,000 in 2012 and the total of the Executive Chairman’s performance cash bonus and long-term incentives for 2011decreased by 61% as compared to the prior year.

When combining the performance-based compensation decisions and those related to the planned transition of the CEO and Executive Chairman, the total direct Compensation awarded to each named executive officerremained flat or declined and, in the aggregate,fell by approximately $9.3 million, or 23%, as compared to the prior year (see the “Comparison of Total Direct Executive Pay” table with footnotes on page 31).

29Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Overview of Pay Decisions

We believe that the proportion of any employee’s total direct compensation that varies based on performance should increase as the scope of an employee’s ability to influence our results increases. Since executive officers have the greatest influence over our results, a significant portion of their overall compensation consists of performance cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards that vary based on performance. This practice is consistent with norms in the oil and gas industry. As illustrated below, compensation decisions in 2011 resulted in awards heavily weighted in favor of components subject to performance-related variability with cash bonuses and long-term incentives representing approximately 90% of the estimated value of total direct compensation awarded to our President and CEO and approximately 83% for all other named executive officers.

LOGO

The Committee considers the following factors in making annual compensation decisions for the named executive officers:

Company performance in relation to pre-approved goals that include the Company’s TSR performance as compared to peers;

 

each named executive officer’s individual performance during the year, including the performance of the business or organizational unit for which the officer is responsible;

our compensation philosophy;

interviews with the executive officers;

the Compensation Consultant’s input;

the Committee’s own review of competitive market data; and

the President and CEO’s recommendations (as applicable).

In 2011, the Committee also considered challenges presented by the current economic environment and the unique dynamics of the oil and gas industry. Some particularly noteworthy challenges in 2011 involved the continued decoupling of oil and natural gas prices, the expansion of drilling activity in North America by many companies (including oil industry “Majors”) and the exacerbation of tight labor market conditions such that the premium placed on experienced oil and gas talent (including executives) continues to grow.Defined Contribution Plans

30Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Snapshot of 2011 Compensation Outcomes

The following table provides details on the total direct pay awarded to our named executive officers in our November 2011 meeting in which the Committee applied our new performance cash bonus and long-term equity incentive frameworks. Please note that the dollar amounts reflected in the table below will differ from amounts contained in the Summary Compensation Table in the following manner: the table below presents salary in the year of decision not payment and includes the performance share unit and performance restricted stock portions of LTI valued at the closing price on the date of grant rather than the accounting value required in the Summary Compensation Table.

Comparison of Total Direct Executive Pay Decisions1
Executive Decision
Year
  Salary2  Bonus3  Value of
Annual LTI
Grant
4
  Total
Direct Pay
  2011
Compared to
2010

John Richels

  2011   $1,400   $2,300   $10,001   $13,701   decrease
of 1.4%
  2010   $1,400   $2,500   $10,001   $13,901   

J. Larry Nichols

  2011   $1,000   $1,500   $4,001   $6,501   decrease
of 58.1%
  2010   $1,500   $3,000   $11,001   $15,501   

Jeffrey A. Agosta

  2011   $550   $520   $2,002   $3,072   decrease
of 0.2%
  2010   $525   $550   $2,001   $3,076   

David A. Hager

  2011   $775   $850   $3,001   $4,626   decrease
of 1.1%
  2010   $775   $900   $3,000   $4,675   

Darryl G. Smette

  2011   $675   $755   $2,299   $3,729   decrease
of 1.2%
  2010   $675   $800   $2,302   $3,777   
       Aggregate   decrease
of 22.7%

1

Dollar amounts in thousands.

2

Salary determined at year end 2011 and 2010 was effective throughout 2012 and 2011, respectively.

3

Performance bonus awarded in 2011 and 2010 paid in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

4

For the purposes of determining the number of shares underlying LTI grants, the Committee utilizes Black-Scholes Merton method for stock options and face-value (value divided by grant date closing price) method for full value shares. The amounts in this table reflect the Committee’s methodology.

31Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Compensation Elements Used in 2011

The narrative that follows provides additional background and detail on the compensation decisions made in 2011 with respect to direct pay as well as our objectives in including each component of direct pay in our executive compensation programs.

Base Salary

A competitive base salary is vital to ensure that we employ executives who have a combination of business acumen, significant industry experience and longevity with the Company. In order to attract and retain such executives, their base salaries must be competitive with the base salaries of executive officers of peer companies with whom we compete for executive personnel. Competitive base salaries, coupled with a weighting of our overall compensation package toward pay that varies based on performance, allows us to compete effectively.

In its November 2011 meeting, the Committee took the following factors into account when considering whether, and by what amount, to adjust the salary of named executive officers for 2012:

external market forces and data, including the comparative position of our named executive officers’ base salaries to the targeted market objective on a group and individual basis and the tight and competitive labor market for executive leadership in the industry;

the scope of responsibility, experience, and tenure of each named executive officer;

the development plans for, and potential to take on greater or different responsibilities of the named executive officer; and

internal equity considerations.

Based on the foregoing, the Committee determined that in most cases existing salaries appropriately recognized the value the labor market places on the experience, expertise, and knowledge required to be successful in executive officer positions. The Committee, however, approved the President and CEO’s recommendation to increase Mr. Agosta’s annual salary by $25,000, or 4.8%. This increase reflects his recent appointment and continued development as the Company’s CFO and moves his base salary closer to the 50th percentile of market guidelines for base salaries of executives in similar positions at peer companies. With the transition of responsibilities from the Executive Chairman to our President and CEO, the Committee reduced the Executive Chairman’s annual salary by $500,000, or 33%. Other than Messrs. Agosta and Nichols, the Committee determined not to change any named executive officer’s salary during the 2011 performance assessment and compensation decision-making process.

32Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Annual Performance Cash Bonus

The Committee believes that performance bonuses awarded to executives should reflect the near-term financial, operating, and strategic performance and current decision-making that affects long-term stockholder value. As discussed in the Executive Summary of this CD&A, in 2011 the Committee enhanced its performance bonus determination process to further align current and future awards with performance and to provide greater transparency and structure. The Committee now utilizes a bonus determination process that features the following components:

Base Salary

Each executive officer’s base salary for the year is the starting point in determining his annual performance bonus.

Base salary is multiplied by a pre-determined bonus target.

Bonus Target

Each executive officer position is assigned a bonus target relative to base salary. Bonus targets are based on competitive industry norms for the relevant officer position.

CEO’s Target =135% of base salary

Other NEOs’ Target =100% of base salary

The product of the salary and bonus target is multiplied by a company performance score.

Company Performance Score

Based on the Company’s performance against pre-set measures, the Committee assigns a performance score between0 to 200%, with a score of 100% indicating performance that meets expectations or goals.

70% of the company performance score is determined based on operational and financial measures.

30% of the company performance score is based on strategic measures.

The product of the above steps, the “Process Determined Amount,” may then be adjusted by the Committee.

Limited Discretion to Adjust

The Committee retains the discretion to adjust the Process Determined Amount based on individual or across-the-board performance factors.

Discretion to adjust Process Determined Amount by no more than25%.

The company performance score is determined by reference to performance in relation to structured and measurable goals approved by the Board of Directors before the start of the relevant year target. Success in the oil and gas industry requires continuous execution on multiple fronts in order to propel stockholder value. Accordingly, the Company’s goals cover a number of both quantitative and qualitative areas, such as delivering stockholder returns and growing our oil and gas production and reserves. In order to reflect the relative importance of those areas in light of our philosophy for performance cash bonuses, we include two general categories in our company performance goals and assign a separate weighting to each category.

For 2011, the Committee grouped performance measures into two general categories—operational and financial measures, and strategic measures—at weights of 70% and 30%, respectively. The 2011 performance measures were selected because they represent key metrics for our near-term performance and together they contribute to our prospects for sustainable growth of the Company and long-term value creation for the Company and our stockholders.

33Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

The following table summarizes the Company’s performance on key operational and financial measures in 2011:

LOGO

1

Certain performance measures above refer to the Company’s rank among a group that includes six recognized industry peers of the Company (Anadarko Petroleum Company, Apache Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, EnCana Corporation, EOG Resources, Inc., and Noble Energy, Inc.). Each peer is similar in size with a comparable business to the Company. Each peer is also included within our benchmarking peer group.

2

Normalized to control for the effect of currency exchange rates and commodity price fluctuations so that the measure provides an accurate picture of the Company’s operational efficiency.

The Committee did not assign a particular weight to any single operational and financial performance measure, but instead the Committee considered the measures together and assigned one score for the group of measures as a whole. In assessing 2011 performance, the Committee noted that the Company substantially met all but one of the measures and that the Company had outperformed goals on reserves additions, pre-tax cash margin, and oil and gas exploration. The Committee also noted year-over-year improvement in operational and financial performance on most measures. Based on this level of performance, the Committee determined a performance score of 120% for operational and financial measures.

34Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

After assessing operational and financial performance, the Committee then reviewed performance on a number of strategic measures considered key indicators of Company’s ability to grow and compete successfully in the future. The table below reflects the Company’s performance on strategic measures in 2011:

LOGO

1

Environmental Health and Safety measures consisted of employee recordable incident rate, contractor recordable incident rate, preventable vehicle incident rate, spill rate, and lost spill rate.

2

Learning and People measures consisted of number of job positions with “ready-now” succession candidates, percent of promotional opportunities filled by internal candidates, and voluntary attrition rate.

Similar to its approach to scoring operational and financial measures, the Committee assessed performance and assigned a score for the group of strategic measures as a whole. In assessing 2011 performance, the Committee noted that the Company met or exceeded goals on all measures. As part of its assessment, the Committee singled out the Company’s strong position with respect to attracting and developing critical talent as well as the leading role the Company took in advancing the interests of the domestic oil and gas industry during 2011. Based on these considerations, the Committee assigned a performance score of 150% for strategic measures.

35Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

As noted above, the Committee apportioned weights to the two general categories of performance measures—70% for operational and financial measures and 30% for strategic measures—in order to reflect the relative impact of those measures on the Company’s success. Based on the performance scores determined through the forgoing assessments and the apportionment of separate weights to those scores, the cash performance bonus formula yielded the following overall company performance score:

      
    Weighting    Score    Total
  

Operational and Financial Measures

  70% X  120% =  85%

Strategic Positioning Measures

  30%   150%   45%

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

2011 Company Performance Score (Sum of Scoring of Measures, rounded)

    130%

While our compensation program is highly structured and makes use of metrics and formulas, the Committee maintains discretion to adjust the amount of performance cash bonuses in order to recognize critical performance factors that may not have been fully taken into account in calculating the company performance score. Although the company performance score for 2011 was 130%, the Committee believed that the Company’s below average TSR warranted a downward adjustment to bonuses so that each named executive officer’s bonus for 2011 would be lower than that of the prior year. The Committee did not apply any adjustments based on individual performance factors.

The following table outlines the calculations made for the performance cash bonuses awarded for 2011:

Executive 2011
Salary1
     Performance
Bonus
Target
     Company
Performance
Score
     Process
Determined
Bonus
Amount1
  

Committee-
applied
downward
adjustment

due to the

under-

performance

of the

Company’s

TSR

 Actual
Bonuses
Awarded1
 

John Richels

 $1,400      135    130   $2,457    $2,300  

J. Larry Nichols

 $1,500      100    130   $1,950    $1,500  

Jeffrey A. Agosta

 $525    X    100  X    130  =   $683    $520  

David A. Hager

 $775      100    130   $1,008    $850  

Darryl G. Smette

 $675      100    130   $878    $755  

1

All dollar amounts in thousands.

Long-Term Incentives

A key element of our compensation program is to reward executive officers for long-term strategic accomplishments and enhancement of long-term stockholder value through equity-based incentives that vest over an extended period of time. Long-term incentive compensation plays an essential role in attracting and retaining executive officers and aligns their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

36Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

In analyzing the value and type of long-term incentives awarded to our named executive officers, the Committee takes into account:

recent Company performance with a focus on how such performance creates value for our stockholders over the long-term;

each named executive officer’s individual performance during the year;

our compensation philosophy;

competitive market conditions;

historical practices, including the value of prior years’ long-term incentives;

incentive awards for others in the organization; and

the impact of awards on the Company’s share dilution levels.

In 2011, the Committee determined that creation of stockholder value would be promoted by linking all long-term incentives awarded in the year to Company performance. Accordingly, the Committee granted stock options and two new types of long-term incentives to named executive officers—performance restricted stock and performance share units—and elected not to grant any restricted stock that vested over time without reference to performance measures.

37Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

The following table describes the long-term incentives granted to named executive officers in 2011:

Type of LTI Award Purpose Vesting Conditions
Stock Options 

Stock options give executives the right to purchase common stock of the Company at a specified price within a specified period of time. Only when the Company’s stock price exceeds the strike price will the executive have the opportunity to gain financially.

 

•  20% of stock options immediately vest and become exercisable on the grant date; an additional 20% of each grant vests and becomes exercisable on each of the first four anniversaries of the original grant date.

 

•  The grant term is 8-years.

Performance Restricted Stock (PRS) 

PRS encourages executives to work toward achievement of a pre-set financial metric. For 2012 the metric, which relates to the Company’s cash flow, is confidential but will be detailed in the Company’s 2013 Proxy Statement.

 

•  Shares only vest if the Company meets the applicable pre-set financial metric.

 

•  If metric is achieved, shares will vest 25% per year over four years.

 

•  If metric is not achieved, grant will be forfeited.

Performance Share Units (PSU) 

PSU encourages executives to promote mid-term shareholder return.

 

•  Executives may earn between 0 and 200% of the shares underlying the grant based on the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) relative to companies in the peer group.

 

•  For 2011 PSU grants, 50% of the grant will vest pursuant to relative TSR for the two-year period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013; the remaining 50% will vest based on relative TSR for the three-year period of January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014.1

 

•  Payout will be determined as of the end of the specified performance period based on actual TSR performance over the period; the following grid details the tie between relative performance and payout levels.

   The Company’s TSR against its peers2 Payout percent of shares underlying grant
  1-3 200%
  4 180%
  5 160%
  6 140%
  7 120%
  8 100%
  9 85%
  10 70%
  11 60%
  12 50%
  13-15 0%

1

It is anticipated that future PSU grants (if any) will vest based on relative TSR over a three-year period.

2

The Company and the 14 peer companies listed under “Benchmarking” on page 27 constitute the 15 companies whose TSR will be ranked from highest to lowest to determine share payout under PSU grant.

38Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Benchmarking conducted in 2011 indicated that the value of long-term incentives awarded to the named executive officers in 2010 was generally consistent with the Company’s market objective of the 50th to 75th percentiles of the peer companies. For 2011 awards, the Committee targeted the 50th percentile.

During its year-end meeting, the Committee approved the grants set forth in the table below. In accordance with applicable accounting requirements, we use a different valuation method (in this case, a Monte Carlo simulation) in the Summary Compensation Table for performance share units. The Monte Carlo simulation for the performance share units assigned a higher per unit value than the closing price for the Company’s stock as of the grant date.

Executive    Item1       Stock
Options
2
     Performance
Restricted
Stock
2
     

Performance
Share

Units2

 

John Richels

    

Value

       $3,334       $3,334       $3,333  
    

Shares

       145.2       51.2       51.2  

J. Larry Nichols

    

Value

       $0       $4,001       $0  
    

Shares

       0.0       61.5       0.0  

Jeffrey A. Agosta

    

Value

       $667       $668       $667  
    

Shares

       29.1       10.3       10.2  

David A. Hager

    

Value

       $1,000       $1,001       $1,000  
    

Shares

       43.6       15.4       15.4  

Darryl G. Smette

    

Value

       $767       $767       $766  
    

Shares

       33.4       11.8       11.8  

1

For each executive, the Committee first determines the total value of long-term incentives to be awarded then apportions the total value by type of long-term incentives. Then the committee determines the number of stock options using Black-Scholes-Merton method and the number of performance restricted stock and performance share units using face-value method (value divided by grant date closing price).

2

Dollar and share amounts in thousands.

In making its award decisions, the Committee noted its continued confidence in the strategic direction set by the named executive officers and that the Company improved its long-term growth prospects through the redeployment of a portion of the divestiture proceeds as discussed earlier.

For each named executive officer other than Mr. Nichols, the overall award’s face value was divided into one-third portions among stock options, performance restricted stock, and performance share units. For Mr. Nichols, the Committee determined that the options with an 8 year term and TSR-based performance share units were not appropriate for the nature of the Executive Chairman position and therefore decided to grant only performance restricted stock.

Also for Mr. Nichols, the Committee reduced the overall value of his long-term incentives by $7,000,000 as compared to the prior year in recognition of the transition of his responsibilities to Mr. Richels.

39Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION

Retirement Benefits

Our named executive officers are entitled toAll NEOs participate in the following retirement benefits:

a qualified 401(k) Plan withthat provides for a Company match of up to 6%; of their earnings and a non- matching Company contribution of 8% of their compensation. Under the Supplemental Contribution Restoration Plans (SCRPs) the Company may make supplemental contributions that would otherwise be subject to limitations in the Internal Revenue Code based on the compensation of the executives.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Devon maintains a nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan that allows eligible employees to defer cash compensation beyond the limits placed on the 401(k) Plan by the Internal Revenue Code and permits the Company to contribute a match to the extent that the match available under the qualified 401(k) Plan is limited;

a qualified Defined Benefit Plan that provides annual retirement income of 65% of final average compensation (i.e., the average of the highest three consecutive years’ compensation from salary and cash bonuses out of the last 10 years), less any benefits due to the participant under Social Security, times a fraction, the numerator of which is credited years of service up to a maximum of 25 and the denominator of which is 25; and

a nonqualified defined benefit plan (the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan or SRIP) that, among other things, provides retirement benefits calculated without certain limitations applicable to the Defined Benefit Plan, accrues over 20 years of service (rather than the 25 years applicable to the Defined Benefit Plan), includes a five-year vesting schedule, and allows for payments in a lump sum upon a change in control of the Company.

Mr. Hager joined the Company after our Defined Benefit Plan was closed to new participants. In lieu of participating in the Defined Benefit Plan and the SRIP, Mr. Hager is eligible to participate in the enhanced defined contribution structure of the 401(k) Plan and receive a Company retirement contribution to his 401(k) account of 8% of his compensation. He is also eligible to participate in additional nonqualified defined contribution plans in lieu of participating in the SRIP.limited.

For additional information on the Defined Benefit Plan, the SRIP,plans and the defined contribution plans as well as the present valuesvalue of the accumulated benefits of our named executive officersfor the NEOs under each plan,the various plans described in this “Retirement Benefits” section, please refer to the Pension Benefits for the Year Ended December 31, 2011“Pension Benefits” section beginning on page 4958 and the Nonqualified“Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan in 2011Plan” section beginning on page 54.60.

Other Benefits

TheDetails regarding the perquisites made available to ourDevon’s executives are both limited and minimal. They are listed in detailmay be found in the “All Other Compensation” table on page 44. Personal55. The perquisites for 2022 were:

limited personal use of aircraft, by executives on a limited basis is allowed as approved by the Executive Chairman or the President and CEO. The Committee reviews the personal use of aircraft on CEO;

an annual basisexecutive physical;

a reimbursement program for financial planning services; and has noted that the use has been less than that of other companies in our peer group.

a Company match, up to $10,000, of charitable contributions made to non-profit organization(s) by the executive.

Post-Termination or Change in ControlChange-in-Control Benefits

We maintainDevon maintains an employment agreementsagreement with each of our named executive officers.the NEOs. These agreements providedo not guarantee continued employment, but they do place certain restrictions on the executives during and after their employment with the Company. Through these agreements, each named executive officerNEO is provided certain additional compensation if his employment is involuntarily terminated other than for cause“cause” or if the executiveNEO voluntarily terminates his employment for “good reason,” as those terms are defined in the relevant agreements. Also, in these situations, the applicable named executive officerNEO fully vests in any unvested long-term incentive awards.

40Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

If a named executive officer is terminated within two years of a change in control, the executive isLTI awards subject to certain covenants and agreements and proration as described below. The agreements also entitled to an additional three years of service credit and age in determining entitlement to retiree medicalprovide certain benefits and SRIP benefits (or with respect to Mr. Hager’s nonqualified defined contribution plan, an additional three years of contributions by the Company).

In April 2011, the Company amended the employment agreements in order to eliminate tax gross-up payment obligations of the Company to the executives in the event of a change in control of the Company. Prior to the amendments, thetermination within a two-year period following a change-in-control.

The employment agreements contained a tax gross-up provisiondo not include “gross-up” provisions that obligatedobligate the Company to pay an additional amount to the named executive officerNEO if his benefits under the employment agreement or any other Company arrangement wereare subject to the tax imposed on excess parachute payments by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The amendmentsCompany’s award agreements for LTI granted to the NEOs provide that officers who meet certain years-of-service and age criteria are eligible to continue to vest as scheduled in outstanding awards following retirement subject to certain covenants and agreements. See page 64 for additional details.

50Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

The unvested shares underlying LTI awards are eligible for continued or accelerated vesting post termination in the case of a severance- related employment agreements eliminate this tax gross-up provision.termination or a retirement. Such terminations occurring prior to the first anniversary of the grant date result in a pro-rata reduction in the number of shares eligible for continued or accelerated vesting post termination.

Employment agreementsArrangements with post-termination and change in controlchange-in-control benefits are typical in the oil and gas industry and necessary in order to compete for executive talent. Please refer to the Potential“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in ControlChange-in-Control” section beginning on page 5562 for more information.detail on amounts that could be payable under certain scenarios and additional information on the Company’s employment agreements.

Material Differences in Compensation of Messrs. Richels and Nichols

Mr. Richels’ total compensation for 2011 was higher than that of other named executive officers primarily because of his position as President and CEO, his experience and stature in the industry, his reporting relationship to the Executive Chairman, the compensation levels of comparable executives of other companies against whom his compensation is benchmarked, and his greater influence over and responsibility for the entire Company (as opposed to a distinct division or function). In addition, Mr. Richels’ compensation recognized the leadership role he is exercising with respect to the day-to-day operations of the Company.

Mr. Nichols’ total compensation for 2011 was higher than that of other named executive officers (other than Mr. Richels) primarily because of his position, his role in setting the strategy for the Company, his leadership in the industry with respect to matters affecting the oil and gas industry generally, his long tenure with the Company, and his status as a founder of the Company. As discussed on page 31, each component of the Executive Chairman’s direct pay was decreased from the prior year to reflect the transition of responsibilities from the Executive Chairman to the President and CEO.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Ownership of ourDevon’s stock by ourthe executives aligns their interests with the interests of ourDevon’s stockholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors maintains stock ownership guidelines that require each executive officer who has served in such capacity for at least five years to own shares of common stock at least equal in value to a multiple of his or her base salary. The guidelines establish the following minimum ownership levels:

 

Officer Title Share Ownership Expectation as Multiple of Base SalaryRequirement

President and CEO

 

FiveSix times base salary

Other Named Executive ChairmanOfficers

 

Five times base salary

Executive Vice Presidents

Three times base salary

The guidelines require an executive officer who has served in such capacity less than five years to maintain ownership of at least one-half of the shares of Devon common stock received through equity-based awards from the Company (net of taxes) until the officer meets his or her ownership requirement.

Compliance with the ownership guidelines is determined at the end of each year. As of December 31, 2022, the NEOs held stock in excess of the levels required in the guidelines. The executives have historically maintained share ownership levels well above the Company’s guidelines. For purposes of calculating share ownership levels, the Board includes:

(i)

shares owned directly by the officer and his or her immediate family members who share the same household,

(ii)

shares owned beneficially by the officer and his or her immediate family members who share the same household, and

(iii)

unvested restricted stock.

For additional detail on the stock owned by NEOs, please refer to “Security Ownership of Management” table on page 76.

Pledging and Hedging Guidelines

The Company also has a policy that prohibits Devon employees, officers, and directors from trading in Devon securities on a short-term basis, entering short sales, and buying or selling puts, calls, or similar instruments. The policy also discourages Devon employees, officers, and directors from placing standing or limit orders and prohibits executive officers and directors from pledging or hedging Devon stock, buying Devon stock on margin, or holding Devon stock in a margin account. The hedging prohibition covers any transaction that is designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Devon stock, including, but not limited to, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds.

 

 4151 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

As of March 31, 2012, each executive officer held stock in excess of the levels required in the guidelines. Moreover, our executives have historically maintained share ownership levels well above our guidelines. For purposes of calculating share ownership levels, the Board includes (i) shares owned directly by the officer and his immediate family members who share the same household, (ii) shares owned beneficially by the officer and his immediate family members residing in the same household, and (iii) unvested restricted stock for which restrictions have not lapsed.

The Company also has a policy that prohibits our personnel from engaging in short-term or speculative transactions involving our common stock. This policy prohibits trading in our stock on a short-term basis, engaging in short sales, buying and selling puts and calls, and discourages the practice of purchasing the Company’s stock on margin.

For additional detail on the stock owned by our named executive officers, please refer to the Security Ownership of Management table on page 64.

Compensation Program and Risk-Taking

OurThe Company’s executive compensation program is designed to provide executive officers incentives for the achievement of near-term and long-term objectives, without motivating themin a manner that motivates executives to take unnecessarymeasured and appropriate risk. As part of its review and discussion of the impact of the Company’s executive compensation program withprograms on the Compensation Consultant,Company’s risk profile and risk management, the Committee noted the following factors that discourage the Company’s executives from taking unnecessary or excessive risk:

 

the Company’s operating strategy and related compensation philosophy;

 

the effective balance of our compensation program between cash and equity mix, near-term and long-term focus, corporate and individual performance, and financial and non-financial performance;

the effective balance of Devon’s compensation program between cash and equity, near-term and long-term focus, corporate and individual performance, and financial and non-financial performance;

 

a multi-faceted approach to performance evaluation and compensation that does not reward an executive for engaging in risky behavior to achieve one objective to the detriment of other objectives; and

 

significant executive stock ownership pursuant to ourDevon’s stock ownership guidelines.guidelines; and

the Board’s annual risk assessment process.

Based on this review, and discussion, the Committee believes that the total executive compensation program doesprograms do not encourage executive officersexecutives to take unnecessary or excessive risk.

ConsiderationPolicy for Recovery of Tax ImplicationsCompensation (Clawback Policy)

Section 162(m)The Company has a policy concerning the recovery of bonuses, incentives, and equity-based compensation awarded to executive officers under certain circumstances (the Clawback Policy). In the event of a restatement of the Internal Revenue Code disallows, with certain exceptions,Company’s financial statements that leads to a federal income tax deduction forrevision of one or more performance measures on which a bonus or other incentive compensation over $1,000,000 paidwas based, the Committee may require reimbursement or forfeiture of all or a portion of any bonus or incentive compensation subject to the Chief Executive Officer or any other named executive officer except the Chief Financial Officer. One exception applies to “performance-based compensation” paid pursuant to stockholder approved employee benefit plans (essentially, compensation that is paid only if the individual’s performance meets pre-established objective performance goals using performance measures approved by our stockholders).

With approvals given by the Committee in 2011, the Company will take actions in 2012 to promote tax efficiencies provided for under Section 162(m). At the 2012 annual meeting, the Company is seeking stockholder approval for amendments to the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan that, if approved, will allow for any performance share units or performance restricted stock earned by named executive officers in the future to be deductible by the Company. Additionally, the Company is seeking stockholder approval for the 2012 Incentive Bonus Plan which, if approved, will allow for future performance bonuses paid to named executive officers to be deductible by the Company.Clawback Policy.

 

 4252 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee has reviewed and discussed the preceding Compensation Discussion and Analysis section with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee

 

LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

Robert A.

Mosbacher, Jr., Chair

John E. BethancourtAnn G. FoxKelt KindickKarl F. KurzDuane C. Radtke

53Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table and accompanying footnotes summarize the compensation earned, awarded, paid, or paidattributed to our named executive officersthe NEOs for the years indicated below. The named executive officersNEOs are ourthe President and Chief Executive Officer, ourthe Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company serving as of December 31, 2011.2022. This table should be read together with ourthe Compensation Discussion and Analysis (see(starting on page 24)37 of this Proxy Statement), which includes information about ourCompany performance for 2022, the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives, the programs and describes significant changesplans that were made in 2011 to our programsunderlie executive officer compensation opportunities, and the Committee’s process for performance cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards.awarding compensation.

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)1
  Option
Awards
($)1
  

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)2

  All Other
Compensation
($)3
  

Total

($)

 

John Richels

  2011    1,396,154    2,300,600    7,517,206    3,333,552    3,285,798    177,820    18,011,130  

President and

  2010    1,226,442    2,500,600    5,000,583    5,000,322    3,988,522    193,902    17,910,371  

Chief Executive Officer

  2009    1,150,000    1,400,600    2,743,400    3,017,759    2,080,364    195,647    10,587,770  

J. Larry Nichols

  2011    1,496,154    1,500,600    4,001,046        1,286,137    309,460    8,593,397  

Executive Chairman

  2010    1,400,000    3,000,600    5,499,907    5,500,943    3,156,189    319,113    18,876,752  
   2009    1,400,000    2,100,600    5,582,500    5,761,447    1,034,772    323,241    16,202,560  

Jeffrey A. Agosta4

  2011    561,949    520,600    1,504,483    667,055    537,780    41,543    3,833,410  

Executive Vice President

  2010    398,505    550,600    1,148,6735   1,148,5245   333,895    41,054��   3,621,251  

and Chief Financial Officer

                                

David A. Hager

  2011    771,154    850,600    2,256,073    1,000,008        411,314    5,289,149  

Executive Vice President

  2010    675,000    900,600    1,499,808    1,500,631        154,108    4,730,147  
   2009    504,952    680,500    2,195,3206   2,110,4386       9,302    5,500,512  

Darryl G. Smette

  2011    672,500    755,600    1,727,611    766,941    1,504,635    81,924    5,509,211  

Executive Vice President

  2010    610,000    800,600    1,151,015    1,150,528    1,647,878    115,402    5,475,423  
   2009    610,000    630,600    937,860    1,034,516    834,994    116,972    4,164,942  
   Name and Principal Position  Year  

Salary

($)1

  Stock
Awards
($)2
  

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($)3

  

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)4

 All Other
Compensation
($)5
  Total ($) 
 

Richard E. Muncrief

   

2022
2021
 
 
  

1,132,577

1,045,000

 

 

  

10,404,927

8,310,964

 

 

  

2,442,100

2,336,400

 

 

 0

0

  

545,173

222,183

 

 

  

14,524,777

11,914,547

 

 

 

President and Chief

 

Executive Officer

 

 

Jeffrey L. Ritenour

   2022   638,362   3,805,243   952,900  0  254,304   5,650,809 
 

Executive Vice President

   2021   620,000   2,374,583   987,700  0  253,316   4,235,599 
 

and Chief Financial Officer

 

   2020   616,923   2,796,697   418,500  87,211  315,633   4,234,964 
 

Clay M. Gaspar

   

2022

2021

 

 

  

638,362

589,000

 

 

  

4,518,726

3,609,362

 

 

  

1,058,800

1,097,400

 

 

 0

0

  

279,155

124,210

 

 

  

6,495,043

5,419,972

 

 

 

Executive Vice President

 

 

and Chief Operating Officer

 

 

David G. Harris

   2022   628,108   3,805,243   937,600  0  250,059   5,621,010 
 

Executive Vice President and

   2021   610,000   2,374,583   971,700  0  144,762   4,101,045 
 

Chief Corporate Development Officer

 

   2020   600,769   2,796,697   411,800  0  243,499   4,052,765 
 

Dennis C. Cameron

   
2022
 
  
496,154
 
  
2,378,276
 
  
660,000
 
 0
  
192,956
 
  
3,727,386
 
 

Executive Vice President

 

 

 

and General Counsel

 

 

1 

At its January 2022 meetings, the Committee increased Mr. Muncrief’s annual base salary rate to $1,138,500, Mr. Ritenour’s annual base salary rate to $641,700, Mr. Gaspar’s annual base salary rate to $641,700, Mr. Harris’s annual base salary rate to $631,400, and Mr. Cameron’s annual base salary rate to $500,000. These rates took effect on February 12, 2022.

2

The dollar amounts reported in these columnsthis column represent the aggregate grant date fair values of the stock and option awards.awards, as determined pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The assumptions used to value stock and option awards are discussed inNote 3—4 – Share-Based Compensationof the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.2022. For restricted stock, values are based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. In valuing the PSU awards, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation. The grant date fair value of the PSU awards was determined based on the vesting at target of the units awarded, which is the performance the Company believed was probable on the grant date. If a maximum, rather than target, number of shares is used to determine the maximum award opportunity for the NEOs for the 2022 PSU awards, the grant date value of the awards is as follows: Mr. Muncrief, $13,809,762; Mr. Ritenour, $5,050,452; Mr. Gaspar, $5,997,412; Mr. Harris, $5,050,452; and Mr. Cameron, $3,156,533.

 

23 

This column reflects performance bonuses awarded to the NEOs.

4

The dollar amounts reported in this column reflect the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of each named executive officer’sparticipating NEO’s accumulated benefits under ourthe Company’s Defined Benefit Plan and the SRIP during the applicable year. The amounts shown werefor each year do not paidreflect payments made to the executives.executives during the applicable year. None of our named executive officersthe NEOs received above market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation in any of the reported years. For Mr. HagerRitenour, the actuarial present value of his pension benefit decreased by $148,113 in 2022 due to a difference in the discount rate required to be used in the calculation of his benefit. Messrs. Muncrief, Gaspar, Harris, and Cameron joined the Company after ourDevon’s Defined Benefit Plan was closed to new participants.participants in 2007. At the time the plan closed to new participants, Mr. Ritenour elected to freeze his participation in this plan and instead participate in the Company’s enhanced defined contribution plan. Under the Defined Benefit Plan, Mr. Ritenour continues to earn years of vesting service only.

 

35 

Details offor the dollar amounts for 2011shown in this column for 2022 are shownreflected in the supplemental table that follows.

4

Mr. Agosta became a named executive officer in 2010 so his compensation for 2009 is not included in this table.

5

The dollar amounts reported in these entries reflect $148,189 of restricted stock and $147,658 of stock options that were awarded upon Mr. Agosta’s appointment as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in March 2010. It also includes $1,000,484 of restricted stock and $1,000,866 of stock options that were awarded upon the annual grant in December 2010.

6

The dollar amounts reported in these entries reflect $893,800 of restricted stock and $677,254 of stock options that were awarded upon Mr. Hager’s employment in March 2009. It also includes $1,301,520 of restricted stock and $1,433,183 of stock options that were awarded upon the annual grant in December 2009.immediately below.

 

 4354 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

The following supplemental table shows the components of “All Other Compensation” for 20112022 in the previous table.Summary Compensation Table.

 

Name 

Group
Term Life

Insurance

Premiums

($)

  

401(k) Plan

Employer

Match and
Retirement
Contribution

($)

  

Deferred

Compensation

Plan
Employer

Match

($)

  

Defined
Contribution
Restoration
Plan
Employer
Contribution

($)

  

Defined
Contribution
Supplemental
Executive
Retirement
Plan
Employer
Contribution

($)

  

Personal

Air
Travel

($)1

  

Total

($)

 

John Richels

  7,423    14,700    142,887            12,810    177,820  

J. Larry Nichols

  14,478    14,700    195,300            84,982    309,460  

Jeffrey A. Agosta

  1,133    14,700    25,710                41,543  

David A. Hager

  4,814    26,9502   33,300    88,800    257,450        411,314  

Darryl G. Smette

  7,524    14,700    59,700                81,924  
Name 

Group
Term Life
Insurance
Premiums

($)

 

401(k) Plan
Employer
Match and
Retirement
Contribution

($)

 

Deferred
Compensation
Plan

Employer
Match

($)

 

Defined
Contribution
Restoration
Plan and
Supplemental
Contribution
Plan

Employer
Contribution

($)

 Other
Perquisites
($)1
 

Charitable
Match

($)

 

Total

($)

 

Richard E. Muncrief

 7,524 40,500 189,839 255,318 51,992 —     545,173 

Jeffrey L. Ritenour

 1,710 40,500 79,264 107,885 14,945 10,000  254,304 

Clay M. Gaspar

 2,622 40,500 85,846 116,661 23,526 10,000  279,155 

David G. Harris

 1,710 40,500 77,688 105,785 14,376 10,000  250,059 

Dennis C. Cameron

 7,463 40,500 51,825 71,300 11,868 10,000  192,956 

 

1 

The aggregate incremental costCompany offers minimal perquisites to the Companyexecutives. Executives are eligible for financial planning services, an annual executive physical exam, and limited, pre-approved personal use of ourCompany aircraft, is calculated basedwhich may include travel for any immediate family members of such NEO included on our average variable operating costs. Variable operating costs include fuel, engine reserves, maintenance, weather-monitoring, on-board catering, landing/ramp fees and other miscellaneous variable costs. The total annual variable costs are divided by the annual number of hours our aircraft flew to determine an average variable cost per hour. This average variable cost per hour is then multiplied by the hours flown fortrip. Mr. Muncrief’s perquisites included personal use of Company aircraft ($38,103), financial planning reimbursement ($7,952), and executive physical ($5,937). In addition to determine the incremental cost. The methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilots’charitable match, (i) Mr. Ritenour’s perquisites included financial planning reimbursement ($11,342) and other employees’ salaries, purchase costsexecutive physical ($3,603), (ii) Mr. Gaspar’s perquisites included personal use of theCompany aircraft ($11,658) and non-trip related hangar expenses.

2

financial planning reimbursement ($11,868), (iii) Mr. Hager joined the Company after the Defined Benefit Plan was closed to new entrants. As a result, he is eligible forHarris’s perquisites included financial planning reimbursement ($10,750) and receives additional employer retirement contributions to his 401(k) plan.executive physical ($3,626) and (iv) Mr. Cameron’s perquisites included financial planning reimbursement ($11,868).

 

 4455 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS DURING 2011

The following Grants of Plan-Based Awards table sets forth information concerning performance bonuses, restricted stock, and performance share units granted during 2022 for the NEOs as described below. The long-term incentive awards reflected below are the only equity-based incentives granted to the NEOs in the year.

 

Name

 

Grant Date

  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
  

All Other
Option
Awards:

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)3

  

Closing
Price on
Date of
Grant

($/Sh)4

  

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards

($)5

 
  Threshold
(#)
   Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
    
   12/01/2011         51,2001   102,400        65.10    3,333,120  

John Richels

  12/01/2011         51,2202   51,220        65.10    3,334,422  
   12/01/2011                 145,175    65.10    3,333,552  

J. Larry Nichols

  12/01/2011         61,4602   61,460        65.10    4,001,046  
   12/01/2011         10,2401   20,480        65.10    666,624  

Jeffrey A. Agosta

  12/01/2011         10,2602   10,260        65.10    667,926  
   12/01/2011                 29,050    65.10    667,055  
   12/01/2011         15,3601   30,720        65.10    999,936  

David A. Hager

  12/01/2011         15,3802   15,380        65.10    1,001,238  
   12/01/2011                 43,550    65.10    1,000,008  
   12/01/2011         11,7601   23,520        65.10    765,576  

Darryl G. Smette

  12/01/2011         11,7802   11,780        65.10    766,878  
   12/01/2011                 33,400    65.10    766,941  
     

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards1

  

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards2

  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or

Units
(# shares)

 

  

Grant

Date Fair
Value of
Stock

Awards3

($)

 

 

Name

 

 

Grant Date

 

  

Threshold
($)

 

 

Target
($)

 

  

Maximum
($)

 

  

Threshold
(# shares)

 

  

Target
(# shares)

 

  

Maximum
(# shares)

 

 

 Richard E. Muncrief

  1/25/2022  740,050  1,480,100   2,960,200   -   -   -   -   - 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   -   -   -   67,025   3,500,046 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   50,269   100,537   201,074   -   6,904,881 

 Jeffrey L. Ritenour

  1/25/2022  288,750  577,500   1,155,000   -   -   -   -   - 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   -   -   -   24,512   1,280,017 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   18,384   36,768   73,536   -   2,525,226 

 Clay M. Gaspar

  1/25/2022  320,850  641,700   1,283,400   -   -   -   -   - 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   -   -   -   29,108   1,520,020 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   21,831   43,662   87,324   -   2,998,706 

 David G. Harris

  1/25/2022  284,150  568,300   1,136,600   -   -   -   -   - 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   -   -   -   24,512   1,280,017 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   18,384   36,768   73,536   -   2,525,226 

 Dennis C. Cameron

  1/25/2022  200,000  400,000   800,000   -   -   -   -   - 
  2/10/2022  -  -   -   -   -   -   15,320   800,010 
   2/10/2022  -  -   -   11,490   22,980   45,960   -   1,578,266 

 

1 

For those named executives receiving Performance Share Units,The evaluation of the numberCompany’s preset performance scorecard goals for the year may result in a bonus payment of shares paid out will be basedzero. The amounts shown in the columns reflect a range of possible payouts for the performance bonus awards made on the Company’s relative total stockholder return, determined pursuantdates indicated; “Threshold ($)” assumes achievement of Threshold results on each scorecard measure used to the grid set forthevaluate 2022 Company performance and “Maximum ($)” assumes achievement of Maximum results on page 38 of this proxy. Share payouts for half of the target amount will be based on relative performance for the two year-period of 2012-2013; the other half will be based on relative performance for the three-year period of 2012-2014. The number of shares paid out as a result of total stockholder return will beeach scorecard measure used to evaluate 2022 Company performance. Performance related to these awards was determined by the Committee following each period.the end of the year and amounts were paid shortly thereafter. The awards were earned and paid at 165% of target levels; actual payouts under these awards are shown in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Please refer to “Annual Performance Bonus” on page 43 for more information about 2022 performance bonus goal establishment, evaluation, and determination of actual payments to executives.

 

2 

Performance Restricted Stock will only be earned if the Company achieves a pre-set cash flow goal for 2012. The Committee will determine whether the goal has been achieved at the conclusion of 2012. If the goal is met, 25% of the grant’s shares will immediately vest and 25% will vest on each of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th anniversaries of the grant date. If the Company does not achieve the goal for 2012, the entire grant will be forfeited.

3

Stock options vest at the rate of 20% on the date of grant and 20% on each of the first four anniversary dates of the grant date.

4

The exercise priceevaluation of the Company’s performance for stock options is equalthe period may result in a payout of zero shares. The amounts in the “Threshold,” “Target,” and “Maximum” columns reflect the range and midpoint of possible payouts for the PSU awards made on the dates indicated. All awards were made under the 2017 LTIP, prior to the closing priceadoption of our common stock on the date of grant.

5

2022 LTIP. The dollar amounts reported in thisfor the table’s rightmost column represent the aggregate grant date fair values of the stock and option awards.PSUs determined pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The assumptions used togrant date fair value stock and optionof the PSU awards was determined based on the vesting at target of the units awarded, which is the performance the Company believed was probable on the grant date. For more information, please see the discussion of “Long-Term Incentives” starting on page 45 of this Proxy Statement. Dividends on the awards are discussednot paid until shares vest. As of December 31, 2022, the awards reflected inNote 3—Share-Based Compensation this table were trending at 125% of target payout.

3

The amounts reported in the table’s rightmost column reflect the value of the NotesRSA made on the date indicated. The value is calculated using the face-value method (the closing price of the Company stock as of the grant date multiplied by the number of shares granted). The award was made under the 2017 LTIP, prior to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Reportthe adoption of the 2022 LTIP. 25% of the shares granted vest on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.anniversary of the grant date and 25% will vest on each of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th anniversaries of the grant date.

 

 4556 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END

The following table shows the numberoutstanding equity awards held by the NEOs as of shares covered by exercisable and unexercisable options and unvested restricted stock, performance restricted stock and performance share awards owned by our named executive officers on December 31, 2011.2022.

 

   Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
Exercisable

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
Unexercisable

  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested

(#)1

  

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

($)2

  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: 
       

Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other

Rights That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

  

Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested

($)

 

John Richels

  12,0004       34.27    09/14/2012                  
   106,0003     23.05    12/02/2012          
   42,0003     38.45    12/08/2012          
   43,4003     66.39    12/11/2013          
   63,6003     71.01    12/11/2014          
   76,8003     89.15    12/09/2015          
   101,2803   25,320    65.32    12/07/2016          
   71,7603   47,840    63.80    12/07/2017          
   74,8403   112,260    73.43    12/01/2018          
   29,0353   116,140    65.10    11/30/2019          
           12,125    751,750      
           21,500    1,333,000      
           51,075    3,166,650      
               51,2207   3,175,640  
                           51,2008   3,174,400  

J. Larry Nichols

  40,0004     34.27    09/14/2012          
   210,0003     23.05    12/02/2012          
   125,0003     38.45    12/08/2012          
   141,1003     66.39    12/11/2013          
   143,6003     71.01    12/11/2014          
   153,4003     89.15    12/09/2015          
   192,0003   48,000    65.32    12/07/2016          
   125,0403   83,360    63.80    12/07/2017          
   75,0803   112,620    73.43    12/01/2018          
           23,025    1,427,550      
           43,750    2,712,500      
           56,175    3,482,850      
                           61,4607   3,810,520  

Jeffrey A. Agosta

  4,3383     23.05    12/02/2012          
   30,0003     38.45    12/08/2012          
   15,8003     66.39    12/11/2013          
   18,0003     71.01    12/11/2014          
   16,1003     89.15    12/09/2015          
   1,0003     88.91    12/30/2015          
   24,8003   6,200    65.32    12/07/2016          
   16,3803   10,920    63.80    12/07/2017          
   2,3603   3,540    64.43    03/30/2018          
   14,9803   22,470    73.43    12/01/2018          
   5,8103   23,240    65.10    11/30/2019          
           2,7506   170,500      
           2,583    160,146      
           4,900    303,800      
           1,725    106,950      
           10,219    633,578      
               10,2607   636,120  
                           10,2408   634,880  
    OptionAwards1 Stock Awards
              Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
  Name 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)

Exercisable

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)2
 Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)2

  Richard E. Muncrief

 42,582 - 41.53 3/3/2024 508,9275 31,304,100 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 133,0477 8,183,721 279,1146 17,168,302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 67,0259 4,122,708 125,6718 7,730,039

  Jeffrey L. Ritenour

 - - - - 12,2843 755,589 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 93,0084 5,720,922 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 27,7295 1,705,611 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 38,0147 2,338,241 79,7476 4,905,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 24,5129 1,507,733 45,9608 2,827,000

  Clay M. Gaspar

 - - - - 221,0185 13,594,817 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 57,7817 3,554,109 121,2156 7,455,935

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 29,1089 1,790,433 54,5788 3,357,062

  David G. Harris

 - - - - 5,8973 362,724 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 93,0084 5,720,922 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 27,7295 1,705,611 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 38,0147 2,338,241 79,7476 4,905,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 24,5129 1,507,733 45,9608 2,827,000

  Dennis C. Cameron

 - - - - 81,1475 4,991,352 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 22,8097 1,402,982 47,8486 2,943,130
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 15,3209 942,333 28,7258 1,766,875

1

The Option Awards were granted by WPX from the 2013 WPX Energy, Inc. Incentive Plan, as amended (the WPX Plan), and assumed by Devon upon the Merger. All awards are 100% vested.

2

Based on a stock price of $61.51, the last closing price of Devon’s common stock in 2022.

3

The rows reflect RSAs granted in 2019. With each grant, 25% of the shares vest (or vested) on each anniversary of the grant date (i.e., on February 10, 2020, February 10, 2021, February 10, 2022, and February 10, 2023).

4

For PSUs granted in 2020, the number of shares listed is based on the trending level of performance as of December 31, 2022 (167.7%) for the three- year period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022. At its January 2023 meeting, the Committee determined that the Company’s TSR for such period ranked 1st in the 12-member peer group, which could have provided for a payout of 200% of target. The grant’s value on the last day of the performance period was greater than the “Payout Value Limit” under the terms of the grant agreement, reducing the payout from 200% of target. After the end of 2022, the Committee certified a performance at 167.7% of target and earned shares were released on February 10, 2023.

5

The rows reflect RSAs granted in 2020. With each grant, 25% of the shares vest (or vested) on each anniversary of the grant date (i.e., on February 10, 2021, February 10, 2022, February 10, 2023, and February 10, 2024). For Messrs. Muncrief, Gaspar, and Cameron, the RSAs (i) relate to grants originally made by WPX which were assumed by Devon in connection with the Merger and (ii) provide that 33 13% of the shares vest (or vested) on each anniversary of the grant date (i.e. on March 1, 2021, March 1, 2022, and March 1, 2023).

 

 4657 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

   Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
Exercisable

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
Unexercisable

  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested

(#)1

  

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

($)2

  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: 
       

Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other

Rights That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

  

Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested

($)

 

David A. Hager

  3,0005       112.59    03/11/2012                  
   27,0003   18,000    44.69    03/30/2017          
   34,0803   22,720    63.80    12/07/2017          
   22,4603   33,690    73.43    12/01/2018          
   8,7103   34,840    65.10    11/30/2019          
           10,000    620,000      
           10,200    632,400      
           15,319    949,778      
               15,3807   953,560  
                           15,3608   952,320  

Darryl G. Smette

  106,0003     23.05    12/02/2012          
   40,0003     38.45    12/08/2012          
   29,4003     66.39    12/11/2013          
   31,8003     71.01    12/11/2014          
   30,2003     89.15    12/09/2015          
   36,0003   9,000    65.32    12/07/2016          
   24,6003   16,400    63.80    12/07/2017          
   17,2203   25,830    73.43    12/01/2018          
   6,6803   26,720    65.10    11/30/2019          
           4,000    248,000      
           7,350    455,700      
           11,757    728,934      
               11,7807   730,360  
                           11,7608   729,120  

 

1

Restricted stock awards granted December 8, 2008, March 31, 2009, December 8, 2009, March 31, 2010 and December 2, 2010 vest 25% on each anniversary of the grant date.

2

Based on a stock price of $62.00, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2011.

3

Options granted December 2, 2002, December 9, 2004, December 12, 2005, December 12, 2006, December 10, 2007, December 31, 2007, December 8, 2008, March 31, 2009, December 8, 2009, March 31, 2010, December 2, 2010 and December 1, 2011 vested 20% on the date of grant and an additional 20% on each anniversary of the grant date.

4

Options granted September 15, 2004 vested 20% on September 15, 2004, December 4, 2004, December 4, 2005, December 4, 2006, and December 4, 2007.

5

Mr. Hager was granted options on June 4, 2008, during his time as a Director of the Company. For Directors, options vest on the date granted.

6 

Restricted stock awards granted September 9, 2008 vest 50% on September 9, 2011 and September 9, 2012.

7

Performance restricted stock will only be earned if the Company achieves a pre-set cash flow goal for 2012. The Committee will determine whether the goal has been achieved at the conclusion of 2012. If the goal is met, 25% of the shares granted will immediately vest and 25% will vest on each of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th anniversaries of the grant date. If the Company does not achieve the goal for 2012, the entire grant will be forfeited.

8

For those named executives receiving performance share units,PSUs granted in 2021, the number of shares listed is based on targetthe trending level of performance.performance as of December 31, 2022 (200%) for the three-year period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2023. The actual number of shares paid out will be based on the Company’s relative total stockholder return,TSR, as determined by the Committee following the period pursuant to the grid set forth on page 3847 of this proxy. Share payouts for halfDevon’s 2021 proxy statement, and may be subject to certain limitations set forth in the applicable grant agreements at the time of settlement.

7

The rows reflect RSAs granted in 2021. With each grant, 25% of the target amount will beshares vest (or vested) on each anniversary of the grant date (i.e., on February 10, 2022, February 10, 2023, February 10, 2024, and February 10, 2025).

8

For PSUs granted in 2022, the number of shares listed is based on relativethe trending level of performance for the two-year periodas of 2012-2013, the other half will be based on relative performanceDecember 31, 2022 (125%) for the three-year period of 2012-2014.from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024. The actual number of shares paid out will be based on the Company’s relative TSR, as determined by the Committee following each period.the period pursuant to the grid set forth on page 46 of Devon’s 2022 proxy statement, and may be subject to certain limitations set forth in the applicable grant agreements at the time of settlement.

 

9
47Commitment Runs Deep

The rows reflect RSAs granted in 2022. With each grant, 25% of the shares vest (or vested) on each anniversary of the grant date (i.e., on February 10, 2023, February 10, 2024, February 10, 2025, and February 10, 2026).


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING 20112022

The table below shows the number of shares of ourDevon’s common stock acquired during 20112022 upon the exercise of options. This table also includes information regardingstock options and the vesting during 2011 of stock awards, previouslyeach of which were granted to the named executive officers.NEOs in previous years.

 

   Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of
Shares

Acquired  on

Exercise

(#)

  

Value
Realized on

Exercise
($)
1

  

Number of

Shares

Acquired
on Vesting

(#)

  

Value
Realized on

Vesting

($)2

 

John Richels

  111,000    6,237,750    47,200    3,056,977  

J. Larry Nichols

  330,000    13,600,050    78,250    5,059,345  

Jeffrey A. Agosta

  21,200    1,173,939    13,496    884,436  

David A. Hager

  3,000    29,910    15,206    1,117,754  

Darryl G. Smette

  99,000    5,241,968    14,468    936,686  
  Options Awards Stock Awards
  Name Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise (#)
 Value
Realized
on
Exercise
($)1
 Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (#)
 Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)2

  Richard E. Muncrief

 

20,000

  

 

507,800

  

 

492,582

  

 

28,831,832  

  Jeffrey L. Ritenour

 -   -  

 

144,777

  

 

7,560,255  

  Clay M. Gaspar

 -   -  

 

215,987

  

 

12,643,642  

  David G. Harris

 -   -  

 

83,794

  

 

4,375,723  

  Dennis C. Cameron

 

18,206

  

 

515,079

  

 

84,088

  

 

4,920,262  

 

1 

The dollar amounts shown in this column are determined by multiplying the number of options exercised by the difference between the perper- share market price of underlying common stock at exercise and the per shareper-share exercise price of the options.

 

2 

The dollar amounts shown in this column are determined by multiplying the number of shares of common stock awards that vestedacquired upon vesting by the per shareclosing per-share market price of ourDevon’s common stock on the vesting date.

48Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

PENSION BENEFITS FOR 2011

We maintain three defined benefit retirement plans in which our named executive officers may participate. Mr. Hager joined the Company after the defined benefit retirement plans were closed to new participants, and therefore does not participate in the plans.

ADevon maintains a tax qualified defined benefit retirement plan and related trust for certain employees (Defined Benefit Plan);

A nonqualified Benefit Restoration Plan (BRP) that provides benefits that would be provided. Mr. Ritenour, the only NEO eligible to participate in the plan, elected to have his benefit under the Defined Benefit Plan except for:

limitations imposed by the Code, and

the exclusion of nonqualified deferred compensation in the definition of compensation; and

A nonqualified Supplemental Retirement Incomefrozen. Messrs. Muncrief, Gaspar, Harris, and Cameron joined the Company after the Defined Benefit Plan (SRIP)was closed to new participants in 2007. As a result, they are not eligible for a small groupbenefit under any of executives that provides benefits similar to those provided by the BRP plus certain additional benefits.Devon’s defined retirement benefit plans.

A nonqualified Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (SRIP) for a small group of executives that provides benefits similar to those provided by the BRP plus certain additional benefits.

The following table shows the estimated present value, as of December 31, 2022, of accumulated retirement benefits as provided to Mr. Ritenour under the Defined Benefit Plan and the SRIPPlan. Please refer to the named executive officers. All named executive officers, excluding Mr. Hager, are participants in the SRIP; therefore, BRP benefits are not included in the following table. SRIP benefits vest after five years of service. Participants who are terminateddiscussion titled “Benefit Plans” below for cause lose their SRIP benefits and are instead paid under the BRP. Amounts payable under the SRIP or the BRP are reduced by the amounts payableadditional details on Devon’s defined benefit plans.

58Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Name  Plan Name  Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
  Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
($)1
  Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)

  Jeffrey L. Ritenour

  Defined Benefit Plan    7    146,982    0

1

The present value of Mr. Ritenour’s accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2022 under the Defined Benefit Plan is calculated assuming 10% of participants would elect a single life annuity, 50% of participants would elect a lump sum, and 40% would elect a 100% joint and survivor annuity. The calculation assumes that Mr. Ritenour would begin receiving payments at normal retirement age (age 65) or when eligible for unreduced benefits, if earlier, and would be vested in those payments. The present value is calculated using the Pri-2012 mortality table with MP-2021 improvement scale, and a discount rate of 5.79% for the Defined Benefit Plan.

BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Benefit Plan

The Defined Benefit Plan so there is no duplication of benefits. Retirementa qualified defined benefit retirement plan that provides benefits are calculated based upon employment service with Devon. Each eligible employee who retires is entitled to receive monthly retirement income based upon their final average compensation and years of credited service, and “final average compensation.”the retirement income is reduced by Social Security benefits payable to the employee. Alternatively, an eligible employee may elect a lump-sum payment at the time of retirement equivalent to the present value of the calculated annuity stream. Final average compensation consists of the average of the highest three consecutive years’ compensation from salary and cash performance bonuses out of the last 10 years. The definition of compensation under the Defined Benefit Plan is the same as the definitionincludes salary and annual performance bonus. Mr. Ritenour elected to have his benefit under the SRIPplan frozen at the end of 2007, and BRP except that undereffective as of December 31, 2020, the Company’s Defined Benefit Plan nonqualified deferred compensation is excluded and the amount of compensation and pension benefits are limited by the Code.was amended to discontinue further benefit accruals.

Pension Benefits Table

NamePlan NameNumber of Years
Credited Service
(#)
Present Value of
Accumulated  Benefit
($)
1
Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)

John Richels2,3,4

Defined Benefit Plan  

SRIP


8
16


1,820,879
13,719,289




J. Larry Nichols

Defined Benefit Plan

SRIP


42
42


2,450,858
27,099,069




Jeffrey A. Agosta

Defined Benefit Plan

SRIP


15
15


878,447
608,733




David A. Hager5

Defined Benefit Plan

SRIP










Darryl G. Smette2

Defined Benefit Plan

SRIP


25
25


2,635,094
9,026,322




49Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

1

We calculated the present value of each named executive officer’s accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2011 under our pension plans assuming 25% of participants would elect a single life annuity, 15% of participants would elect a 50% joint and survivor annuity and 60% would elect a 100% joint and survivor annuity. We assumed that each named executive officer would begin receiving payments at normal retirement age (age 65) and would be vested in those payments. The present value is calculated using the 2012 PPA Static mortality table and a discount rate of 4.65%. No pre-retirement decrements were used in this calculation.

2

Messrs. Smette and Richels are eligible for early retirement under the Defined Benefit Plan and the SRIP. See the following “Defined Benefit Plan—Early Retirement” for a description of the eligibility requirements and benefits payable under our Defined Benefit Plan.

3

Years of credited service for Mr. Richels for the Defined Benefit Plan are determined based on time worked in the U.S. For the SRIP, Mr. Richels’ service is based on time worked in the U.S. and Canada while with the Company. Mr. Richels’ Canadian service is included for benefit eligibility purposes (vesting and early retirement) in both plans.

4

Benefits payable to Mr. Richels under the SRIP are reduced by benefits under our Pension Plan for Employees of Devon Canada Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Richels’ benefit under the Pension Plan for Employees of Devon Canada Corporation is frozen and Mr. Richels’ future pension benefits are accruing under the Defined Benefit Plan and the SRIP.

5

Mr. Hager joined the Company after our Defined Benefit Plan was closed to new participants. As a result, he will not receive a benefit under the plans described in this table.

BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Benefit Plan

The Defined Benefit Plan is a qualified defined benefit retirement plan which provides benefits based upon employment service with us. Employees hired before October 1, 2007, became eligible to participate in the Defined Benefit Plan when they earned one year of service and attained the age of 21 years. Employees who were hired after September 30, 2007, are not eligible to participate in the Defined Benefit Plan. Each eligible employee who retires is entitled to receive monthly retirement income, based upon their final average compensation, years of credited service and reduced by Social Security benefits payable to the employee. Contributions by employees are neither required nor permitted under the Defined Benefit Plan. Benefits are computed based on straight-life annuity amounts. Benefits under the Defined Benefit Plan are limited for certain highly compensated employees, including our named executive officers,the NEOs, in order to comply with certain requirements of ERISAthe Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code.

Normal Retirement

Employees, including the named executive officers,Mr. Ritenour, are eligible for normal retirement benefits under the Defined Benefit Plan upon reaching age 65. Normal retirement benefits for the employees participating in the Defined Benefit Plan are equal to 65% of the participant’s final average compensation less any benefits due to the participant under Social Security, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is his or her credited years of service (up to a maximum of 25 years) and the denominator of which is 25.

50Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Early Retirement

Employees, including the named executive officers, are eligible for early retirement benefits under the Defined BenefitContribution Plan after (i) attaining age 55, and (ii) earning at least 10 years of credited service. Early retirement benefits are equal to a percentage of the normal retirement income the participant would otherwise be entitled to if he or she had commenced benefits at age 65 depending on the participant’s age when he or she elects to begin receiving benefits:

Age When

Benefits Begin 

 Percentage of
Normal Retirement
Income
65 100%
64   97%
63   94%
62   91%
61   88%
60   85%
59   80%
58   75%
57   70%
56   65%
55   60%

51Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Deferred Vested Pension

Participants in the Defined Benefit Plan are fully vested in their accrued benefits after five years of service. If the participant’s employment is terminated after attaining five years of service but before eligibility for early retirement, the participant is entitled to a deferred vested pension based on his or her accrued benefit on the date of termination. An unreduced deferred vested pension is payable at age 65. Alternatively, the participant may elect to receive a reduced benefit as early as age 55. The benefit payable prior to age 65 is a percentage of his or her normal retirement benefit based on his or her age at the time the benefit begins, as shown in the table below:

Age at Election to

  Receive  Deferred  

Vested Pension

 Percentage of
  Normal Retirement  
Income
65 100.00%
64   90.35%
63   81.88%
62   74.40%
61   67.79%
60   61.91%
59   56.68%
58   52.00%
57   47.80%
56   44.03%
55   40.63%

If a participant is:

involuntarily terminated for any reason other than death or “cause,” is between the ages of 50 and 55 and has at least 10 years of credited service, or

involuntarily terminated for any reason other than “cause” within two years following a change in control and has at least 10 years of credited service regardless of the participant’s age,

then the participant may elect to have his or her benefits under the Defined Benefit Plan paid at any time on or after the age of 55 subject to the same percentage reduction in benefits as set forth under “Early Retirement” applicable to the participant.

Benefit Restoration Plan

The BRP is a nonqualified defined benefit retirement plan, the purpose of which is to restore retirement benefits for certain selected key management and highly compensated employees because their benefits under the Defined Benefit Plan are limited in order to comply with certain requirements of ERISA and the Code or because their final average compensation is reduced as a result of contributions into our Deferred Compensation Plan. Benefits under the BRP are equal to 65% of the executive’s final average compensation less any benefits due to the executive under Social

52Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Security, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is his or her years of credited service (not to exceed 25) and the denominator of which is 25. The BRP benefit is reduced by the benefit that is otherwise payable under the Defined Benefit Plan. An employee must be selected by the Compensation Committee in order to be eligible for participation in the BRP. The same early retirement reduction factors that apply under the Defined Benefit Plan are applicable under the BRP. Participants become vested in retirement benefits under the BRP at the same time as the participant becomes vested for retirement benefits under the Defined Benefit Plan.

Supplemental Retirement Income Plan

The SRIP is another nonqualified defined benefit retirement plan for a small group of our key executives, the purpose of which is to provide additional retirement benefits for these executives. An employee must be selected by the Compensation Committee in order to be eligible for participation in the SRIP. Participants in the SRIP become vested in the SRIP benefits after five years of service. If the executive is terminated for “cause” as that term is defined in the executive’s employment agreement, then all benefits under the SRIP are forfeited and the executive would receive benefits under the BRP. If the executive is receiving benefits under the SRIP, the executive is not eligible for benefits under the BRP.

The SRIP provides for retirement income equal to 65% of the executive’s final average compensation less any benefits due to the participant under Social Security, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the executive’s credited years of service (not to exceed 20) and the denominator of which is 20. For those participating in the plan as of January 24, 2002 (“Grandfathered Participants”), the SRIP benefit is reduced by a fraction of the benefits otherwise accrued under the Defined Benefit Plan, the numerator of which is years of credited service (not greater than 20) and the denominator of which is 20. For those who become participants after January 24, 2002, the SRIP benefit is reduced by the full benefits otherwise accrued under the Defined Benefit Plan. Of the named executive officers who participate in the SRIP, Mr. Agosta is not a Grandfathered Participant. In the case of Mr. Richels, his SRIP benefit is also reduced by amounts payable to him under the defined contribution provisions of our Canadian Pension Plan.

The same early retirement reduction factors that apply under the Defined Benefit Plan are applicable under the SRIP. Early retirement benefits are payable under the SRIP after attaining age 55 and earning at least 10 years of service or, if earlier, 20 years of service regardless of age. The early retirement benefit prior to age 55 is the actuarial equivalent to the age 55 early retirement benefit. In the event that a named executive officer is terminated “without cause” or terminates his or her employment for “good reason” as those terms are defined in our employment agreements with our named executive officers, then the executive will be 100% vested in his accrued SRIP benefit. If a change in control event occurs, the executive will be 100% vested and his benefit will be an amount equal to the normal retirement annuity payable immediately, unreduced for early commencement, paid in a lump sum. Otherwise, the benefit will be paid monthly, pursuant to the annuity option selected by the executive. Additionally, the SRIP provides that if the executive is terminated “without cause” or terminates his or her employment for “good reason” within 24 months of a change in control event, the executive will be entitled to an additional three years of service credit and age in determining benefits. The SRIP may be informally funded through a rabbi trust arrangement.

53Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN 2011

The following table shows information about our nonqualified deferred compensation plans, which are further described below.

Name Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)1
  Company
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)2
  Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
  Aggregate
Distributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
  Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year End
($)3
 

John Richels

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  233,769    142,887    (34,142  248,096    1,389,565  

J. Larry Nichols

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  269,769    195,300    30,979    358,983    2,263,786  

Jeffrey A. Agosta

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  278,585    25,710    (19,464      1,087,015  

David A. Hager

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  50,135    33,300    (9,595      146,579  

Defined Contribution Restoration Plan

      88,800    (5,087      106,152  

Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

      257,450    (14,748      344,387  

Darryl G. Smette

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  88,350    59,700    (15,060  141,694    1,276,096  

1

The amounts in this column are also included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 43, in the salary column or the bonus column.

2

The amounts in this column are also included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 44, in the “All Other Compensation” column.

3

Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan may elect for balances to track the performance of a sub-set of the investment choices available under the Company’s 401(k) plan. The investment choices available on December 31, 2011, each of which is managed by a third party, produced the following returns for 2011: SEI Stable Value, 0%; PIMCO Total Return Institutional Class, 4.16%; Large Cap Value Fund, -7.12%; Large Cap Growth Fund, -1.15%; Small/Mid Cap Value Fund, -1.21%; Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund, -1.32%.

401(k) Plan

The 401(k) Plan is a qualified defined contribution plan that provides for a Company matchingCompany-matching contribution of up to 6% of compensation. The Defined Benefit Plan was closed to new entrants on October 1, 2007. Supplemental contributionscompensation and a non-matching company contribution of 8% or 16% of.

59Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION1

The following table shows the contributions, earnings, distributions, and balances for 2022 under Devon’s nonqualified deferred compensation that are determined based on years of benefit service were addedplan and supplemental contribution restoration plans, to the 401(k) Plan for employees who areextent the respective NEO participates in such plans. Additional information regarding each plan is provided following the table.

   Name 

Executive
Contributions in

Last Fiscal Year
($)1

  

Company
Contributions for

Last Fiscal Year
($)2

  Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year
($)3,4
  

Aggregate
Distributions in

Last Fiscal Year
($)5

  Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year End
($)3,6
 
 

Richard E. Muncrief

     

 

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  927,435         189,839         (134,074  0   1,245,052 

 

 

Supplemental Contribution

Restoration Plans (SCRPs)

  N/A         255,318         (27,051  0   316,650 

 

 

WPX Deferred Compensation

Plan

  N/A         N/A         (1,469,824  0   4,690,288 

 

 

WPX Restoration Plan

  N/A         N/A         24,034   0   1,232,490 
 

Jeffrey L. Ritenour

     

 

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  296,310         79,264         (68,284  (1,532  494,049 

 

 

Supplemental Contribution

Restoration Plans (SCRPs)

  N/A         107,885         (22,466  0   179,936 
 

Clay M. Gaspar

     

 

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  104,146         85,846         (20,434  0   224,824 

 

 

Supplemental Contribution

Restoration Plans (SCRPs)

  N/A         116,661         (11,485  0   143,621 

 

 

WPX Deferred Compensation

Plan

  N/A         N/A         (254,911  0   1,142,243 

 

 

WPX Restoration Plan

  N/A         N/A         (157,880  0   605,845 
 

David G. Harris

     

 

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  95,989         77,688         (28,654  0   255,614 

 

 

Supplemental Contribution

Restoration Plans (SCRPs)

  N/A         105,785         (19,991  0   170,488 
 

Dennis C. Cameron

     

 

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

  70,125         51,825         (12,424  0   146,539 

 

 

Supplemental Contribution

Restoration Plans (SCRPs)

  N/A         71,300         (6,090  0   86,563 

 

 

WPX Deferred Compensation

Plan

  N/A         N/A         (7,930  0   328,300 
 

 

 

WPX Restoration Plan

  N/A         N/A         (32,978  0   431,063 

“N/A” indicates the plan does not accruing benefits inpermit the Defined Benefit Plan.participant or, as applicable, the Company to make contributions.

1

The amounts in this column are already included in, and are not in addition to, the amounts in the “Salary” or “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54.

60Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

2

The amounts in this column are already included in, and are not in addition to, the amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 54. Company contributions are made in arrears during the first month following the fiscal quarter during which the contributions were earned. Company contributions earned by the NEOs during 2022 were deposited in April, July, and October 2022 and January 2023.

3

Messrs. Muncrief, Gaspar, and Cameron participate in the WPX Deferred Compensation Plan and the WPX Restoration Plan. No new contributions may be made to these plans after December 31, 2021.

4

Earnings reflect the returns produced by the investments selected by the applicable NEO. For the Devon Plans, the investment options available to the NEOs are the same options available under the Company’s 401(k) Plan. As of December 31, 2022, investment options consisted of the following (returns for 2022 noted in parentheses): PIMCO Stable Income-Class 1 (1.79%); Global Low Volatility Fund (-10.04%); US Equity Index Fund (-19.20%); International Equity Index Fund (-16.25%); TCW Core Fixed Income (-14.25%); Fidelity Inflation Bond Index (-12.05%); Vanguard Total Bond Market (-13.16%); Vanguard Prime Money Market (1.55%). BlackRock LifePath Target-Date Funds (nine funds ranging from -15.25% to -18.30%). For the WPX Deferred Compensation Plan and the WPX Restoration Plan, the investment options are the same in each plan. As of December 31, 2022, investment options consisted of the following (returns for 2022 noted in parentheses): iShares Total US Stock Market Index (-19.07%); iShares MSCI Total International Index (-16.39%); Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index (-12.05%); PIMCO Short Asset Investment (0.57%); TCW Core Fixed Income (-14.25%); Vanguard Total Bond Market Index (-13.16%); Vanguard Federal Money Market (1.55%); BlackRock LifePath Target-Date Funds (nine funds ranging from – 15.77% to -18.33%). The Company does not guarantee a level of investment return.

5

In-service distributions (if any) are made in accordance with the elections made by the NEO at the time of enrollment in the plan.

6

For the referenced plans, the Aggregate Balance reflects the changes in the plan balance for the NEOs due to contributions (executive and Company), earnings, and distributions. The amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table as compensation to the NEOs are as follows: Mr. Muncrief – $132,960; Mr. Ritenour – $938,135; Mr. Gaspar – $56,077; and Mr. Harris – $402,819.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan is designed to allow each participating employees,employee, including the named executive officers,NEOs, to contribute up to 50%70% of his or her base salary and up to 100% of his or her performance bonus and receive a Company match beyond the contribution limits prescribed by the IRSInternal Revenue Service with regard to ourDevon’s 401(k) Plan. The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan provides executives a tax effectivetax-effective means to defer a portion of their cash compensation at a minimal cost to the Company.

Unless otherwise distributed in accordance with the terms of a scheduled in-service withdrawal, a participant’s account is payable upon the earlier to occur of the participant’s separation from service, disability, change-in- control event, or death. Payment will be made in the form of a single lump sum unless the participant elects installment payments. In the case of a change-in-control event or death, distribution will be made within ninety days. If the participant experiences a separation from service, distribution will be made within ninety days unless the participant is a specified employee in which case payment will be delayed for six months.

A participant may elect to schedule an in-service withdrawal at least two years after the plan year in which deferrals were made in the form of a lump sum or quarterly installment payments over a period of one or more years. Payment will be made (or commence in the case of installments) within thirty days of the first business day of January in the year elected. However, in the event of death, disability, the occurrence of a change-in- control event or separation from service, payment of the participant’s account is determined without regard to any scheduled in-service withdrawal, which will be cancelled.

Investments under the plan mirror those provided to participants under the Company’s 401(k) Plan. Participants are always fully vested in any deferrals made to the plan; vesting of employer contributions follows the four- year graded vesting schedule under the Company’s 401(k) Plan. Vesting is accelerated due to death, disability, retirement, or attainment of normal retirement age (all as defined under the Company’s 401(k) Plan).

The WPX Deferred Compensation plan operated on substantially the same terms as the Devon plan prior to the 2021 merger of the companies. In the year of the Merger, contributions to the WPX plan ceased and NEO participants became participants in the Devon plan.

 

 5461 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

Supplemental Contribution Restoration Plans

The Supplemental Contribution Restoration Plans (SCRPs) are the Company’s two nonqualified supplemental defined contribution plans. The purpose of the SCRPs is to ensure that participants in the 401(k) Plan who are eligible to receive the supplemental contribution receive the full supplemental contribution despite the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. A contribution will be made by the Company in an amount equal to the difference between the supplemental contribution that the Company would have contributed under the 401(k) Plan in the absence of the Internal Revenue Code limitations and the actual amount contributed.

Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanAccounts under the SCRPs are payable upon the earlier to occur of a participant’s separation from service, disability, a change-in-control event, or death. Upon a participant’s death or a change-in-control event, a lump sum payment is made within ninety days. If a participant experiences a separation from service, the account is distributed in a lump sum within ninety days unless the participant is a specified employee in which case payment will be subject to a six-month delay.

Investments under the SCRPs mirror those provided to participants under the Company’s 401(k) Plan. Vesting under the plans follows the four-year graded vesting schedule under the Company’s 401(k) Plan. Vesting is accelerated due to death, disability, retirement or attainment of normal retirement age (all as defined under the Company’s 401(k) Plan).

The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (DC SERP) is a nonqualified supplemental executive retirementWPX Restoration plan that provides benefits in lieuoperated on substantially the same terms as the Devon SCRPs prior to the Merger. In the year of the SRIP to a small group of key executives who are not eligible to participate in the Defined Benefit Plan or the SRIP. Under the DC SERP, an executive is eligible to receive a contribution of a specified percentage of compensation annually. This contribution will be offset by supplementalMerger, contributions to the 401(k) PlanWPX plan ceased and contributions to the SCRPs. An employee must be selected by the Compensation Committee in order to be eligible for participationNEO participants became participants in the DC SERP. A participant in the DC SERP becomes 50% vested after five years of service and vests at the rate of 10% for another five years. At age 62, a participant will be 100% vested with five years of participation. In the event of a change in control or a named executive officer is terminated “without cause” or terminates his or her employment for “good reason,” as those terms are defined in our employment agreements with our named executive officers, then the executive will be 100% vested in his or her DC SERP account. Additionally, the DC SERP provides that if the executive is terminated “without cause” or terminates his or her employment for “good reason” within 24 months of a change in control event, the executive will be entitled to an additional three years of contributions. For those additional three years of contribution, no contributions under the 401(k) plan or the SCRPs will exist to apply as an offset because the executive will have terminated employment. A participant will be 100% vested in the event of death or disability. Payment of DC SERP accounts will be in the form of a lump sum payment. The DC SERP may be informally funded through a rabbi trust arrangement.Devon plan.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROLCHANGE-IN-CONTROL

WeDevon will be obligated to make certain payments to our named executive officersthe NEOs or potentially accelerate the vesting of their equity awards and retirement benefits upon termination of their employment or upon a change in controlchange-in-control of the Company pursuant to the following plans or agreements:

 

employment agreements entered into withan “Employment Agreement” is applicable to the President and CEO and each of our named executive officers;the Executive Vice Presidents,

 

the Defined Benefit Plan;Plan,

 

the 401(k) Plan;Plan,

 

the BRP, the SRIP, the SCRPs, or the DC SERP, depending on the circumstances of the executive officer’s termination;

the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and

 

the 2009Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan.Plans (the Devon 2017 LTIP, the 2022 LTIP, and the WPX Plan).

Please refer to the discussion in the sections immediately above for information about each of the applicable pension plans and nonqualified deferred compensation plans that the NEOs participate in and may be eligible to receive benefits from in the event of a termination of employment or a change-in-control.

As specified below, the Employment Agreement with Devon’s NEOs provide the following rights to compensation in the event of employment termination.

 

 5562 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

The following tables provideAccrued Payments Upon Termination of Employment

Upon termination under the estimated compensation and present value of benefits potentially payableagreements, the NEO is entitled to each named executive officer upon a change in control ofreceive the Companyaccrued amounts earned during his or a terminationher term of employment, of the named executive officer. The benefit values shown do not include benefits that are broadly available to substantially all salaried employees. The amounts shown assume that a termination or change in control occurred on December 31, 2011. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of an executive’s actual separation from the Company.including:

Please see the narrative for the following tables for a discussion of the methods of calculating the payments required upon termination of our named executive officers in the manners set forth in each column. The footnotes for each of the following tables are presented after the final table. The amounts shown do not include any amounts with respect to tax gross-up payments in favor of the named executive officers because the employment agreements between the Company and each of the named executive officers were amended in April 2011 to eliminate the tax gross-up payment obligations.

John Richels

Benefits and Payments

($)

 

Retirement/

Voluntary

Termination

($)

  

Termination

Without
Cause

($)

  

Termination

With
Cause

($)

  

Change in

Control

($)

  

Disability

($)

  

Death

($)

 

Base Salary/Bonus1

      13,590,000        13,590,000          

SRIP2,3

  16,069,000    16,069,000        30,796,0004   16,069,000    14,934,0005 

BRP2,3

                        
Accelerated Vesting of
Stock Options6
                        
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock7      11,601,440        11,601,440        11,601,440  

Health Care Benefits8

      39,798        39,798          

Post-Retirement Health Care9

              418          

Outplacement Services10

      35,000        35,000          
  
                         

Total11

  16,069,000    41,352,238        56,062,656    16,069,000    26,535,440  

 

56Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

J. Larry Nichols

Benefits and Payments

($)

 

Retirement/

Voluntary

Termination

($)

  

Termination

Without
Cause

($)

  

Termination

With
Cause

($)

  

Change in

Control

($)

  

Disability

($)

  

Death

($)

 

Base Salary/Bonus1

      15,000,000        15,000,000          

SRIP2,3

  27,099,000    27,099,000        30,464,0004   27,099,000    24,110,0005 

BRP2,3

          27,099,000              
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options6                        
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock7      11,433,420        11,433,420        11,433,420  

Health Care Benefits8

      39,798        39,798          

Post-Retirement Health Care9

                        

Outplacement Services10

      35,000        35,000          
  
                         

Total11

  27,099,000    53,607,218    27,099,000    56,972,218    27,099,000    35,543,420  

Jeffrey A. Agosta

Benefits and Payments

($)

 

Retirement/

Voluntary

Termination

($)

  

Termination

Without
Cause

($)

  

Termination

With

Cause

($)

  

Change in

Control

($)

  

Disability

($)

  

Death

($)

 

Base Salary/Bonus1

      3,750,000        3,750,000          

SRIP2,3

  482,000    482,000        7,896,0004   270,000    682,0005 

BRP2,3

          247,000              
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options6                        
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock7      2,645,974        2,645,974        2,645,974  

Health Care Benefits8

      55,573        55,573          

Post-Retirement Health Care9

                        

Outplacement Services10

      35,000        35,000          
  
                         

Total

  482,000    6,968,547    247,000    14,382,547    270,000    3,327,974  

57Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

David A. Hager

Benefits and Payments

($)

 

Retirement/

Voluntary

Termination

($)

  

Termination

Without
Cause

($)

  

Termination

With

Cause

($)

  

Change in

Control

($)

  

Disability

($)

  

Death

($)

 

Base Salary/Bonus1

      5,800,000        5,800,000          

DC SERP12

  661,906    661,906        1,447,470    661,906    661,906  

SCRPs13

  239,844    239,844        239,844    239,844    239,844  
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options6      311,580        311,580        311,580  
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock7      4,108,058        4,108,058        4,108,058  

Health Care Benefits8

      55,573        55,573          

Post-Retirement Health Care9

                        

Outplacement Services10

      35,000        35,000          
  
                         

Total11

  901,750    11,211,961        11,997,525    901,750    5,321,388  

Darryl G. Smette

Benefits and Payments

($)

 

Retirement/

Voluntary

Termination

($)

  

Termination

Without
Cause

($)

  

Termination

With

Cause

($)

  

Change in

Control

($)

  

Disability

($)

  

Death

($)

 

Base Salary/Bonus1

      5,400,000        5,400,000          

SRIP2,3

  9,226,000    9,226,000        9,450,0004   9,226,000    8,217,0005 

BRP2,3

          9,226,000              
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options6                        
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock7      2,892,114        2,892,114        2,892,114  

Health Care Benefits8

      39,798        39,798          

Post-Retirement Health Care9

                        

Outplacement Services10

      35,000        35,000          
  
                         

Total11

  9,226,000    17,592,912    9,226,000    17,816,912    9,226,000    11,109,114  

1(i)

The employment agreements for our named executive officers provide that each executive is entitled toany earned but unpaid salary through the paymentdate of a pro rata share of any bonus for the performance period in which the termination, occurs based on the number of days worked in the period. For purposes of quantifying the potential payments for our named executive officers upon a termination, we have assumed that a termination took place on December 31, 2011. As a result, each named executive officer would be entitled to the bonus they earned in 2011. Those bonus amounts are set forth in the bonus column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 43.

 

2(ii)

Participants are vested in their benefits under the SRIP after five years of service. Benefits underannual performance bonus amount only if the SRIPNEO has been employed the entire year upon which such annual performance bonus is based, and the BRP are mutually exclusive; therefore, participants will not receive a benefit under the SRIP if they are receiving a benefit under the BRP and vice versa. Participants forfeit their benefits under the SRIP if they are terminated for “cause” and will instead receive benefits under the BRP except for Mr. Richels and Mr. Hager who are not participants in the BRP. Benefits paid under the SRIP or the BRP are reduced by any amounts payable under the Defined Benefit Plan so that there is no duplication of benefits.

 

58Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

3(iii)

The values shown for the SRIP and the BRP benefits for each named executive officer are the present values as of December 31, 2011, of the benefits that would be payable under the SRIPamounts he or BRP as of each executive’s earliest possible commencement date. Except in the case of a change in control where the benefitshe is paid as a lump sum and in the case of benefits payable to a beneficiary upon death as a monthly single life annuity, we have assumed that 25% of participants would elect the SRIP and BRP benefits in the form of a single life annuity, 15% would elect a 50% joint and survivor annuity and 60% of participants would elect a 100% joint and survivor annuity. All other assumptions are the same as those used to determine the present value of benefits disclosed in the Pension Benefits Table.

4

Under the SRIP, a participating named executive officer will receive credit for an additional three years of service and an additional three years of age when determining his or her SRIP benefit if the officer is terminated “without cause” or terminates his or her employment for “good reason” within 24 months following a change in control. All benefits under the SRIP are payable as a lump sum payment, within 90 days following a change in control where the lump sum payment is the present value of the unreduced accrued benefit payable immediately. The lump sum amount shown is based on the lump sum rate in effect for payments beginning January 2012.

5

Participants are immediately vested in the SRIP accrued benefit upon death. The benefit is payable to a participant’s beneficiary at the date the participant would have reached age 55 with 10 years of service, reduced by subsidized early retirement factors and assuming that the participant had elected a 100% joint and survivor pension.

6

Values displayed for acceleration of vesting of stock options represent the number of options multiplied by the difference between the year end closing market price of our common stock which was $62.00 per share and the exercise price of each option.

7

Values displayed for acceleration of vesting of restricted stock represent the year end closing market price of our common stock which was $62.00 per share.

8

For all named executive officers, health care benefits are payable for 18 months following termination “without cause” or following their termination in connection with a change in control. All named executive officers are alsootherwise entitled to a payment in an amount equal to 18 times the monthly COBRA premium following termination “without cause” or following their termination in connection with a change in control. The values in the tables are estimated based on our current cost of these benefits.

9

Mr. Richels will receive an enhancement in his post-retirement medical benefit upon a change in control. All other named executives either would not be eligible for a post-retirement medical benefit or are fully accrued in the benefit. We have not included the value of benefits that would be available to substantially all employees. Instead we have only included the value of the enhancement that is payable based on the executive’s employment agreement.

10

Outplacement services are provided following termination “without cause” or following termination in connection with a change in control. The value in the table is estimated based on our current cost of this benefit.

11

Our nonqualifiedunder Devon’s employee benefit plans including(together, the SRIP, the BRP, the Deferred Compensation Plan, the DC SERP, the SCRPs, and employment agreements are subject, all or in part, to Section 409A of the Code, which requires certain payments made under these plans and agreements to be delayed for six months.“Accrued Amounts”).

12

Mr. Hager participates in the DC SERP in lieu of participating in the SRIP. Mr. Hager will receive an additional three years of contributions by the Company under the DC SERP if he is terminated “without cause” or terminates his employment for “good reason” within 24 months following a change in control.

13

Mr. Hager’s benefit in the SCRPs will become 100% vested upon a change in control.

59Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

All of the named executive officers are parties to employment agreements that set out their rights to compensation following their termination under various circumstances.

Rights Upon Termination for Any Reason

Under the employment agreements, regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer’s employment terminates, he is entitled to receive amounts earned during his term of employment. Such amounts include:

unpaid salary through the date of termination;

unused vacation pay;

bonuses that have already been earned; and

amounts otherwise entitled to under our employee benefit plans.

As discussed under “Overview of Executive Compensation Elements Used in 2011 – Post-Termination or Change in Control Benefits” on page 40, the employment agreements were amended in 2011 to eliminate certain tax gross-up payment obligations of the Company to the named executive officers.

Rights Upon Termination for Death or Disability

The employment agreements provide thatIn addition to the Accrued Amounts, if the named executive officer’sNEO’s employment terminates by reason of death or disability, then, in addition to the items set forth under “Rights Upon Termination for Any Reason,” the named executive officerNEO is entitled to receive a pro rata share of any performance bonus for the performance period in which the day of termination occurs (based on the number of days worked in the performance period), payable at the same time it is payable to other participants in the performance bonus plan.

Rights Upon Termination Without Cause and Constructive Discharge

If the named executive officer’sNEO’s employment is involuntarily terminated other than for “cause” or the named executive officerNEO terminates for “good reason,” as those terms are defined in the employment agreements, and severance agreement, then in addition to the items set forth under “Rights Upon Termination for Any Reason,”Accrued Amounts, the named executive officerNEO is entitled to the following:

 

under the Employment Agreement, a lump sum cash payment equal to three times the aggregate annual compensation of each named executive officer. “Aggregate annual compensation”which is equal to the sum of:

 

 ¡ 

the executive officer’sgreater of (x) the NEO’s then-current annual base salary, or (y) the NEO’s annual base salary at any time during the two years before the termination date, and

 

 ¡ 

an amount equal to the largest annual performance bonus paid or payable to the named executive officerNEO for the three consecutive calendar years prior to the date the named executive officer’sNEO’s termination occurs;occurs,

 

payment of a pro rata share of any bonus for the performance period in which the day of termination occurs (based on the number of days worked in the performance period), payable at the same time it is payable to other participants in the bonus plan;

 

the same basic health and welfare benefits that the executive would otherwise be entitled to receive if the named executive officer were ourNEO was a Devon employee for 18 months following termination;termination,

60Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

payment of an amount equal to 18 times the monthly COBRA premium;premium,

the same level of life insurance benefits that the NEO would otherwise be entitled to receive if the NEO was a Devon employee for three years following termination, and

 

payment of a reasonable amount for outplacement services commensurate with the named executive officer’sNEO’s title and position with the Company and other executives similarly situated in other companies in ourDevon’s peer group.

Termination Following a Change in ControlChange-in-Control

Under the employment agreements, if within 24 months following a “change in control”change-in-control of the Company, the named executive officer:NEO:

 

is terminated “without cause”without “cause” by us;Devon, or

63Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

 

terminates his or her employment with usDevon for “good reason,” as each of those terms are defined in the employment agreements;

agreements, then, in addition to the itemsAccrued Amounts and the rights set forth under “Rights Upon Termination for Any Reason” andabove in the section titled “Rights Upon Termination Without Cause and Constructive Discharge,” three years of service and three years of age shall be added to the named executive officer’sNEO’s actual years of service and actual age when determining the named executive officer’sNEO’s entitlement under ourthe Company’s Retiree Medical Benefit Coverage. In no event, however, should the additional years of age be construed to reduce or eliminate the executive’s right to coverage under the plan.

Change in control”Change-in-control” is defined as the date on which one of the following occurs:

 

an entity or group acquires 30% or more of ourDevon’s outstanding voting securities;securities,

 

the incumbent Board ceases to constitute at least a majority of our Board;Devon’s Board, or

 

a merger, reorganization or consolidation is consummated, after stockholder approval, unless

 

 ¡ 

substantially all of the stockholders prior to the transaction continue to own more than 50% of the voting power after the transaction;transaction,

 

 ¡ 

no person owns 30% or more of the combined voting securities;securities, and

 

 ¡ 

the incumbent Board constitutes at least a majority of the Board after the transaction.

Payment Conditions

The agreements require a NEO to execute a waiver agreement as a condition to receipt of the payments described in the sections “Rights Upon Termination Without Cause and Constructive Discharge” and “Termination Following a Change-in-Control” above. By executing the waiver, the NEO effectively releases Devon from any waivable claims. The agreements also include a non-disparagement provision and a non-solicitation provision covering employees of Devon and Devon’s affiliates that applies for 36 months following a NEO’s termination date under the Employment Agreement.

Long-Term Incentive PlanAwards

InSubject to the terms of the applicable LTIP under which an award agreements, the Compensation Committee is authorized to provide for the acceleration of anymade, unvested portions of any outstanding awards under our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2009 Long-Term Incentive Planmay be accelerated upon a change in control,the retirement, disability, death or termination of the NEO for an approved reason. Award agreements provide for automatic vesting upon a change in control or the death of the executive. Performance share unitsNEO. The 2017 and 2022 LTIPs do not provide for the automatic acceleration of unvested portions of outstanding awards in the event of a change-in-control unless a job loss occurs or the acquiring company is not listed on a national securities exchange. The WPX Plan provided for acceleration of vesting of outstanding awards in the event of a job loss following a change-in-control. Devon award agreements provide that NEOs who meet certain years-of-service and age criteria are eligible to continue to vest as scheduled in outstanding awards following retirement subject to, among other things, annual execution of a confidentiality agreement that includes non-solicitation and non-competition covenants. Under the 2017 LTIP and 2022 LTIPs, employment terminations occurring prior to the first anniversary of the grant date may result in a pro rata reduction in the number of shares underlying the award depending on the circumstances of the termination pursuant to a formula that considers the number of days from the grant date to the termination date. PSUs that vest on an accelerated basis as a result of a change in control or death will vest at the target award level. In the event of a change-in-control, treatment of PSUs is determined by whether an acquiring company assumes the awards.

 

 6164 Commitment Runs Deep


NAMED

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

The following tables provide the estimated compensation and present value of benefits potentially payable to each NEO upon a termination of employment of the NEO. The benefit values shown do not include benefits that are broadly available to substantially all salaried employees. The amounts shown assume that a termination or change-in-control occurred on December 31, 2022. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of an executive’s actual separation from the Company. The footnotes for each of the following tables are presented after the final table.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL1

Richard E. Muncrief

 

Benefits and

Payments

($)

 Retirement/
Voluntary
Termination
($)
 Termination
Without Cause
($)
 Termination
With Cause
($)
 Disability
($)
 Death
($)
 

Change in
Control - No

Job Loss

($)

 

Change in
Control - Job

Loss

($)

Base Salary/
Performance Bonus2

   0   12,867   0   2,442   2,442   0   12,867

SCRPs6

   1,549   1,549   0   1,549   1,549   1,549   1,549

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock3,8

   0   43,159   0   0   43,611   0   43,611

Performance Share Units4,8

   0   39,618   0   0   40,465   0   40,465

Other Benefits5

   0   87   0   0   0   0   87

Total7

   1,549   97,280   0   3,991   88,067   1,549   98,579

Jeffrey L. Ritenour

Benefits and

Payments

($)

 Retirement/
Voluntary
Termination
($)
 Termination
Without Cause
($)
 Termination
With Cause
($)
 Disability
($)
 Death
($)
 

Change in
Control - No

Job Loss ($)

 

Change in
Control - Job

Loss

($)

Base Salary/
Performance Bonus2

   0   5,841   0   953   953   0   5,841

SCRPs6

   180   180   0   180   180   180   180

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock3,8

   0   6,142   0   0   6,307   0   6,307

Performance Share Units4,8

   0   17,591   0   0   17,901   0   17,901

Other Benefits5

   0   87   0   0   0   0   87

Total7

   180   29,841   0   1,133   25,341   180   30,316

65Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Clay M. Gaspar

Benefits and

Payments

($)

 Retirement/
Voluntary
Termination
($)
 Termination
Without Cause
($)
 Termination
With Cause
($)
 Disability
($)
 Death
($)
 

Change in
Control - No

Job Loss

($)

 

Change in
Control - Job

Loss

($)

Base Salary/ Performance Bonus2

   0   6,276   0   1,059   1,059   0   6,276

SCRPs6

   749   749   0   749   749   749   749

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock3,8

   0   18,743   0   0   18,939   0   18,939

Performance Share Units4,8

   0   17,205   0   0   17,573   0   17,573

Other Benefits5

   0   90   0   0   0   0   90

Total7

   749   43,063   0   1,808   38,320   749   43,627

David G. Harris

Benefits and

Payments

($)

 Retirement/
Voluntary
Termination
($)
 Termination
Without Cause
($)
 Termination
With Cause
($)
 Disability
($)
 Death
($)
 

Change in
Control - No

Job Loss

($)

 

Change in
Control - Job

Loss

($)

Base Salary/Performance Bonus2

   0   5,747   0   938   938   0   5,747

SCRPs6

   170   170   0   170   170   170   170

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock3,8

   0   5,749   0   0   5,914   0   5,914

Performance Share Units4,8

   0   17,591   0   0   17,901   0   17,901

Other Benefits5

   0   87   0   0   0   0   87

Total7

   170   29,344   0   1,108   24,923   170   29,819

66Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

Dennis C. Cameron

Benefits and

Payments

($)

 Retirement/
Voluntary
Termination
($)
 Termination
Without Cause
($)
 Termination
With Cause
($)
 Disability
($)
 Death
($)
 

Change in
Control - No

Job Loss

($)

 

Change in
Control - Job

Loss

($)

Base Salary/ Performance Bonus2

   0   4,178   0   660   660   0   4,178

SCRPs6

   518   518   0   518   518   518   518

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock3,8

   0   7,233   0   0   7,337   0   7,337

Performance Share Units4,8

   0   7,185   0   0   7,379   0   7,379

Other Benefits5

   0   87   0   0   0   0   96

Total7

   518   19,201   0   1,178   15,894   518   19,508

1

Values in thousands (except in footnotes).

2

The tables assume a December 31, 2022 employment termination. In such a scenario, each executive would be entitled to the performance bonus earned.

3

Values displayed for acceleration of vesting of restricted stock represent the 2022 year-end closing market price of Devon’s common stock, which was $61.51.

4

In the case of a without “cause” employment termination, performance share units remain outstanding for the duration of the performance period and thereafter pay out to the executive officer at the level earned based on the level of performance certified by the Committee. Values displayed represent the trending shares of outstanding grants multiplied by the 2022 year-end closing market price of Devon’s common stock, which was $61.51.

5

Executive officers are entitled to (i) the equivalent of 36 months of post-termination company-paid life insurance, coverage of $1,000,000, valued based on age; (ii) the equivalent of 18 months of continuing health benefits less applicable active employee premiums following termination without “cause” or following their termination in connection with a change in control; (iii) a payment in an amount equal to 18 times the monthly COBRA premium following termination without “cause” or following their termination in connection with a change in control; and (iv) outplacement services with a maximum value of $20,000. For Mr. Cameron, the amounts reported also include an enhancement in post-retirement medical benefits of approximately $8,112, upon a change in control.

6

The SCRPs are 100% vested for each NEO. Values for Messrs. Muncrief, Gaspar, and Cameron include account balances in the WPX Restoration Plan.

7

Devon’s nonqualified employee benefit plans, including the Deferred Compensation Plan, SCRPs, and employment agreements are subject, all or in part, to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which requires certain payments made under these plans and agreements to be delayed for six months following termination of employment.

8

In the case of a change in control, restricted stock only vests if the change in control results in a job loss for the NEO. For PSUs, shares only vest if change in control results in a job loss for the NEO or if the award is not assumed by the acquiring entity. The value shown anticipates that the award is assumed by the acquiring entity. If the award is not assumed by the acquiring entity, the PSUs vest at the target level but are pro-rated for the time of the performance period that has elapsed, which as of December 31, 2022 would be valued as follows: Mr. Muncrief, $12,972,931; Mr. Ritenour, $7,282,640; Mr. Gaspar, $5,633,988; Mr. Harris, $7,282,640; and Mr. Cameron, $2,341,727.

67Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)

CEO PAY RATIO

Section 953(B) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires certain public companies to disclose the median pay of Company employees, the method of determining median employee pay (the median of the total annual compensation of all employees other than the CEO), and the ratio of CEO pay to median employee pay. Devon’s employees, which are all located in the U.S., are included in the calculation of median pay based on Devon’s employee population as of December 31, 2022.

For CEO pay, Devon used the amount for 2022 reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for the Company’s current CEO (Richard E. Muncrief), which includes LTI granted in the year. In determining the median pay of employees, Devon at year end selected the median-paid employee by aggregating base pay, performance bonus, and LTI for the year. Once the median-paid employee was determined, the remaining compensation elements, such as Company retirement arrangement contributions, were added to the total in order to compare the same elements of compensation that are reflected for the current CEO within the Summary Compensation Table. Based on this methodology, CEO pay is $14.5 million, median employee pay is $180.6 thousand, and the ratio is 80:1.

68Commitment Runs Deep


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
we are providing the following information regarding the relationship between executive compensation and our financial performance for each of the last three completed calendar years. “Compensation actually paid” includes payments made to executives during the applicable year such as salary, performance bonus, and various benefits. The SEC’s valuation methods for this section emphasize the changes in fair value of equity awards under applicable financial accounting standards, and as such, references to “compensation actually paid” below reflects the change in equity award values on the applicable calculation dates and does not necessarily reflect what our NEOs received
year-to-year.
This is highlighted by the 2020 values in the Pay Versus Performance (PvP) Tables 1 and Table 2 below, where the “compensation actually paid” numbers are negative. The three PvP tables
below
, along with three PvP charts and their respective footnotes, are Devon’s disclosure to the new SEC requirements.
PvP Table 1: Named Executive Officer “Compensation Actually Paid”
1,10
Year SCT Total
CEO
2,4
  “Compensation
Actually Paid”
to CEO
3,4
  Average SCT
Total for Other
NEOs
2,5
  Average
“Compensation
Actually Paid”
to Other
NEOs
3,5
  Value of a
$100
Investment
in Devon
Based on
Cumulative
TSR
6,10
  Value of a
$100
Investment
in the Peer
Group
Based on
Cumulative
TSR
6,7,10
  
Post-Tax

Net Income
8,10
  CROCE
9,10
 
2022 $14,531   $30,817  $5,379   $8,670  $285  $143   $6.031B   62
2021-Muncrief $11,915   $39,748  $4,596   $12,245  $191  $121   $2.808B   39
2021-Hager  $3,391   $31,575 
2020 $13,355   ($4,994 $4,536   ($444 $65  $58  ($2.688B  27
Dollar amounts are shown in thousands, except where otherwise indicated. Amounts in parentheses are negative. References to our CEO are also references to our principal executive officer (“PEO”) for purposes of this section.
“SCT Total” is the Summary Compensation Table’s total for the applicable year.
The calculation for “Compensation Actually Paid” is shown in “PvP Table 3”.
The CEO for each year is as follows:
2022: Richard E. Muncrief
2021: Richard E. Muncrief, from January 7
th
to the end of the year; David A. Hager, from January 1
st
to 6
th
. After January 6
th
, Mr. Hager assumed the position of Executive Chair of the Board of Directors until his retirement in early 2023.
2020: David A. Hager
The other NEOs for each year are as follows:
2022: Dennis C. Cameron, Clay M. Gaspar, David G. Harris, and Jeffrey L. Ritenour.
2021: Tana K. Cashion, Clay M. Gaspar, David G. Harris, Jeffrey L. Ritenour, and Lyndon C. Taylor.
2020: Tana K. Cashion, David G. Harris, Jeffrey L. Ritenour, and Lyndon C. Taylor.
“TSR” is Total Shareholder Return including reinvested dividends. It is a measure of finance performance indicating the growth or decline in an investment’s value over a specified period. For 2022, “Cumulative TSR” is measured from the last trading day of 2019 to the last trading day of 2022; for 2021, the range is the last trading day of 2019 to the last trading day of 2021; and for 2020, the range is the last trading day of 2019 to the last trading day of 2020. For Devon, Cumulative TSR for 2022, 2021, and 2020 was 185%, 91%, and
-35%,
respectively. For the Peer Group, Cumulative TSR was 43%, 21%, and
-42%
for the same periods.
69Commitment Runs Deep

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
The 2022 peer group is the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (Symbol: XOP). The 2021 peer group is comprised of APA Corporation, ConocoPhillips, Continental Resources, Diamondback Energy, Inc., EOG Resources, Inc., Marathon Oil Corporation, Ovintiv, Inc., Pioneer Natural Resources Company, and the S&P Midcap 400 Index. Cimarex Energy Co. is excluded from this Cumulative TSR calculation due to its subsequent acquisition, and the S&P Midcap 400 is excluded due to incomparability on a market capitalized basis. The 2020 peer group was comprised of APA Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Cimarex Energy Co, Continental Resources, Inc., EOG Resources, Inc., Marathon Oil Corporation, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Ovintiv, Inc., and Pioneer Natural Resources Company. Chesapeake Energy Corporation is excluded from this Cumulative TSR calculation due to the impact of their subsequent bankruptcy filing, and Cimarex Energy Co. is excluded due to the company’s subsequent acquisition.
Post-Tax Net Income is disclosed in the Comprehensive Statements of Consolidated Earnings of Devon’s annual report as “Comprehensive earnings (loss) attributable to Devon.
Cash Return on Capital Employed (CROCE) is an important financial measure used by the Company to link “compensation actually paid” to Company performance because of the importance of capital efficiency to successful operations in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. In Devon’s annual performance scorecard published in the “Annual Performance Bonus” section of this Proxy Statement (and the same section title in the 2021 and 2020 proxy statements), CROCE was weighted as the joint-highest measure of performance on preset annual goals. The Company’s other important financial measures used to link “compensation actually paid” to Company performance are used to calculate Devon’s Annual Performance Bonus and can be found on page 43.
10 The PvP Charts below illustrate the relationship between various performance measures and “Compensation Actually Paid.”
PvP Table 2: Other Measures important in Linking Performance to “Compensation Actually Paid”
Other Important Measures
1
Free Cash Flow
(FCF)
Emissions
Reduction
ESG & Community EngagementTotal Oil & Gas ProductionTotal Capital Expenditures
These are the measures, in addition to CROCE, used to determine 2022 NEO performance bonuses. For more information on measures used to determine performance bonuses, see section “Annual Performance Bonus” in this Proxy Statement and similar disclosures in prior proxy statements.
PvP Table 3: Converting Summary Compensation Table Total to “Compensation Actually Paid”
1,2
,3
         
Subtract
(-)
    Subtract
(-)
    Add
(+)
    Add
(+)
    Equals
(=)
  
Year Executive  SCT Total
Compensation
 
 
  

 
Fair Value of
Stock-Based
Awards Granted
During the Year
 
 
 
 
  
 
Change in
Pension Value
for the Year
 
 
 
  




 
The difference
in the fair value
from start to
end of the year
for all stock
awards
outstanding
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  




 
Pension Service
Cost and Cost
of Additional
Pension
Benefits Due to
Plan
Amendment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  “Compensation
Actually Paid”
  
2022   CEO  $14,531   $10,405   $0    $26,691   $0    $30,817 
 Other NEO Average  $5,379   $3,717   $0    $7,008   $0    $8,670 
2021   CEO-Muncrief  $11,915   $8,311   $0    $36,144   $0    $39,748 
 CEO-Hager  $3,391   $712   $0    $28,897   $0    $31,575 
 Other NEO Average  $4,596   $1,881   $0    $9,530   $0    $12,245 
2020   CEO  $13,355   $9,509   $0   ($8,840  $0   ($4,994
 Other NEO Average  $4,536   $2,405   $1,038   ($1,904  $368   ($444
70Commitment Runs Deep

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
Dollar amounts are shown in thousands, except where otherwise indicated. Amounts in parentheses are negative. References to our CEO are also references to our PEO for purposes of this section.
The CEO for each year is as follows:
2022: Richard E. Muncrief
2021: Richard E. Muncrief, from January 7
th
to the end of the year; David A. Hager, from January 1
st
to 6
th
. After January 6
th
, Mr. Hager assumed the position of Executive Chair of the Board of Directors until his retirement in early 2023.
2020: David A. Hager
The other NEOs for each year are as follows:
2022: Dennis C. Cameron, Clay M. Gaspar, David G. Harris, and Jeffrey L. Ritenour.
2021: Tana K. Cashion, Clay M. Gaspar, David G. Harris, Jeffrey L. Ritenour, and Lyndon C. Taylor.
2020: Tana K. Cashion, David G. Harris, Jeffrey L. Ritenour, and Lyndon C. Taylor.
The process for determining the change in fair value under applicable financial accounting standards for stock-based compensation for this exhibit is substantially similar to that used for determining accounting value at the time of grant. For RSAs, the fair value is determined by multiplying the Fair Market Value of the underlying stock by the number of shares granted. For the interim calculations in this table, the product of the shares outstanding multiplied by the stock price at the beginning of the year (or at grant) is subtracted from the same calculation at the end of the year (or at vest). To determine grant value of PSUs, a Monte-Carlo simulation assimilating 10,000 potential outcomes is used. The Monte-Carlo simulation was rerun at the beginning and end of the year covered by this disclosure to create the interim valuations required. The table below reconciles the change in fair value of outstanding stock-based compensation awards for the period covered by this disclosure; amounts are shown in thousands. No awards were forfeited by NEOs during this period. Dividend equivalents earned on grants are included in the fair value of the awards and no other payments were made.
Items Added (Subtracted) to
Determine Change in Fair
Value
  2022   2021   2020 
  CEO   
 
Other
NEO
Average
 
 
 
  CEO -
Muncrief
 
 
  CEO -
Hager
 
 
  
 
Other
NEO
Average
 
 
 
  CEO   
 
Other
NEO
Average
 
 
 
Grant Date Fair Value – Awards Made During Year  ($10,405  ($3,627  ($8,311  ($712  ($2,351  ($9,509  ($2,405
Year End Fair Value – Awards Made During Year  $13,005   $4,533   $18,136   $1,555   $5,130   $7,572   $1,915 
Change in Fair Value – Awards Outstanding During Year  $15,003   $4,105   $24,292   $17,015   $5,653   ($4,435  ($935
Change in Fair Value – Awards Vesting During Year  $9,088   $1,997   $2,027   $11,040   $1,653   ($2,469  ($479
Total Change in Fair Value  $26,691   $7,008   $36,144   $28,897   $9,530   ($8,840  ($1,904
71Commitment Runs Deep

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
PvP Charts: Relationship Between Performance Measures and “Compensation Actually Paid”
The following charts illustrate the relationship between “Compensation Actually Paid” and performance on the measures identified in PvP Table 1 above.
Total Shareholder Return and “Compensation Actually Paid”
1,2,3,4
LOGO
Cash Return on Capital Employed (CROCE) and “Compensation Actually Paid”
1,2,3,5
LOGO
72Commitment Runs Deep

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
Post-Tax
Net Income and “Compensation Actually Paid”
1,2,3,6
LOGO
All dollar amounts shown in thousands unless otherwise labeled.
The CEO for each year is as follows:
2022: Richard E. Muncrief
2021: Richard E. Muncrief, from January 7
th
to the end of the year; David A. Hager, from January 1
st
to 6
th
. After January 6
th
, Mr. Hager assumed the position of Executive Chair of the Board of Directors until his retirement in early 2023.
2020: David A. Hager
The other NEOs for each year are as follows:
2022: Dennis C. Cameron, Clay M. Gaspar, David G. Harris, and Jeffrey L. Ritenour.
2021: Tana K. Cashion, Clay M. Gaspar, David G. Harris, Jeffrey L. Ritenour, and Lyndon C. Taylor.
2020: Tana K. Cashion, David G. Harris, Jeffrey L. Ritenour, and Lyndon C. Taylor.
4TSR, including reinvested dividends, is the performance measure on which the stock-based compensation component of “Compensation Actually Paid” is based.
CROCE is an important financial measure used by the Company to link “compensation actually paid” to Company performance because of the importance of capital efficiency to successful operations in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. In Devon’s annual performance scorecard published in the “Annual Performance Bonus” section of this Proxy Statement (and the same section title in the 2021 and 2020 proxy statements), CROCE was weighted the joint-highest measure of performance on preset annual goals. The calculation for CROCE can be found in Appendix A to this document.
Post-Tax
Net Income is a measure of profitability. These numbers are reported as “Comprehensive earnings (loss) attributable to Devon” in the Company’s annual Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings. During the period covered by this disclosure, Devon did not tie any compensation plans or programs directly to this measure.
73Commitment Runs Deep

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information about ourDevon’s common stock as of December 31, 2011,2022, that may be issued under ourDevon’s equity compensation plans:

Plan Category 

Number of  Securities

To be Issued Upon

Exercise of
Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights

(a)

  

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights

(b)

  

Number of  Securities Remaining
Available For Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation Plans

(Excluding Securities Reflected
In Column (a))

(c)

 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  10,542,680   $66.35    4,320,1041 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders            

Total2

  10,542,680   $66.35    4,320,104  

Plan Category Number of
Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and Rights
(a)
 
Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and Rights
(b)
 
Number of Securities
Remaining available for Future
Issuance under Equity
Compensation Plans
(excluding Securities reflect
in Column (a))
(c)
3,4
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
 2,727,026
1
 $40.23
2
 40,038,245
Equity compensation plans
not approved by security holders
 0 0 0
Total 2,727,026
1
 $40.23
2
 40,038,245
1

Represents 51,254 outstanding options, 1,841,259 outstanding performance share units, and 834,513 outstanding restricted stock units. Shares for performance share units are included assuming target payout but may be paid out at greater or lesser amounts, or not at all, according to the achievement of performance goals. Devon assumed and became the administrator of the WPX Plan at the time of the closing of the Merger in January 2021. Of the 2,727,026 shares reflected in column (a), 834,513 and 51,254 represent outstanding restricted stock units and options, respectively, granted under the WPX Plan.

The weighted-average exercise price only applies to stock options.
Represents shares available for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan,2022 LTIP, which may be in the form of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, Canadian restricted stock units, performance units, or stock appreciation rights. Other than the 2022 LTIP, no new awards will be made under any other Devon long-term incentive plan in effect as of December 31, 2022. Under the 2022 LTIP, any shares granted as stock options or stock appreciation rights count against the number of securities available for future issuance under the 2022 LTIP as one share for each share granted. With respect to any other awards under the 2022 LTIP, any shares granted count against the number of securities available for future issuance under the 2022 LTIP as 1.74 shares for each share granted. The 2022 LTIP also provides that shares covered by awards under any Devon long-term incentive plans that are forfeited, cancelled, or expire after the effective date of the 2022 LTIP are added to the shares available for issuance under the 2022 LTIP.
74Commitment Runs Deep


OUR STOCKHOLDERS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth the only persons known to the Company to be the owners of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2022 (unless an earlier date is noted), based on the information available as of March 31, 2023, according to reports filed with the SEC:

Common Stock
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

Percent of   

Class1

The Vanguard Group

    100 Vanguard Blvd.

    Malvern, PA 19355

77,845,5522[•]%

BlackRock, Inc.

    55 East 52nd Street

    New York, NY 10055

56,828,0113[•]%

State Street Corporation

    State Street Financial Center

    One Lincoln Street

    Boston, MA 02111

43,147,8524[•]%

1

Percentage calculated using the Company’s outstanding share count as of April 10, 2023.

 

2 

As of December 31, 2011, options to purchase an aggregate of 36,852 shares of our common stock atInformation based on a weighted-average exercise price of $24.50 were outstanding under the Ocean Energy, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan for Non-Executive Employees, which is an equity compensation plan assumed in connectionSchedule 13G/A filed with the Company’s acquisitionSEC on February 9, 2023. That filing indicates that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power as to none of Ocean Energy,the shares, shared voting power as to 937,604 shares, sole dispositive power as to 75,122,510 shares, and shared dispositive power as to 2,723,042 shares.

3

Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2023. That filing indicates that BlackRock, Inc. No further grants or awards will be made under this plan.has sole voting power as to 52,261,322 shares, shared voting power as to none of the shares, sole dispositive power as to 56,828,011 shares, and shared dispositive power as to none of the shares.

4

Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 6, 2023. That filing indicates that State Street Corporation has sole voting power as to none of the shares, shared voting power as to 40,902,890 shares, sole dispositive power as to none of the shares, and shared dispositive power as to 43,019,375 shares.

 

 6275 Commitment Runs Deep


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the preceding Compensation Discussion and Analysis section with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Proxy Statement.

John A. Hill, Chairperson

Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr.

Duane C. Radtke

 

63Commitment Runs Deep


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT (cont’d)

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

To the best of our knowledge, no person beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock at the close of business on March 31, 2012, except as set forth below: (Note: Update after 03/31/2012)

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Common Stock

Amount and  Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

Percent of
Class

George P. Mitchell

24 Waterway Avenue, Suite 300

The Woodlands, TX 77380

23,372,37415.8

1

Based on an amended Schedule 13D filed March 7, 2012, Mr. Mitchell states that 14,827,417 shares are held by three trusts of which he is the sole trustee. Mr. Mitchell has sole voting and dispositive power over such shares. Mr. Mitchell states that 8,544,957 shares are held by a trust of which he is one of three trustees. Mr. Mitchell has shared voting and dispositive power over such shares.

Security Ownership of Management

TO BE UPDATED AGAIN AS OF MARCH 31, 2012

The following table sets forth as of March 31, 2012,2023, the number and percentage of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each of our named executive officers, each of our Directors, and Director nominees and by all our executive officers, Directors, and DirectorsDirector nominees as a group. Unless otherwise noted, the persons named below have sole voting and/orand investment power.power of their respective beneficially owned shares.

 

Common Stock
  Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
1

Percent of  

Class  

Name of Beneficial Owner

Common Stock

Amount and  Nature of

Beneficial Ownership1Richard E. Muncrief*

  

Percent

of  Class

1,958,050
2 ** 

J. Larry Nichols*Clay M. Gaspar

  3,307,619671,20723** 

Jeffrey L. Ritenour

340,847  *

John Richels*David G. Harris

  934,516258,49834** 

Dennis C. Cameron

226,710  *

Darryl G. SmetteJohn E. Bethancourt*

  493,88895,61045** 

Tana K. Cashion

89,063  *

Jeffrey A. AgostaDuane C. Radtke*

  214,751578,473  *

David A. HagerBarbara M. Baumann*

  164,522676,636  *

John A. Hill*

164,0157*

Michael M. Kanovsky*

143,0528*

Mary P. Ricciardello*

27,2639*

Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr.*

  27,0711073,944  *

Duane C. Radtke*Karl F. Kurz*

  20,0001171,930  *

Robert H. Henry*Kelt Kindick*

  10,10065,258126** 

John Krenicki Jr.*

44,166  *

Valerie M. Williams*

29,649** 

Ann G. Fox*

26,858** 

Gennifer F. Kelly*

1,624** 

Michael N. Mears*

1,624*

All of our Directors and executive officers as of March 31, 2023, as a group

Including those named above (15 (17 persons)

  6,085,5284,082,647137  1.51%** 

 

*

Director

 

**

Less than 1%

 

64Commitment Runs Deep


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT (cont’d)

1 

SharesFor purposes of this table, shares beneficially owned include shares of common stock (including unvested shares of restricted stock granted under the 2017 and 2022 LTIP with respect to which executive officers and Directors have voting power) as well as shares of common stock issuablethat can be acquired through the exercise of stock options within 60 days of DecemberMarch 31, 2011.2023. In addition, amounts include restricted stock units held subject to the terms of the WPX Plan by certain Directors over which such individuals have no voting or investment power, as follows: Mr. Kurz, 16,017; and Ms. Williams, 25,651.

 

2 

Includes 1,859,221 shares owned of record by Mr. Nichols, 85,930 shares owned of record by Mr. Nichols as Trustee of a family trust in which he shares voting and investment power, 157,248 shares owned by Mr. Nichols’ spouse, and 1,205,220 shares which are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Nichols.

3

Includes 313,801 shares owned of record by Mr. Richels, and 620,715(i) 42,582 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Richels.Muncrief and (ii) 153,430 shares held in a foundation in which Mr. Muncrief shares voting and investment control.

 

43 

Includes 23,107194,175 shares ownedheld through a trust of record bywhich Mr. Smette, 146,246Gaspar’s spouse is the sole trustee.

4

Includes 14,717 shares owned indirectly byheld through trusts in which Mr. SmetteHarris shares voting and investment control.

5

Includes 941 shares held through a trust in which heMr. Bethancourt shares voting and investment power, 2,635control.

6

Includes 42,590 shares owned by a trust of which Mr. Smette’sKindick’s spouse is both the sole trustee and 321,900the sole beneficiary.

7

Includes 42,582 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Smette.

5

Includes 65,183 shares owned of record by Mr. Agosta and 149,568 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant toMuncrief, as well as 41,668 restricted stock optionsunits held by Mr. Agosta.

6

Includes 69,272 shares ownedcertain Directors subject to the terms of record by Mr. Hager and 95,250 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Hager.

7

Includes 24,237 shares owned of record by Mr. Hill, 18,478 shares owned by a partnership in which Mr. Hill shares voting and investment power, 93,300 shares owned indirectly by Mr. Hill through a trust in which he shares voting and investment power and 28,000 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Hill.

8

Includes 42,820 shares owned of record by Mr. Kanovsky, 72,232 shares held indirectly through a family owned entity in which Mr. Kanovsky shares voting and investment power, and 28,000 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Kanovsky.

9

Includes 12,200 shares owned of record by Ms. Ricciardello, 63 shares held indirectly through a managed account in which Ms. Ricciardello shares voting and investment power and 15,000 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Ms. Ricciardello.

10

Includes 18,071 shares owned of record by Mr. Mosbacher and 9,000 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Mosbacher.

11

Includes 14,000 shares owned of record by Mr. Radtke and 6,000 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Radtke.

12

Includes 4,100 shares owned of record by Mr. Henry and 6,000 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Mr. Henry.

13

Includes 2,873,834 shares that are deemed beneficially owned pursuant to stock options held by Directors and executive officers.the WPX Plan.

 

 6576 Commitment Runs Deep


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires that Devon’s Directors, executive officers, and 10% stockholders file with the SEC reports concerning their ownership, and changes in their ownership, of Devon equity securities. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5, and amendments thereto, furnished to us during and with respect to our most recently completed fiscal year, and any written representations of reporting persons, we believe that all transactions bythe reporting persons during 2011 were reported on a timely basis.

66Commitment Runs Deep


INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Information concerning our executive officers is set forth below. Information concerning J. Larry Nichols and John Richels is set forth under the caption “Election of Directors—Director Nominees.”

Jeffrey A. Agosta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Agosta, 44, was elected to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in March 2010, and has been with the Company since 1997. He held the position of Senior Vice President—Corporate Finance and Treasurer from 2003 to 2010. Prior to joining Devon, Mr. Agosta was with the management consulting firm of D. R. Payne and Associates and with KPMG Peat Marwick. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the University of Oklahoma and is a Certified Public Accountant.

David A. Hager, Executive Vice President Exploration and Production

Mr. Hager, 55, holds the position of Executive Vice President Exploration and Production, and has been with the Company since March 2009. From 2007 until joining the Company as an executive officer, Mr. Hager served as a member of the Board of Directors. From 1999 to 2006, Mr. Hager was employed by Kerr-McGee Corporation, serving in various capacities, most recently as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Hager has a Bachelor’s degree in Geophysics from Purdue University and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from Southern Methodist University.

R. Alan Marcum, Executive Vice President Administration

Mr. Marcum, 45, holds the position of Executive Vice President Administration, and has been with the Company since 1995. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Marcum was employed by KPMG Peat Marwick as a Senior Auditor. He holds a Bachelor’s degree from East Central University, majoring in Accounting and Finance. Mr. Marcum is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the Oklahoma Society of Certified Public Accountants.

Frank W. Rudolph, Executive Vice President Human Resources

Mr. Rudolph, 55, holds the position of Executive Vice President Human Resources, and has been with the Company since 2007. From 2000 until he joined Devon, Mr. Rudolph served as Vice President Human Resources for Banta Corporation, an international printing and supply chain management company. Mr. Rudolph holds a Bachelor’s degree in Administration from Illinois State University and a Master’s degree in Industrial Relations and Management from Loyola University.

Darryl G. Smette, Executive Vice President Marketing, Midstream and Supply Chain

Mr. Smette, 64, holds the position of Executive Vice President Marketing, Midstream and Supply Chain, and has been with the Company since 1986. His marketing background includes 15 years with Energy Reserves Group, Inc./BHP Petroleum (Americas), Inc. Mr. Smette serves on the Board of Directors of Panhandle Oil & Gas Inc. Mr. Smette also is an oil and gas industry instructor approved by the University of Texas Department of Continuing Education. He is a member of the Oklahoma Independent Producers Association, Natural Gas Association of Oklahoma and the American Gas Association. Mr. Smette holds an undergraduate degree from Minot State University and a Master’s degree from Wichita State University.

67Commitment Runs Deep


INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (cont’d)

Lyndon C. Taylor, Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Mr. Taylor, 53, holds the position of Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and has been with the Company since 2005. He served as Deputy General Counsel from the time he joined the Company in 2005 until 2007. Prior to joining Devon, Mr. Taylor was with Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP for 20 years, most recently as managing partner of the energy practice in Houston. He is admitted to practice law in Oklahoma and Texas. Mr. Taylor holds a Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Oklahoma State University and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Oklahoma.

William F. Whitsitt, Executive Vice President Public Affairs

Mr. Whitsitt, 67, holds the position of Executive Vice President Public Affairs, and has been with the Company since 2008. For 11 years prior to joining Devon, Mr. Whitsitt served as a public affairs consultant in Washington, D.C. He also held the positions of president and chief operating officer for the American Exploration & Production Council, the national trade association representing the largest U.S. independent exploration and production companies. Previously he served as director of Government Affairs for the law firm of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, and held the position of Vice President of worldwide Marketing and Public Affairs for Oryx Energy. Mr. Whitsitt holds a Doctoral degree in Public Administration from George Washington University.

68Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 3.

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2012

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent auditors for 2012. Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. In maintaining its corporate governance practices, the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of KPMG LLP to the stockholders for ratification. If the appointment of KPMG LLP is not ratified by the stockholders, the Board of Directors will consider appointing another independent accounting firm for 2013.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent auditors for 2012.

69Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 4.

APPROVE AMENDING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

TO GRANT STOCKHOLDERS THE RIGHT TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the Company’s stockholders approve an amendment (the “Special Meeting Charter Amendment”) to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) that would add a right permitting holders of record who hold in the aggregate, and who have held continuously for at least one year, at least twenty-five (25%) percent of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding capital stock to call a special meeting of stockholders by written request filed with the Secretary of the Company, provided that such written request is made in accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. Currently, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only (i) pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Board of Directors or (ii) by the Chairman of the Board or the President with the concurrence of a majority of the Board of Directors.

At the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting, a stockholder proposal for the right of stockholders to take action by written consent was approved by a majority of the shares present at the meeting. We believe that stockholders would also support the right for stockholders to call a special meeting. The Board of Directors supports the concept of greater stockholder access and believes that providing stockholders with a right to call a special meeting is the best method to provide access. Accordingly, the Board of Directors is presenting this proposal to grant such a right to stockholders. In establishing a holding period of at least one year and an ownership threshold of at least 25% in order for stockholders to request a special meeting, the Board of Directors believes that it is striking an appropriate balance between enhancing the rights of stockholders and avoiding the costs and distractions associated with the calling of a special meeting, unless a significant group of stockholders believe that the calling of a special meeting of stockholders is warranted. Organizing and preparing for a special meeting involves significant management commitment of time and focus, and imposes substantial legal, administrative and distribution costs on the Company. Accordingly, the Board of Directors believes that a special meeting should be held only to cover special or extraordinary events, when fiduciary, strategic or other similar considerations dictate that the matter be addressed on an expeditious basis, rather than waiting until the next annual meeting. A one-year holding period and a 25% ownership threshold also minimizes the risk of frequent meeting requests, especially those potentially covering agenda items relevant to particular constituencies as opposed to stockholders generally. The Board of Directors therefore believes that a holding period of one year and an ownership threshold of 25% are appropriate and reflect the best interest of stockholders.

If the Special Meeting Charter Amendment is approved, stockholders who hold at least 25% of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding capital stock and who have a holding period of at least one year will have the right to call a special meeting of the stockholders, subject to certain procedural and informational requirements set forth in the Bylaws. These requirements would be implemented through an amendment to the current Bylaws and are intended to facilitate the Company and stockholders receiving basic information about the meeting and to insure, among other things, that the special meeting is not duplicative of matters that were, or, in the near term, could be covered at an annual meeting. In particular, the Bylaw amendments would provide, among other things, that: no business may be conducted at the special meeting except as set forth in the Company’s notice of meeting; no stockholder special meeting request may be made during the period commencing 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting and ending on the earlier of the date of the next annual meeting or 30 days after the first anniversary of the previous annual meeting; a special meeting request cannot cover business

70Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 4. APPROVE AMENDING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF

INCORPORATION TO GRANT STOCKHOLDERS THE RIGHT TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING (cont’d)

substantially similar to what was covered at an annual or special meeting held not more than 12 months, or in the case of director elections 120 days, before the special meeting request was received by the Secretary; a special meeting will not be held if similar business is to be covered at an annual or special meeting called by the Board of Directors to be held within 120 days after the special meeting request is received by the Secretary; the requisite shares must be beneficially owned or held as of the date of the request and as of the meeting date and any shares beneficially owned or held of record as of the date of the request and sold by the requesting holder prior to the meeting will be treated as a revocation of the request to the extent of the shares sold; and the requesting stockholder’s notice must include information (as specified in the Bylaws) as to the business proposed to be conducted, as to each director nominee (if applicable), and as to the stockholder giving notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made. The Board of Directors believes these procedures will help protect stockholders’ interests and are not unduly burdensome. The Board of Directors intends to adopt these amendments to the Bylaws upon stockholder approval, and the implementation, of the Special Meeting Charter Amendment.

The complete text of Article VI of the Certificate of Incorporation as it is proposed to be amended is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A, with deletions indicated by strikeouts and additions indicated by double-underlining.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company that are entitled to vote, voting together as a single class, will beall reports required for approval of this proposal. If approved, the Special Meeting Charter Amendment will become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which the Company intends to do promptly following the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow stockholders the right to call a special meeting.

71Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 5.

APPROVE THE 2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

On March 7, 2012 the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors approved the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), subject to stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting.

Discussion of the Purpose of this Proposal

Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally does not allow a publicly held company to obtain tax deductions for compensation of more than $1 million paid in any year to its chief executive officer and the three other highest paid named executive officers of the company (not including the company’s chief financial officer) (“covered officers”). Payments that qualify as “performance-based” in accordance with conditions specified under Section 162(m) are exempt from this limitation. Stockholder approval of the Incentive Plan will allow the cash bonuses paid under the plan to qualify as performance-based compensation that is not subject to the $1 million per person limitation imposed under Section 162(m) on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid to our covered officers.

A summary of the Incentive Plan follows and is qualified by reference to the full text of the plan, which is included in this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan.

Summary of the Terms of the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan

General. The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to provide a link between compensation and performance, to motivate participants to achieve corporate performance objectives and to enable the Company to attract and retain high quality employees. Provided certain requirements are satisfied, the bonuses paid under the Incentive Plan will qualify as performance-based compensation not subject to the limitations on income tax deductibility imposed under Section 162(m).

Eligibility. Participation in the Incentive Plan will be limited to our employees who are selected for participation in the plan by the Committee and (i) who hold the title or position of executive vice president or above or (ii) who are officers subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As of February 29, 2012, nine individuals held the title or position of executive vice president or above or were officers subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and would have been eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan had those individuals been selected by the Committee for participation in the plan.

Administration.The Incentive Plan will be administered by the Committee (or a subcommittee thereof). Each member of such Committee will qualify as an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m). The Committee will have the authority to (i) establish the duration of each performance period; (ii) select the eligible employees who are to participate in the plan for such performance period; (iii) determine the specific performance goal or goals for each performance period and the relative weighting of those goals, (iv) establish one or more designated levels of attainment for each such goal and set the bonus potential for each participant at each corresponding level of attainment; and (v) certify the level at which the applicable performance goal or goals are attained for the performance period and determine, on the basis of that certification, the actual

72Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 5.

APPROVE THE 2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN (cont’d)

bonus for each participant in an amount not to exceed his or her maximum bonus potential for the certified level of attainment. In its capacity as administrator, the Committee may adopt rules and regulations for the administration of the Incentive Plan and interpret any and all provisions of the Incentive Plan. All determinations of the Committee will be final and binding on all persons.

Performance Objectives. Under the Incentive Plan, participants will be eligible to receive cash bonuses based upon the attainment of the performance objectives established by the Committee for a designated performance period. Each performance period established by the Committee may range in duration from a minimum period of twelve (12) months to a maximum period of thirty-six (36) months.

Performance goals established by the Committee may be based on any one of, or combination of, the following criteria: earnings; earnings per share (actual or targeted growth); earnings before interest and taxes; pretax earnings before interest, depreciation, amortization, exploration and abandonment costs; pretax operating earnings after interest expense and before incentives, service fees, and extraordinary or special items or operating income; revenues; sales; debt level; cost reduction targets; interest-sensitivity gap levels; cash flow (including but not limited to free cash flow, net cash flow, net cash flow before financing activities, cash flow from operations, increase in cash flow return); capital expenditures; weighted average cost of capital; debt/proved reserves; net income or gross income (including but not limited to income after capital costs and income before or after taxes); operating income; expense; working capital; operating or profit margin; pre-tax margin; contribution margin; return factors (including, but not limited to return on equity, capital employed, or investment; risk adjusted return on capital; return on investors’ capital; return on average equity; return on assets; and return on net assets); book value; operating expenses (including, but not limited to lease operating expenses, severance taxes and other production taxes, gathering and transportation and general and administrative costs); unit costs; net borrowing, debt leverage levels, credit quality, or debt ratings; accomplishment of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, or similar business transactions (including, but not limited to acquisition goals based on value of assets acquired or similar objectives); debt to debt plus stockholder equity; debt to EBIT or EBITDA; interest coverage; total stockholder return; comparative stockholder return; market price per share; book value per share; net asset value per share; growth measures; debt to total capitalization ratio; asset quality levels; investments; economic value added; stock price appreciation; market capitalization; accounts receivables day sales outstanding; accounts receivables to sales; achievement of balance sheet or income statement objectives; market share; assets; asset sale targets; non-performing assets; satisfactory internal or external audits; improvement of financial ratings; charge-offs; regulatory compliance; employee retention/attrition rates; individual business objectives; risk management activities, corporate value measures which may be objectively determined (including but not limited to, ethics, compliance, environmental, diversity commitment, and safety); amount of the oil and gas reserves; costs of finding oil and gas reserves; reserve replacement ratio, reserve additions, or other reserve level measures; drilling results; natural gas and/or oil production, production and reserve growth; implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; production volume; sales volume; production efficiency; inventory to sales; and inventory turns. Such performance goals may be measured not only in terms of the Company’s performance but also in terms of its performance relative to the performance of other entities or may be measured on the basis of the performance of any of the Company’s business units or divisions or any parent or subsidiary entity. Performance may also be measured on an absolute basis, relative to internal business plans, or based on growth. As may be applicable, they may also be measured in aggregate or on a per-share basis. Performance goals need not be uniform among participants.

73Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 5.

APPROVE THE 2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN (cont’d)

To the extent applicable and unless the Committee determines otherwise, the determination of the achievement of performance goals will be determined based on the relevant financial measure, computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and in a manner consistent with the methods used in the Company’s audited financial statements. However, each applicable performance criteria may be structured at the time of establishment to provide for appropriate adjustment, including for one or more of the following items: asset write-downs; litigation or claim judgments or settlements; changes in accounting principles; changes in tax law or other laws affecting reported results; changes in commodity prices; severance, contract termination, and other costs related to exiting, modifying or reducing any business activities; costs of, and gains and losses from, the acquisition, disposition, or abandonment of businesses or assets; gains and losses from the early extinguishment of debt; gains and losses in connection with the termination or withdrawal from a pension plan; stock compensation costs and other non-cash expenses; any extraordinary non-recurring items as described in applicable Accounting Principles Board opinions or Financial Accounting Standards Board statements or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year; and any other specified non-operating items as determined by the Committee in setting performance goals.

Establishment of Performance Objectives. The Committee will, not later than ninety (90) days after the commencement of the performance period, or the date on which 25% of such performance period has been completed, establish the specific performance objectives for that period. In no event may a performance objective be established at a time when no substantial uncertainty exists as to its attainment. For each performance objective, the Committee may establish one or more potential levels of attainment. At the time the performance objectives for a particular period are established, the Committee will also set the bonus potential for each participant at each of the designated levels of performance. Alternatively, the Committee may establish a linear formula for determining the bonus potential at various points of performance goal attainment.

Maximum Award. The maximum bonus payment that any one participant may receive under the Incentive Plan will be limited to $5,000,000 per each 12-month period included within the applicable performance period.

Actual Bonus Awards. The total actual bonus amount to be paid for each performance period will be determined by the Committee on the basis of the Company’s actual performance relative to each of the performance objectives established for that period. Accordingly, each performance objective will be measured separately in terms of actual level of attainment and will be weighted, equally or in such other proportion as the Committee determines at the time the performance objectives are established, in determining the actual bonus payable to each participant. If the actual level of attainment is between two of the designated performance levels, the bonus amount will be interpolated on a straight-line basis. In no event will any participant receive a bonus in excess of amount determined on the basis of the bonus potential established for the particular level of performance attained for the period.

Committee Discretion. The Committee will have the discretion to reduce or eliminate the bonus that would otherwise be payable to one or more participants on the basis of the certified level of attained performance. The Committee may not waive any performance goal applicable to a participant’s bonus potential for a particular performance period, however the Committee will have complete discretion to waive the performance goal for a particular performance period in the event

74Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 5.

APPROVE THE 2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN (cont’d)

of the participant’s death or disability or under such circumstances as the Committee deems appropriate in the event a change in control of the Company should occur prior to the completion of that performance period.

Prorated Awards. A participant will not be entitled to any bonus payment for a particular performance period if that participant’s employment with the Company (or its subsidiaries) ceases for any reason prior to the end of that period. However, the Committee will have complete discretion to award a full or pro-rated bonus, based on the level at which the applicable performance goals are attained for the performance period, to a participant who ceases employee status prior to such payment date by reason of death or disability or in connection with an involuntary reduction in force.

Payment of Awards. No bonuses will be paid until the Committee certifies the actual level of attained performance for the performance period. The bonuses earned for each performance period will be paid in cash as soon as practicable following the determination and certification of the actual performance levels for the performance period, but not later than March 15 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the performance period ends. However, one or more participants may defer the receipt of their bonus payments until their separation from service or other designated date through a timely election made under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan.

Term of Incentive Plan. The plan became effective on January 1, 2012, but no bonus will be paid under the plan to an employee covered by Section 162(m) unless the plan is approved by the Company stockholders at the 2012 annual meeting. Assuming that such stockholder approval is obtained, the plan will continue in effect until the Board terminates it or until stockholder approval again is required for the plan to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) but is not obtained.

Company Policies. All bonuses under the Incentive Plan will be subject to any applicable clawback or recoupment policy of the Company.

Amendment and Termination. The Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Incentive Plan at any time. Any amendment or modification of Incentive Plan will be subject to stockholder approval to the extent required under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code or any other applicable law or regulation.

Federal Income Tax Consequences. Under present federal income tax laws, participants will recognize taxable income equal to the bonus payment that they receive under the Incentive Plan. Such taxable income will be recognized in the year the bonus payment is made to them. The Company will be entitled to an income tax deduction, equal to the amount of the taxable income recognized by the participants, for the taxable year for which the bonus is earned, provided such payment is made within two and one-half months following the close of that year; otherwise, the deduction will be deferred to the taxable year of payment. The bonus payments should qualify as performance-based compensation that is not subject to the $1 million limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid per executive officer imposed under Section 162(m).

New Plan Benefits

To date, no awards have been made under the Incentive Plan. As future awards will be established in the discretion of the Committee, the recipients and amounts of future awards are not determinable at this time.

75Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6.

APPROVE THE 2012 AMENDMENT TO THE

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Our 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”) governs the award and payment of equity awards to our employees (including executive officers) and non-employee Directors. On March 7, 2012 our Board of Directors approved an amended and restated 2009 Plan, subject to shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting. The primary purpose for the amendment and restatement and the request for shareholder approval at this time is to (i) ensure that certain equity awards made under the 2009 Plan will qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as described below and (ii) increase the number of shares available for award under the 2009 Plan by 25,500,000 shares. The amended and restated 2009 Plan also includes a number of technical modifications to the terms of the 2009 Plan.

Discussion of the Purposes of this Proposal

Section 162(m).Our Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to ensure that, where possible, awards made to its executive officers are deductible by the Company for federal income tax purposes. Section 162(m) generally does not allow a publicly held company to obtain tax deductions for compensation of more than $1 million paid in any year with respect to its chief executive officer and the three other highest paid named executive officers of the company (not including the company’s chief financial officer) (“covered officers”). However, payments that qualify as “performance-based” in accordance with conditions specified under Section 162(m) are exempt from this limitation. Under Section 162(m), shareholder approval of the 2009 Plan, including the metrics that will be used when establishing performance goals applicable to certain awards made under the 2009 Plan, is necessary to permit the awards to qualify as “performance-based” under Section 162(m). Accordingly, shareholder approval of this proposal will assure that any deductions to which the Company would otherwise be entitled upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under the 2009 Plan will not be subject to the $1 million limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid per covered officer imposed under Section 162(m). In addition, any deductions to which the Company would otherwise be entitled upon the settlement of performance shares or performance units will also not be subject to the $1 million deduction limitation to the extent the vesting of those awards is tied to the attainment of one or more of the performance milestones identified in the plan summary below.

Share Reserve Increase.A total of 47,000,000 shares of common stock have been authorized for award under the amended and restated 2009 Plan. In 2009, 2010 and 2011, the three completed calendar years16(a) during which grants were made from the 2009 Plan, the Company granted on average approximately 1,967,000 shares underlying options and 2,446,000 restricted stock awards, performance units and Canadian restricted stock units per year. The average annual dilution rate over this period net of shares forfeited is less than 1% of the common stock outstanding. As of February 29, 2012, approximately 10,254,000 options and 5,503,000 restricted stock awards, performance units and Canadian restricted stock units were outstanding under the 2009 Plan, and 4,497,000 shares were available for award under the plan. Even with our measured approach to equity compensation and low rate of dilution we do not believe the current reserve provides the Company with sufficient authority and flexibility to adequately provide for future incentives to attract and retain employees at competitive levels in 2012 and future years. The increase to the 2009 Plan is designed to provide flexibility to meet our needs over two to three years in a changing and competitive environment while attempting to minimize dilution to shareholders.2022.

76Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6. APPROVE THE 2012 AMENDMENT TO THE

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (cont’d)

A summary of the amended and restated 2009 Plan follows and is qualified by reference to the full text of the plan, which is included in this Proxy Statement as Appendix C.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the amendment and restatement of the 2009 Plan.

Summary of the Terms of the 2009 Plan

Purpose of the 2009 Plan.The purpose of the 2009 Plan is to create incentives designed to motivate selected employees to significantly contribute toward our growth and profitability. The shares under the 2009 Plan will enable us to attract and retain experienced employees who, by their positions, abilities and diligence, are able to make important contributions to our success. The share reserve available under the plan is designed to provide flexibility to meet our needs over two to three years in a changing and competitive environment while attempting to minimize dilution to shareholders. We do not intend to use all incentive awards at all times for each participant but will selectively grant awards primarily to achieve long-term goals. Awards will be granted in such a way as to align the interests of participants with those of our shareholders.

Stock Subject to the Plan. Awards may be made under the amended and restated 2009 Plan for a total of 47 million shares of Common Stock. Shares of common stock covered by an award under prior Devon Energy Corporation long-term incentive plan, including assumed plans, which are forfeited, cancelled, or expire after June 3, 2009 (the day the plan was first approved by shareholders) will be added to the shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2009 Plan. Any shares granted as stock options or stock appreciation rights will be counted against this limit as one share for each share granted. Any shares granted under awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights will be counted against this limit as 2.38 shares for each share granted. Any shares related to awards which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise or are exchanged in the Compensation Committee’s discretion for awards not involving Common Stock, will be available again for grant under the plan and shall not be counted against the shares authorized under the plan. Shares of Common Stock which are (i) tendered in payment of an option, (ii) tendered or withheld in payment of taxes or repurchased using option proceeds, or (iii) not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right, will not be added back to the shares authorized under the plan.

Key Features of the 2009 Plan.Key features of the 2009 Plan include:

a maximum term of eight years for any award under the plan;

a prohibition against the repricing of stock options or stock appreciation rights, including the cancellation of such awards in exchange for cash or other awards;

a prohibition against granting options with an exercise price less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant;

a provision under which shares granted as awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights will be subtracted from the total shares available for award as 2.38 shares for every one share granted;

a provision under which the vesting of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and Canadian restricted stock units which vest based upon continued service will be limited in such a way that, except in the case of termination due to death, disability, an approved

 

 77 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6. 5.

APPROVE THE 2012AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS TO DESIGNATE THE EXCLUSIVE FORUM FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF CERTAIN LEGAL MATTERS

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders approve an amendment to the Company’s Bylaws (the “Exclusive Forum Amendment”) designating the exclusive forums in which certain claims against the Company may be brought.

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (cont’d)

The Exclusive Forum Amendment provides:

reason, or the occurrence of a change in control, (i) no portion of the award will vest prior to the first anniversary of the grant date; (ii) up to one-third of the shares subject to the award will be eligible to vest on or after the first anniversary of the grant date; (iii) up to an additional one-third of the shares subject to the award will be eligible to vest on or after the second anniversary of the grant date; and (iv) up to an additional one-third of the shares subject to the award will be eligible to vest on or after the third anniversary of the grant date;

(i) the Court of Chancery in the state of Delaware (the “Delaware Court of Chancery”) (or, if and only if the Delaware Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, or, if the Superior Court of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, in each case, subject to that court having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named defendants therein) will be the exclusive forum for certain actions involving Devon unless we consent in writing to an alternative forum. Specifically, the Delaware Court of Chancery would be the exclusive forum for (a) any derivative actions or proceedings brought on behalf of Devon; (b) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, stockholder, other employee or agent of Devon to Devon or our stockholders; (c) any action against Devon arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Delaware Court of Chancery; or (d) any action against Devon or any director, officer, other employee or agent of Devon asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, including, without limitation, any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Certificate of Incorporation or our Bylaws (as they shall be amended from time to time); and

(ii) the federal district courts of the United States of America shall serve as the sole and exclusive jurisdiction for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under which restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and Canadian restricted stock units which vest based upon performance standards will requirethe Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), unless we consent in writing to an alternative forum.

The description of the Exclusive Forum Amendment is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Exclusive Forum Amendment attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.

The Company believes that the holder must remainExclusive Forum Amendment will reduce the risk that the Company could become subject to duplicative litigation in multiple forums, the risk of premature and abusive discovery in state courts that are not subject to federal rules for claims under the Securities Act, and the risk that the outcome of cases in multiple forums could be inconsistent, even though each forum purports to follow Delaware law or federal securities law. Any of these outcomes could expose the Company to increased expenses or losses.

Discussion of the Purposes of this Amendment

The Board believes that the Exclusive Forum Amendment is in the employmentbest interest of the Company and the Company’s stockholders for at least one year froma variety of reasons. The legal actions involving the grant date, exceptCompany’s internal corporate affairs that are subject to the exclusive forum proposed by the Exclusive Forum Amendment can continue to be asserted but would need to be brought in the caseforum widely regarded as the preeminent U.S. court for corporate law and related business disputes. Having a designated forum is intended to help provide a streamlined, efficient and organized process for resolution of termination duethese disputes. The Exclusive Forum Amendment helps to death, disability, an approved reason, oravoid the occurrenceprocedural and substantive problems and expense associated with navigating multiple lawsuits, including derivative suits brought on behalf of the Company, across multiple jurisdictions on matters relating to the corporate law of Delaware that would be expected to govern many such disputes.

The ability for plaintiffs to litigate claims governed by Delaware law in state courts outside the State of Delaware may mean that claims are brought in jurisdictions that do not apply Delaware law in the same manner as the courts of Delaware. Even if jurisdictions outside of Delaware seek to apply Delaware law in a change in control;manner

the Compensation Committee’s ability to grant awards that qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m);

the following award limits:

the maximum number of shares that may be awarded in the form of options to an employee in any calendar year is 800,000;

the maximum number of shares that may be awarded in the form of restricted stock awards, performance units, restricted stock units and Canadian restricted stock units to an employee in any calendar year is 400,000;

the maximum number of shares that may be awarded in the form of restricted stock awards, or restricted stock units to a non-employee Director in any calendar year is 15,000; and

the maximum number of shares that may be awarded in the form of non-qualified stock options or stock appreciation rights to a non-employee Director in any calendar year is 30,000.

Administration.For purposes of administration, the 2009 Plan is divided into three separate plans:

Non-executive officer plan:this plan is limited to participants who are not subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 because they are not executive officers of the Company. The non-executive officer plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee may, to the extent permitted by law, delegate authority to the regular award committee to administer the awards to non-executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer and other individuals appointed by the Compensation Committee will comprise the regular award committee. Although the regular award committee may be authorized to administer the non-executive officer plan, it can only make awards within guidelines set by the Compensation Committee.

Executive officer plan: this plan is limited to participants who are executive officers of the Company and who, therefore, are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The executive officer plan is administered exclusively by the Compensation Committee.

 

 78 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6. 5.

APPROVE THE 2012AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS TO DESIGNATE THE EXCLUSIVE

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANFORUM FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF CERTAIN LEGAL MATTERS (cont’d)

Exceptconsistent with the Delaware courts, the outcomes of those cases could be inconsistent with each other and with the manner in which the Delaware courts would decide those cases. In addition, the Board considered the fact that the Delaware courts are widely regarded as the leading courts for administrationthe determination of corporate law disputes in terms of precedent, experience and focus. The specialized Delaware Court of Chancery’s considerable expertise has led to the development of a substantial and influential body of case law interpreting the Delaware General Corporation Law. The Company expects this will provide the Company and the categoryCompany’s stockholders with more consistency and predictability regarding the outcome of participants eligiblecorporate disputes, which can reduce the time, cost and uncertainty of litigation for all parties. The Delaware Court of Chancery additionally employs procedures that can provide relatively expeditious decisions, potentially limiting the time, cost and uncertainty of protracted litigation for all parties. In providing for Delaware courts as the exclusive forum for certain actions, the Exclusive Forum Amendment is intended to receive awards,avoid the termsadded costs, the unpredictability and the risk of inconsistent outcomes (even though each court may purport to follow Delaware law) that could arise when duplicative internal corporate claims proceed in different courts.

The Board also believes that designating the federal district courts of the planUnited States of America as the exclusive forum for claims brought under the Securities Act promotes many of the same benefits to the Company and the Company’s stockholders as discussed with respect to awardsthe exclusive forum provision for certain Delaware law claims and would likely reduce litigation costs resulting from burdensome discovery allowed by state courts earlier than would be permitted in federal district courts. Plaintiffs increasingly file Securities Act claims in state courts, and companies are forced to non-executive officersdefend suits in both federal and executive officers are identical.

Non-employee Director plan: this plan is limited to non-employee Directors of the Company and permits only grants of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for selection of non-employee Directors for awards and for determination of the nature of the award. The Compensation Committee is responsible for the administration of awards granted to non-employee Directors.

Eligibilitystate courts, which is costly, inefficient, and unpredictable. Requiring Securities Act litigation to be brought only in federal courts has many benefits for Participation.Our employees are eligible to participate in the long-term incentive plan. Subject to the provisions of the 2009 Plan, the Compensation Committee has exclusive power in selecting participants from among the eligible employees. In addition, non-employee Directors are eligible to receive grants of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock unitsCompany and restricted stock awards under the 2009 Plan. As of February 29, 2012, approximately 2,800 employees (including nine executive officers) and all six non-employee Directors are eligible to participate in the 2009 Plan.

Types of Awards.The 2009 Plan provides that any or all of the following types of awards may be granted:its stockholders:

 

nonqualified stock options and stock options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options”Federal district courts have considerable expertise in matters arising under Section 422the Securities Act, which provides greater predictability regarding the outcome of the Code;these disputes;

 

stock appreciation rights (SARs);

restricted stock;

restricted stock units;

Canadian restricted stock units;

performance units;Securities Act claims in federal court are subject to the heightened pleading standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act; and

 

performance-based awards.

Stock Options.The Compensation Committee may grant awards underA motion to dismiss in federal district court invokes an automatic stay of discovery during the planpendency of the motion, thereby reducing abusive discovery practices in the form of options to purchase shares of our common stock. Stock optionsmany state courts that involve significant costs even before a court determines there may be either nonqualified stock options or stock options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” under Section 422a valid claim.

In addition, adoption of the Code. The Compensation Committee will haveExclusive Forum Amendment would reduce the authorityrisk that the Company could be involved in duplicative litigation in more than one forum, as well as the risk of inconsistent outcomes of cases in multiple forums.

This Exclusive Forum Amendment is not being proposed in anticipation of any specific litigation or transaction. Under the Exclusive Forum Amendment, the Company would retain the ability to determine the termsconsent to an alternative forum in appropriate circumstances where it determines that its interests and conditions of each option, the number of shares subject to the option, and the manner and time of the option’s exercise.

The exercise price of an option may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair market value of shares of common stock subject to options is determined by the closing price as reported on the NYSE. As of February 29, 2012, the closing pricethose of the Company’s common stock as reported onstockholders are best served by permitting a particular lawsuit to proceed in a forum other than the NYSE was $73.31. A participantcourts designated by the Exclusive Forum Amendment. The Exclusive Forum Amendment would regulate only the forum in which the Company’s stockholders may paypursue certain claims; it would not restrict the exercise price of an option in cash, in sharesability of the Company’s common stockstockholders to bring such claims, and it would not affect the remedies available if such claims were ultimately successful. Moreover, the Exclusive Forum Amendment would not specify the federal district courts in any particular state as the exclusive forum for Securities Act claims, so a plaintiff could select, on the basis of convenience or a combination of both, providedfor other reasons, the federal district courts in any state as the forum for any such claim.

In reaching its conclusion to recommend that stockholders approve the Exclusive Forum Amendment, the Board considered that the exercise price (including required withholding taxes) may be paid using shares of the Company’s common stock only to the extent such exercise would not result in a compensation expense to the Company for financial accounting purposes,exclusive forum provisions contemplated by the withholding of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to the exercisable option which have a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the exercise price, or by such other method as the CommitteeExclusive Forum Amendment may in some

 

 79 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6. 5.

APPROVE THE 2012AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS TO DESIGNATE THE EXCLUSIVE

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANFORUM FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF CERTAIN LEGAL MATTERS (cont’d)

instances impose additional litigation costs on plaintiffs in pursuing certain claims, particularly if a plaintiff does not reside in or near the State of Delaware. The Board also weighed the possibility that an exclusive forum provision may limit a plaintiff’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with the Company or the Company’s directors, officers or other employees, which such plaintiffs may claim limits their ability to enforce certain rights. The Board believes that the benefits of the Exclusive Forum Amendment to the Company and the Company’s stockholders far outweigh these potential drawbacks.

Exclusive Forum Amendment

Although the Board could amend the Company’s Bylaws to include the Exclusive Forum Amendment without obtaining stockholder approval, the Board determined that it would be consistent with the Board’s commitment to strong corporate governance practices for the Company’s stockholders to have the opportunity to consider and act upon the Exclusive Forum Amendment.

Effectiveness of the Exclusive Forum Amendment

If approved by the Company’s stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Exclusive Forum Amendment will be immediately effective. If the Exclusive Forum Amendment is not approved by the Company’s stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Board will continue to consider whether the Amendment is in the best interests of the Company and the Company’s stockholders and may conduct further outreach to the Company’s stockholders on the subject of exclusive forum provisions.

 

approve. The Compensation Committee may permitCompany’s Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote

“FOR” the exercise of stock options through a broker-dealer acting on a participant’s behalf if in accordance with procedures adopted by the Company to ensure that the arrangement will not constitute a personal loanamendment to the participant. Unless sooner terminated,Company’s Bylaws to designate the stock options granted under

exclusive forum for the plan expire eight years from the dateadjudication of the grant.

Stock Appreciation Rights.The Compensation Committee may grant awards under the Plan in the form of SARs. A SAR permits the participant to receive an amount (in cash or common stock) equal to the number of SARs exercised by the participant multiplied by the excess of the fair market value of common stock on the exercise date over the exercise price. The exercise price of SARs granted under the Plan cannot be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the SAR is granted. The Compensation Committee will have the authority to determine the terms and conditions of each SAR, the number of shares subject to the SAR, and the manner and time payment of amounts attributable to a SAR.

Restricted Stock AwardsandUnits.Shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded under the plan will be subject to the terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations, if any, that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, including restrictions on continued employment.

Canadian Restricted Stock Units. The Compensation Committee may authorize the establishment of a trust for purposes of administering the grant of Canadian restricted stock units to employees of our Canadian subsidiaries and affiliated entities who perform the majority of their employment duties in Canada. The restricted stock units will have substantially the same after-tax effect for Canadian employees as the restricted stock awards described above have on United States employees. Cash contributions will be made to the trust in amounts that approximate the value of units awarded to participants. The trust will be authorized to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market for use in settling the Canadian restricted stock units granted under the Plan. Upon vesting, the trustee of the trust would distribute the shares of our common stock which have been allocated to a participant’s account. Due to restrictions in the Canadian Income Tax Act, the term of a Canadian restricted stock unit must be limited to three years.

Performance Units.The Plan permits grants of performance units, which are rights to receive cash or common stock based upon the achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. Such awards are subject to the fulfillment of conditions that may be established by the Compensation Committee including, without limitation, the achievement of performance targets based upon the factors described above relating to restricted stock awards.

Award Limitations

Employee Participants.Subject to certain adjustment provisions, the Compensation Committee cannot grant options with respect to more than 800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to any employee participant in any calendar year. In addition, and subject to certain adjustment provisions, no more than 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock can be awarded to an employee participant under the Plan as restricted stock awards, performance units, restricted stock units or Canadian restricted stock units in any calendar year.legal matters.

The foregoing award limitations, together with the requirement that all stock options under the 2009 Plan have an exercise price per share equal to not less than the fair market value per share of common stock on the grant date, are intended to help ensure that any deductions to which the company would otherwise be entitled upon the exercise of stock options granted under the plan or

 

 80 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6.

APPROVE THE 2012 AMENDMENTAMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ADOPT LIMITATIONS ON THE LIABILITY OF OFFICERS SIMILAR TO THOSE THAT ALREADY EXIST FOR DIRECTORS

The Board unanimously recommends that the Company’s stockholders approve an amendment (the “Exculpation Amendment”) to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) that would implement new Delaware law provisions that allow exculpation of officers similar to the exculpation provisions that already exist for directors.

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (cont’d)

Background

The Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) permits Delaware corporations to limit the subsequent salepersonal liability of directors for monetary damages associated with breaches of the shares purchasedduty of care in limited circumstances, and the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation has always included those limitations. That protection did not extend to corporate officers under those options will not bethe DGCL or the Certificate of Incorporation. Consequently, stockholder plaintiffs in recent years have persuaded courts to impose the same fiduciary duties on officers that directors have, thereby exploiting the absence of the same protections for officers in order to prolong litigation and extract larger settlements from defendant corporations. This has resulted in increased litigation and insurance costs for companies, which harms stockholders. Effective August 1, 2022, the Delaware legislature amended the DGCL to correct this inconsistent treatment between directors and officers. The DGCL now allows Delaware corporations to amend their certificates of incorporation, subject to stockholder approval, to limit the $1 million limitation onpersonal liability of certain officers for monetary damages associated with breaches of the income tax deductibilityfiduciary duty of compensation paid per executivecare (but not the fiduciary duty of loyalty) in limited circumstances.

As provided in the new Delaware legislation, if the Company’s Exculpation Amendment is adopted, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation will permit officer imposed under Section 162(m).exculpation only for direct claims brought by stockholders for breach of an officer’s fiduciary duty of care, including class actions, but would not eliminate officers’ monetary liability for breach of fiduciary duty claims brought by the Company itself or for derivative claims brought by stockholders in the name of the Company. The foregoing per–participant share limitations will alsoExculpation Amendment would not apply to any performance-based awards made to a participant that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Accordingly, shareholder approval of this Agenda Item 6 will also constitute shareholder approvalbreaches of the foregoing per-participant shareduty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction in which the officer derived an improper personal benefit. These limitations are similar to those already in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation for purposes of Section 162(m).directors.

A maximum of 25,500,000 shares may be granted underThe primary reason to adopt the 2009 Plan as Incentive Stock Options.

Non-Employee Director Participants. SubjectExculpation Amendment is to certain adjustment provisions,strike a balance between stockholders’ interest in officer accountability and stockholders’ interest in the Board cannot grant stock options or stock appreciation rights with respectCompany’s ability to more than 30,000 shares of the company’s common stockattract and retain quality officers to any employee participant in any calendar year. In addition, and subject to certain adjustment provisions, no more than 15,000 shares of the company’s common stock can be awarded to a non-employee Director participant under the plan as restricted stock awards or restricted stock units in any calendar year.

Performance Based Awards

Generally.The Compensation Committee may determine that a restricted stock award, restricted stock unit, Canadian restricted stock unit or performance unit granted to an employee will be considered “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) (“Performance-Based Awards”). As determined by the Compensation Committee, either the granting or vesting of such Performance-Based Awards will be based on achievement of performance objectives that are based on one or more of the business criteria described below, with respect to one or more business units or the Company and its subsidiariesto reduce litigation and insurance costs associated with lawsuits.

Discussion of the Purposes of this Amendment

The Board and the GEPP Committee of the Board believe:

there is a need for officers to be protected from the risk of financial ruin as a whole.result of an unintentional misstep;

Business Criteria.The Compensation Committee will use objectively determinable performance goals based on one

the Exculpation Amendment is carefully drafted, consistent with the new Delaware law, to protect officers without limiting their liability for claims by the Company or morefor breaches of their duty of loyalty;

the following business criteria, individually or in combination: earnings; earnings per share (actual or targeted growth); earnings before interestExculpation Amendment would help the Company to attract and taxes; pretax earnings before interest, depreciation, amortization, explorationretain the most qualified officers;

the Exculpation Amendment would not materially and abandonment costs; pretax operating earnings after interest expensenegatively affect stockholder rights; and before incentives, service fees,

the Exculpation Amendment could reduce litigation and extraordinary or special items or operating income; revenues; sales; debt level; cost reduction targets; interest-sensitivity gap levels; cash flow (including but not limited to free cash flow, net cash flow, net cash flow before financing activities, cash flow from operations, increase in cash flow return); capital expenditures; weighted average cost of capital; debt/proved reserves; net income or gross income (including but not limited to income after capitalinsurance costs and income before or after taxes); operating income; expense; working capital; operating or profit margin; pre-tax margin; contribution margin; return factors (including, but not limited to return on equity, capital employed, or investment; risk adjusted return on capital; return on investors’ capital; return on average equity; return on assets; and return on net assets); book value; operating expenses (including, but not limited to lease operating expenses, severance taxes and other production taxes, gathering and transportation and general and administrative costs); unit costs; net borrowing, debt leverage levels, credit quality, or debt ratings; accomplishment of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, or similar business transactions (including, but not limited to acquisition goals based on value of assets acquired or similar objectives); debt to debt plus stockholder equity; debt to EBIT or EBITDA; interest coverage; total shareholder return; comparative shareholder return; market price per share; book value per share; net asset value per share; growth measures; debt to total capitalization ratio; asset quality levels; investments; economic value added; stock price appreciation; market capitalization; accountsassociated with frivolous lawsuits.

 

 81 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6.

APPROVE THE 2012 AMENDMENTAMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ADOPT LIMITATIONS

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANON THE LIABILITY OF OFFICERS SIMILAR TO THOSE THAT ALREADY EXIST FOR DIRECTORS (cont’d)

Thus, the GEPP Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board recommends to the Company’s stockholders, the adoption of the Exculpation Amendment.

Directors and officers must often make decisions in response to time-sensitive opportunities and challenges. The existence of aggressive plaintiffs’ attorneys and governmental enforcers can create substantial risk of investigations, claims, actions, suits or proceedings seeking to impose liability on the Company and its directors and officers, regardless of ultimate merit. Limiting concerns about personal risk for ordinary failures of care (but not loyalty) empowers both directors and officers to exercise their business judgment in furtherance of stockholder interests. Because the Company expects many or most of its peers to adopt exculpation clauses that limit the personal liability of officers in their governing documents, the Company’s ability to recruit and retain exceptional officer candidates could be adversely affected if the Company does not adopt the Exculpation Amendment because those candidates and of

receivables day sales outstanding; accounts receivablesficers may conclude that the higher exposure to sales; achievementpersonal liabilities at the Company is not as attractive as working at a company that provides these protections.

The Board believes that adopting the Exculpation Amendment would potentially reduce litigation and insurance costs associated with lawsuits (many of balance sheet or income statement objectives; market share; assets; asset sale targets; non-performing assets; satisfactory internal or external audits; improvement of financial ratings; charge-offs; regulatory compliance; employee retention/attrition rates; individual business objectives; risk management activities, corporate value measures which may be objectively determined (including ethics, compliance, environmental, diversity commitment,frivolous), better position the Company to attract top officer candidates and safety); amountretain the Company’s current officers and enable the officers to exercise their business judgment in furtherance of the oilinterests of the stockholders without the potential for distraction posed by the risk of personal liability. This Exculpation Amendment will also better align the protections available to the Company’s officers with those already available to the Company’s directors. In view of the above considerations, the Company’s Board has unanimously determined to provide for the exculpation of officers as proposed.

Proposed Exculpation Amendment

The Board is asking the Company’s stockholders to approve the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation. The proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation is attached hereto as Appendix C, with additions marked in bold, underlined text and gas reserves; costsdeletions indicated by strike-out text.

Effectiveness of finding oil and gas reserves; reserve replacement ratio, reserve additions, or other reserve level measures; drilling results; natural gas and/or oil production, production and reserve growth; implementation or completionthe Exculpation Amendment

If the Exculpation Amendment is approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Exculpation Amendment will become effective upon the filing of critical projects or processes; production volume; sales volume; production efficiency; inventorya Certificate of Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State. This filing is expected to sales; and inventory turns.

Establishment of Performance Goals.The Compensation Committee will establish the performance goals applicable to a given award no later than the earlier of ninety (90) daysoccur shortly after the commencementAnnual Meeting. If the Exculpation Amendment is not approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Certificate of the applicable performance period or the date on which twenty-five percent (25%) of such performance period has been completed.

Certification of Performance.No Performance-Based AwardsIncorporation will not be amended, and no exculpation will be payable to or vest with respect to any participantprovided for a given period until the Compensation Committee certifies that the objective performance goals applicable to such period have been satisfied.

Modification of Performance-Based Awards.The Compensation Committee may reduce or eliminate the number of shares of common stock awarded or the number of shares of common stock vested upon the attainment of a performance goal, based on such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee may make such changes to performance goals and Performance-Based Awards as the committee deems appropriate in the event of a change in corporate capitalization, corporate transaction or other corporate event as permitted by Section 162(m), or as the committee otherwise determines.

Impact of Extraordinary Items or Changes in Accounting.To the extent applicable and unless the Committee determines otherwise, the determination of the achievement of performance goals will be determined based on the relevant financial measure, computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and in a manner consistent with the methods used in the Company’s audited financial statements.officers. The Compensation Committee may provide Company’s officers will nevertheless retain their existing rights under indemnification agreements and insurance policies.

The Company’s Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote

“FOR” the amendments to theCertificate of Incorporation to adopt limitations

on theliability of officers similar to those that already existfor appropriate adjustment as it deems appropriate, including for one or more of the following items: asset write-downs; litigation or claim judgments or settlements; changes in accounting principles; changes in tax law or other laws affecting reported results; changes in commodity prices; severance, contract termination, and other costs related to exiting, modifying or reducing any business activities; costs of, and gains and losses from, the acquisition, disposition, or abandonment of businesses or assets; gains and losses from the early extinguishment of debt; gains and losses in connection with the termination or withdrawal from a pension plan; stock compensation costs and other non-cash expenses; any extraordinary non-recurring items as described in applicable Accounting Principles Board opinions or Financial Accounting Standards Board statements or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year; and any other specified non-operating items as determined by the committee in setting performance goals.directors. 

Death, Disability or Other Circumstances.The Compensation Committee may provide that Performance-Based Awards will be payable in the event of the participant’s death or disability, a change in control or under other circumstances consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m).

 

 82 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6. APPROVE7.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO

REFORM THE 2012 AMENDMENT TO THE

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (cont’d)NEAR IMPOSSIBLE SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING REQUIREMENTS

Termination of Employment

The Compensation Committee will determineCompany has been notified by Mr. John Chevedden that the treatment of a participant’s award infollowing proposal is to be presented for consideration at the event of death, disability, retirement or termination of employment for an approved reason. Except as otherwise provided, if a participant’s employment is terminated for any other reason, all unvested awards will terminate at that time.

Company Policies.All awards granted under the 2009 PlanAnnual Meeting. This proposal will be subjectvoted on if it is properly presented at the Annual Meeting. The Company will provide to any applicable clawback or recoupment, share trading or other policystockholder, promptly upon receipt of the Company.

Amendingstockholders’s written or oral request, the Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Company’s Board of Directors may amend the 2009 Plan at any time. The Company’s Board of Directors may not, however, without Devon shareholder approval,

adopt any amendment that would increase the maximum number of shares that may be granted under the 2009 Plan (except for certain anti-dilution adjustments),

materially modify the 2009 Plan’s eligibility requirements, or

materially increase the benefits provided to participants under the 2009 Plan. Amendments to award agreements that would have the effect of repricing outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights are prohibited.

Change in Control Event

The Compensation Committee is authorized to provide in the award agreements for the acceleration of any unvested portion of any outstanding awards under the 2009 Plan upon a change of control event.

Automatic Adjustment Features

The 2009 Plan provides for the automatic adjustmentname and address of the numberproponent of this proposal and kind of shares available under it, and the number and kind of shares subject to outstanding awards in the event our common stock is changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares of stock or other securities of Devon or another corporation, or if the number of shares of ourthe Company’s common stock held by the proponent of this proposal.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the adoption of this stockholder proposal.

The Company is increased through a stock dividend. The 2009 Plan also provides thatnot responsible for the Compensation Committee may adjustcontent of this stockholder proposal, including the number of shares available under the 2009 Plansupporting statement and the numbercheckmark graphic.

Proposal 7 — Reform the Near Impossible Special Shareholder Meeting Requirements

LOGO

Shareholders ask our board to take the steps necessary to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of shares subject to any outstanding awards if, in the Compensation Committee’s opinion, any other change in the number or kinda combined 10% of shares ofour outstanding common stock equitably requiresthe power to call a special shareholder meeting. This includes that each share shall have an equal right per share to formally participate in the calling for a special shareholder meeting to the fullest extent possible.

The current Devon Energy right to call for a special shareholder meeting is like a bait and switch right. The bait is the 25% figure which seems somewhat favorable.

However it goes downhill fast from here. Only non-street name shares have a right to call a special shareholder meeting.

Thus if one makes the reasonable estimate that 50% of Devon Energy stock is non-street name stock, it means that our current requirement that 25% of shares are needed to call for a special shareholder meeting translates into 50% of this one category of stock and all other Devon Energy shares are 100% excluded.

The next downhill bump is that all shares not owned for one full continuous year are 100% excluded. Thus the owners of such an adjustment.

New Plan Benefits

To date, no awards have been made on the basis50% of Devon Energy stock could determine that they own 65% of the increaseexclusive category of Devon Energy stock that can call a special shareholder meeting if they include the shares that are owned for less than a full continuous year. Thus a somewhat favorable figure of 25% can translate into a steeply unfavorable 65% of shares to call a special shareholder meeting.

The 10% figure, that gives each share an equal right to formally participate in calling for a special shareholder meeting, is also reasonable because the share reserve underlaws of some states mandate that 10% of shares be able to call a special shareholder meeting without the long-term incentive plan.Devon type strings attached. Another sign that a 10% of shares is reasonable is that some companies that have a 25% figure then allow the 10% figure to apply to one shareholder who owns 10% of shares.

U.S. Federal Tax TreatmentCalling for a special shareholder meeting is hardly ever used by shareholders but the main point of the right to call for a special shareholder meeting is that it gives shareholders at least significant standing to engage effectively with management. Devon management professes to be strongly in favor of shareholder engagement.

Incentive Stock Option Grant/Exercise.A participant who is grantedDevon management will have an incentive stockto genuinely engage with shareholders, instead of stonewalling, if shareholders seeking engagement have a realistic Plan B option does not realize any taxable income atof calling a special shareholder meeting.

Please vote yes:

Reform the time of grant or at the time of exercise (except for alternative minimum tax). Similarly, we are not entitled to a deduction at the time of grant or at the time of exercise. If the participant makes no disposition of the shares acquired pursuant to an incentive stock option before the later of two years from the date of grant of such option or one year from the date of the exercise of such shares by the participant, any gain or loss realized on a subsequentNear Impossible Special Shareholder Meeting Requirements — Proposal 7

 

 83 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 6. APPROVE7.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO

REFORM THE 2012 AMENDMENT TO THE

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANNEAR IMPOSSIBLE SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING REQUIREMENTS (cont’d)

dispositionOpposition Statement of the Company:

The Company’s stockholders already have the right to call special meetings.

The Company’s Board is committed to having strong corporate governance practices in place to ensure that the Company is responsive to stockholder concerns. Among many other stockholder rights, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation already allows record holders of an aggregate of at least 25% of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding shares willto call a special meeting, in addition to requiring holders to have continuously owned the shares for at least one year. Under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, stockholders are also permitted to aggregate their holdings to reach the special meeting threshold, and there is no aggregation cap. This right reflects a balanced approach to enhancing stockholder rights while protecting the interests of all stockholders.

The existing special meeting right is common among S&P 500 Companies.

The Company’s existing special stockholder meeting provisions are consistent with good governance practices at large publicly-traded companies. Approximately 29% of S&P 500 companies do not grant stockholders the right to call a special meeting at all. Among the approximately 71% of companies in the S&P 500 that grant stockholders a special meeting right, the most common ownership requirement is that the meeting be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss. Under such circumstances, we will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes.

Nonqualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Right Grant/Exercise.A participant who is granted a nonqualified stock option or stock appreciation rightrequested by holders of at least 25% of the voting power—the standard the Company already has. There does not appear to be much support for changing this. Of the over 110 proposals to adopt or amend special meeting provisions submitted for annual meetings held in 2022, fewer than 10 received support from a majority of shareholders, and more than half of those were at companies that did not already have taxable incomethe right for stockholders to call a special meeting at all.

The Company’s Board believes that the current threshold to call a special meeting provides stockholders with assurance that a reasonable number of stockholders consider a matter important enough to warrant a special meeting. In particular, reducing the threshold to 10%, as proposed, could cause the Company to spend substantial time and resources on a special meeting even if holders of up to 90% of the Company’s shares do not want a special meeting. Reducing the threshold to call a special meeting to 10% would effectively allow such holders to call a special meeting at any time, regardless of the desires of the Company’s other stockholders. If the proposal were adopted, a small minority of stockholders—sometimes a single stockholder—with potentially narrow, short-term interests, could call an unlimited number of special meetings, without regard to how direct costs and other burdens might affect the Company’s future success or the interests of the vast majority of stockholders.

Preparing for, and holding, a special meeting is time-consuming and expensive. A company must pay to prepare, print, and distribute disclosure documents to stockholders, solicit proxies, hold the meeting, and tabulate votes, among other things. Moreover, holding a special meeting at the timerequest of grant. Taxable income occurs atsuch a small minority of stockholders has the time of exercise in an amount equalpotential to injure the difference between the exercise price of the shares and the market value of the shares on the date of exercise. We are entitled to a corresponding deduction for the same amount.

Restricted Stock Awards.A participant who has been granted an award in the form of restricted stock will not realize taxable income at the time of grant, and we will not be entitled to a deduction at the time of grant, assuming that the restrictions constitute a substantial risk of forfeiture for U.S. income tax purposes. When such restrictions lapse, the participant will receive taxable income (and have tax basis in the shares) in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for such shares, and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. The participant may elect to include the value of his restricted stock awardCompany, as income at the time it is granted under Section 83(b) of the Code, and we will take a corresponding income tax deduction at such time.

Restricted Stock Units.A participant who has been granted an award in the form of restricted stock units will not realize taxable income at the time of grant, and we will not be entitled to a deduction at the time of grant, assuming that the restrictions constitute a substantial risk of forfeiture for U.S. income tax purposes. When such restrictions lapse, the participant will receive taxable income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares at such time and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

Section 162(m) of the Code.Section 162(m) of the Code precludes a public corporation from taking a deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to its principal executive officer and any of its three other most highly compensated officers. However, compensation that qualifies under Section 162(m) of the Code as “performance-based” is specifically exemptspecial meetings demand significant attention from the deduction limit. Based on Section 162(m) ofBoard and senior management and disrupt normal business operations. As a result, the Code and the regulations thereunder, the Company’s ability to deduct compensation expense generated in connection with the exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the plan and with respect to Performance-Based AwardsCompany believes special meetings should not be limited by Section 162(m)to when there are urgent and important strategic matters or profound fiduciary concerns. The Company’s existing 25% threshold helps avoid waste of the Code.

Canadian Tax Treatment

Stock Options.A participant who is granted a stock option does not have taxable incomeCompany and stockholder resources on the date of grant. Instead, tax liability is deferred until the time that the stock option is exercised. At the time of exercise, the participants are subject to tax on the difference between the value of the underlying shares acquired on the exercise of the stock option and the exercise price paid to acquire the shares. Generally, the participant will only be taxed on 50% of the difference in value. However, in certain circumstances, participants may also defer the recognition of this income until disposition of the shares. We will not be entitled to a deduction for Canadian tax purposes.

Canadian Restricted Stock Units. A participant who is granted a Canadian restricted stock unit will not have taxable income at the time of grant. Taxable income will instead occur as the participant becomes vested and shares of common stock are distributed to the participant. We will be entitled to a deduction for the payments made to the trust. However, the deduction will be deferred to the year in which the shares are vested and distributed to the participants.addressing narrow or special interests.

 

 84 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 7.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A REPORT ONTO

REFORM THE

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING POLICIES AND PRACTICES NEAR IMPOSSIBLE SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING REQUIREMENTS (cont’d)

The Company’s stockholders can be assured that their right to be apprised of, and vote on, significant matters is protected not only by their existing right to call special meetings but also by state law and other regulations. The Company has been notified byis incorporated in Delaware. Delaware law requires that major corporate actions, such as a groupmerger or sale of stockholders that they intend to submit the resolution set forth below at the Annual Meeting for action by the stockholders. Pursuant to Rule 14a-8(l)(1)all or substantially all of the Securities Exchange ActCompany’s assets, be approved by its stockholders. The Company is also listed on the NYSE, which requires, among other things, that listed companies obtain stockholder approval for issuances of 1934,equity representing more than 20% of an issuer’s voting power as well as equity compensation plans and significant issuances of equity to related parties.

The Company’s Board strongly believes that the current threshold is a reasonable and meaningful threshold affording stockholders a significant right and is part of an entire suite of rights that the Company will provide the name, addressprovides to its stockholders.

We have established multiple governance mechanisms to ensure meaningful stockholder engagement and number of shares of our common stock held by the proponents of the stockholder proposal set forth below promptly upon receipt of a written or oral request. Requests should be submittedparticipation, as well as to Devon Energy Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 333 W. Sheridan, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, email:CorporateSecretary@dvn.com or by calling (405) 235-3611.

The Board of Directors’ statement in opposition is set forth below. Proxies solicited on behalfassure accountability of the Board and management to stockholders.

In addition to the existing right of Directors will be voted“AGAINST” this proposal unless stockholders specifyto call a contrary choice in their proxies.

“Whereas, businesses, like individuals, have a recognized legal right to express opinions to legislators and regulators on public policy matters. It is important that our company’s lobbying positions, as well as processes to influence public policy, are transparent. Public opinion is skeptical of corporate influence on Congress and public policy and questionable lobbying activity may pose risks to our company’s reputation when controversial positions are embraced. Hence, we believe full disclosure of Devon’s policies, procedures and oversight mechanisms is warranted.

Resolved, the shareholders of Devon Energy Corp. requestspecial meeting, the Board authorizehas in place robust corporate governance policies that provide stockholders with a means to communicate their priorities to the preparationBoard and management. Although the proponent dismisses or ignores these rights, they are meaningful opportunities for stockholders to voice their concerns and to motivate management to engage with stockholders. These rights include:

Annual election of all directors;

A board comprised of a report, updated annually, disclosing:majority of independent directors (11 of 12 directors are independent);

A majority voting standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections with a director resignation policy;

 

 1.

Company policy and procedures governingAnnual votes on the lobbying of legislators and regulators, including that doneadvisory “say-on-pay” vote on our company’s behalf by trade associations. The disclosure should include both direct and indirect lobbying and grassroots lobbying communications.executive compensation;

 

2.

A listing of payments (both direct and indirect, including payments to trade associations) used for direct lobbying as well as grassroots lobbying communications, including the amount of the payment and the recipient.

In addition to proxy access, a policy of considering director candidates recommended by stockholders; and

 

3.

Membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

4.

Description of the decision making process and oversight by the management and Board for

a.

direct and indirect lobbying contribution or expenditure;

b.

payment for grassroots lobbying expenditure.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take actionNo supermajority voting provisions, including with respect to amending the legislation.Company’s Bylaws.

Both “directDevon engages with its investors substantively and indirect lobbying”frequently. Devon regularly engages with investors and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, statemakes forums to do so widely available. In 2022 alone, Devon interacted with investors hundreds of times in meetings and federal levels.

The report shall be presentedby email and telephone. Management regularly reports to the Audit CommitteeBoard on these interactions and the Company has responded to such feedback in the past. Devon does not make a practice of, in the words of the Board or other relevant oversight committeesproponent, “stonewalling” investors. Instead, Devon’s level of engagement and transparency with investors has been recognized and appreciated.

A more complete review of the BoardCompany’s governance policies and postedpractices can be found on the company’s website.

page 15 of this Proxy Statement.

 

 85 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 7.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A REPORT ONTO

REFORM THE

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING POLICIES AND PRACTICES NEAR IMPOSSIBLE SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING REQUIREMENTS (cont’d)

We also maintain strong and effective practices that reflect the Company’s ongoing commitment to corporate governance, including:

 

Supporting StatementIndependent Chair of the Board, separate from the CEO;

As shareholders, we encourage transparency

Independent committee chairs;

No restrictions on directors’ access to management or employees;

Annual Board and accountabilitycommittee self-evaluations;

Prohibition on hedging and pledging of Company stock by directors and executive officers;

Stock ownership requirements whereby directors must own equal to five times the useDirector’s annual retainer by the end of staff timea five-year period after election and corporate fundsa holding requirement for those who have yet to influence legislation and regulation both directly and indirectly as well as grassroots lobbying initiatives. We believemeet such disclosure is in shareholder’s best interests. Absentrequirements;

Clawback Policy allowing the Company to require reimbursement or forfeiture of all or a systemportion of accountability, company assets could be used for policy objectives contrary to a company’s long-term interests posing risksany bonus or incentive compensation subject to the companyClawback Policy;

Active Board refreshment, with eight new directors joining since 2018;

No poison pill;

A Governance, Environmental, and shareholders.

For example,Public Policy Committee that periodically reviews the Company’s corporate governance practices along with best practices followed by other companies to maintain a company may lobby directly or throughcorporate governance framework for the Company that is effective and functional and that addresses the interests of the Company’s stakeholders; and

A consistent program of contacting and meeting with the Company’s stockholders on a trade associationrange of topics, including the Company’s governance practices.

The Company’s existing governance policies and practices, including the right of the Company’s stockholders to weakencall special meetings, already provide the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or stopCompany’s stockholders with a significant ability to raise important matters with the EPA from regulating climate change or tryingBoard and senior management and demonstrate the Company’s continuing commitment to limiteffective corporate governance. Accordingly, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.

DevonBoard believes that this stockholder proposal is actively involvednot in the American Petroleum Institute & National Associationbest interests of Manufacturers both very active lobbyists.the Company and its stockholders, and for the reasons described above, the Board recommends that stockholders vote against this proposal.

Company funds of approximately $4.45 million for 2009 and 2010 supported direct federal lobbying activities, according to disclosure reports. (U.S. Senate Office of Public Record) This figure may not include grassroots lobbying to directly influence legislation by mobilizing public support or opposition. Also, not all states require disclosure of lobbying expenditures.

We encourage our Board to require comprehensive disclosure related to direct, indirect and grassroots lobbying.”

TheFor the foregoing reasons, the Company’s Board of Directors recommends athat stockholders vote “AGAINST”

“AGAINST” the proposal forto Reform the preparation of a report disclosing specified lobbying policies and practices.Near Impossible Special Shareholder Meeting Requirements.

Opposition Statement of the Company: This proposal requests the Board of Directors to authorize the preparation of a report disclosing the Company’s lobbying policies, procedures and practices. For the reasons discussed below, the Board of Directors recommends a vote“AGAINST” this stockholder proposal.

The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s current disclosures regarding lobbying practices and procedures are significant, adequate and accessible. The Board of Directors agrees with the shareholder proponents regarding the importance of transparency and accountability with respect to use of staff time and corporate funds. However, we currently provide extensive disclosures regarding our lobbying practices and policies.

Nearly five years ago, Congress passed the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act, which amended parts of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 and dramatically increased overall required disclosure of lobbying activities. Pursuant to these laws, we provide quarterly reports on the aggregate amount that is spent on lobbying activities and bill numbers of lobbied legislation, and provides semi-annual reports on political action committee contributions, expenses relating to meetings, conferences and awards of certain officials, and charitable contributions. These disclosures are publicly available on the Internet through databases maintained by the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate athttp://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/ and

http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=lobbyistselectfields, respectively. We also disclose lobbying activities pursuant to applicable state law, including Montana, New Mexico, Texas, Wyoming and Oklahoma, and these reports are publicly available through state websites. Our lobbying policies and practices are included in our “Code of Business Conduct,” which is available

 

 86 Commitment Runs Deep


AGENDA ITEM 7. STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A REPORT ON THE

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING POLICIES AND PRACTICES (cont’d)

 

throughSUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

Proposals for Inclusion in Our 2024 Proxy Statement

SEC rules permit stockholders to submit proposals to be included in our corporate websiteProxy Statement if the stockholder and the proposal satisfy the requirements specified in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proposal must be received at www.dvn.com. Given our current levelthe address provided below by December [    ], 2023.

Director Nominations for Inclusion in Our 2024 Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)

Our proxy-access bylaw permits a stockholder (or a group of disclosure with respectup to lobbying activities,20 stockholders) owning 3% or more of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s Proxy Statement director candidates constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, if the nominating stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our Bylaws. For the 2024 Annual Meeting of Directors believes that the proposal is unnecessary. The Board of Directors also believes that additional disclosures with respect to lobbying practices would not provide useful information to our stockholders. As evidenced by the proponent’s supporting statement, information concerning our lobbying activities is already available. Further, we do not currently have a substantial involvement in lobbying activities and have historically spent an annual amount that totals less than 0.01% (less than one one-hundredthStockholders, notice of a percent)proxy-access nomination must be received at the address provided below no later than December [    ], 2023, and no earlier than November [    ], 2023.

Proposals and Nominations to Be Brought before Our 2024 Annual Meeting But Not for Inclusion in Our 2024 Proxy Statement

Our Bylaws permit a stockholder to propose items of business and nominate director candidates that are not intended to be included in our Proxy Statement if the stockholder complies with the procedures set forth in our Bylaws. For the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, notice of such proposals or nominations must be received at the address provided below no later than March 9, 2024, and no earlier than February 8, 2024.

If the Company moves the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to a date that is more than 30 days before or after the date which is the one-year anniversary of this year’s Annual Meeting date (i.e., June 7, 2024), the Company must receive notice of such proposals no earlier than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 70th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.

Stockholder Proxy Solicitation for Nominees (the SEC’s Universal Proxy Rule)

Any stockholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of any director nominee must comply with the content requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the SEC’s universal proxy rule) at the time it complies with the earlier of the deadlines in the advance notice provisions of our total assets. We do not directly engage in any “grassroots lobbying communication.” We also do not directly influence how the trade associations to which we contribute spend monies for lobbying purposes, nor is lobbying our primary purpose for joining such associations. Therefore, the Board of Directors believes that our expenditures on,Bylaws and involvement with, lobbying activities are insignificant.

The Board of Directors believes that the currently available information with respect to lobbying activities strikes the appropriate balance between transparency and excessive burden and cost. The proposal’s requirements would tip this balance, resulting in the waste of valuable time and corporate resources tracking immaterial activity without materially altering the publicly-available disclosure that currently exists.

SEC Rule 14a-19.For the foregoing reasons,2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, if a stockholder intends to solicit proxies in support of any director nominees submitted under the Boardadvance notice provisions of Directors recommendsour Bylaws, such stockholder must also provide proper written notice that sets forth all the information required under SEC Rule 14a-19 that must be received at the address provided below no later than March 9, 2024 and no earlier than February 8, 2024. If the Company moves the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to a vote “AGAINST”date that is more than 30 days before or after the proposal fordate which is the preparationone-year anniversary of a report disclosing specified lobbying policiesthis year’s Annual Meeting date (i.e., June 7, 2024), the Company must receive notice of such proposals no earlier than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and practices.not later than the close of business on the later of the 70th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.

 

 87 Commitment Runs Deep


SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS (cont’d)

AnyAddress for Submission of Notices and Additional Information

All stockholder desiringnominations of individuals for election as directors or proposals of other items of business to present a proposalbe considered by stockholders at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (whether or not intended for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must present the proposal to our Corporate Secretary not later than December 27, 2012. Only those proposals that comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be included in our Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting. Written notice of stockholder proposals submitted outside the process of Rule 14a-8 for consideration at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but not included in our Proxy Statement,Statement) must be received bysubmitted in writing to our Corporate Secretary at 333 W. Sheridan Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, or email:CorporateSecretary@dvn.com between February 7, 2013by email to CorporateSecretary@dvn.com.

In addition, both the proxy access and March 8, 2013 in order to be considered timely, and must otherwise comply with the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws require a stockholder’s notice of a nomination or other item of business to include certain information. Director nominees must also meet certain eligibility requirements. Any stockholder considering introducing a nomination or other item of business should carefully review our Bylaws.

 

 88 Commitment Runs Deep


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

What are the Board of Directors’ voting recommendations?

For the election of the 11 Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement for a term expiring at the next Annual Meeting;


For the ratification of the appointment of our independent auditors for 2023;

OTHER MATTERS

For the approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation;

Our Board

For the option of one year as the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation;

For the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Bylaws to designate the exclusive forum for the adjudication of certain legal matters;

For the approval of amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to adopt limitations on the liability of officers similar to those that already exist for directors; and

Against the stockholder proposal set forth in this Proxy Statement.

Who is entitled to vote?

Stockholders as of Directors knowsthe close of no other matterbusiness on April 10, 2023 (the Record Date) are eligible to come beforevote their shares at the meeting other than that set forth herein andAnnual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were [    ] shares of our common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders do not have the right to cumulative voting in the accompanying Noticeelection of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, if any other matters should properly come beforeDirectors.

How do I vote?

You may:

Attend the Annual Meeting it is the intention of the persons namedand vote in the accompanying proxy to vote such proxies as they deem advisable in accordance with their best judgment.person; or

Your cooperation in giving this matter your immediate attention and in returning your proxy promptly will be appreciated.

 

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSDial the toll-free number 1-800-690-6903 (listed on the Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Form). Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. Telephone voting will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on June 6, 2023; or

Go to the website www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote using the website, you can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Internet voting will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time) on June 6, 2023; or

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

April 25, 2012

 

LOGO

Carla D. Brockman

Vice President Corporate Governance

If you elected to receive a paper copy of your proxy materials, mark your selections on the Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Form, date and Corporate Secretarysign it, and return the card or form in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided.

Why did I receive a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail instead of a full set of proxy materials?

SEC rules allow companies to furnish proxy materials over the Internet. Commencing on or about April [    ], 2023, we have mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice) to most of our stockholders instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or email will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

 

 89 Commitment Runs Deep


Appendix A  

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING (cont’d)

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE VI OF THE

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATEDWhy did I receive paper copies of proxy materials?

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATIONWe are providing paper copies of the proxy materials instead of the Notice to certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive them. If you prefer to no longer receive printed proxy materials, you may consent to receive all future proxy materials electronically via email. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided in your proxy materials. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.

ARTICLE VIWill each stockholder in our household receive proxy materials?

Generally, no. We try to provide only one set of proxy materials to be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless you have given us other instructions. Any stockholder at a shared address may request delivery of single or multiple copies of proxy materials for future meetings or an additional copy of the proxy materials for this meeting, which shall be promptly delivered, by contacting Broadridge at 1-866-540- 7095 or our Corporate Secretary at the telephone number or address provided below.

Who will be admitted to the Annual Meeting?

Admission to the Annual Meeting will be limited to our stockholders of Stockholders

A.    Meetingsrecord, persons holding proxies from our stockholders, beneficial owners of our common stock, and our employees. If your shares are registered in your name, we will verify your ownership at the meeting in our list of stockholders as of the Corporation may beRecord Date. If your shares are held withinthrough a broker, bank, or without the Stateother nominee, you must bring proof of Delaware, as the Bylawsyour ownership of the Corporation may provide. Exceptshares. This proof could consist of, for example, a bank or brokerage firm account statement or a letter from your bank or broker confirming your ownership as otherwise provided for or fixed pursuant to the provisions of Article IV relating to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock, special meetings of stockholders of the Corporation may be called only (i) pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the then-authorized number of directors of the Corporation, and (ii) if permitted by the Bylaws of the Corporation, by the Chairman of the BoardRecord Date.

If I vote via telephone or the PresidentInternet or by mailing my Proxy Card, may I still attend the Annual Meeting?

Yes. You will need the control number located on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to attend the Corporation as and inmeeting.

What if I want to change my vote?

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by submitting a new proxy with a later date (by mail, telephone, or Internet), by voting at the manner provided inAnnual Meeting, or by filing a written revocation with our Corporate Secretary. Your attendance at the Bylaws ofAnnual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy.

Who will count the Corporation, and (iii) byvotes?

Broadridge will tabulate the Secretary of the Corporation upon receipt of the written request of one or more record holders owning, and having held continuously forvotes.

What constitutes a period of at least one year prior to the date such request is delivered, an aggregate of not less than 25%quorum?

A majority of the voting power of allthe outstanding shares of capitalour common stock of the Corporation entitled to vote ongenerally in the matterelection of Directors, present at the meeting or matters torepresented by proxy, constitutes a quorum. If you vote by telephone or Internet or by returning your Proxy Card, you will be brought before the proposed special meeting, provided that such written request is made in accordance with and subject to the applicable requirements and proceduresconsidered part of the Bylawsquorum. Broadridge,

90Commitment Runs Deep


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING (cont’d)

the Inspector of the Corporation, including any limitations on the stockholders’ ability to request a special meeting set forth in the Bylaws of the Corporation. Special meetings of stockholders may not be called by any other person or persons or in any other manner. The ability of the stockholders of the Corporation to call a special meeting of stockholders is hereby specifically denied. Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the Bylaws of the Corporation shall so provide.

B.    In addition to the powers conferred on the Board by this Certificate of Incorporation and by the General Corporation Law, and without limiting the generality thereof, the Board is specifically authorized from time to time, by resolution of the Board without additional authorization by the stockholders of the Corporation, to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws of the Corporation, in such form and with such terms as the Board may determine, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Bylaws relating to (i) regulation of the procedure for submission by stockholders of nominations of persons to be elected to the Board, (ii) regulation of the attendance at annual or special meetings of the stockholders of persons other than holders of record or their proxies, and (iii) regulation of themanner in which, and the circumstances under which, special meetings may be called by stockholders pursuant to Paragraph A of this Article VI or and (iv) the regulation of the business that may properly be broughtElection, will treat shares represented by a stockholder of the Corporation before an annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Corporation.

A-1


Appendix B  

2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION

2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Effective January 1, 2012

1.    Purpose of the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to provide a link between compensation and performance, to motivate participants to achieve corporate performance objectives and to enable the Company to attract and retain high quality Eligible Employees.

2.    Definitions. As used herein, the following definitions shall apply:

(a) “Affiliated Entity” means any partnership or limited liability company in which a majority of the partnership or other similar interest thereof is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Company or one or more of its subsidiaries or Affiliated Entities or a combination thereof. For purposes hereof, the Company, a subsidiary or an Affiliated Entity shall be deemed to have a majority ownership interest in a partnership or limited liability company if the Company, such subsidiary or Affiliated Entity shall be allocated a majority of partnership or limited liability company gains or losses or shall be or control a managing director or a general partner of such partnership or limited liability company.

(b) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(c) “Bonus” means a cash payment made pursuant to the Plan.

(d) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,properly executed proxy as amended.

(e) “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board.

(f) “Company” means Devon Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

(g) “Covered Employee” means an Employee who is a “covered employee” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(h) “Director” means a non-Employee member of the Board.

(i) “Eligible Employee” means any Employee who is selected for participation in the Plan by the Committee and (i) holds the title or position of Executive Vice President or above or (ii) is an officer subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(j) “Employee” means any person who is in the employ of the Company, a subsidiary or an Affiliated Entity, subject to the control and direction of the Company, the subsidiary or the Affiliated Entity as to both the work to be performed and the manner and method of performance. Neither service as a Director nor fees received from the Company, the subsidiary or the Affiliated Entity for service as a Director shall be sufficient to constitute Employee status.

(k) “Performance-Based Compensation” means compensation qualifying as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(l) “Performance Goal” means any measurable criterion tied to the success of the Company and based on one or more of the business criteria described in Section 6.

(m) “Performance Period” means a fixed period established by the Committee that may range in duration from a minimum period of twelve (12) months to a maximum period of thirty-six (36) months and over which the attainment of the applicable Performance Goals set by the Committee is to be measured.

B-1


(n) “Plan” means the Devon Energy Corporation 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan.

3.    Administration of the Plan.

(a)The Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee (or a subcommittee of the Committee) which shall be comprised solely of two or more Directors eligible to serve on a committee awarding Bonus payments qualifying as Performance-Based Compensation.

(b)Powers of the Committee. Subject the provisions of the Plan (including any other powers given to the Committee hereunder), the Committee shall have the authority, in its discretion, to:

(i) establish the duration of each Performance Period;

(ii) select the Eligible Employees who are to participate in the Plan for such Performance Period;

(iii) determine the specific Performance Goal or Goals for each Performance Period and the relative weighting of those goals, establish one or more designated levels of attainment for each such goal and set the Bonus potential for each participant at each corresponding level of attainment;

(iv) certify the level at which the applicable Performance Goal or Goals are attained for the Performance Period and determine, on the basis of that certification, the actual Bonus for each participant in an amount not to exceed his or her maximum Bonus potential for the certified level of attainment;

(v) exercise discretionary authority, when appropriate, to reduce the actual Bonus payable to any participant below his or her Bonus potential for the attained level of the Performance Goal(s) for the Performance Period;

(vi) construe and interpret the terms of the Plan and Bonuses awarded under the Plan;

(vii) establish additional terms, conditions, rules or procedures for the administration of the Plan; provided, however, that no Bonus shall be awarded under any such additional terms, conditions, rules or procedures which are inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan; and

(viii) take such other action, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Committee deems appropriate.

All decisions and determinations by the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding on the Company, its subsidiaries, Affiliated Entities, the participants, and any other persons having or claiming an interest hereunder.

(c)Indemnification. In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board, members of the Committee who administer the Plan shall be defended and indemnified by the Company, to the extent permitted by law, on an after-tax basis against (i) all reasonable expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan or any Bonus awarded hereunder and (ii) all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct; provided, however, that within 30 days after the institution of such claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Company, in writing, the opportunitypresent at the Company’s expense to handlemeeting. Abstentions, withheld votes, and defend the same.

B-2


4.    Coverage. All Eligible Employees shallbroker non-votes will be covered by the Plan, except to the extent the Committee may elect to exclude one or more Eligible Employees from participation in a designated Performance Period.

5.    Terms and Conditions of Bonus Awards.

(a)Pre-Established Performance Goals. Payment of Bonuses shall be based solely on account of the attainment of one or more pre-established, objective Performance Goals over the designated Performance Period. The Committee shall establish one or more objective Performance Goals with respect to each Eligible Employee in writing not later than 90 days after the commencement of the Performance Period to which the Performance Goals relate or the date on which twenty-five percent (25%) of such Performance Period has been completed (or such other date as may be required or permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code), provided that the outcome of the Performance Goals must be substantially uncertain at the time of their establishment. Performance Goals shall be based solely on one or more of the business criteria described in the Section 6 and shall be weighted, equally or in such other proportion as the Committee shall determine at the time such Performance Goals are established,counted for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner submits a proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the actual Bonus amountsbroker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that may become payable uponitem and has not received instructions from the attainmentbeneficial owner.

How many votes will be required to approve a proposal? How will you treat withheld votes, abstentions and broker non-votes?

The following table identifies the voting standard and the effect of those goals. For each Performance Goal, the Committee may establish one or more designated levels of attainmentwithheld votes, broker non-votes, and set the Bonus potentialabstentions for each Eligible Employeeitem of business at each designated performance level. Alternatively, the Committee may establish a linear formula for determining the Bonus potential at various points of Performance Goal attainment. Under no circumstance, however, shall the aggregate Bonus potential for any participant for any Performance Period exceed the applicable maximum dollar amount set forth in Section 5(d).Annual Meeting.

(b)Committee Certification. As soon

ItemVoting Standard

Effect of Withheld Votes, Broker Non-

Votes and Abstentions

Board’s Recommendation
1Election of Directors

Votes cast “for” must exceed the votes cast “withheld”

Resignation Policy1 applies if votes cast “withheld” exceed votes cast “for”

Withheld votes will have the effect of a vote “against”

Broker non-votes will have
no effect

FOR each director nominee nominated herein
2Ratify the selection of the independent auditors for 2023The affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to
vote on the subject matter

Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “against”

Broker non-votes will have
no effect

FOR
3Approve, in an advisory vote, executive compensationThe affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to
vote on the subject matter

Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “against”

Broker non-votes will have no effect

FOR
4Approve, in an advisory vote, the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation

The affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to
vote on the subject matter

If none of the frequency options receives a majority vote, the option receiving the greatest number of votes

Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “against”

Broker non-votes will have
no effect

ONE YEAR
5Approve an amendment to the Company’s Bylaws to designate
the exclusive forum for the adjudication of certain legal matters
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock voting together as a single class
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote “against”FOR
6

Approve amendments to the Company’s Certificate of

Incorporation to adopt limitations
on the liability of
officers similar to those that
already exist for directors

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock voting together as a single class
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote “against”FOR
7Consider and vote upon the stockholder proposal set
forth in this Proxy Statement, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting
The affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to
vote on the subject matter

Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “against”

Broker non-votes will have
no effect

AGAINST

1

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Bylaws contain a director resignation policy which provides that any nominee for Director in an uncontested election who fails to receive a greater number of votes cast “for” such nominee’s election than the votes cast “withheld” in such nominee’s election shall tender his or her written offer of resignation to the GEPP Committee of the Board of Directors within 90 days from the date of the election. The GEPP Committee will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation.

91Commitment Runs Deep


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING (cont’d)

What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?

All properly executed proxies, unless revoked as administratively practicable following the completion of the Performance Period, the Committee shall certify the actual levels at which the Performance Goal or Goals for that period have been attained and determine, on the basis of such certified levels, the actual Bonus amount to be paid to each Eligible Employee for that Performance Period. Such certification shall be final, conclusive and binding on the participant, and on all other persons, to the maximum extent permitted by law.

(c)Committee Discretion. The Committee, in determining the amount of the Bonus actually to be paid to an Eligible Employee, shall in no event award a Bonus in excess of the dollar amount determined on the basis of the Bonus potential established for the particular level at which each of the applicable Performance Goals for the Performance Period is attained. If the actual level of attainment is between two of the designated performance levels, the Bonus amountsdescribed above, will be interpolated on a straight-line basis between those two levels. In addition,voted at the Committee shall have the discretion to reduce or eliminate the Bonus that would otherwise be payable with respect to one or more Performance Goals on the basis of the certified level of attained performance of those goals. In exercising its discretion to reduce the Bonus payable to any participant, the Committee may utilize such objective or subjective criteria as the Committee deems appropriate in its sole and absolute discretion. The Committee shall not waive any Performance Goal applicable to a participant’s Bonus potential for a particular Performance Period, provided that, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, waive the Performance Goal for a particular Performance Period in the event of the participant’s death or disability or under such circumstances as the Committee deems appropriate in the event a Change in Control should occur prior to the completion of that Performance Period. For purposes of the Plan, a Change in Control shall have the same definition as set forth in the Company’s 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan (or any successor to that plan).

(d)Individual Limitations on Awards. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the maximum amount of any Bonus paid to a Covered Employee or other Eligible Employee under the Plan shall be limited toFive Million Dollars ($5,000,000) per each twelve (12)-month period (or portion thereof) included within the applicable Performance Period.

B-3


(e)Payment Date. Payment of such Bonus amounts shall be made as soon as administratively practicable thereafter, but in any event, no later than March 15 of the year following the year in which the Performance Period ends. No participant shall accrue any right to receive a Bonus award under the Plan unless that participant remains in Employee status until the payment date for that Bonus following the completion of the Performance Period. Accordingly, no Bonus payment shall be made to any participant who ceases Employee status prior to the payment date for that Bonus; provided, however, that the Committee shall have complete discretion to award a full or pro-rated Bonus, based on the level at which the applicable Performance Goals are attained for the Performance Period, to a participant who ceases Employee status prior to such payment date by reason of death or disability or in connection with an involuntary reduction in force. A participant may also defer the payment of the Bonus pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan (or any successor plan) and in compliance with Section 409A of the Code.

(f)Withholding Tax. To the extent required by applicable federal, state, local or foreign law, each employer shall withhold all applicable taxes from all Bonus amounts.

6.    Business Criteria.

(a)Permitted Criteria. Performance Goals established by the Committee may be based on any one of, or combination of, the following: earnings; earnings per share (actual or targeted growth); earnings before interest and taxes; pretax earnings before interest, depreciation, amortization, exploration and abandonment costs; pretax operating earnings after interest expense and before incentives, service fees, and extraordinary or special items or operating income; revenues; sales; debt level; cost reduction targets; interest-sensitivity gap levels; cash flow (including but not limited to free cash flow, net cash flow, net cash flow before financing activities, cash flow from operations, increase in cash flow return); capital expenditures; weighted average cost of capital; debt/proved reserves; net income or gross income (including but not limited to income after capital costs and income before or after taxes); operating income; expense; working capital; operating or profit margin; pre-tax margin; contribution margin; return factors (including, but not limited to return on equity, capital employed, or investment; risk adjusted return on capital; return on investors’ capital; return on average equity; return on assets; and return on net assets); book value; operating expenses (including, but not limited to lease operating expenses, severance taxes and other production taxes, gathering and transportation and general and administrative costs); unit costs; net borrowing, debt leverage levels, credit quality, or debt ratings; accomplishment of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, or similar business transactions (including, but not limited to acquisition goals based on value of assets acquired or similar objectives); debt to debt plus stockholder equity; debt to EBIT or EBITDA; interest coverage; total shareholder return; comparative shareholder return; market price per share; book value per share; net asset value per share; growth measures; debt to total capitalization ratio; asset quality levels; investments; economic value added; stock price appreciation; market capitalization; accounts receivables day sales outstanding; accounts receivables to sales; achievement of balance sheet or income statement objectives; market share; assets; asset sale targets; non-performing assets; satisfactory internal or external audits; improvement of financial ratings; charge-offs; regulatory compliance; employee retention/attrition rates; individual business objectives; risk management activities, corporate value measures which may be objectively determined (including ethics, compliance, environmental, diversity commitment, and safety); amount of the oil and gas reserves; costs of finding oil and gas reserves; reserve replacement ratio, reserve additions, or other reserve level measures; drilling results; natural gas and/or oil production, production and reserve growth; implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; production volume; sales volume; production efficiency; inventory to sales; and inventory turns. Such Performance Goals may be measured not only in terms of the Company’s performance but also in terms of its

B-4


performance relative to the performance of other entities or may be measured on the basis of the performance of any of the Company’s business units or divisions or any parent or subsidiary entity. Performance may also be measured on an absolute basis, relative to internal business plans, or based on growth. As may be applicable, they may also be measured in aggregate or on a per-share basis. Performance Goals need not be uniform as among participants.

(b)Authorized Adjustments. To the extent applicable, subject to the following sentence and unless the Committee determines otherwise, the determination of the achievement of Performance Goals shall be determined based on the relevant financial measure, computedAnnual Meeting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and inyour instructions on your proxy. If a manner consistent with the methods usedproperly executed proxy gives no specific instructions, your shares will be voted in the Company’s audited financial statements. To the extent permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code, in setting the Performance Goals within the period prescribed in Section 5(a), the Committee may provide for appropriate adjustment as it deems appropriate, including for one or more of the following items: asset write-downs; litigation or claim judgments or settlements; changes in accounting principles; changes in tax law or other laws affecting reported results; changes in commodity prices; severance, contract termination, and other costs related to exiting, modifying or reducing any business activities; costs of, and gains and losses from, the acquisition, disposition, or abandonment of businesses or assets; gains and losses from the early extinguishment of debt; gains and losses in connection with the termination or withdrawal from a pension plan; stock compensation costs and other non-cash expenses; any extraordinary non-recurring items as described in applicable Accounting Principles Board opinions or Financial Accounting Standards Board statements or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year; and any other specified non-operating items as determined by the Committee in setting Performance Goals.

7.    Effective Date and Term of Plan. The Plan is effective on January 1, 2012, but no Bonus shall be paid under this Plan to a Covered Employee unless the Plan is approved by the Company stockholders at the 2012 annual meeting. Assuming that such stockholder approval is obtained, the Plan shall continue in effect until the Board terminates it or until stockholder approval again is required for the Plan to meet the requirements of Code Section 162(m) but is not obtained.

8.    Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan. The Board may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the Plan. However, any amendment or modification of the Plan shall be subject to stockholder approval to the extent required under Code Section 162(m) or other applicable law or regulation.

9.    General Provisions.

(a)Transferability. No participant in the Plan shall have the right to transfer, alienate, pledge or encumber his or her interest in the Plan, and such interest shall not (to the maximum permitted by law) be subject to the claims of the participant’s creditors or to attachment, execution or other process of law. However, should a participant die before payment is made of the actual Bonus to which he or she has become entitled under the Plan, then that Bonus shall be paid to the executor or other legal representative of his or her estate.

(b)No Rights to Employment. Neither the action of the Company in establishing or maintaining the Plan, nor any action taken under the Plan by the Committee, nor any provision of the Plan itself shall be construed so as to grant any person the right to remain in Employee status for any period of specific duration, and each participant shall at all times remain an Employee at-will and may accordingly be discharged at any time, with or without cause and with or without advance notice of such discharge.

B-5


(c)Acknowledgement of Authority. All Bonuses shall be awarded conditional upon the participant’s acknowledgement, by participation in the Plan, that all decisions and determinations of the Committee shall be final and binding on the participant, his or her beneficiaries and any other person having or claiming an interest in such Bonus.

(d)Company Policies. All Bonuses under the Plan shall be subject to any applicable clawback or recoupment policy of the Company adopted from time to time by the Board.

(e)Unfunded Obligation. Eligible Employees eligible to participate in the Plan shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts payable to such Employees pursuant to the Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including (without limitation) Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The Company shall not be required to segregate any monies from its general funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such obligations. Employees shall have no claim against the Company for any changes in the value of any assets that may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to the Plan.

(f)Reliance on Reports. Each member of the Committee shall be fully justified in relying or acting in good faith upon any report made by the independent public accountants of the Company and its subsidiaries or Affiliated Entities and upon any other information furnished in connection with the Plan by any person or persons other than himself or herself. In no event shall any person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee or of the Board be liable for any determination made or other action taken or any omission to act in reliance upon any such report or information or for any action taken, including the furnishing of information, or failure to act, if in good faith.

(g)Successors. The terms and conditions of the Plan, together with the obligations and liabilities of the Company that accrue hereunder, shall be binding upon any successor to the Company, whether by way of merger, consolidation, reorganization or other change in ownership or control of the Company.

(h)Section 409A. The Plan is intended to comply with the short-term deferral rule set forth in the regulations under Section 409A of the Code in order to avoid application of Section 409A of the Code to the Plan. If and to the extent that any payment under this Plan is deemed to be deferred compensation subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, this Plan shall be administered so that such payments are made in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. If an award is subject to Section 409A of the Code, (i) distributions shall only be made in a manner and upon an event permitted under Section 409A of the Code, (ii) payments to be made upon a termination of employment shall only be made upon a “separation from service” under Section 409A of the Code, and (iii) in no event shall a participant, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year in which a distribution is made except in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. Any award granted under the Plan that is subject to Section 409A of the Code and that is to be distributed to a key employee (as defined below) upon separation from service shall be administered so that any distribution with respect to such award shall be postponed for six months following the date of the participant’s separation from service, if required by Section 409A of the Code. If a distribution is delayed pursuant to Section 409A of the Code, the distribution shall be paid within 30 days after the end of the six-month period. If the participant dies during such six-month period, any postponed amounts shall be paid within 90 days of the participant’s death. The determination of key employees, including the number and identity of persons considered key employees and the identification date, shall be made by the Committee or its delegate each year in accordance with Section 416(i) of the Code and the “specified employee” requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

B-6


(i)Governing Law.The validity, construction, interpretation and effect of the Plan shall be governed and construed by and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the conflict of laws provisions thereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,             , by its duly authorized officer acting in accordance with a resolution duly adoptedrecommended by the Board of Directors of Devon Energy Corporation, has executed this Plan on                     , 2011, effective as of January 1, 2012.

B-7


Appendix C  

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION

2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JUNE 6, 2012)

ARTICLE I

PURPOSE

SECTION 1.1    Purpose. The 2009 Devon Energy Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan is established by Devon Energy Corporation (the “Company”) to create incentives designed to provide meaningful share ownership opportunities that align Participants’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders, emphasize long-term performance results, and promote retention of Participants. Toward these objectives, the Plan provides for the grant of Options, Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units, Canadian Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units and SARs to Eligible Employees and the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units to Eligible Directors, subject to the conditions set forth in the Plan. The Plan is designed to provide flexibility to meet the needs of the Company in a changing and competitive environment while minimizing dilution to the Company’s stockholders. The Company does not intend to use all incentive vehicles at all times for each Participant but will selectively grant Awards to achieve long-term goals.

SECTION 1.2    Establishment. The Plan was originally adopted by the Board on June 3, 2009. This amendment and restatement of the Plan was adopted by the Board on March 7, 2012, and will become effective as of that date, if this amendment and restatement of the Plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company by a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock present, or represented and entitled to vote at a meeting of the stockholders of the Company to be held on June 6, 2012 for such purpose. If this amendment and restatement of the Plan is not so approved at such meeting, then the 2009 Devon Energy Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan as in effect immediately prior to March 7, 2012 shall remain in effect. The authority to issue Awards under the Plan will terminate on June 2, 2019 and the remaining terms of the Plan shall continue in effect until all matters relating to the payment of Awardspresented in this Proxy Statement and administration of the Plan have been settled.

SECTION 1.3    Shares Subject to the Plan. Subject to the limitations set forth in the Plan, Awards may be made under this Plan for a total of 47 million shares of Common Stock since the inception of the Plan. Shares of Common Stock covered by an Award under prior Devon Energy Corporation long-term incentive plans, including assumed plans, which are forfeited, cancelled, or expire after the Effective Date of this Plan shall be added to the shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under this Plan. Any shares granted as Options or SARs shall be counted against this limit as one share for each share granted. Any shares granted under Awards other than Options or SARs shall be counted against this limit as 2.38 shares for each share granted. Provided further, that a maximum of 25.5 million shares of the total authorized under this SECTION 1.3 may be granted as Incentive Stock Options. The limitations of this SECTION 1.3 shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to ARTICLE XII. The number of shares that are subject to Options or other Awards outstanding at any time under the Plan shall not exceed the number of shares which then remain available for issuance under the Plan. The Company shall, at all times, reserve and keep available sufficient shares to satisfy the requirements of the Plan during the term of the Plan.

C-1


ARTICLE II

DEFINITIONS

SECTION 2.1    “Account”means the recordkeeping account established by the Company which will be utilized to track an Award of Canadian Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, Restricted Stock Units, or dividends or dividend equivalents to a Participant.

SECTION 2.2    “Affiliated Entity”means any partnership or limited liability company in which a majority of the partnership or other similar interest thereof is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Company or one or more of its Subsidiaries or Affiliated Entities or a combination thereof. For purposes hereof, the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliated Entity shall be deemed to have a majority ownership interest in a partnership or limited liability company if the Company, such Subsidiary or Affiliated Entity shall be allocated a majority of partnership or limited liability company gains or losses or shall be or control a managing director or a general partner of such partnership or limited liability company.

SECTION 2.3    “Award” means, individually or collectively, any Option, Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit, Canadian Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Unit or SAR granted under the Plan to an Eligible Employee by the Committee or any Nonqualified Stock Option, SAR, Restricted Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit granted under the Plan to an Eligible Director by the Board pursuant to such terms, conditions, restrictions, and/or limitations, if any, as the Committeeproxy holders may establish by the Award Agreement or otherwise.

SECTION 2.4    “Award Agreement” means any written instrument that establishes the terms, conditions, restrictions, and/or limitations applicable to an Awarddetermine in addition to those established by this Plan and by the Committee’s exercise of its administrative powers.

SECTION 2.5    “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

SECTION 2.6    “Canadian Employee Benefit Plan”has the meaning set out under ARTICLE VIII of the Plan.

SECTION 2.7    “Canadian Employee Benefit Trust”has the meaning set out under ARTICLE VIII of the Plan.

SECTION 2.8    “Canadian Restricted Stock Unit” means the Awards under ARTICLE VIII of the Plan authorized for grant to Eligible Employees of one of the Company’s Canadian Subsidiaries or Affiliated Entities.

SECTION 2.9    “Change in Control Event” means the occurrence of any one of the following events:

(i) the Incumbent Directors cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;

(ii) any person is or becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange of Act of 1934 (the “Act”)), directly or indirectly, of Company securities representing 30% or more of either (x) the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock or (y) the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities eligible to vote in the election of directors (each, “Company Securities”); provided, however, that the event described in this paragraph (ii) shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control Event by virtue of any of the following acquisitions or transactions: (A) by the Company or any subsidiary, (B) by any employee benefit plan (or related

C-2


trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any subsidiary, (C) by an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (D) pursuant to a Non-Qualifying Transaction;

(iii) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange, or similar form of corporate transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries that requires the approval of the Company’s stockholders, whether for such transaction or the issuance of securities in the transaction (a “Reorganization”), or the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity that is not an Affiliate (a “Sale”), unless:

(A) immediately following the consummation of the Reorganization or Sale, the holders of the Company’s shares of common stock hold or receive in such Reorganization or hold more than 50% of each of the outstanding common stock and the total voting power of securities eligible to vote in the election of directors of (x) the corporation resulting from such Reorganization or the corporation that has acquired all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (in either case, the “Surviving Corporation”), or (y) if applicable, the ultimate parent corporation that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership of 100% of the voting securities eligible to elect directors of the Surviving Corporation (the “Parent Corporation”),

(B) no person (other than any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Surviving Corporation or the Parent Corporation) is or becomes, as a result of the Reorganization or Sale, the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 30% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock or the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities eligible to vote in the election of directors of the Parent Corporation (or, if there is no Parent Corporation, the Surviving Corporation), and

(C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the Parent Corporation (or, if there is no Parent Corporation, the Surviving Corporation) following the consummation of the Reorganization or Sale were Incumbent Directors at the time of the Board’s approval of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such Reorganization or Sale;

(any Reorganization or Sale that satisfies all of the criteria specified in (A), (B) and (C) above shall be deemed to be a “Non-Qualifying Transaction”); or

(iv) the Company’s stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control Event shall not be deemed to occur solely because any person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 30% of Company Securities due to the Company’s acquisition of Company Securities that reduces the number of Company Securities outstanding; provided, however, if, following such acquisition by the Company, such person becomes the beneficial owner of additional Company Securities that increases the percentage of outstanding Company Securities beneficially owned by such person, a Change in Control shall then occur. In addition, if a Change in Control Event occurs pursuant to paragraph 2.9(ii) above, no additional Change in Control Event shall be deemed to occur pursuant to paragraph 2.9(ii) by reason of subsequent changes in holdings by such person (except if the holdings by such person are reduced below 30% and thereafter increase to 30% or above).

Provided, however, solelytheir discretion with respect to any Award thatother matters properly presented for a vote at the Committee determines to be subject to Section 409AAnnual Meeting.

Can brokers who hold shares in street name vote those shares if they have received no instructions?

Under the rules of the Code, the provisions of Section 409A and the regulations promulgated thereunder shall define a “Change in Control Event” for purposes of such Award.

C-3


For purposes of Awards granted to employees of Devon Canada Corporation, the Committee may, pursuant to the Award Agreement, define a “change in control event” to include a change in control of Devon Canada Corporation as the Committee determines.

SECTION 2.10    “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. References in the Plan to any section of the Code shall be deemed to include any amendments or successor provisions to such section and any regulations under such section.

SECTION 2.11    “Committee” shall have the meaning set forth in SECTION 3.1.

SECTION 2.12    “Common Stock” means the common stock, par value $.10 per share, of the Company, and after substitution, such other stock as shall be substituted therefore as provided in ARTICLE XII.

SECTION 2.13    “Compensation Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board.

SECTION 2.14    “Date of Grant” means the date on which the grant of an Award is authorized by the Committee or such later date as may be specified by the Committee in such authorization.

SECTION 2.15    “Effective Date” means June 3, 2009.

SECTION 2.16    “Eligible Employee” means any employee of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliated Entity as approved by the Committee.

SECTION 2.17    “Eligible Director” means any member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company, an Affiliated Entity or any Subsidiary.

SECTION 2.18    “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

SECTION 2.19    “Executive Officer Participants” means Participants who are subject to the provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

SECTION 2.20    “Fair Market Value” means (A) during such time as the Common Stock is listed upon the New York Stock Exchange or any other established stock exchange,(the NYSE), brokers may not vote the closing price of the Common Stock as reportedshares held by such stock exchange on the daythem in street name for their customers and for which such value is to be determined, or, if no sale of the Common Stock shallthey have been made on any such stock exchange that day, on the following day on which there was a sale of such Common Stock, or (B) during any such time as the Common Stock is not listed upon an established stock exchange, the mean between dealer “bid” and “ask” prices of the Common Stock in the over-the-counter market on the day for which such value is to be determined, as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or (C) during any such time as the Common Stock cannot be valued pursuant to (A) or (B) above, the fair market value shall be as determined by the Board considering all relevant information including, by example and not by limitation, the services of an independent appraiser.

SECTION 2.21    “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

SECTION 2.22    “Incumbent Directors” means the members of the Company’s Board of Directors on the Effective Date; provided, however, that (x) any person becoming a director and whose election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director, without written objection to such

C-4


nomination) shall be deemed an Incumbent Director, and (y) no individual initially elected or nominated as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest (as described in Rule 14a-11 under the Act (“Election Contest”)) or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any “person” (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Act and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Act) other than the Board (“Proxy Contest”), including by reason of any agreement intended to avoid or settle any Election Contest or Proxy Contest, shall be deemed an Incumbent Director; provided further, however, that when two or more persons act as a partnership, limited partnership, syndicate, or other group for the purpose of acquiring, holding, or disposing of Company securities, such partnership, syndicate or group shall be deemed a “person” for purposes of this definition.

SECTION 2.23    “Non-Executive Officer Participants” means Participants who are not subject to the provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

SECTION 2.24    “Nonqualified Stock Option” means an Option which is not an Incentive Stock Option.

SECTION 2.25    “Option” means an Award granted under ARTICLE V of the Plan and includes both Nonqualified Stock Options and Incentive Stock Options to purchase shares of Common Stock.

SECTION 2.26    “Participant” means an Eligible Employee of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliated Entity to whom an Award has been granted by the Committee or an Eligible Director to whom an Award has been granted by the Board under the Plan.

SECTION 2.27    “Performance-Based Award” means a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit, Canadian Restricted Stock Unit or Performance Unit granted under the Plan to an Eligible Employee in accordance with ARTICLE XI.

SECTION 2.28    “Performance Units” means those monetary units that may be granted to Eligible Employees pursuant to ARTICLE IX hereof.

SECTION 2.29    “Plan” means Devon Energy Corporation 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.

SECTION 2.30    “Regular Award Committee” means a committee comprised of the individual who is the Company’s chief executive officer and such additional members, if any, as shall be appointed by the Compensation Committee.

SECTION 2.31    “Restricted Stock Award” means an Award granted to an Eligible Employee or Eligible Director under ARTICLE VI of the Plan.

SECTION 2.32    “Restricted Stock Unit” means an Award granted to an Eligible Employee or Eligible Director under ARTICLE VII of the Plan.

SECTION 2.33    “Restriction Period” means the period when a Restricted Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit is subject to forfeiture based upon continued employment over a period of time, the achievement of performance criteria, the occurrence of other events and/or the satisfaction of nondisclosure and protection of business provisions as determined by the Committee, in its discretion.

SECTION 2.34    “SAR” means a stock appreciation right granted to an Eligible Employee or Eligible Director under ARTICLE X of the Plan.

C-5


SECTION 2.35    “Secretary” means the corporate secretary of the Company duly elected by the Board.

SECTION 2.36    “Subsidiary” shall have the same meaning set forth in Section 424 of the Code.

ARTICLE III

ADMINISTRATION

SECTION 3.1    Administration of the Plan by the Committee. For purposes of administration, the Plan shall be deemed to consist of three separate stock incentive plans, a “Non-Executive Officer Participant Plan” which is limited to Non-Executive Officer Participants, an “Executive Officer Participant Plan” which is limited to Executive Officer Participants and a “Non-Employee Director Participant Plan” which is limited to Eligible Directors. Except for administration and the category of Eligible Employees eligible to receive Awards, the terms of the Non-Executive Officer Participant Plan and the Executive Officer Participant Plan are identical. The Non-Employee Director Plan has other variations in terms and only permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units.

The Non-Executive Officer Participant Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may, at its discretion, delegate authority to the Regular Award Committee to administer the Non-Executive Officer Participant Plan to the extent permitted by applicable law, rule or regulation. The Regular Award Committee may only act within guidelines established by the Compensation Committee. The Executive Officer Participant Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee. With respect to the Non-Executive Officer Participant Plan and to decisions relating to Non-Executive Officer Participants, including the grant of Awards, the term “Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee, and refer to the Regular Award Committee as authorized by the Compensation Committee; and with respect to the Executive Officer Participant Plan and to decisions relating to the Executive Officer Participants, including the grant of Awards, the term “Committee” shall mean only the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee shall consist solely of two or more members of the Board who shall be (i) “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3) (or any successor rule) of the Exchange Act, (ii) “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, and (iii) “independent directors”, as determined in accordance with the independence standards established by the stock exchange on which the Common Stock is at the time primarily traded.

Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have exclusive power to:

(a) Select Eligible Employees to participate in the Plan.

(b) Determine the time or times when Awards will be made.

(c) Determine the form of an Award, whether an Option, Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit, Canadian Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Unit or SAR, the number of shares of Common Stock, Canadian Restricted Stock Units, Restricted Stock Units or Performance Units subject to the Award, the amount and all the terms, conditions (including performance requirements), restrictions and/or limitations, if any, of an Award, including the time and conditions of exercise or vesting, and the terms of any Award Agreement.

(d) Determine whether Awards will be granted singly or in combination.

C-6


(e) Accelerate the vesting, exercise or payment of an Award or the performance period of an Award.

(f) Take any and all other action it deems necessary or advisable for the proper operation or administration of the Plan.

SECTION 3.2    Administration of Grants to Eligible Directors. The Board shall have the exclusive power to select Eligible Directors to participate in the Plan and to determine the number of Nonqualified Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock Units or shares of Restricted Stock awarded to Eligible Directors selected for participation. The Compensation Committee shall administer all other aspects of the Awards made to Eligible Directors.

SECTION 3.3    Compensation Committee to Make Rules and Interpret Plan. The Committee in its sole discretion shall have the authority, subject to the provisions of the Plan, to establish, adopt, or revise such rules and regulations and to make all such determinations relating to the Plan, as it may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. The Committee’s interpretation of the Plan or any Awards and all decisions and determinations by the Committee with respect to the Plan shall be final, binding, and conclusive on all parties.

ARTICLE IV

GRANT OF AWARDS

SECTION 4.1    Grant of Awards. Awards granted under this Plan shall be subject to the following conditions:

(a) Subject to ARTICLE XII, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock made subject to the grant of Options and SARs to any Eligible Employee in any calendar year may not exceed 800,000.

(b) Subject to ARTICLE XII, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock made subject to the grant of Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units, Canadian Restricted Stock Units and Performance Unit Awards to any Eligible Employee in any calendar year may not exceed 400,000.

(c) Any shares of Common Stock related to Awards which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise or are exchanged in the Committee’s discretion for Awards not involving Common Stock, shall be available again for grant under the Plan and shall not be counted against the shares authorized under SECTION 1.3. Shares of Common Stock which are (i) tendered in payment of an Option, (ii) tendered or withheld in payment of taxes or repurchased using Option proceeds, or (iii) not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding SAR or Option, shall not be added back to the shares authorized under SECTION 1.3.

(d) In the case of any Award granted in substitution for an award of a company or business acquired by the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliated Entity, shares of Common Stock issued or issuable in connection with such substitution will not be counted against the number of shares of Common Stock reserved under the Plan, but will be available under the Plan by virtue of the Company’s assumption of the plan or arrangement of the acquired company or business.

(e) Common Stock delivered by the Company in payment of an Award authorized under the Plan may be authorized and unissued Common Stock or Common Stock held in the treasury of the Company.

(f) The Compensation Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine the manner in which fractional shares arising under this Plan shall be treated.

C-7


(g) The Compensation Committee shall from time to time establish guidelines for the Regular Award Committee regarding the grant of Awards to Eligible Employees.

(h) Separate certificates or a book-entry registration representing Common Stock shall be delivered to a Participant upon the exercise of any Option.

(i) Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units and Canadian Restricted Stock Units which vest based upon the Participant’s continued employment shall be limited in such a way that,received instructions, except in the case of termination due to death, disability, or an approved reason, or the occurrence of a Change in Control Event, (i) no portion of the Award will vest prior to the first anniversary of the Date of Grant; (ii) up to one-third of the shares subject to the Award is eligible to vest on or after the first anniversary of the Date of Grant; (iii) up to an additional one-third of the shares subject to the Award is eligible to vest on or after the second anniversary of the Date of Grant; and (iv) up to an additional one-third of the shares subject to the Award is eligible to vest on or after the third anniversary of the Date of Grant.

(j) Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units and Canadian Restricted Stock Units which vest based upon performance standards shall require that, except in the case of termination due to death, disability, or an approved reason, or the occurrence of a Change in Control Event, the holder must remain in the employment of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliated Entity for at least one year from Date of Grant.

(k) Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, or exchange of shares), the terms of outstanding awards may not, without stockholder approval, be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or SARs or cancel outstanding Options or SARs in exchange for cash, other Awards or Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or SARs.

(l) Eligible Directors may only be granted Nonqualified Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Units under this Plan.

(m) Subject to ARTICLE XII, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock made subject to the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options or SARs to any individual Eligible Director in any calendar year may not exceed 30,000.

(n) Subject to ARTICLE XII, in no event shall more than 15,000 shares of Restricted Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Units be awarded to any individual Eligible Director in any calendar year.

(o) The maximum term of any Award shall be eight years.

(p) Awards under the Plan shall be made conditional upon the Participant’s acknowledgement, in writing or by acceptance of the Award grant, that all decisions and determinations of the Committee shall be final and binding on the Participant, his or her successors and any other person having or claiming an interest under such Award grant.

C-8


ARTICLE V

STOCK OPTIONS

SECTION 5.1    Grant of Options. The Committee may grant Options to Eligible Employees, subject to the provisions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine. These Options may be Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options, or a combination of both. The Board may, subject to the provisions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine, grant Nonqualified Stock Options to Eligible Directors. Each grant of an Option shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement executed by the Company and the Participant, and shall contain such terms and conditions and be in such form as the Committee may from time to time approve, subject to the requirements of SECTION 5.2.

SECTION 5.2    Conditions of Options. Each Option so granted shall be subject to the following conditions:

(a)Exercise Price. As limited by SECTION 5.2(e) below, each Option shall state the exercise price which shall be set by the Committee at the Date of Grant; provided, however, no Option shall be granted at an exercise price which is less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Date of Grant.

(b)Form of Payment. The exercise price of an Option may be paid (i) in cash or by check, bank draft or money order payable to the order of the Company; (ii) by delivering shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value on the date of payment equal to the amount of the exercise price, but only to the extent such exercise of an Option would not result in an adverse accounting charge to the Company for financial accounting purposes with respect to the shares used to pay the exercise price unless otherwise determined by the Committee; (iii) by the withholding of shares of Common Stock subject to the exercisable Option, which have a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the exercise price; (iv) a combination of the foregoing; or (iv) by such other method as the Committee may approve. In addition to the foregoing, the Committee may permit an Option granted under the Plan to be exercised by a broker-dealer acting on behalf of a Participant through procedures approved by the Committee.

(c)Exercise of Options. Options granted under the Plan shall be exercisable, in whole or in such installments and at such times, and shall expire at such time, as shall be provided by the Committee in the Award Agreement. Exercise of an Option shall be by notice to the Secretary of such exercise stating the election to exercise in the form and manner determined by the Committee. Every share of Common Stock acquired through the exercise of an Option shall be deemed to be fully paid at the time of exercise and payment of the exercise price.

(d)Other Terms and Conditions. Among other conditions that may be imposed by the Committee, if deemed appropriate, are those relating to (i) the period or periods and the conditions of exercisability of any Option; (ii) the minimum periods during which Participants must be employed, or must hold Options before they may be exercised; (iii) the minimum periods during which shares acquired upon exercise must be held before sale or transfer shall be permitted; (iv) conditions under which such Options or shares may be subject to forfeiture; (v) the frequency of exercise or the minimum or maximum number of shares that may be acquired at any one time; (vi) the achievement by the Company of specified performance criteria; and (vii) non-compete and protection of business provisions.

(e)Special Restrictions Relating to Incentive Stock Options. Options issued in the form of Incentive Stock Options shall only be granted to Eligible Employees of the Company or a Subsidiary.

C-9


(f)Application of Funds. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of Common Stock pursuant to Options will be used for general corporate purposes.

(g)Stockholder Rights. Participants shall not have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any share of Common Stock subject to an Option prior to purchase of such shares of Common Stock by exercise of the Option. In no event shall dividends or dividend equivalents be granted with respect to Options.

SECTION 5.3    Cash Out Rights. With respect to any Options granted to Eligible Employees pursuant to SECTION 5.1, the Committee may include in the Eligible Employee’s Award Agreement the right to surrender the Option once vested. In the event that an Option surrender right is authorized, the Award Agreement shall provide that, upon the vesting of an Option, the holder thereof shall be entitled to, at his or her option:

(a)

Exercise such Option, in whole or in part, in accordance with the procedures specified in SECTION 5.2; or

(b)

Surrender such Option, in whole or in part, by notice to the Secretary of such surrender stating the election to surrender in the form and manner determined by the Committee and a request for payment of the Cash-Out Amount where:

“Cash-Out Amount” means an amount of cash equal to the amount by which the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Common Stock subject to the Option exceeds the aggregate Exercise Price under the Option.

Payment of the Cash-Out Amount shall be made in shares of Common Stock or cash as established by the Committee in the Award Agreement.

ARTICLE VI

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

SECTION 6.1    Grant of Restricted Stock Awards. The Committee may grant a Restricted Stock Award to any Eligible Employee, subject to the provisions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine. Restricted Stock Awards may constitute Performance-Based Awards, as described in ARTICLE XI hereof. Restricted Stock Awards shall be awarded in such number and at such times during the term of the Plan as the Committee shall determine. The Board may grant a Restricted Stock Award to an Eligible Director, subject to the provisions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine. Each Restricted Stock Award may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee deems appropriate, including, without limitation, a book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates, and by an Award Agreement setting forth the terms of such Restricted Stock Award.

SECTION 6.2    Conditions of Restricted Stock Awards. The grant of a Restricted Stock Award shall be subject to the following:

(a)Restriction Period. Subject to SECTION 4.1(i) and SECTION 4.1(j), the Committee shall determine the Restriction Period(s) that apply to the shares of Common Stock covered by each Restricted Stock Award or portion thereof. At the end of the Restriction Period, the restrictions imposed by the Committee shall lapse with respect to the shares of Common Stock covered by the Restricted Stock Award or portion thereof.

(b)Restriction on Transfer. The holder of a Restricted Stock Award may not sell, transfer, pledge, exchange, hypothecate, or otherwise dispose of the shares of Common Stock represented by

C-10


the Restricted Stock Award during the applicable Restriction Period. The Committee shall impose such other restrictions and conditions on any shares of Common Stock covered by a Restricted Stock Award as it may deem advisable including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable Federal or state securities laws, and may legend the certificates representing Restricted Stock to give appropriate notice of such restrictions.

(c)Stockholder Rights. During any Restriction Period, the Committee may, in its discretion, grant to the holder of a Restricted Stock Award all or any of the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares, including, but not by way of limitation, the right to vote such shares. At the discretion of the Committee, dividends or other distributions with respect to a Restricted Stock Awardroutine matter. The only matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting that is considered routine for these purposes is the ratification of the appointment of the independent auditors. This means that brokers may pursuantnot vote your shares on any other matter if you have not given instructions as to how to vote. Please be sure to give voting instructions to your broker so that your vote will be counted.

Who pays the termssolicitation expenses?

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. Proxies may be solicited by mail or personally by our Directors, officers, or employees, none of whom will receive additional compensation for such solicitation. We have retained D.F. King & Co. to assist in the solicitation of proxies at an estimated cost of $12,000 plus reasonable expenses. Those holding shares of common stock of record for the benefit of others, or nominee holders, are being asked to distribute proxy soliciting materials to, and request voting instructions from, the beneficial owners of such award, be either currently paid toshares. We will reimburse nominee holders for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

Where can I find the Participant or withheld by the Company and credited to the Participant’s Account; provided that any dividends or other distributions with respect to Restricted Stock Awards subject to vesting based on performance shall vest only if and to the extent that the underlying Restricted Stock Award vests, as determined by the Committee. Any dividends or distributions so withheld by the Committee and attributable to any particular share of Restricted Stock shall be subject to the same restrictions on transferability as the shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid, and, if such shares are forfeited, the Participant shall have no right to such dividends or distributions.

ARTICLE VII

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

SECTION 7.1    Grant of Restricted Stock Units. The Committee may grant Restricted Stock Units to any Eligible Employee, subject to the provisionsvoting results of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine. Restricted Stock Units may constitute Performance-Based Awards, as describedAnnual Meeting?

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be included in ARTICLE XI hereof. The Board may grant Restricted Stock Units to an Eligible Director, subject toa Form 8-K that will be filed with the provisions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine. Restricted Stock Units shall be similar to Restricted Stock Awards except that no shares of Common Stock are actually awarded to the Participant on the Date of Grant. Restricted Stock Units shall be awarded in such number and at such times during the term of the Plan as the Committee shall determine.

SECTION 7.2    Conditions of Restricted Stock Units. The grant of a Restricted Stock Unit shall be subject to the following:

(a)Restriction Period. Subject to SECTION 4.1(i) and SECTION 4.1(j), the Committee shall determine the Restriction Period(s) that apply to the shares of Common Stock covered by each Award of Restricted Stock Units or portion thereof. At the end of the Restriction Period, the restrictions imposed by the Committee shall lapse and the Award shall be paid as specified in SECTION 7.2(c) below.

(b)Restriction on Transfer. Restricted Stock Units granted herein may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Restriction Period established by the Committee, or upon earlier satisfaction of any other conditions, as specified by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and set forth in the Award Agreement or otherwise.

(c)Form of Payment. Restricted Stock Units shall be paid in cash, shares of Common Stock, or a combination of cash and shares as established by the Committee in the Award Agreement, no later than 75SEC within four business days after the lapseAnnual Meeting. You may obtain a copy of the Restriction Period unless otherwise requiredForm 8-K and other reports free of charge at www.devonenergy.com, or by applicable law.contacting us at (405) 235-3611 or CorporateSecretary@dvn.com or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

(d)Stockholder Rights. Participants shall not have any rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to an Award of Restricted Stock Units.

C-11


ARTICLE VIII

CANADIAN RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

SECTION 8.1    Establishment. The Committee may authorize the establishment of an employee benefit plan (a “Canadian Employee Benefit Plan”) which shall be considered as a part of this Plan for the purpose of providing benefits to Eligible Employees of one ofWill the Company’s Canadian Subsidiaries or Affiliated Entities. Benefits granted in the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan will take the form of Canadian Restricted Stock Units having substantially the same income tax consequences for such Canadian Eligible Employees as would Restricted Stock Awards granted by the Company to Eligible Employees who are residents of the United States. The Committee may further authorize the establishment of an employee benefit trust (a “Canadian Employee Benefit Trust”) for the purpose of holding the assets of the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan and shall appoint one or more persons who are residents of Canada to act as trustees of the Canadian Employee Benefit Trust.

SECTION 8.2    Grant of Awards and Contributions to Canadian Employee Benefit Trust. The Committee may grant to Eligible Employees, Canadian Restricted Stock Units entitling such Eligible Employees to an interest in the assets of the Canadian Employee Benefit Trust in such form that it determines necessary to comply with applicable Canadian tax law requirements, subject to the terms of the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine. Each Award of Canadian Restricted Stock Units shallindependent auditors be evidenced by an Award Agreement and such Award Agreement shall contain the terms and conditions of the Award subject to the provisions of the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan. At the time of granting an Award of Canadian Restricted Stock Units, the Committee may authorize the Company or any of its Canadian Subsidiaries or Affiliated Entities to make cash contributions to the Canadian Employee Benefit Trust, with such contributions to be used as specified in the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan, including for the purpose of acquiring shares of Common Stock of the Company on the open market through the facilities of a stock exchange. The Committee shall designate,available at the time of making any contribution in respect of a Participant, when the shares of Common Stock of the Company which are acquired with the contribution pursuantAnnual Meeting to the terms of the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan arerespond to vest pursuant to the applicable Award Agreement, and shall inform the trustees of the same.questions?

SECTION 8.3    Holding of Shares of Common Stock in Trust. Subject to the specific provisions of the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan, upon completion of any purchases of shares of Common Stock of the Company by the trustees, the trustees shall immediately notionally allocate such shares to an account in respect of each Participant in proportion to the contributions received in respect of each Participant in the preceding month.Yes. The Trustees shall hold the shares in trust in the name of the trustee, until such time as: (i) the Canadian Restricted Stock Units granted to Participants are vested, in accordance with the vesting conditions designated by theAudit Committee in the Award Agreement, or (ii) the Canadian Restricted Stock Units are forfeited by Eligible Employees as provided in the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan.

SECTION 8.4    Conditions of Awards. Each Award of Canadian Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the following general conditions (with the specific details to be determined by the Company upon establishment of the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan):

(a)Vesting Period. The Committee shall establish in the Award Agreement the vesting periods applicable to a grant of Canadian Restricted Stock Units, subject to compliance with the timing requirements specified in SECTION 8.4(b).

(b)Settlement in Stock. Upon satisfaction of the vesting requirements established by the Committee, the Committee will authorize the trustees to distribute the shares of the Common Stock of the Company which have been allocated to such Participant’s account to the Participant.

C-12


Participants will not be entitled to receive cash in settlement of an Award of a Canadian Restricted Stock Unit. The Company, its Canadian Subsidiaries or Affiliated Entities, and the trustees may withhold from any amount payable to an Eligible Employee, either under the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan, or otherwise, such amount as may be necessary so as to ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of any federal, provincial or local law relating to the withholding of tax or other required deductions. For greater certainty and notwithstanding any other provision of the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan, all amounts payable to, or in respect of, a Participant under the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan shall be paid within three years following the end of the year in respect of which the Award of Canadian Restricted Stock Units was made.

(c)Rights of Stockholders. Prior to the date the shares of Common Stock are distributed by the trustees, Participants will have no rights to the shares of Common Stock and no rights as stockholders of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock held by the Canadian Employee Benefit Trust related to an Award. Title and all incidents of beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock will remain with the trustees while the shares are held in trust.

(d)Additional Awards. The Committee may authorize the Company or its Canadian Subsidiaries or Affiliated Entities to grant an additional Award to the Participant equal to the dividend that the Participant would have received had the Award been made with the underlying shares of Common Stock directly, rather than in Canadian Restricted Stock Units.

ARTICLE IX

PERFORMANCE UNITS

SECTION 9.1    Grant of Awards. The Committee may grant Performance Units to Eligible Employees, subject to the provisions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as it may determine. Performance Units may constitute Performance-Based Awards, as described in ARTICLE XI hereof. Each Award of Performance Units shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement executed by the Company and Eligible Employee, and shall contain such terms and conditions and be in such form as the Committee may from time to time approve, subject to the requirements of SECTION 9.2.

SECTION 9.2    Conditions of Awards. Each Award of Performance Units shall be subject to the following conditions:

(a)Establishment of Award Terms. Each Award shall state the target, maximum and minimum value of each Performance Unit payable upon the achievement of performance goals.

(b)Achievement of Performance Goals. The Committee shall establish performance targets for each Award for a period of no less than a year. The performance goals may, but need not, be based on the business criteria described in SECTION 11.2. The Committee shall also establish such other terms and conditions as it deems appropriate to such Award. The Award may be paid out in cash or Common Stock as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee no later than 75 days after the vesting date of the Award unless otherwise required by applicable law.

ARTICLE X

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

SECTION 10.1    Grant of SARs. The Committee may grant a SAR to any Eligible Employee, subject to the provisions of the Plan and subject to other terms and conditions as the Committee may determine. The Board may grant a SAR to any Eligible Director, subject to the provisions of the

C-13


Plan and subject to other terms and conditions as the Board may determine. SARs may be granted as an independent Award separate from an Option or granted in tandem with an Option, subject to the limitations of SECTION 10.3. Each grant of a SAR shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement executed by the Company and the Participant and shall contain such terms and conditions and be in such form as the Committee may from time to time approve, subject to the requirements of the Plan. The exercise price of the SAR shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Date of Grant of the SAR. In no event shall dividends or dividend equivalents be granted with respect to a SAR.

SECTION 10.2    Exercise and Payment. SARs granted under the Plan shall be exercisable in whole or in installments and at such times as shall be provided by the Committee in the Award Agreement. The amount payable with respect to each SAR shall be equal in value to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the exercise date over the exercise price of the SAR. Payment of amounts attributable to a SAR shall be made in shares of Common Stock or cash as established by the Committee in the Award Agreement.

SECTION 10.3    Tandem Awards. SARs may be granted in tandem with an Option, in which event, the Participant has the right to elect to exercise either the SAR or the Option. Upon the Participant’s election to exercise one of these Awards, the other tandem award is automatically terminated. In the event a SAR is granted in tandem with an Incentive Stock Option, the Committee shall subject the SAR to restrictions necessary to ensure satisfaction of the requirements under Section 422 of the Code.

ARTICLE XI

PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS.

SECTION 11.1    Generally. The Committee may determine that a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit, Canadian Restricted Stock Unit or Performance Unit granted to an Eligible Employee will be considered “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code (“Performance-Based Awards”). As determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, either the granting or vesting of such Performance-Based Awards shall be based on achievement of performance objectives that are based on one or more of the business criteria described below, with respect to one or more business units or the Company and its subsidiaries as a whole.

SECTION 11.2    Business Criteria. The Committee shall use objectively determinable performance goals based on one or more of the following business criteria, individually or in combination: earnings; earnings per share (actual or targeted growth); earnings before interest and taxes; pretax earnings before interest, depreciation, amortization, exploration and abandonment costs; pretax operating earnings after interest expense and before incentives, service fees, and extraordinary or special items or operating income; revenues; sales; debt level; cost reduction targets; interest-sensitivity gap levels; cash flow (including but not limited to free cash flow, net cash flow, net cash flow before financing activities, cash flow from operations, increase in cash flow return); capital expenditures; weighted average cost of capital; debt/proved reserves; net income or gross income (including but not limited to income after capital costs and income before or after taxes); operating income; expense; working capital; operating or profit margin; pre-tax margin; contribution margin; return factors (including, but not limited to return on equity, capital employed, or investment; risk adjusted return on capital; return on investors’ capital; return on average equity; return on assets; and return on net assets); book value; operating expenses (including, but not limited to lease operating expenses, severance taxes and other production taxes, gathering and transportation and general and administrative costs); unit costs; net borrowing, debt leverage levels, credit quality, or debt ratings; accomplishment of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, or similar

C-14


business transactions (including, but not limited to acquisition goals based on value of assets acquired or similar objectives); debt to debt plus stockholder equity; debt to EBIT or EBITDA; interest coverage; total shareholder return; comparative shareholder return; market price per share; book value per share; net asset value per share; growth measures; debt to total capitalization ratio; asset quality levels; investments; economic value added; stock price appreciation; market capitalization; accounts receivables day sales outstanding; accounts receivables to sales; achievement of balance sheet or income statement objectives; market share; assets; asset sale targets; non-performing assets; satisfactory internal or external audits; improvement of financial ratings; charge-offs; regulatory compliance; employee retention/attrition rates; individual business objectives; risk management activities, corporate value measures which may be objectively determined (including ethics, compliance, environmental, diversity commitment, and safety); amount of the oil and gas reserves; costs of finding oil and gas reserves; reserve replacement ratio, reserve additions, or other reserve level measures; drilling results; natural gas and/or oil production, production and reserve growth; implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; production volume; sales volume; production efficiency; inventory to sales; and inventory turns.

SECTION 11.3    Establishment of Performance Goals. With respect to Performance-Based Awards, the Committee shall establish in writing (i) the performance goals applicable to a given period, and such performance goals shall state, in terms of an objective formula or standard, the method for computing the amount of compensation payable to the participant if such performance goals are obtained and (ii) the individual employees or class of employees to which such performance goals apply; provided, however, that such performance goals shall be established in writing no later than the earlier of ninety (90) days after the commencement of the applicable performance period or the date on which twenty-five percent (25%) of such performance period has been completed, or such other date as may be required or permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code.

SECTION 11.4    Certification of Performance. No Performance-Based Awards shall be payable to or vest with respect to, as the case may be, any Participant for a given period until the Committee certifies in writing that the objective performance goals (and any other material terms) applicable to such period have been satisfied.

SECTION 11.5    Modification of Performance-Based Awards. With respect to any Awards intended to qualify as Performance-Based Awards, after establishment of a performance goal, the Committee shall not revise such performance goal to cause the goal to cease to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, except as otherwise determined by the Committee, and the Committee shall not increase the amount of compensation payable thereunder (as determined in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code) upon the attainment of such performance goal. The Committee may reduce or eliminate the number of shares of Common Stock or the number of shares of Common Stock vested upon the attainment of such performance goal, based on such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate. The Committee may make such changes to performance goals and Performance-Based Awards as the Committee deems appropriate in the event of a change in corporate capitalization, corporate transaction or other corporate event as permitted by Section 162(m), or as the Committee otherwise determines.

SECTION 11.6    Impact of Extraordinary Items or Changes in Accounting. To the extent applicable, subject to the following sentence and unless the Committee determines otherwise, the determination of the achievement of performance goals shall be determined based on the relevant financial measure, computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and in a manner consistent with the methods used in the Company’s audited financial statements. To the extent permitted by Section 162(m), in setting the performance goals for Performance-Based Awards within the period prescribed in SECTION 11.3, the Committee may

C-15


provide for appropriate adjustment as it deems appropriate, including for one or more of the following items: asset write-downs; litigation or claim judgments or settlements; changes in accounting principles; changes in tax law or other laws affecting reported results; changes in commodity prices; severance, contract termination, and other costs related to exiting, modifying or reducing any business activities; costs of, and gains and losses from, the acquisition, disposition, or abandonment of businesses or assets; gains and losses from the early extinguishment of debt; gains and losses in connection with the termination or withdrawal from a pension plan; stock compensation costs and other non-cash expenses; any extraordinary non-recurring items as described in applicable Accounting Principles Board opinions or Financial Accounting Standards Board statements or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year; and any other specified non-operating items as determined by the Committee in setting performance goals.

SECTION 11.7    Death, Disability or Other Circumstances. The Committee may provide in the Award Agreement that Performance-Based Awards under this ARTICLE XI shall be payable, in whole or in part, in the event of the Participant’s death or disability, a Change in Control Event or under other circumstances consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code.

SECTION 11.8    Stockholder Approval for Performance-Based Awards. The Plan must be reapproved by the Company’s stockholders no later than the first stockholders meeting that occurs in the fifth year following the year in which the stockholders previously approved the provisions of ARTICLE XI, if Performance-Based Awards are to be made under ARTICLE XI after the date of such stockholders meeting and if required by Section 162(m) of the Code.

ARTICLE XII

STOCK ADJUSTMENTS

SECTION 12.1    Stock Adjustments. In the event that the shares of Common Stock shall be changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares of stock or other securities of the Company or of another corporation (whether by reason of merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, combination of shares or otherwise), or if the number of such shares of Common Stock shall be increased through the payment of a stock dividend, or if rights or warrants to purchase securities of the Company shall be issued to holders of all outstanding Common Stock, then there shall be substituted for or added to each share available under and subject to the Plan (including those held in the Canadian Employee Benefit Trust), and each share theretofore appropriated under the Plan, the number and kind of shares of stock or other securities into which each outstanding share of Common Stock shall be so changed or for which each such share shall be exchanged or to which each such share shall be entitled, as the case may be, on a fair and equivalent basis in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 424 of the Code; provided, however, with respect to Options, in no such event will such adjustment result in a modification of any Option as defined in Section 424(h) of the Code. Any adjustments to Options or SARs shall be made in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, to the extent applicable. In the event there shall be any other change in the number or kind of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, or any stock or other securities into which the Common Stock shall have been changed or for which it shall have been exchanged, then if the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine that such change equitably requires an adjustment in the shares available under and subject to the Plan, the Award limits set forth in SECTION 4.1, or in any Award, theretofore granted, such adjustments shall be made in accordance with such determination, except that no adjustment of the number of shares of Common Stock available under the Plan or to which any Award relates that would otherwise be required shall be made unless and until such adjustment either by itself or with other adjustments not previously made would require an increase or decrease

C-16


of at least 1% in the number of shares of Common Stock available under the Plan or to which any Award relates immediately prior to the making of such adjustment (the “Minimum Adjustment”). Any adjustment representing a change of less than such minimum amount shall be carried forward and made as soon as such adjustment together with other adjustments required by this ARTICLE XII and not previously made would result in a Minimum Adjustment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any adjustment required by this ARTICLE XII which otherwise would not result in a Minimum Adjustment shall be made with respect to shares of Common Stock relating to any Award immediately prior to exercise, payment or settlement of such Award. No fractional shares of Common Stock or units of other securities shall be issued pursuant to any such adjustment, and any fractions resulting from any such adjustment shall be eliminated in each case by rounding downward to the nearest whole share.

ARTICLE XIII

GENERAL

SECTION 13.1    Amendment or Termination of Plan. The Board may alter, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. In addition, the Board may, from time to time, amend the Plan in any manner, but may not, without stockholder approval, adopt any amendment which would (i) increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available under the Plan (except by operation of Article XI), (ii) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, or (iii) materially increase the benefits to Participants provided by the Plan. The termination of the Plan shall not impair the power and authority of the Committee with respect to outstanding Awards. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Board may amend the Plan in such manner as it deems appropriate in the event of a change in applicable law or regulations.

SECTION 13.2    Termination of Employment; Termination of Service. If an Eligible Employee’s employment with the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliated Entity terminates for a reason other than death, disability, retirement, or any approved reason, all unexercised, unearned, and/or unpaid Awards, including, but not by way of limitation, Awards earned, but not yet paid, all unpaid dividends and dividend equivalents, and all interest, if any, accrued on the foregoing shall be cancelled or forfeited, as the case may be, unless the Eligible Employee’s Award Agreement provides otherwise. The Compensation Committee shall (i) determine what events constitute disability, retirement or termination for an approved reason for purposes of the Plan, and (ii) determine the treatment of a Participant under the Plan in the event of death, disability, retirement, or termination for an approved reason. The Committee shall also determine the method, if any, for accelerating the vesting or exercisability of any Awards, or providing for the exercise of any unexercised Awards in the event of an Eligible Employee’s death, disability, retirement, or termination for an approved reason.

In the event an Eligible Director terminates service as a director of the Company, the unvested portion of any Award shall be forfeited unless otherwise accelerated pursuant to the terms of the Eligible Director’s Award Agreement or by the Board. The Eligible Director shall have a period of three years following the date he ceases to be a director to exercise any Nonqualified Stock Options or SARS which are otherwise exercisable on his date of termination of service.

SECTION 13.3    Nontransferability of Awards. Awards may be exercised during the lifetime of the Participant only by the Participant. More particularly (but without limiting the generality of the foregoing), an Award shall not be assigned, transferred (except as provided above), pledged or hypothecated in any way whatsoever, shall not be assigned by operation of law, and shall not be subject to execution, attachment or similar process. Any attempted assignment, transfer, pledge, hypothecation, or other disposition of the award contrary to the provisions hereof, shall be null and

C-17


void and without effect. However, in the event of a Participant’s death, an Award may be transferred in accordance with the provisions of a Participant’s will, the applicable laws of descent and distribution or, with respect to Awards other than Incentive Stock Options, a beneficiary designation that is in a form approved by the Committee and in compliance with the provisions of this Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.

SECTION 13.4    Withholding Taxes. Unless otherwise paid by the Participant, the Company, its Subsidiaries or any of its Affiliated Entities shall be entitled to deduct from any payment under the Plan, regardless of the form of such payment, the amount of all applicable income and employment taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payment or may require the Participant to pay to it such tax prior to and as a condition of the making of such payment. In accordance with any applicable administrative guidelines it establishes, the Committee may, in its discretion, allow a Participant to pay the amount of taxes required by law to be withheld from an Award by (i) directing the Company to withhold from any payment of the Award a number of shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value on the date of payment equal to the amount of the required withholding taxes or (ii) delivering to the Company previously owned shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value on the date of payment equal to the amount of the required withholding taxes. However, any payment made by the Participant pursuant to either of the foregoing clauses (i) or (ii) shall not be permitted if it would result in an adverse accounting charge with respect to such shares used to pay such taxes unless otherwise approved by the Committee.

SECTION 13.5    Changeof Control. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan to the contrary, Awards granted under the Plan to any Eligible Employee or Eligible Director may, in the discretion of the Committee, provide in the Award Agreement that such Awards shall be immediately vested, fully earned and exercisable upon the occurrence of a Change in Control Event.

SECTION 13.6    Amendments to Awards. Subject to the limitations of ARTICLE IV, such as the prohibition on repricing of Options, the Committee may at any time unilaterally amend the terms of any Award Agreement, whether or not presently exercisable or vested, to the extent it deems appropriate. However, amendments which are materially adverse to the Participant shall require the Participant’s consent.

SECTION 13.7    Regulatory Approval and Listings. The Company shall use its best efforts to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission as soon as practicable following approval by the stockholders of the Company of the Plan as provided in SECTION 1.2 of the Plan, and keep continuously effectively, a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with respect to shares of Common Stock subject to Awards hereunder. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Plan to the contrary, the Company shall have no obligation to issue shares of Common Stock under this Plan prior to:

(a) the obtaining of any approval from, or satisfaction of any waiting period or other condition imposed by, any governmental agency which the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or advisable;

(b) the admission of such shares to listing on the stock exchange on which the Common Stock may be listed; and

(c) the completion of any registration or other qualification of such shares under any state or Federal law or ruling of any governmental body which the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or advisable.

SECTION 13.8    Foreign Laws. The Committee may grant Awards to individual participants who are subject to the tax laws of nations other than the United States, which Awards may have terms and conditions as determined by the Committee as necessary to comply with applicable foreign laws. The Committee may take any action which it deems advisable to obtain approval of such Awards by

C-18


the appropriate foreign governmental entity; provided, however, that no such Awards may be granted pursuant to this SECTION 13.8 and no action may be taken which would result in a violation of the Exchange Act, the Code or any other applicable law.

SECTION 13.9    Company Policies. All Awards granted under the Plan shall be subject to any applicable clawback or recoupment policies, share trading policies and other policies that may be implemented by the Board from time to time.

SECTION 13.10    Right to Continued Employment. Participation in the Plan shall not give any Eligible Employee any right to remain in the employ of the Company, any Subsidiary, or any Affiliated Entity. The Company or, in the case of employment with a Subsidiary or an Affiliated Entity, the Subsidiary or Affiliated Entity reserves the right to terminate any Eligible Employee at any time. Further, the adoption of this Plan shall not be deemed to give any Eligible Employee or any other individual any right to be selected as a Participant or to be granted an Award.

SECTION 13.11    Beneficiary Designation. In the event of the death of a Participant, the portion of the Participant’s Award with respect to which vesting dates have occurred shall be paid to the then surviving beneficiary designated by the Participant, and if there is no beneficiary then surviving or designated, then such benefits will automatically be paid to the estate of the Participant.

SECTION 13.12    Reliance on Reports. Each member of the Committee and each member of the Board shall be fully justified in relying or acting in good faith upon any report made by theof Directors has approved KPMG LLP to serve as our independent public accountants of the Company and its Subsidiaries and upon any other information furnished in connection with the Plan by any person or persons other than himself or herself. In no event shall any person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee or of the Board be liable for any determination made or other action taken or any omission to act in reliance upon any such report or information or for any action taken, including the furnishing of information, or failure to act, if in good faith.

SECTION 13.13    Construction. Masculine pronouns and other words of masculine gender shall refer to both men and women. The titles and headings of the sections in the Plan areauditors for the convenienceyear ending December 31, 2023. Representatives of reference only,KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and inwill be available to respond to stockholder questions.

Where can I contact the event of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall control.Company?

SECTION 13.14    Governing Law. The Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware except as superseded by applicable federal law.Our contact information is:

SECTION 13.15    Severability. If any provision of the Plan or any Award is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction or as to any Participant or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to conform to the applicable laws, or if it cannot be construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction, Participant or Award and the remainder of the Plan and any such Award shall remain in full force and effect.Corporate Secretary

SECTION 13.16    Other Laws. The Committee may refuse to issue or transfer any shares of Common Stock or other consideration under an Award if, acting in its sole discretion, it determines that the issuance or transfer of such shares or such other consideration might violate any applicable law or regulation or entitle the Company to recover the same under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, and any payment tendered to the Company by a Participant, other holder or beneficiary in connection with the exercise of such Award shall be promptly refunded to the relevant Participant, holder or beneficiary.

C-19


SECTION 13.17    Section 409A Considerations. The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, to the extent applicable. All Awards shall be construed and administered such that the Award either (A) qualifies for an exemption from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or (B) satisfies the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. If a Award is subject to Section 409A of the Code, (I) distributions shall only be made in a manner and upon an event permitted under Section 409A of the Code, (II) payments to be made upon a termination of employment shall only be made upon a “separation from service” under Section 409A of the Code, (III) unless the Award specifies otherwise, each installment payment shall be treated as a separate payment for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, and (IV) in no event shall a participant, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year in which a distribution is made except in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. Any Award granted under the Plan that is subject to Section 409A of the Code and that is to be distributed to a key employee (as defined below) upon separation from service shall be administered so that any distribution with respect to such Award shall be postponed for six months following the date of the participant’s separation from service, if required by Section 409A of the Code. If a distribution is delayed pursuant to Section 409A of the Code, the distribution shall be paid within 30 days after the end of the six-month period. If the participant dies during such six-month period, any postponed amounts shall be paid within 90 days of the participant’s death. The determination of key employees, including the number and identity of persons considered key employees and the identification date, shall be made by the Committee or its delegate each year in accordance with Section 416(i) of the Code and the “specified employee” requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

No Trust or Fund Created. Except as provided in the Canadian Employee Benefit Plan for the creation of the Canadian Employee Benefit Trust, neither the Plan nor an Award shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate fund of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and a Participant or any other person. To the extent that a Participant acquires the right to receive payments from the Company pursuant to an Award, such right shall be no greater than the right of any general unsecured creditor of the Company.

C-20


LOGO

Devon Energy Corporation

333 W. Sheridan Avenue

Oklahoma City, OKOklahoma 73102


LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your Proxy Card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your Proxy Card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy materials electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

(405) 235-3611

 

92Commitment Runs Deep


OTHER MATTERS

Our Board of Directors knows of no other matters to come before the meeting other than as set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, if any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote such proxies as they deem advisable in accordance with their best judgment.

Your cooperation in giving this matter your immediate attention and in returning your proxy promptly will be appreciated.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

April [    ], 2023

 

M44759-P19868-Z57092LOGO

Christopher J. Kirt

Vice President Corporate Governance and Secretary

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

 

 93Commitment Runs Deep


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Proxy Statements includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Such statements include those concerning strategic plans, our expectations and objectives for future operations, as well as other future events or conditions, and are often identified by use of the words and phrases “expects,” “believes,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “continue,” “may,” “aims,” “likely to be,” “intends,” “forecasts,” “projections,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expectations,” “targets,” “opportunities,” “potential,” “anticipates,” “outlook” and other similar terminology. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Proxy Statement that address activities, events or developments that Devon expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Consequently, actual future results could differ materially and adversely from our expectations due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

the volatility of oil, gas and natural gas liquids prices;

uncertainties inherent in estimating oil, gas and natural gas liquids reserves;

the extent to which we are successful in acquiring and discovering additional reserves;

the uncertainties, costs and risks involved in our operations;

risks related to our hedging activities;

our limited control over third parties who operate some of our oil and gas properties;

midstream capacity constraints and potential interruptions in production, including from limits to the build out of midstream infrastructure;

competition for assets, materials, people and capital;

regulatory restrictions, compliance costs and other risks relating to governmental regulation, including with respect to federal lands, environmental matters and seismicity;

risks related to regulatory, social and market efforts to address climate change;

governmental interventions in energy markets;

risks relating to the COVID-19 pandemic or other future pandemics;

counterparty credit risks;

risks relating to our indebtedness;

cyberattack risks;

the extent to which insurance covers any losses we may experience;

risks related to stockholder activism;

our ability to successfully complete mergers, acquisitions and divestitures;

our ability to pay dividends and make share repurchases; and

any of the other risks and uncertainties discussed in Devon’s 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2022 Form 10-K”) or other SEC filings.

The forward-looking statements included in this Proxy Statement speak only as of the date of this Proxy Statement, represent management’s current reasonable expectations as of the date of this Proxy Statement and are subject to the risks and uncertainties identified above as well as those described in the 2022 Form 10-K

94Commitment Runs Deep


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS (cont’d)

and in other documents we file from time to time with the SEC. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of our forward- looking statements, and readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in the 2022 Form 10-K and in other documents we file from time to time with the SEC. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Devon, or persons acting on its behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim, any duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements based on new information, future events, or otherwise.

95Commitment Runs Deep


APPENDIX A

EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

This Proxy Statement includes the non-GAAP financial measures of “Free Cash Flow,” “Capital Expenditures” and “Cash Return on Capital Employed.” These measures were used as components of the Company’s performance scorecard for purposes of determining the performance cash bonuses for 2022. Non-GAAP measures are not alternatives to GAAP measures, and you should not consider non- GAAP measures in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Set forth below is additional information regarding these measures.

Note that the financial measures considered by the Committee when determining the performance cash bonuses for 2022 were based on the Company’s best reasonable estimates available at the time of the applicable Committee meeting in January 2023. Although the actual results varied from such estimates in certain instances, none of the variances were material in amount or significance.

Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Capital Expenditures

For purposes of determining the Company’s performance cash bonuses for 2022, Free Cash Flow means total operating cash flow adjusted for balance sheet changes less total Adjusted Capital Expenditures. The Adjusted Capital Expenditure amount represents accrued capital less the RimRock and Validus acquisitions. A detailed reconciliation of Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Capital Expenditures is provided below.

  (dollar amounts in millions)2022

 Cash flow from operating activities (GAAP)

$8,530   

 Changes in assets and liabilities, net

226   
 

 

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

 Cash flow from operating activities before B/S changes (Non-GAAP)

8,756   

 Capital expenditures (accrued) (GAAP)

(5,301)  

 RimRock and Validus acquisitions

2,531   

 Adjusted capital expenditures (accrued) (Non-GAAP)

(2,770)  

 Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP)

$5,986   

A-1Commitment Runs Deep


APPENDIX A

EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (cont’d)

Cash Return on Capital Employed

We define Cash Return on Capital Employed, or CROCE, as the quotient of an adjusted cash flow metric over the average capital employed. The adjusted cash flow metric is the sum of cash flow from operating activities, adjusted for balance sheet changes, plus after-tax net financing costs. Average capital employed is the average of the capital employed as of the beginning and ending of the relevant period, with capital employed calculated as the sum of short and long-term debt plus stockholders’ equity attributable to Devon less cash and cash equivalents. A detailed calculation of Cash Return on Capital Employed is provided below, which includes reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

(dollar amounts in millions)2022

Cash Return on Capital Employed (CROCE) (Non-GAAP)

Cash flow from operating activities (GAAP)

$  8,530   

Changes in assets and liabilities, net

226   

Cash flow from operating activities before B/S changes (Non-GAAP)

8,756   

Net financing costs (GAAP)

309   

Noncash net premium and issuance cost amortization

41   

Adjusted net financing costs (Non-GAAP)

350   

Tax benefit imputed (based on 23%)

(81)  

After-tax net financing costs (Non-GAAP)

269   

Adjusted cash flow (Non-GAAP)(1) — (a)

9,025   

Total capitalization - beginning balance:

Short and long-term debt (GAAP)

$  6,482   

Total stockholders’ equity attributable to Devon (GAAP)

9,262   

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (GAAP)

(2,271)  

Total capitalization - beginning balance (Non-GAAP)

13,473   

Total capitalization — ending balance:

Short and long-term debt (GAAP)

6,440   

Total stockholders’ equity attributable to Devon (GAAP)

11,167   

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (GAAP)

(1,454)  

Total capitalization - ending balance (Non-GAAP)

16,153   

Average total capitalization (Non-GAAP)(2) — (b)

$  14,813   

CROCE (Non-GAAP) — (a) / (b)

61% 

(1)

Sum of cash flow from operating activities before balance sheet changes, and after-tax net financing costs.

(2)

Average of the beginning and ending total capitalization balances.

A-2Commitment Runs Deep


APPENDIX B

AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS

ARTICLE VI

Section 6. Exclusive Forum for Adjudication of Disputes. Unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Corporation, (b) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, other employee or agent or stockholder of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Corporation’s stockholders, (c) any action against the Corporation arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law or as to which the Delaware General Corporation Law confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, or (d) any action against the Corporation or any director, officer, other employee or agent of the Corporation asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, including, without limitation, any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation or these Bylaws (as they shall be amended from time to time), shall be the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, or, if the Superior Court of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, in each case, subject to that court having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named defendants therein), in each case subject to such Court of Chancery (or if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, or, if the Superior Court of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, in each case, subject to that court having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named defendants therein) having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants therein. Unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of this Section 6.

B-1Commitment Runs Deep


APPENDIX C

AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

Article VIII

Limitation of Liability

A director or officer of this Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the General Corporation Law as the same exists or may hereafter be amendedfor liability (i) for any breach of the director or officer’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for any act or omission not in good faith or which involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) with respect to any director, under Section 174 of the General Corporation Law, (iv) for any transaction from which the director or officer derived an improper personal benefit, or (v) with respect to any officer, in any action by or in the right of the Corporation. In addition to the circumstances in which a director or officer of the Corporation is not personally liable as set forth in the preceding sentence, a director or officer of the Corporation shall not be liable to the fullest extent permitted by any amendment to the General Corporate Law hereafter enacted that further limits or permits the Corporation to limit the liability of a director or officer. Any repeal or modification of the foregoing paragraph shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director or officer of the Corporation existing hereunder with respect to any act or omission occurring prior to such repeal or modification.

C-1Commitment Runs Deep


LOGO


LOGO

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION 333 W. SHERIDAN AVE. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102 SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE VOTE BY INTERNET—www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 6, 2023. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 6, 2023. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: V11274-P85875 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the nominees listed in Agenda Item 1. 1. Election of Directors Nominees: 01) Barbara M. Baumann 07) Karl F. Kurz 02) John E. Bethancourt 08) Michael N. Mears 03) Ann G. Fox 09) Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr. 04) Gennifer F. Kelly 10) Richard E. Muncrief 05) Kelt Kindick 11) Valerie M. Williams 06) John Krenicki Jr. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Item 2. 2. Ratify the selection of the Company’s Independent Auditors for 2023. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Item 3. 3. Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. The Board of Directors recommends a vote for “ONE YEAR” for Agenda Item 4. 4. Advisory Vote on the Frequency of an Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Item 5. 5. Approve an Amendment to the Company’s Bylaws to Designate the Exclusive Forum for the adjudication of certain legal matters. For All Withhold All Except For All For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain For Against Abstain To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda For Against Abstain Item 6. 6. Approval of Amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to Adopt Limitations on the Liability of Officers similar to those that already exist for Directors. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “AGAINST” For Against Abstain Agenda Item 7. 7. Stockholder Proposal to Reform the Near Impossible Special Shareholder Meeting Requirements. 8. OTHER MATTERS THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS. Please sign exactly as your name appears above, indicating your official position or representative capacity, if applicable. If shares are held jointly, each owner should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc. should include their title and authority. Corporations should provide the full name of the corporation and the title of the authorized officer signing the proxy. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATIONForWithholdFor All

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

AllAllExcept

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR”

the nominees listed in Agenda Item 1.

¨¨¨

1.       Election of Directors

          Nominees:

01)  Robert H. Henry

02)  John A. Hill

03)  Michael M. Kanovsky

04)  Robert A. Mosbacher, Jr.

05)  J. Larry Nichols

06)  Duane C. Radtke

07)  Mary P. Ricciardello

08)  John Richels

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Item 2.ForAgainstAbstainThe Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Item 5.ForAgainstAbstain    

2.        Approve, in an advisory vote, Executive Compensation.

¨¨¨

5.        Approve the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan.

¨¨¨
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Item 3.The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Item 6.

3.        Ratify the Appointment of the Independent Auditors for 2012.

¨¨¨

6.        Approve the 2012 Amendment to the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.

¨¨¨

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Item 4.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “AGAINST” Agenda Item 7.

4.        Approve Amending the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Grant Stockholders the Right to Call a Special Meeting.

¨¨¨

7.        Report on the Disclosure of Lobbying Policies and Practices.

¨¨¨

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

¨

8.        OTHER MATTERS: In its discretion, to vote with respect to any other matters that may come up before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, including matters incident to its conduct.

YesNo

I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REVOKE THE PROXY AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE EXERCISE THEREOF.

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

¨

¨

Please sign exactly as your name appears above, indicating your official position or representative capacity, if applicable. If shares are held jointly, each owner should sign.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting

The following proxy materials are available at www.proxyvote.com:

Notice and Proxy Statement

Annual Report on Form 10-K DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned stockholder of Devon Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation, hereby nominates and appoints Richard E. Muncrief and Christopher J. Kirt, with full power of substitution, as true and lawful agents and proxies to represent the undersigned and vote all shares of common stock of Devon Energy Corporation owned by the undersigned in all matters coming before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (or any adjournment thereof) of Devon Energy Corporation to be held at the Devon Energy Center Auditorium, 333 W. Sheridan Ave., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. Central Time. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Agenda Items 1, 2 and 3, for “ONE YEAR” for Agenda Item 4, “FOR” Agenda Items 5 and 6, and “AGAINST” Agenda Item 7 as set forth on the reverse side. WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED ON THE REVERSE SIDE BY THE STOCKHOLDER. TO THE EXTENT CONTRARY SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. BY SIGNING THIS PROXY, THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER REVOKES ANY PRIOR PROXIES EXECUTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED. Do not return your Proxy Card if you are voting by telephone or Internet. TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

M44760-P19868-Z57092        

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION

PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned stockholder of Devon Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation, hereby nominates and appoints J. Larry Nichols, John Richels and Carla D. Brockman with full power of substitution, as true and lawful agents and proxies, to represent the undersigned and vote all shares of common stock of Devon Energy Corporation owned by the undersigned in all matters coming before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (or any adjournment thereof) of Devon Energy Corporation to be held at The Skirvin Hilton Hotel, Continental Room, 1 Park Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on Wednesday, June 6, 2012, at 8:00 a.m. local time. The Board of Directors recommends a vote“FOR” Agenda Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 and recommends a vote“AGAINST” Item 7 as set forth on the reverse side.

WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED ON THE REVERSE SIDE BY THE STOCKHOLDER. TO THE EXTENT CONTRARY SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

Do not return your Proxy Card if you are voting by telephone or Internet.

Address Changes/Comments:  

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE